Do Smart Cars Equal Safer Roads? www.iihs.org Property Casualty Insurers Association of America Capital Engagement Series Washington D.C. ● July 29, 2014 David S. Zuby EVP/Chief Research Officer, IIHS The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, founded in 1959, is an independent, nonprofit, scientific, and educational organization dedicated to reducing the losses — deaths, injuries, and property damage — from crashes on the nation’s roads. The Highway Loss Data Institute, founded in 1972, shares and supports this mission through scientific studies of insurance data representing the human and economic losses resulting from the ownership and operation of different types of vehicles and by publishing insurance loss results by vehicle make and model. Both organizations are wholly supported by auto insurers. IIHS/HLDI members write 85% of U.S. private passenger market. www.hldi.org www.iihs.org Rationale for smart cars People don’t always “just drive” • 1979 – Indiana “Tri-Level Study” estimated “driver error” to be proximate cause of 9 out of 10 crashes – 15 percent of crashes associated with driver inattention Changing audio tapes/CDs Eating/drinking Children, bugs, animals in vehicle Reading, shaving, and applying makeup • 2011 – NHTSA estimated that distraction was a factor in15 percent of police reported crashes • 2012 – 3,328 were killed and 421,000 were injured in crashes involving distracted driver in the U.S. www.iihs.org Driver assistance features Radar, LIDAR, ultrasonic, infrared, cameras, GPS www.iihs.org Annual relevance of driver assistance technology By type of system all injury fatal forward collision warning 1,165,000 66,000 879 lane departure warning 179,000 37,000 7,529 side view assist 395,000 20,000 393 adaptive headlights 142,000 29,000 2,484 total unique crashes 1,866,000 149,000 10,238 www.iihs.org Availability of driver assistance technology Percent of vehicle series in 2014 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% FCW FCW w/autobrake lane departure warning standard lane departure prevention optional blind spot warning adaptive head lights rear cameras not available www.iihs.org • Front crash prevention systems are working • Adaptive headlights are working • The benefits of these systems are less clear – – Lane departure warning – Blind spot warning – Rearview cameras – Parking proximity sensors www.iihs.org www.iihs.org Effect of front crash prevention on property damage liability claim frequency By manufacturer 20% 10% statistically significant 0% -10% warning only warning with autobrake -20% Honda Accord (includes LDW) Mercedes Volvo Acura Mercedes Volvo Volvo XC60 (includes LDW) with City Safety www.hldi.org www.iihs.org Effect of front crash prevention on bodily injury liability claim frequency By manufacturer 40% 20% statistically significant 0% -20% warning only warning with autobrake -40% Honda Accord (includes LDW) Mercedes Volvo Acura Mercedes Volvo Volvo XC60 (includes LDW) with City Safety www.hldi.org www.iihs.org Rear cameras and other backing aids • Enhance the drivers’ perception of areas not otherwise visible • Experiments indicate benefits • The real-world efficacy is unclear • Cameras will be required on new vehicles beginning 2016 – Phase-in complete in 2018 www.iihs.org Visibility advantage provided by technology Rear visibility in typical SUV: 2013 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ mirrors: right rear left shoulder glance technology: sensors camera www.iihs.org Cameras prevented crashes with stationary object Percent of participants who hit the object, by technology and object motion 100 stationary moving 80 60 40 20 0 none sensors camera camera + sensors www.iihs.org Calendar year features reach 95% of registered vehicle fleet with and without mandate 2050 without mandate 2040 2015 mandate 2030 2020 forward collision rear parking warning sensors lane departure warning adaptive headlights blind spot warning rear camera www.iihs.org Summary • Automated driving will help prevent and mitigate crashes – Actual effectiveness of partial automation has been documented – Ideal automated systems cannot be distracted as drivers can be • Wide spread automated driving will take time – Current partial automated systems are evolving quickly, but – Older vehicles are replaced by state-of-the-art vehicles slowly www.iihs.org www.iihs.org Dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries, and property damage on the highway
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz
