Log in using OpenID

Cannabinoids,New Promising Agents in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases

Molecules 2014, 19, 18781-18816; doi:10.3390/molecules191118781
ISSN 1420-3049
Cannabinoids: New Promising Agents in the Treatment of
Neurological Diseases
Sabrina Giacoppo 1, Giuseppe Mandolino 2, Maria Galuppo 1, Placido Bramanti 1 and
Emanuela Mazzon 1,*
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, Via Provinciale Palermo, contrada Casazza,
98124 Messina, Italy
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Centro di Ricerca per le Colture
Industriali (CRA-CIN), Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected];
Tel.: +39-090-6012-8708; Fax: +39-090-6012-8850.
External Editor: Derek J. McPhee
Received: 6 October 2014; in revised form: 7 November 2014 / Accepted: 7 November 2014 /
Published: 17 November 2014
Abstract: Nowadays, Cannabis sativa is considered the most extensively used narcotic.
Nevertheless, this fame obscures its traditional employ in native medicine of South Africa,
South America, Turkey, Egypt and in many regions of Asia as a therapeutic drug. In fact,
the use of compounds containing Cannabis and their introduction in clinical practice is still
controversial and strongly limited by unavoidable psychotropic effects. So, overcoming
these adverse effects represents the main open question on the utilization of cannabinoids as
new drugs for treatment of several pathologies. To date, therapeutic use of cannabinoid
extracts is prescribed in patients with glaucoma, in the control of chemotherapy-related
vomiting and nausea, for appetite stimulation in patients with anorexia-cachexia syndrome
by HIV, and for the treatment of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Recently, researcher efforts
are aimed to employ the therapeutic potentials of Cannabis sativa in the modulation of
cannabinoid receptor activity within the central nervous system, particularly for the
treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as psychiatric and non-psychiatric
disorders. This review evaluates the most recent available data on cannabinoids utilization
in experimental and clinical studies, and highlights their beneficial effects in the prevention of
the main neurological diseases and for the clinical treatment of symptoms with them correlated.
Molecules 2014, 19
Keywords: Cannabis sativa; cannabinoids; cannabinoid receptors; neurodegenerative
diseases; epilepsy
1. Introduction
Cannabis is probably one of the most ancient non-food crops cultivated by mankind; it belongs to the
botanical family of Cannabaceae, along with Humulus, the cultivated hop. It is an annual, dioecious
plant, though monoecious varieties have been bred, and its diploid chromosomic complement is 2n = 20,
with 18 autosomes and a couple of sexual chromosomes (XY for male and XX for female and
monoecious plants [1].
The Cannabis species originated from Central Asia, where it was probably domesticated over 6000 years
ago, but it has since been cultivated at virtually all latitudes for a large number of end-products deriving
from the seed (e.g., fatty acids and proteins), the fiber, the wooden core and from the inflorescences,
where cannabinoids are produced and secreted [2]. There still is limited agreement on whether Cannabis
sativa should be considered a single species or a poly-species genus; however, the species boundaries,
if existing, are weak, as full intercrossing between the different Cannabis accessions can occur, and
several molecular markers-based analyses confirmed that Cannabis is a highly heterozygous species,
with the intra-accession variation as wide as the inter-accession one [3].
In recent years, the debate on Cannabis re-introduction in our agricultural landscapes went beyond
the agronomical and productive virtues of the plant, and especially focused on the potential of the plant’s
main metabolites, the cannabinoids, as medicines useful for a number of therapeutical applications [4].
In fact, medications based on Cannabis have been used for therapeutic purposes in many cultures for
centuries [5], with descriptions of its effects including alterations in mood, cognitive functions, memory
and perception of the user [6].
In Europe, they were used at the end of the 19th century to alleviate a wide variety of conditions,
including pain, spasms, dysentery, depression, sleep disturbance and loss of appetite [7]. In the first half
of the 20th century cannabinoid medications fell into almost complete disuse, partly because scientists
were unable to establish the chemical structure of the ingredients of the Cannabis plant (Cannabis sativa L.).
It was only in 1964 that the psychoactive component of the Cannabis resin and flowers,
О” -tetrahydrocannabinol (О”9-THC) was isolated [8]. Following, numerous non-psychoactive
cannabinoids have been identified, such as cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene
(CBC), О”9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (О”9-THCV) and cannabidivarin (CBDV). These compounds exert
multiple actions through mechanisms that are only partially related to modulation of the
endocannabinoid system.
