close

Enter

Log in using OpenID

Blandino Massimo prof. - Ordine dei Dottori agronomi e forestali

embedDownload
UniversitàdegliStudidiTorino
DISAFA
Strategie di intervento per
minimizzare i rischi sanitari
nei cereali
Grugliasco12giugno2014
Dr.MassimoBlandino
&HUHDOLTXDOL VRQR JOL RELHWWLYL
(YROX]LRQHGHOO¶RELHWWLYRSULRULWDULR
DQQL«± ¶
SURGX]LRQH
DQQL¶± ¶
DJURDPELHQWH
DQQL¶± ¶
VDQLWj
DQQLµ± ¶«
TXDOLWjGLILOLHUDFRQDOWL
VWDQGDUGDPELHQWDOL
Lenuoveprioritànoneliminanogliobiettiviche
invececrescono
anni…...– ’80:
anni’90– ’00:
anni’00– ’10:
anni‘10– ’20…
produzione
X
X
X
X
agroamb. sanitàqualità
X
X
X
X
XXX
5,6&+,3(5&(3,7,
'DFRQVXPDWRUL
5HVLGXLILWRIDUPDFL
2*0
$GGLWLYL
(UURULGLDOLPHQWD]LRQH
7RVVLQH
'DHVSHUWL
(UURULGLDOLPHQWD]LRQH
7RVVLQH
5HVLGXLILWRIDUPDFL
$GGLWLYL
2*0
NRC,2002
0,&27266,1(
3URGRWWLGHOPHWDEROLVPRVHFRQGDULR GLDOFXQHVSHFLHIXQJLQHLQ
JUDGRGLFRORQL]]DUHOHFROWXUHLQFDPSRROHGHUUDWHVWRFFDWH
3RVVRQRHVVHUHSURGRWWHLQTXDOXQTXHIDVHGHOODILOLHUDSURGXWWLYDGL
XQDOLPHQWR
6RVWDQ]HWRVVLFKHSHUO¶XRPRHSHUJOLDQLPDOLVXSHULRULFKHFDXVDQR
SDWRORJLHDFXWHRFURQLFKHQRWHFRPHPLFRWRVVLFRVL
9 1RQWXWWLLFHSSLGHOOH
VSHFLHWRVVLJHQH
SURGXFRQRWRVVLQH
9 &¶qXQ¶HOHYDWD
YDULDELOLWjQHOO¶DPELWR
GHOOHVSHFLHWRVVLJHQH
GHUUDWHDOLPHQWDULGHOPRQGRRJQLDQQR
qFRQWDPLQDWRGDPLFRWRVVLQH
&KDUPOH\ et al)$2
0,&27266,&26,
$&87(
&521,&+(
(OHYDWDGLYHUVLWj
VWUXWWXUDOHPLFRWRVVLQH
'DQQLDRUJDQL
GLYHUVL
0,&27266,1(
ICEREALI,inparticolareilMAIS,sonoitraprodottivegetalipiùsensibilialla
contaminazionedamicotossine.
FUNGHIdiCAMPO
FUNGHIdiMAGAZZINO
(umidità>20Ͳ22%)
(umidità<18Ͳ20%)
Fusarium
Alternaria
F. verticillioides
F. graminearum
FUMONISINE
ZEARALENONE
DON
Aspergillus
Penicillium
A. flavus
A. parasiticus
AFLATOSSINE
A. ochraceus
P. verrucosum
OCRATOSSINE
0,&27266,1(
0LFRWRVVLQD
3URGXWWRUH
$OLPHQWLFRQWDPLQDWL
)XPRQLVLQH
F. verticillioides PDLV HGHULYDWL
7ULFRWHFHQL'21 F. graminearum PDLVIUXPHQWRRU]R
$IODWRVVLQH
A. parasiticus
A. flavus
PDLVIUXWWDVHFFD
VHPLROHRVLODWWLFLQL
2FUDWRVVLQD$
A.ochraceus
P. verrucosum
Fusarium VSS
FHUHDOLYLQRELUUD
FDIIqFDUQLVXLQH
PDLVIUXPHQWRRU]R
%%**0
=HDUDOHQRQH
0,&27266,&26,
ƒ $&87( LQWRVVLFD]LRQLGRYXWHDGLQJHVWLRQHLQXQ¶XQLFD
YROWDRSLYROWHUDYYLFLQDWHGLXQDGRVHDOWDGLPLFRWRVVLQD
ƒ &521,&+( VLPDQLIHVWDQRLQVHJXLWRDOO¶LQJHVWLRQHGHO
PHWDEROLWDWRVVLFRDSLFFROHGRVLULSHWXWHQHOWHPSR
(OHYDWDGLYHUVLWjVWUXWWXUDOH
PLFRWRVVLQH
'DQQLDRUJDQLHVLVWHPLDQDWRPLFL
GLYHUVLDVHFRQGDGHOODWRVVLQD
7RVVLFLWjGLSHQGHGD ƒ 'RVH
ƒ 6SHFLH VHQVLELOLWjPLQRUHSHUUXPLQDQWL
ƒ (Wj
VHQVLELOLWjPDJJLRUHSHUDQLPDOLJLRYDQL
ƒ 6HVVR HV]HDUDOHQRQHSHUVFURIH
ƒ 6LQHUJLDWUDOHGLYHUVHPROHFROH
$//(9$0(172
LeintossicazionidaMICOTOSSINEsonoricorrentineglianimalidiproduzione
zootecnica
molteinformazionisullaproblematicamicotossicologicaprovengonodalla
medicinaveterinaria
6PLWKH+HQGHUVRQ
(IIHWWRGHOOHLQWRVVLFD]LRQLGDPLFRWRVVLQHQHJOLDQLPDOLDOOHYDWL
ƒ 0LFRWRVVLFRVL DFXWHFRQPRUWHGHLVRJJHWWLFROSLWL
ƒ 0LFRWRVVLFRVL VXEDFXWHHFURQLFKHFRQPDOHVVHUHJHQHUDOH
GHOO¶DQLPDOH
9 ULGX]LRQHSURGX]LRQH
9 SUREOHPLULSURGXWWLYL
SHUGLWDHFRQRPLFD
ƒ 7UDVIHULPHQWRcarry overQHLSURGRWWL]RRWHFQLFL
ODWWHHGHULYDWLFDUQHHXRYD
6SDKU et al0LUDJOLD H%UHUD3LHWUL
Tenorimassimideicontaminantinellagranelladimais
Contaminante
FOOD
U.M.
FEED
Tenore Riferimento
Tenore
Riferimento
MICOTOSSINE
AflatossinaB1
µg/kg
2,0
Reg.CE165/2010
20
Reg.CE574/2011
Aflatossinetotali
µg/kg
4,0
Reg.CE165/2010
Ͳ
Ͳ
OcratossinaA
µg/kg
5,0
Reg.CE1881/2006
250
Deossinivalenolo
µg/kg
1750
Reg.CE1126/2007
8000
Rac.CE17ago‘06
Zearalenone
µg/kg
350
Reg.CE1126/2007
2000
Rac.CE17ago‘06
FumonisineB1 +B2
µg/kg
4000
Reg.CE1126/2007
60000
Rac.CE17ago‘06
TossineT2+HT2
µg/kg
100
Rac.16527mar13
Ͳ
Ͳ
Rac.CE17ago‘06
Cadmio
mg/kg
0,10
Reg.CE1881/2006
1
Reg.CE574/2011
Piombo
mg/kg
Reg.CE1881/2006
mg/kg
10
2
Reg.CE574/2011
Arsenico
0,20
Ͳ
Ͳ
Dir.CE32/2002
$)/$7266,1(
18compostinaturali(AF)
AFB1,AFB2
AFG1,AFG2
Cereali,fruttasecca,semi
oleaginose
AFM1,AFM2
Latteederivati
EFFETTI:
9 (SDWLWLQHIULWLFLUURVLHSDWLFD
DWWLYLWjFDQFHURJHQDJHQRWRVVLFD
LPPXQRVRSUHVVLYD
9 $)%%** FODVVLILFDWHFRPH
VLFXUDPHQWHFDQFHURJHQHSHUO¶XRPR
,$5&
9 Carry over $)% QHOODWWH
3UREDELOHDQFKHQHOODFDUQHHQHOOHXRYD
(Picci,1992;Pietri,2002;MiragliaeBrera,2000)
(Bottalico,2002)
/,0,7,GL/(**(SSE —JNJ
AFB1 AFtotAFM1
Cereali
ederivati24
Mais(granella) 510
Latte0,05
(U.E.Reg1525/98;Reg1881/06)
580,1$17,
¾ (IIHWWRPLQRUHSHUODSUHVHQ]D GHO580,1(
¾ 7UDVIHULPHQWRGLTXHVWLPHWDEROLWLQHO/$77(
AFLATOSSINAM
$]LRQH
GHJUDGDQWHGHL
EDWWHULSHUWXWWHOH
PLFRWRVVLQH
1
9 ,'5266, GHULYDWR$)/$7266,1$%
9 Tassoditrasferimento1Ͳ5%(medio3%)
9 7RVVLFLWjDFXWDVLPLOHDOO¶$)/$%
9 &DQFHURJHQLFLWjHSDWLFD$)/$%
9 &ODVVLILFDWDGDOOR,$5&FRPHVRVWDQ]D%
SRVVLELOPHQWHFDQFHURJHQDSHUO¶XRPR
9 4XDQWLWjPDVVLPDLQJHULELOHJLRUQDOPHQWH
‰ QJNJSHVRFRUSRUHRJLRUQRSHU$)/$0
‰ QJNJSHVRFRUSRUHRJLRUQRSHU$)/$%
6SDKUet al0LUDJOLDH%UHUD3LHWUL
75$6/2&$=,21(QHO/$77(
‡
(OHYDWDYDULDELOLWjLQGLYLGXDOHWUDJOLDQLPDOL
‡
9DULD]LRQLGHOWHQRUH$)0 PROWRUDSLGHLQIXQ]LRQHGHO
DOLPHQWRFRQWDPLQDWRJLjQHOODPXQJLWXUDVXFFHVVLYD
‡
(IIHWWROLYHOORSURGXWWLYRLQL]LRODWWD]LRQHcarry-over PDJJLRUHULVSHWWRILQHODWWD]LRQH
‡
/HLQIH]LRQLDOODPDPPHOODLQIOXHQ]DQRLOcarry-over
‡
6XOO¶LQVLHPHGHOODPDQGULDWXWWLJOLDOLPHQWL
$)0 SSW ODWWH SSE $)% LQJHULWLFDSRG
Ingestionegiornalieradi
AFLATOSSINAB
1 >40ppb
AflatossinaM 1 nel
latte>0,05ppb
9HOGPDQ et al
2&5$7266,1$
9molecoledescritte
OcratossinaA(OTA)
EFFETTI:
9 1HIURWRVVLQD GLVIXQ]LRQLUHQDOLH
Cereali,caffè,cacao,uvaederivati,carnie
derivati
(Aspergillus ochraceus,
Penicillium verrucosum)
DOWHUD]LRQLDSSDUDWRXULQDULR
9 $]LRQHHSDWRVVLFDHPRWRVVLFD
/,0,7,GL/(**(SSE —JNJ
9 &ODVVLILFDWDQHOJUXSSR%,$5&
DFFHUWDWDSHUJOLDQLPDOLHSRVVLELOHSHUO¶XRPR
9 qPROWRSHUVLVWHQWHQHJOLDQLPDOL
LQWRVVLFDWLVDQJXHUHQLPXVFROL
9 SHUO¶XRPRqDVVRFLDWDDOOD1HIURSDWLD
HQGHPLFDEDOFDQLFD
(IARC,1993;Krogh,1997;Sciaraffia,2002)
OTA
Cereali
5
DerivatiCereali
3
Infanzia
0,5
(RegUE472/02;Reg1881/06)
75,&27(&(1,
Gruppo di circa 70 metaboliti prodotti da 6 diversi generi fungini
Fusarium
TIPOA
Produttore di circa 50 fusariumͲtossine presenti
quasi esclusivamente nei CEREALI
TIPOB
Tossina T2
Deossinivalenolo (DON)
Tossina HͲT2
Nivalenolo (NIV)
Diacetossiscirpenolo
(DAS)
Fusarenone X (FUS)
(Chelkowski,1989;Bottalico,2002)
'(266,1,9$/(12/2
NotaanchecomeVOMITOSSINA
Diffusaneinostriambientineicereali(frumento,mais)
Fusariumgraminearum eculmorum
Spessoassociataallaformeacetilate 3AcͲDon,15AcͲDoned
altritricoteceni ditipoB.Formeglucosidate.
/,0,7,GL/(**(SSE —JNJ
Frumentotenero
1250
Frumentoduro,mais1750
Farinadicereali,crusca,germeper
utilizzoalimentare750
Pasta750
Pane500
Alimentiperl’infanzia200
(Reg.CE1881/2006)
EFFETTI:
9 'HUPDWLWLJDVWURHQWHULWLYRPLWR
HPRUUDJLH
9 VLQGURPHHPDWLFDULILXWRFLERH
YRPLWRULGRWWDFUHVFLWD
9 &ODVVLILFDWDQHOJUXSSR,$5&
QRQDFFHUWDWHFRPHVRVWDQ]HFDQFHURJHQH
=($5$/(121,
IlcompostopiùimportanteèloZEARALENONE(ZEA)
ÈprodottodaceppidiF.graminearum eF.culmorum
SiritrovaprincipalmentenellagranelladiMAIS
(Bottalico,2002)
EFFETTI:
9 QRQSUHVHQWDWRVVLFLWjDFXWD
9 DWWLYLWjRUPRQRVLPLOHFRQHIIHWWL
DQDEROLFLHXWHURWURILFL
9 qFDXVDGLLSHUHVWULVPRHLSRIHUWLOLWj
9 VLQGURPHHVWURJHQLFDQHLVXLQL
9 &ODVVLILFDWDQHOJUXSSR,$5&
QRQDFFHUWDWHFRPHVRVWDQ]HFDQFHURJHQH
(Visconti,1999;Bottalico,2002)
/,0,7,GL/(**(SSE —JNJ
ZEA
Maisgranella350
Prodottimais100
Altricereali100
Prodotticereali75
Infanzia20
(UEReg1881/06;Reg1126/07)
)8021,6,1(
Scoperterecentemente(1988)
FuB1,FuB2,FuB3
Presentisumaisederivati,sorgo,pocosu
altricereali
EFFETTI:
9 HOHYDWDDWWLYLWjLPPXQRGHSUHVVLYDH
QHXURWRVVLFD
9 (/(0QHJOLHTXLQL
9 HGHPDSROPRQDUHQHLVXLQL
9 FDQFURHVRIDJHRXRPR
9 &ODVVLILFDWDQHOJUXSSR%,$5&
DFFHUWDWDSHUJOLDQLPDOLHSRVVLELOHSHUO¶XRPR
(IARC,1993;Dutton,1996;Bottalico,2002;Ballarini,2002)
(Meister,1996;Bottalico,2002)
/,0,7,GL/(**(SSE —JNJ
Cerealiederivati
(Alim.umana)
FUMB1+B2
Maisgranella
Farine(<500micron)
Farine(>500micron)
Prodottimais
4000
2000
1400
1000
(UEReg1881/06;Reg1126/07)
)81*+,H0,&27266,1(
DONeZEA
umidità
T
FUMONISINE
AFLATOSSINE
Recuperare valore d’uso
Da commodity a specialty
$IODWR[LQ%
ppb
)XPRQLVLQV% %
<1000
<200
<2Ͳ4000
<LOD
<5
>20
EDE\IRRG
IRRG
SLJV
<5000
<8000
<20
ZHWPLOOLQJ
SRXOWU\
<20000
>30000
>60000
CONSOLIDATE
Deoxynivalenol
Zearalenone
Ochratoxin
Metallipesanti
GDLU\FRZV
FDYHV
DGXOW
UXPLQDQWV
HQHUJ\
(0(5*,1*
0<&272;,16
7DQG+77R[LQV
0RQLOLIRUPLQ
)XVDSUROLIHULQD
(QQLDWLQV
(UJRW DONDORLGV
%HDXYHULFLQ
$FLGRIXVDULFR
'LDFHWR[\VFLUSHQRO
&LWULQLQ
1LYDOHQRO
$OWHUQDULD WR[LQV
6WHULJPDWRF\VWLQ
Contaminazione nella filiera
Esame di lotti mais adiversa contaminazione (AͲG)
)XPRQLVLQHSSE
A,C,F
B,E
D,G
Reyneriet al.,2006.
6Y
6H
LOX PL
SS QD
R
Y
) L HJ
R
0 ULWX
DW
/ UD
0
DW DWWH
0
D
DW &H
UR
IL
VL
V
RO D
RJ
L
5
3U
D FD
HV FF
WR ROW
FF
D
DJ
6W
J
RF
3X LR
FD
OLW
J
6W JL XUD
RF R
FD LQL
JJ ]LR
L
& RIL
RQ Q
VH H
J
0 QD
RO
LWX
UD
'(7266,),&$=,21(
ƒ alta stabilità chimica delle molecole
ƒ ènecessaria azione drastica
• pericolosità perresidui
• perdite qualitativeprodotti
• elevati costi
Prevenire la contaminazione
3DUDVVLWL
3DWRJHQR
&OLPD
0LFURFOLPD
7HFQLFD
DJURQRPLFD
9DULHWj
6YLOXSSRIXQJLQRH
SURGX]LRQHPLFRWRVVLQH
Prevenzione del rischio in campo
Epoca di semina
Effettosufumonisine
SSE
,,,PDU]R
,,,DSULOH
,,,PDJJLR
ForterelazioneconpiralideͲ fumonisine
EffettopiùevidentesuDONeZEA
Blandinoet al.,2009.J.Phytopath.
Recuperare produttività
Potenziamento early vigor
6DUFKLDWXUD
1FRSHUWXUD
1H3
SUHFRFH
IUD]LRQDWR
ORFDOL]]DWR
3URJORZLPSXW
3URJODYRUD]LRQL
3URJQXWUL]LRQH
2009 Ͳ 2011,
2ibridi,10tesi
Semina:20mar– 2apr
Ntot250kg/ha
3URJVHPLQD
3URJFRPSOHWR
'DWD
ILRULWXUD
3URJORZLPSXW
3URJODYRUD]LRQL
3URJQXWUL]LRQH
3URJVHPLQD
3URJFRPSOHWR
*giornidallasemina.
D
D
D
E
E
3URGX]LRQH
WKD
F
EF
E
D
D
8PLGLWj
JUDQHOOD
D
DE
E
F
F
Inf.Agrario,9.2011Blandinoet al.
Anticipo della fioritura
6HYHULWjPDUFLXPHGHOODVSLJD
6HYHULWjDWWDFFR GLSLUDOLGH
\ [ 5ð \ [ 5ð 'DWDGLILRULWXUDJLRUQLGDOODVHPLQD
'DWDGLILRULWXUDJLRUQLGDOODVHPLQD
Fatto100ilvaloredelprogrammalowimput
Scelta varietale
&ODVVHGLSUHFRFLWj
IXPRQLVLQH
]HDUDOHQRQH
D
QV DE
QV
QV
D
DE QV
QV
E
QV
E
IXPRQLVLQH
]HDUDOHQRQH
,QGLFH
,QGLFH
7LSRGLHQGRVSHUPD
IDULQRVR
VHPLFRPSDWWR
FRPSDWWR
QRUPDOH
ZD[\
7LSRORJLDGLDPLGR
)XPRQLVLQDSSE
D
Blandino e Reyneri, 2007; 2008
D
E
E
Riduzione degli stress
(IIHWWRGHOODFRQFLPD]LRQH1VXIXPRQLVLQH
)XPRQLVLQD% % ȝJNJ
.J1KD
Blandinoet al.,2008.Crop protection.Modificato
Riduzione degli stress
Ruolo delle malerbe sulla contaminazione da fumonisine
Contaminazioneda
Fumonisine(ppb)
Limite
Reg.1126/07
Amatoet al.,2012.TerraeVita
Riduzione degli stress
Ruolo delle malerbe sulla contaminazione da FUM
BlandinoeReyneri,2006.L’Informatorefitopatologico
Riduzione degli stress
Ruolo delle malerbe sulla contaminazione da DON
(vomitotossina)
BlandinoeReyneri,2006.L’Informatorefitopatologico
Densità colturale
Prove agronomiche
250
6.0Ͳ6.5pt/m2
7.8Ͳ8.2pt/m2
Valoreindice
200
Investimento alla semina
150
100
50
0
FUB1
ZEN
DON
OTA
%ODQGLQRHWDO)LHOG&URS 5HVHDUFK &DUPDJQROD
Densità colturale
narrow interrow
75cm
45cm
75cm
75cm
twinrow
50cm
45cm
20cm
Densità colturale
75cm(7.5pt/m2)
VS
45cm(10pt/m2)
Carmagnola– nontrattatoinsetticida
Piralide: via infezione chiave
LQIH]LRQH
)YHUWLFLOOLRLGHV
PDUFLXPHGHOODVSLJD
LQFLGHQ]D
VHYHULWj
)XPRQLVLQH
%%
7HVL
µJNJ LQIHVWD]LRQHQDWXUDOH
SURWH]LRQH
)XPRQLVLQH—JNJ
)XP%
)XP%
$
0
%
$
0
%
$
0
%
$
0
%
SLUDOLGHLQIHVWD] QDWXUDOHSURWH]LRQHLQIHVWD] QDWXUDOHSURWH]LRQH
Blandinoet al.,2012.Inform.Agrario
PDWXUD]LRQHFHURVD
PDWXUD]LRQHFRPPHUFLDOH
Piralide: momento trattamento
.DUDWH=HRQ
/DPEDFLDORWULQD
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1XPEHURIDGXOWVFDSWXUHG
'DWH
Fioritura
%ODQGLQRHWDO)RRG $GG&RQW
9LJRQHDQG1RYDUD
Piralide: momento trattamento
(&%LQFLGHQFH
(&%LQFLGHQFH
)XVHDUURWLQFLGHQFH
)XVHDUURWLQFLGHQFH
*''V
*''V
**'
*''V
17777
%ODQGLQRHWDO
9LJRQHDQG1RYDUD
)XPRQLVLQ%%ȝJNJ
Piralide: momento trattamento
7FRQWUROQRWWUHDWHG
7WHVWLPRQH QRQWUDWWDWR
7WHVWLPRQH QRQWUDWWDWR
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
)%
)%
%ODQGLQRHWDO)RRG $GG&RQWDP
)81*,&,'$
0LONVWDJH
)ORZHULQJ
)XQJLFLGH
7
7
7
'RXJKVWDJH
7
GLQWHUYDO
,QVHFWLFLGH
7
3K\VLRORJLFDO
PDWXULW\
7
7
,16(77,&,'$
3DUDPHWHUV
8QWUHDWHG
FRQWURO
3LUHWURLG
DSSOLFDWLRQ
9DULDWLRQ
(&%LQFLGHQFH
(&%VHYHULW\
($5VHYHULW\
F. verticillioides LQIHFWLRQ
F. proliferatum LQIHFWLRQ
)80% %—JNJ
021—JNJ
)VH]GLVFRORU LQIHFWLRQ
'21—JNJ
$YHUDJHGDWDRI\HDUVDQGIXQJLFLGHWLPLQJV
7,0,1*)81*,&,'$
7HVWLPRQH 17
D
$YHUDJHGDWDRI\HDUVDQGLQVHFWLFLGHWUHDWPHQWXQWUHDWHGDQGDSSOLFDWLRQDWWKH(&%IOLJKWSHDN
1RVLJQLILFDQWGLIIHUHQFH$129$IRUIXQJLFLGHDQGWKHLQWHUDFWLRQZLWKLQVHFWLFLGHRU\HDU
Diabrotica e micotossine
20confrontiperanno,
campiaziendalimonitoratiinPiemontedal2009al2011
HOHYDWRGDQQRUDGLFDOH
WHVWLPRQH
)XPRQLVLQH% % —JNJ
)XPRQLVLQH—JNJ
WUDWWLQVHWWLFLGD
QRQWUDWWDWR
CampiaziendalimonitoratiinPiemontenel2009
3HUGLWDSURGXWWLYDUHODWLYD
Il ruolo dell’agrotecnica
)XPRQLVLQH
,PSRUWDQFH
(SRFD
VHPLQD
6FHOWD
YDULHWDOH
&RQWUROOR
LQVHWWL
(SRFD GL
UDFFROWD
'HQVLWj
FROWXUDOH
Ͳ
6WUHVV
LQIHVWH
LGULFR
5RWD]LRQH H
ODYRUD]LRQL
0LHWLWUHE
ELDWULFH
1IHUWLOL]
5RWD]LRQH H
ODYRUD]LRQL
6FHOWD
YDULHWDOH
(SRFD
VHPLQD
'HQVLWj
FROWXUDOH
1IHUWLOL
6WUHVV
LQIHVWH
LGULFR
&RQWUROOR
LQVHWWL
HSRFD GL
UDFFROWD
0LHWLWUHE
ELDWULFH
Processo coltivazione
%ODQGLQRDQG5H\QHUL
Percorsi colturali e FUM
)XPRQLVLQ%%ȝJNJ D
'DWDVHPLQD
GHQVLWj
FRQFLPD]1
WUDWWSLUDOLGH
E
F
G
%ODQGLQR HWDO)LHOG&URS5HV
3URYHFRQGRWWH LQORFDOLWj LQ1RUG,WDOLDQHO WULHQQLR 'DWL PHGL GLHVSHULPHQWL
Il ruolo dell’agrotecnica
'21]HDUDOHQRQH
,PSRUWDQFH
(SRFD GL
VHPLQD
(SRFD GL
UDFFROWD
'HQVLWj
FROWXUDOH
,EULGR
Ͳ
5RWD]LRQH H
ODYRUD]LRQL
0LHWLWUHE
ELDWULFH
1IHUWLOL]
5RWD]LRQH H
ODYRUD]LRQL
6FHOWD
YDULHWDOH
(SRFD GL
VHPLQD
'HQVLWj
FROWXUDOH
1IHUWLOL]
6WUHVV
LQIHVWH
LGULFR
&RQWUROOR
LQVHWWL
6WUHVV
LQIHVWH
LGULFR
&RQWUROOR
LQVHWWL
(SRFD GL
UDFFROWD
0LHWLWUHE
ELDWULFH
Processo dicoltivazione
%ODQGLQRDQG5H\QHUL
Percorsi colturali e DON
)$2
)$2
D
'21—JNJ E
E
F
F
G G
G
6RZLQJGDWH
3ODQWGHQVLW\
1IHUWLOL]DWLRQ
(&%FRQWURO
%ODQGLQR HWDO:RUOG0\FRW-
)LHOGH[SHULPHQWFRQGXFWHGLQVLWHVLQ1RUWK,WDO\LQ'DWDUHSRUWHGDUHPHDQVRIH[SHULPHQWV
Il ruolo dell’agrotecnica
$IODWRVVLQH
5HVLGXL
FROWXUDOL
8PLGLWj
UDFFROWD
'LIHVD
LQVHWWL
&ODVVH
LEULGR
Ͳ
6WUHVV
LGULFR
(SRFD
ILRULWXUD
6WUHVV
QXWUL]LR
QDOL
7UHEELD
WXUD
Processodicoltivazione
Blandino andReyneri,2011
MICOTOSSINE EMERGENTI
MICOTOSSINE
CONSOLIDATE
Deoxynivalenol
Fumonisins
Zearalenone
Aflatoxins
Ochratoxin
T2 andHT2 Toxins
EFSARequestforascientific
opinionontherisksforpublicand
animalhealthrelatedtothe
presenceofemergingmycotoxins in
feedandfood.
