Asikainen_MTK_Brussels_10.1.2017 [Vain luku]

1/5/2017
Increasing supply of forest
biomass for bioeconomy and
carbon balance of Finnish
forests
Antti Asikainen, professor
Climate Policy and Land Use
The potential of well-managed boreal forests and farm land
10. Januray 2017, European Parliament, Brussels
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
Water supply
Bioeconomy services
Bioenergy
Agriculture and
food industry
National economy
63 bill. €
Bioeconomy
product
Forest-based bioeconomy
43 billion €/a
Wood-based
products
© Natural Resources Institute Finland
1
1/5/2017
What can we make out of 10 mill. m3 of
wood?
• Wood-based bioeconomy produces c.a. 43 bill.
€/year in the Finnish national economy today
• This is reached by using c.a.80 mill. m3 wood
annually
• We plan to increase annual wood use by 10 million
m3 to boost the bio-based sector
• This will increase the economic product by 5.4 bill.
€ annually
• Increasing wood use will reduce the carbon sink
for 2020-2030, but the sink will recover in 2040’s
3
5.1.2017
Net carbon sink of Finnish forests
0
-10
milj. t CO2 ekv.
-20
-30
-40
-50
AFF+FL
4
SK2
2050
2048
2046
2044
2042
2040
2038
2036
2034
2032
2030
2028
2026
2024
2022
2020
2018
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
-60
EU-FL
5.1.2017
2
1/5/2017
Forest growth, wood use of industry
and import define the net carbon sink
• Net carbon sink = -26,59 * - 0.841*annual
increment - 2.058 * wood import + 1.387*wood
harvest
– Net carbon sink: MtCO2eq.
– Annual increment, wood import, wood harvest:
Mm3
– R2=0.76
5
5.1.2017
Import of roundwood, 1000 m3
Volume of imported wood has halved since
mid 2000’s
Year
3
1/5/2017
Volume of imported wood has halved since
mid 2000’s
Recovering construction market in EU and
Japan increase the wood demand from Finland
Planed wood
Pine sawn timber
Spruce sawn timber
Average export price
Export price of pine
Export price of spruce
4
1/5/2017
Carbon sink in Finland is declining and in
Sweden increasing
Regeneration of mature forests results
climate benefits in the long run
10
Source: Kolström 2016
5.1.2017
5
1/5/2017
True reference scenarios for not using wood
Natural disturbances lead to massive CO2
discharges from European forests
Seidl et al 2014
12
5.1.2017
6
1/5/2017
Concluding remarks
• Finnish forests continue to accumulate carbon
• Growing bioeconomy needs more wood
• Setting of the reference level for LULUCF
– Market cycles of industry have a great impact
– Should encourage active forest management
• Maintaining of a net carbon sink in the forest in
the long run is mission impossible!
• Active forest management and viable
bioeconomy will lead to the highest climate
benefits in the long run
13
5.1.2017
LULUCF reference level should be fair
and motivating for active forest
management -> stable carbon sink and
growing biomass supply
for bioeconomy
7