In recent years, a growing interest has been dedicated to the study of cannabinoids for their
antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [9,10]. Specifically, О”9-THC is the most
widely studied phytocannabinoid, but also the predominant psychotropic component of Cannabis,
strongly limiting its therapeutic use as an isolated agent. Therefore, recently research focused to include
non-psychotropic compounds, some of which exhibit potential as therapeutic agents in preclinical
models of central nervous system (CNS) disease.
Molecules 2014, 19
The present review focused on the current state of evidence regarding the possible usefulness of
cannabinoid agents (psychotropic and non-psychotropic) in prevention of the main neurological
disorders and/or in the treatment of symptoms correlated to them, at least in association with existing
conventional therapy.
2. Current Cannabinoid-Based Drugs
Despite the illegality of Cannabis in most nations, a renewed interest in its medicinal properties has
led to development of a number of cannabinoid-based medicines. Currently three drugs are used in
clinical practice.
Dronabinol (MarinolВ®, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Brussels, Belgium) capsules, a synthetic formulation
of О”9-THC, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1986, for the management of
nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy in patients who have not responded to
conventional antiemetic treatments [11]. Dronabinol is also used for the treatment of anorexia with
weight loss in patients with HIV/AIDS [12].
Nabilone (CesametВ®, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada) capsules,
is another synthetic derivative of О”9-THC that is similar to dronabinol, but appears to be more potent. It
was first approved in Canada in 1982 and is now also available in the United States and United Kingdom,
still for the treatment of emesis [13].
Unlike Dronabinol and Nabilone, SativexВ® (GW Pharma, Ltd, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK) is administered
in an oral spray, consisting of a mixture of two extracts in approximately a 1:1 ratio (2.7 mg of О”9-THC
and 2.5 mg of CBD) in an alcoholic solution (50% ethanol). In Spain, Germany, Denmark as well as in
Canada, United Kingdom and Italy, SativexВ® is used as treatment to alleviate spasticity in adult multiple
sclerosis (MS) patients which did not show an appropriate response to other drugs during an initial trial
period of therapy [14,15]. Compared to the oral route, its advantage is a faster plateau of plasma
concentration. Also, it has been established that coadministration of CBD and О”9-THC can reduce
unwanted effects of О”9-THC.
3. Synthesis and Production of Phytocannabinoids
Although Cannabis plant can be defined as a true “chemical factory” extremely rich in secondary
compounds, therapeutic applications essentially rely on the cannabinoids. According to a recent review [16],
there are almost 500 different chemical compounds synthesized by the Cannabis plant, and about 70
among these are cannabinoids. Cannabinoids are secondary compounds unique to the genus Cannabis,
and therefore of taxonomic significance; they are terpenophenols, produced by the enzymatic
condensation of a terpenic moiety (geranyl diphosphate) with a phenolic one (mainly olivetolic or
divarinic acid).
There are two chemical characteristics of the cannabinoid molecule that are particularly relevant
(Figure 1). The first is the carboxylic group on the phenolic ring of the cannabinoid; this group is readily
lost upon drying or mild heating, leaving the decarboxylated form of the different cannabinoids. It is this
decarboxylation that converts the native О”9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) into О”9-THC, the
cannabinoid well known for its intoxicating and psychotropic effects. All cannabinoids in Cannabis
plants are synthesized and accumulated in their acidic form [17].
Molecules 2014, 19
Figure 1. (A) Structure of the most common cannabinoids found in Cannabis plants. All the
compounds have been represented in their acidic, native form, and with a pentylic side chain;
(B) the non-enzymatic decarboxylation of О”9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) to THC.
The second relevant characteristic of the cannabinoid molecule is the polyketide chain present in meta
position to the hydroxylic group of phenolic portion (Figure 1). The most abundant cannabinoids in
Cannabis have in this position a pentyl chain, but also propyl and even methyl side chain groups have
been described [18,19].
Cannabis sativa accessions and varieties have been divided into chemotypes, according to the main
cannabinoid they produce at maturity and to their content ratio. Five chemotypes can be recognized as
most commonly occurring: chemotype I has a very low cannabidiolic acid (CBDA)/THCA content ratio,
and is mainly the chemotype found in drug strains. Chemotype III, on the contrary, is characterized by
a very high CBDA/THCA ratio, and is typical of all cultivated fiber varieties. Chemotype II is a mixed
chemotype, containing roughly equal amounts of CBDA and THCA, as can be found in hashish strains,
but also in some old fiber varieties. Chemotype IV accumulates cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) as the main
cannabinoid. Finally, plants showing no cannabinoids upon gas-chromatographic analysis of mature
inflorescences have been described, and for these plants the chemotype V has been proposed [20].