EMERGINGMYCOTOXINS
2
2
2
Moniliformin
Enniatins
Beauvericin
Fusaproliferin
Fusaric Acid
DeoxynivalenolͲ3ͲGlucoside
Culmorin
Aurofusarin
Nivalenol
Alternaria toxins
Sterigmatocystin
+
MICOTOSSINE EMERGENTI
Veneto
Lombardia
FUMtot(µgkgͲ1)
Equisetin
0.2%
MON
Beauvericin
8%
1%
Fusaricacid
3%
FUS
6%
Bikaverin
3%
7508
Beauvericin
1%
Fusaricacid
3%
12697
Bikaverin
3%
FUMtot
82%
FUMtot
79%
7018
Equisetin
MON FUS
0.4%
6% 5%
10018
EmiliaͲRomagna
Piemonte
Bikaverin
MON
2%
FUS
Equisetin 7%
14%
1%
Beauvericin
2%
Fusaricacid
3%
FUMtot
71%
Equisetin
0.03%
MON
Beauvericin
10%
2%
Fusaricacid
3%
FUS
10%
FUMtot
73%
Bikaverin
2%
MICOTOSSINE EMERGENTI
MON(µgkgͲ1)
869
743
730
1372
7266,1((0(5*(17,
**
Fusarium species Section Liseola
Notprotected
andGibbosum
Artificialcontrol
*
FusariumspeciesSection
DiscolorandRoseum
**
*
*
**
P(F)=LevelofsignificantofANOVA* P<0.05, ** P < 0.01
FUMs=Fumonisins;MON=Moniliformin;FUS=Fusaproliferin;BIK=Bikaverin;FA=FusaricAcid;BEA=Beauvericin;EQU=Equisetin;AUR=
Aurofusarin;DON=Deoxynivalenol;DONǦ3ǦG=DeoxynivalenolǦ3ǦGlucoside;ZEA=Zearalenone;CULM=Culmorin;BUT=Butenolide
Prevenzione del rischio in campo
FUSARIOSI della SPIGA
Agenti:
9
9
9
9
9
9
Microdochiumnivale
F.avenaceum
F.poae
F.roseum
F.graminearum (SudEuropa)
F.culmorum
(NordEuropa)
IlciclodiF.graminearum
ƒ Andamenticlimaticipiovosi e/ocaldoͲ
umidi traspigaturaematurazionelattea
ƒ Disseccamentiparzialiototalispiga
ƒ Semistriminziti,perditeproduttivefinoa
60%
ƒ Dannisanitariconproduzionedi
micotossine(DON)
'(266,1,9$/(12/2
'21
NotaanchecomeVOMITOSSINA
Diffusaneinostriambientineicereali(frumento,mais)
Spessoassociataallaformeacetilate3AcͲDon,
15AcͲDonedaltritricoteceniditipoB
LIMITIdiLEGGE(ppbͲ µg/kg)
Frumentotenero,mais1250
Frumentoduro1750
Farinadicereali,crusca,germeper
utilizzoalimentare750
Pasta750
Pane500
Alimentiperl’infanzia200
(Reg.CE1881/2006)
$QQDWD
&DPSLRQL
SRVLWLYL
&DPSLRQL
FULWLFL
AnalisiHPLC– 2872campioniprelevatiinPiemonte
6&(/7$9$5,(7$/(
Resistenza:
ƒ Precocità
ƒ Taglia
ƒ Infezionefungo
ƒ Sviluppofungo
ƒ Contaminazionemicotossine
0D\HUOH HWDO
6&(/7$9$5,(7$/(
&21&,$)81*,&,'$
Moretti, 2008, L’Inf. Agrario.
&21&,$)81*,&,'$
WHVWLPRQHQRQFRQFLDWR
FRQFLDIXQJLFLGD
'21—JNJ
6SHFLH
)XQJLFLGDLQILRULWXUD
,QIH]LRQHDOVHPH
'XUR
'XUR
'XUR
'XUR
7HQHUR 7HQHUR 7HQHUR 7HQHUR
12
12
6,
6,
12
12
6,
6,
6,
12
6,
12
6,
12
6,
12
Blandino et al. 2011, Inf. fitopatol.
5(6,'8,&2/785$/,
/DYRUD]LRQH
5HVLGXL FROWXUDOL
WVV KD
6HYHULWj
)+%
'21
—JNJ
$UDWR
E
E
0/
D
D
6RGR
D
D
'DWL PHGL ORFDOLWj 5(6,'8,&2/785$/,
D
F
E
E
5HVLGXLWKD
'21ȝJNJ
Micocer 2006Ͳ08
'DWL PHGL GLORFDOLWj ,PROD H5LYDHDQQL
Blandino et al. 2010, Cereal Research Comm.
'21
5HVLGXLFROWXUDOL
5
5
5
5
Reyneri etal.2010,L’inf.Agrario
5(6,'8,H75,&+2'(50$
)XVDULDORJXIFJ
6RGR
0/
$UDWR
6RGR
0/
$UDWR
3UHVHPLQD
SUHLQYHUQRSUHILRULWXUD
'21—JNJ
REMEDIER® - ,6$*52 NJKD
D]LRQH DQWDJRQLVWLFD SHU SUHYHQ]LRQH PDODWWLH IXQJLQH GHO WHUUHQR
6DQ$QJHOR/RG
D
D
D
D
E E
$UDWR
0/
6RGR
'21—JNJ
5HVLGXL DOVXROR
ELRFRPSOGLUHWWD
QRGLIHVD
ORWWDGLUHWWD
ELRFRPSOGLUHWWD
$UDWR