Clearly, plants belonging to the different chemotypes have different potentials as sources for the active
principles they synthesize, and the breeding of Cannabis for pharmaceutical purposes had as its first
Molecules 2014, 19
target the exploration and exploitation of the variability available in Cannabis germplasm for
cannabinoid synthesis.
The sites of biosynthesis and accumulation of cannabinoids are the glandular trichomes
(Figure 2A,B). Glandular trichomes are particularly dense in inflorescences, especially on the bracts, but
also the leaves and, to a minor extent, the stems of Cannabis plants carry trichomes. Roots and seeds are
devoid of any trichome, and, accordingly, these organs contain no cannabinoids. Glandular trichomes
can be capitate-stalked, capitate-sessile, or bulbous, and these different morphologies are associated with
a different quantity of cannabinoids accumulated [21].
Figure 2. Capitate-sessile (A) and bulbous (B) glandular trichomes. In (A), also some
non-glandular trichomes (not secerning) are visible. (C), schematic representation of the
current model of secretion of cannabinoids from the trichomes.
The glandular trichomes density is a trait especially important when breeding Cannabis for
pharmaceutical purposes. In nature, the meaning for the plant’s fitness of the accumulation of
cannabinoids in trichomes is still debated; it has been proposed that the conjugate bonds system
characterizing THCA might have helped to protect plant functions from UV, a hypothesis partially
supported by the origin of high-THCA Cannabis strains in regions with a high UV irradiance.
The first committed step in the biosynthesis of cannabinoids is the prenylation of terpene geranyl
diphosphate with olivetolic acid (or, less frequently, divarinic acid), to yield the cannabinoid considered
today to be the precursor of all other cannabinoids, the CBGA (Figure 3). This enzymatic step is
catalyzed by the enzyme geranylpyrophosphate: olivetolate geranyltransferase (GOT). The length of the
side chain (determined by the preferential use of olivetolic or divarinic acid as the phenolic component
of the cannabinoid) is a genetically determined trait, though specific genes involved have not yet been
identified [22]. From the pharmaceutical point of view, this “variations on the theme” due to the different
length of the alkylic side chain has a great potential, as it is likely that each member of the alkyl-homologs
series for each cannabinoid could be endowed with different and specific therapeutical properties [23].
Molecules 2014, 19
Figure 3. The biosynthesis of the main cannabinoids.
CBGA is the precursor of the most abundant cannabinoids deriving from enzymatic transformation,
i.e., THCA, CBDA and cannabichromenic acid (CBCA). These three cannabinoids are synthesized
through the oxidocyclization of CBGA mediated by three specific enzymes, THCA-synthase (THCAs),
CBDA-synthase (CBDAs) and CBCA-synthase (CBCAs) (Figure 3). These enzymes have been isolated
from inflorescences of different Cannabis strains or growth stages, and biochemically characterized in
detail [24].
The hypothesis that the THCAs and CBDAs genes were alleles at the same locus, and that therefore
the two proteins were isoenzymes, found confirmation by in-depth genetic analysis. The cross of
pure-THCA breeding lines with pure-CBDA ones systematically yields F1 progenies producing equal
amounts of both cannabinoids; besides, upon selfing or intercrossing of F1 plants, the F2 offspring
obtained showed a perfect 1:2:1 segregation of pure-THC: mixed THC+CBD: pure CBD chemotypes [19],
as expected for a single locus (termed B) with two codominant alleles, BT and BD, respectively, coding
for THCAS and CBDAS. These data confirmed that, despite the several environmental factors able to
modulate the total amount of cannabinoids, the chemotype (i.e., the THCA/CBDA content ratio) has a
simple Mendelian inheritance, while the amount of cannabinoids produced by the plant is a typically
quantitative trait. The two aspects of inheritance of cannabinoids had a great impact on breeding of
Cannabis, mainly for pharmaceutical purposes.
Nowadays, the increased availability of sequence data for several Cannabis sativa strains related to
genes encoding for the biosynthesis of secondary compounds of therapeutic interest has led to the
development of advanced tools for breeding and selection of therapeutic Cannabis varieties. For their
use in modern pharmaceutical industry, these varieties are highly uniform, and devoted to the production
of a specific single cannabinoid, or of a specific blend of different cannabinoids; even the zero-cannabinoid
Molecules 2014, 19
varieties have been used in clinical tests as placebo. The completion of the sequencing of the Cannabis
genome and the extensive characterization of the alleles encoding for different cannabinoid synthase
variants, promises to further widen the portfolio of phytocannabinoids available for therapeutic
applications; besides, the recent definition of the tertiary structure of THCAS by X-ray crystallography
at the 2.75 Г… resolution, with the identification of specific aminoacids crucial for enzyme function, pave
the way for several biotechnological applications for synthesis of the cannabinoids ex planta [25].
4. Cannabinoid Receptors
In the human body there are specific binding sites for cannabinoids, distributed on the surface of
many different cells. To date, two types of receptors have been identified to have different tissue
distribution and mechanisms of signaling.
CB1 receptors, of which CB1A and CB1B represent two subtypes [26,27], are localized in the CNS [28].
Particularly, in the brain CB1 receptors are mainly expressed in areas involved in motor coordination
and movement (cerebellum, basal ganglia and substantia nigra), attention and complex cognitive
functions (cerebral cortex), learning, memory and emotions (amygdala and hippocampus) [29,30].In
addition, CB1 receptors are present to a lesser extent in some organs and peripheral tissues, including
endocrine glands, leukocytes, spleen, heart and part of the reproductive, urinary and gastrointestinal
systems [31].
CB1 receptors reduce neuronal cell activity and interfere with the release of some neurotransmitters,
such as serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), acetylcholine, dopamine, histamine, glutamate
and noradrenaline, preserving the CNS from overstimulation or over-inhibition that may be caused by
other neurotransmitters.
CB2 receptors are expressed predominantly in cells of the immune system [31] and hematopoietic,
but more recently their presence has been detected in the brain, in particular microglial cells, though at
low concentrations [32]. It is well known that in response to damaging events, such as neuro-inflammation
and cerebral hypoxia-ischemia, microglial cells may upregulate CB2 receptors expression in brain.
Indeed, CB2 receptors exhibit potent anti-inflammatory effects modulating the release of cytokines [33,34].
Both CB1 and CB2 receptors belong to the family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that, after
cannabinoid agonist binding and signaling, exert an inhibitory effect on adenylate cyclase
activity [35,36]. This inhibits the conversion to cyclic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to cAMP, an
important cellular secondary messenger involved in the mechanisms of signal transduction, which
activates kinase protein A (PKA).
CB1 and CB2 receptors signaling leads to the downstream activation of all mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK), p44/42, p38 and c-JUN amino terminal kinase, which can regulate nuclear transcription
factors. Also, their activation is strictly linked to ion channel regulation by inhibition of calcium channels
and activation of potassium channels [37].
There is increasing evidence supporting the existence of additional cannabinoid receptors (no-CB1
and no-CB2) in both central and peripheral system, identified in CB1 and CB2- knockout mice [38,39].
Indeed, some actions of certain cannabinoid ligands seems that are mediated by other receptors like
transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1), G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55), G
protein-coupled receptor 18 (GPR18), G protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) and 5-hydroxytryptamine
receptor subtype 1A (5-HT1A).
Molecules 2014, 19
TRPV1 is a non-selective cation channel for calcium, magnesium and sodium ions. It exhibits various
activation and modulatory mechanisms, involving in the stimulation by GPCRs, noxious heat, low pH,
and various endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide (AEA), 12-hydroperoxy-eicosatetraenoic
acid (12-HPETE) and N-arachidonoyl dopamine (NADA) [40]. Also, TRPV1 receptors play a role in
transmission and modulation of nociception, as well as the integration of diverse painful stimuli [41].
They are found mainly in the nociceptive neurons of the peripheral nervous system, but they have also
been described in CNS, specifically, in the hippocampus, cortex, and substantia nigra [42,43].