ELRFRPS
6$QJHOR/
3(5&256,&2/785$/,
ORWWDGLUHWWD
ELRFRPS
QRGLIHVD
)81*,&,'$
ContaminazionedaDON
Ͳ40%
'21ȝJNJ Ͳ35%
17
AnalisiLCͲMS;mediadi4ripetizioniͲ RivapressoChieri,2008
)81*,&,'$
8QLWj1WHVWHU
17
7
7
6SLJDWXUD
0DWODWWHD
0DWFHURVD
6WDGLRIHQRORJLFR
)LQHPDW
FHURVD
17 WHVWLPRQHQRQWUDWWDWR
7 PLVFHODDGDPSLRVSHWWUR
VDSURFKORUD] HSRVVLFRQD]ROR
7 IXVDULFLGD VSHFLILFRVDPHWFRQD]ROR
Blandino et al, 2011, Italian Journal of Agronomy
)81*,&,'$
'21ȝJNJ 3URGX]LRQHJUDQHOODWKD 17
7
7
17
7
7
17
7
7
17
7
7
SHUFRUVRDWWHQWRSHUFRUVRULVFKLRVR
SHUFRUVRDWWHQWRSHUFRUVRULVFKLRVR
17 WHVWLPRQHQRQWUDWWDWR
7 PLVFHODDGDPSLRVSHWWUR
VDSURFKORUD] HSRVVLFRQD]ROR
7 IXVDULFLGD VSHFLILFRVDPHWFRQD]ROR
Blandino et al, 2011, Italian Journal of Agronomy
AGROTECNICA e DON
importanza
*HVWLRQH
UHVLGXL
6FHOWD
YDULHWj
5RWD]LRQL
'LIHVD
Ͳ
&RQFLD
&RQFLPD
]LRQH
(SRFD GL
UDFFROWD
7UHEELD
WXUD
(SRFD GL
UDFFROWD
7UHEELD
WXUD
'LVHUER
5RWD]LRQL
*HVWLRQH
UHVLGXL
6FHOWD
YDULHWj
&RQFLD
FRQFLPD
]LRQH
Processodicoltivazione
'LVHUER
'LIHVD
AGROTECNICA e DON
Campagnaetal.,2005.IA
PERCORSI: DON
'21ȝJNJ
'21ȝJNJ
Datimedidi4località
$$
%
%
$
*HVWLRQHUHVLGXL
&
%
%
$5
5,
9DULHWj
7UDWWIXQJLFLGD
Risultati progetto MICOCER
%
05
'
& &
&2
&( &
$7
$*527(&1,&$H'21
6LWH
,0
5&
6/
6RXUFHRI
YDULDWLRQ
7LOODJH$
9DULHW\%
)XQJLFLGH&
$;%
$;&
%;&
$;%;&
7LOODJH$
9DULHW\%
)XQJLFLGH&
$;%
$;&
%;&
$;%;&
7LOODJH$
9DULHW\%
)XQJLFLGH&
$;%
$;&
%;&
$;%;&
0LFRFHU Risultato ANOVAsul
contenuto inDON
Interazione
significativa tra
pratiche difesa
indiretta ediretta
,QWHUD]LRQH IDWWRUL
,QWHUD]LRQH IDWWRUL
Dati riportati sono valori disignificatività (P)conANOVAeschemasperimentale splitplot
Blandino etal.2012,FieldCropResearch
DIFESAFUSARIOSI
‰Difesa integrata
ScenarioswithIncreasingcontrolofDONcontet
Effetto sinergico
100
directsowing,Svariety,nofungicide
51
directsowing,Svariety,triazoleapplication
39
directsowing,MRvariety,nofungicide
32
ploughing,Svariety,nofungicide
20
directsowing,MRvariety,triazole
application
18
17
ploughing,Svariety,triazoleapplication
13
13
ploughing,MRvariety,nofungicide
9
6
ploughing,MRvariety,triazoleapplication
3
0
Simulationbasedonadditiveeffectoffactors
Dataobserved
20
40
60
80
DONcontent(%)
100
7266,1(7H+7
)UXPHQWRGXURFY6DQ&DUOR
,QRFXORF. sporotrichioides H
F. langsethiae FRQLGL
PO
SSE7+7
5DFFGHOPDU]R AGROTECNICA:qualiprospettive
,OSUREOHPDGHOOHPLFRWRVVLQH QRQSXzHVVHUHGHILQLWR
VHPSOLFHPHQWHRFFDVLRQDOHPDqVWUXWWXUDOH
2FFRUUHFRUUHJJHUHLQPRGRQHWWRLOSURFHVVRSURGXWWLYRÆ FRVWUXLUH
ILOLHUHLQWHJUDWHVDQLWj HTXDOLWjWHFQRORJLFD
/¶DJURWHFQLFDLQGLUL]]DWDSHUOHILOLHUH
‡ ,QWURGX]LRQHGLGLVFLSOLQDUL PHQROLEHUWjRDQDUFKLD
‡ 3LDWWHQ]LRQHDOODGLIHVD
‡ &RQFHQWUD]LRQH GHOO¶RIIHUWD
‡ )RUWHDWWHQ]LRQHSHUXQ$OWR9DORUHG¶8VR
$IIURQWDUH OH SUREOHPDWLFKH DJURQRPLFKH
GD XQ DSSURFFLR RULHQWDWR DOOD VROX]LRQH GHO VLQJROR SUREOHPD 6LQJOH
3UREOHP 6ROYLQJ DG XQ DSSURFFLR FROWXUDOH GL VLVWHPD ,QWHJUDWHG &URS
6\VWHP
Grazie per l’attenzione
[email protected]
Author
Document
Category
Uncategorized
Views
0
File Size
9 888 KB
Tags
1/--pages
Report inappropriate content