Orphan GPCRs, most notably GPR55, GPR18 and GPR119 have been proposed as potential novel
cannabinoid receptors [44]. GPR55 is widely expressed in the brain, especially in the cerebellum. GPR55
can be characterized as a cannabinoid receptor, on the basis of sequence homology at the binding site,
in fact the encoded integral membrane protein is a likely CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors [45]. Also,
it was demonstrated that GPR55 responds to a variety of both endogenous and exogenous cannabinoid
ligands, such as О”9-THC, CP55940 (CB1 and CB2 agonist), AEA and virodhamine [46] as do the
cannabinoid receptors. These features led to suggest GPR55 as a putative third cannabinoid
receptor [46,47]. GPR55 may be involved in several physiological and pathological processes by
activating a variety of signal transduction pathways [48]. Combining with an extracellular signal and
transmitting the signal across the membrane by activating an associated G-protein, promotes the
exchange of GDP for GTP on the alpha subunit of a heterotrimeric G-protein complex. Also its activation
promotes activation of the small G proteins rhoA, cdc42 and rac1 and a transduction mediated by the
ERK1 and ERK2 cascade [49,50].
Recently a fourth potential receptor GPR18 activated by N-arachidonoylglycine (NAGly), a
metabolite of AEA, has also been described [51]. GPR18 is expressed in gastrointestinal, immune and
testicular tissues, as well as the striatum, cerebellum and brain stem [52]. Also, GPR18 is found on
microglial cells in the brain where it regulates the migration of these cells following CNS damage or
inflammation [51].
GPR119 is another orphan receptor originally identified in genome-sequencing efforts and expressed
predominantly in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract [53]. The identification of GPR119 as a putative
cannabinoid receptor comes from reports of activation of GPR119 by oleoylethanolamide, a
monounsaturated analogue and functional antagonist of AEA [54], although controversy remains on its
physiological role.
5-HT1A receptor is a subtype of serotonin receptor expressed both as a presynaptic autoreceptor on
raphГЁ neurons, and as a major postsynaptic receptor in several brain regions including cerebral cortex,
amygdala and hippocampus involved in mood, memory, emotion and stress response [55]. Activation of
both pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1a receptors decreases neuronal excitability [56,57] Also, 5-HT1A is a
GPCR that inhibits adenylate cyclase and activate receptor operated potassium channel, whereas inhibits
voltage gated calcium channel [58].
Particularly, it was demonstrated that CBD exerts many of its effects by binding 5-HT1A receptor.
Activation of this receptor in key brain areas related to defensive responses, including the dorsal
paeriaqueductal grey, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial prefrontal cortex, leads to anxiolytic,
antidepressant and antipsychotic effects showed by CBD [59].
О”9-THC, of which are well-known psychotropic effects, is believed to perform the majority of its
actions in the CNS binding CB1 and CB2 receptors [60]. Non-psychotrophic phytocannabinoids (CBD,
Molecules 2014, 19
CBG, CBC, О”9-THCV and CBDV), exert multiple pharmacological effects via CB1/CB2 receptors as
well as no-CB1 and no-CB2 receptors [50] involving intracellular pathways that play a key role in
neuronal physiology. These compounds, especially CBD, are able to suppress the production of a wide
range of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-О± and interleukin (IL-)1ОІ [61,62].
They show also a potent action in inhibiting oxidative and nitrosative stress, modulating the expression
of inducibile nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and reducing the production of reactive oxygen species
(ROS) [63]. Moreover, non-psychotrophic phytocannabinoids attenuate high-glucose-induced
mitochondrialsuperoxide generation and NF-ОєB activation, along with the expression of intercellular
adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) [64]. Together, these
activities suggest that these compounds can exert neuroprotective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.
Figure 4 summarizes the mechanisms of action and cannabinoid-induced cellular signaling in the
neurological diseases investigated.
Figure 4. Cannabinoid-induced cellular signaling in neurologic disease.
CB1/CB2 - NO CB1/CB2
Inhibits ОІ-amyloid plaque formation reducing ROS production and lipid peroxidation.
Modulates iNOS expression. Decreases p38 MAP kinase, NFkB and caspase-3.
Decrease AОІ production. Reduces apoptosis.
WIN 55212-2
Attenuate toxicity associated with Htt aggregation.
Competitively inhibits AChE as well as prevents AChE-induced AОІ aggregation.
Lateral Sclerosis
Attenuate reactive microgliosis. Counteract upregulation of proinflammatory
markers. Reduces mutant Htt protein aggregation.
Reduces reactive microglia and astrogliosis. Decreases oxidative stress and edema.
Neuroprotective activity
HU210, WIN55,212-2
Decreases proinflammatory cytokines and NFkB activity.
Decreases proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-О±, IL-1ОІ) and ROS.
Increase trophic factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10).
Antioxidant activity (modulation of Nrf-2).
GPR55, TPRV-1, 5HT1A,
О±3 and О±1 glycine receptor
Modulates microglia cell function and cytokine expression (TNF-О±, IL-1ОІ).
Reduces neuroinflammation via a CB1-dependent mechanism.
Prevents excitotoxicity by reducing glutamate release and signaling.
Promotes oligodendrocytes survival, reducing demyelination and apoptosis.
Reduces inflammation, probably due to a decreasing of TNF-О± and IL-1ОІ release.
Reduces microglia activation, nitrotyrosine formation, T cell infiltration, production of
TNF-О± and promotes oligodendrocytes survivals
Reduces excitotoxicity (glutamate levels).
and oxidative cell damage (cytokines, NO and ROS).
Modulation of excitotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation.
Modulation of glutamate and cytokine release, iNOS and COX-2 induction.
Reduces of Ca2+ via interaction with the mitochondrial sodium/calcium exchanger.
Modulates GABA release.
Therapeutic properties of CB receptor agonists and antagonists have been proposed for the treatment
of different human disorders by preclinical and clinical observations. Interactions at CB1 and/or CB2
sites appear to affect molecular mechanisms that are responsible for disease onset or progression.
Molecules 2014, 19
5. Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative diseases are chronic and progressive disorders characterized by the gradual loss
of neurons in discrete areas of the CNS. Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD),
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and cerebral
ischemia are considered the disorders with the highest incidence in the population worldwide.
While the etiopathogenesis of these diseases is different, a number of common mechanisms
underlying their progressive nature have been elucidated, such as neuro-inflammation, oxidative stress,
excitotoxicity, protein misfolding and mitochondrial dysfunction.
Nowadays, for these diseases there is no cure, current therapies have focused on treatment of
symptoms and try to delay their progression. It has been demonstrated that endocannabinoid signaling
is alterated in many neurodegenerative diseases [65]. Therefore, it is believed that modulation of the
endocannabinoid system could be a useful alternative in neurodegeneration treatment. Furthermore,
preclinical research from animal models of neurodegeneration and clinical trials have suggested a
potential role of cannabinoids in the attenuation of inflammation and the protection of neurons at risk of
damage. Below we reported the most significant data regarding the current status of therapeutic effects
of cannabinoids in neurodegenerative disease management.
5.1. Cannabinoids in Parkinson’s Disease
PD is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by the progressive
degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and consequent reduction
in dopamine (DA) content in striatum [66]. The enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) present in all
dopaminergic cells, catalyzes the formation of L-DOPA, the rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of DA,
thereby directly linking PD with TH [67]. Thus, a TH deficiency in the striatum is a hallmark of PD [68].
The death of nigral dopaminergic neurons leads to the typical motor symptoms observed in PD,
bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity.
Several experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that endocannabinoid system undergo
evident neurochemical and neurophysiological alterations after dopamine depletion [69–72]. In fact, as
consequence of reduction in dopaminergic signaling, endocannabinoids levels as well as CB1 receptor
expression result to be up-regulated in basal ganglia [73,74], suggesting that cannabinoids could have a
therapeutic role in the treatment of movement disorders associated with PD.
To better understand what is the cannabinoid mechanism of action in PD and their antiglutamatergic
effects, it is vital to explain the network of synapses involved in the genesis and in the control of voluntary
and involuntary movements. For this purpose, it will be beneficial to summarize and comment on mechanism
prospects outlined by many authors [75–77].
At level of basal ganglia, when the prefrontal sensorial cortex receives a stimulus to perform a
movement, sensitive cortical neurons send glutamatergic excitatory signals to striatum nucleus
(putamen) that, via GABAergic neurons, inhibits the activity of internal globus pallidus. This is known
as the direct pathway of movement control. So doing, the GABAergic inhibitory signal of globus
pallidus, that normally controls the activity of thalamic nucleus, is lost and thalamus can send an
excitatory glutamatergic signal to motor cortex that perform the movement.
Molecules 2014, 19
There is also an indirect pathway triggered from putamen: GABAergic neurons project to external
globus pallidus that is inhibited to send, in turn, its GABAergic inhibitory signal to subthalamic nucleus.
Subthalamic nucleus can now activate three pathway trough glutamatergic excitatory signals direct to:
(1) substantia nigra pars reticulate; (2) internal segment of globus pallidus; (3) substantia nigra pars
compacta. Among them, substantia nigra pars compacta is crucial to release dopamine neurotrasmitter
activating striatum that stimulates the triggering of direct pathway via D1 receptors and, parallel, the
inhibition of indirect pathway via D2 receptors. In PD, a depletion of dopamine in the striatum causes a
cascade that lead to invert the normal balanced functioning of the basal ganglia circuitry. All this cascade
of events lead to the blocking of the direct pathway and to the activation of the indirect pathway, so that
we have bradykinesia as well as distorted muscle movements characteristic of PD patients.
Overall, the results is a disinhibition of the striatal neurons and therefore a relative glutamatergic
overactivity, that antiglutamatergic therapies with cannabinoids counteract, mostly via CB1 receptor
sited at level of presynaptic region of glutamatergic terminal [78].
More in detail, since the glutamatergic excitation is mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)
receptors of the neurons sited in the striatum and subthalamic nucleus, antagonists of NMDA receptors
could reduce activity through the indirect pathway [77]. The result of cannabinoids action is translated
in a reduction of glutamate release, decreasing calcium influx, as well as of local inflammatory events.
Current therapeutic strategies aim to increase dopaminergic transmission in basal ganglia by
administration of dopamine precursors, such as L-DOPA [79], however, in a proportion of patients the
efficacy of the treatment declines through time.
The majority of PD patients undergoing levodopa therapy develop disabling motor complications
(dyskinesias) within 10 years of treatment. Recent studies in animal models and in the clinic propose
that CB1 receptor antagonists could prove useful in the treatment of both Parkinsonian symptoms and
levodopa-induced dyskinesia, whereas CB1 receptor agonists could have a role in reducing
levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) [69].
In reserpine rat model of PD, the dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole led to a significant
reduction of akinesia [80]. This effect was substantially reduced by coinjection with the cannabinoid
CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2. The concomitant administration of the CB1 antagonist
rimonabant (SR141716A) with quinpirole and WIN 55,212-2 blocked the effect of WIN 55,212-2 on
quinpirole-induced reduction of akinesia [80]. This suggests that cannabinoid antagonists might be
therapeutically advantageous together with dopamine agonists in reversing the endocannabinoid effects
upon inhibitory motor function observed in PD.
In Lastres-Becker et al. [81] study, PD was induced in rats injected stereotaxically with a
6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), and then administered for two weeks with О”9-THC and CBD.The
authors found that both compounds were equally effective in protecting nigrostriatal dopaminergic
neurons from the neurotoxin 6-OHDA. Also, it was shown that CBD can attenuate dopamine depletion
and TH deficits, which are indicative of the degree of neurodegeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic
projections [81]. These cannabinoids may function as neuroprotective agents in PD due to their
capability to reduce oxidative stress. О”9-THC and CBD might restore the balance between the excessive
production of ROS and a relative deficiency in antioxidant properties by acting as ROS scavengers as
well as improving antioxidant enzymes through the activation of signaling triggered by nuclear
factor-erythroid 2 (Nfr-2) [82].
Molecules 2014, 19
Also, CBD showed anti-inflammatory properties, reducing the generation of pro-inflammatory
cytokines, such as TNF-О± and IL-1ОІ, as well as ROS and anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10 [83].
Moreover, О”9-THCV has been shown to have neuroprotective effects, both in rats subjected to
injection of 6-OHDA [84] as well as in mice injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [84], possibly
mediated through its antioxidant effects as well as through upregulation of CB2 receptors, and can
therefore affect microglia activation. Also, in both models of PD, it was demonstrated that administration
of О”9-THCV delayed disease progression, reducing motor inhibition, presumably through changes in
glutamatergic transmission [84].
However, despite the encouraging data achieved on the potential therapeutic utility of
cannabinoids in PD rodent models, studies with non human 1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
(MPTP)-lesioned primates have also produced conflicting results.
It was been demonstrated that the therapy with plant-derived cannabinoid agonists for attenuating
hypokinetic signs was useless and did not alleviate motor deficits [85,86]. In MTPT-treated common
marmosets, the blockade of CB1 receptors with SR141716A (rimonabant), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor
antagonist, reduced LID without affecting the anti-Parkinsonism efficacy of L-DOPA [87]. Similarly,
Meschler et al. [88] using cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), confirmed that SR141716A did
not improve motor disability. Also in the same study it was demonstrated that cannabinoid agonist
levonantradol produced a decrease in locomotor activity and an increase in bradykinesia in primates.
Also, cannabinoid agonists did not induce catalepsy in primates, a property that differs from their effects
in rodents [88].
Furthermore, as for the animal studies, drug trials in PD patients have produced conflicting results.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study the cannabinoid receptor agonist significantly
reduced LID in PD [89]. On the contrary, in a double-blind, cross-over study, Cannabis extracts, while
well tolerated, did not show effects on LID [90].
5.2. Cannabinoids in Huntington’s Disease
Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder characterized by striatal
neurodegeneration. Literature reports that the cause of the disease is a mutation in the huntingtin (HTT)
gene consisting of a CAG triplet repeat expansion translated into an abnormal polyglutamine (polyQ)
tract in the amino-terminal portion of huntingtin (Htt) protein [91]. Htt aggregation and its accumulation
are extremely toxic for striatal and cortical neuronal subpopulations [92–94]. The loss of motor
inhibition that follows results in an evident abnormal and involuntary writhing, commonly defined as
“choreiform” movements [95], associated with dementia [96] and cognitive impairment [97].
The brain region to which is ascribed the pathology is the corpus striatum that has the functional role
to control both posture and gait via GABA neurons that project to globus pallidus and zona reticulata of
the substantia nigra, controlling in turn subthalamic nucleus. So doing, it inhibits or gates inappropriate
or uncontrolled movements [98,99].
About neuroprotective effects of cannabinoid compounds in experimental HD, three mechanism of
neuroprotection have been hypothesized: CB1-dependent, CB2-dependent and CB1-/CB2-independent [96].
The first hypothesis is corroborated by the fact that CB1 receptor is early down-regulated in ongoing
disease, even in asymptomatic phases, so that CB1 receptor loss could have a role in HD pathogenesis [96].
Molecules 2014, 19
The second hypothesis born from the evidence given by CB2 receptor localization. It was observed that
it is poorly expressed in striatal parenchima under healthy condition while it is progressively over-expressed
during degenerative events leading to HD. In this circumstance, CB2-activation preserve striatal neurons
from inflammatory insults produced by reactive microglial cells, maybe through the release of
neurotrophins, anti-inflammatory cytokines and metabolic substrates [100,101].
Finally, the CB1-/CB2-independent pathway, involved in the neuroprotection during experimental
models of HD seems related to some cannabinoids with antioxidant properties, such as О”9-THC and
CBD, since their particular phenolic structures could exert a scavenger action against ROS. Parallel,
there is also the assumption of an intracellular signal regulation via the expression control of antioxidant
enzymes of phase II (i.e., Nrf-2/ARE signaling) [96]. On this framework, there are conflicting data and
the literature about it is very wide.
From a research on MEDLINE about “Huntington’s disease and cannabinoids” we got 61 results,
extended to 103 when the search was related to “Huntington’s disease and cannabinoid receptor”.
Among them, noteworthy was a recent preclinical study published on PNAS on January 2014
performed on R6/2 mouse [102]. It is the most commonly used model of HD. R6/2 mouse expresses
exon 1 of the human huntingtin gene with around 150 CAG repeats. It also exhibits a progressive
neurological phenotype that mimics many of the features of HD, including choreiform-like movements,
involuntary stereotypic movements, tremor, and epileptic seizures [103].
The paper reports that a restricted population of CB1 receptors, and more precisely those located on
glutamatergic terminals, play a crucial role in the neuroprotective activity of О”9-THC and, more in
general, of (endo)cannabinoids, so that the authors look at these receptors as a promising target for
neuroprotective strategies of therapy during HD [102].
Also, Valdeolivas et al., last September published in Neurotherapeutics, the neuroprotective effects
of CBG treatment in two in vivo models of HD, such as R6/2 mutant mouse and 3-nitropropionate (3-NP)
acid-lesioned mice [104].
Authors ascribe CBG effects both to cannabinoid receptor-dependent and/or independent
mechanisms. So, in the toxic model of HD authors show the neuroprotective CBG capability to attenuate
the reactive microgliosis and to counteract the upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers, while in
genetic model of HD they describe a recovery in the deteriorated rotarod performance typical of R6/2
mice, an expression partially normalized by CBG treatment of genes linked to HD, as well as an
up-regulation of BDNF, IGF-1 and PPARОі genes. Finally, CBG-treated animals showed a reduction in
the aggregation of mutant Htt protein in striatal parenchyma.
Moreover, a MEDLINE research performed on “Huntington’s disease and preclinical study and
cannabinoids” gave just two results: “Neuroprotective effects of phytocannabinoid-based medicines in
experimental models of Huntington’s disease” published in Journal of Neuroscience Research in
September 2011 [105] and the other one entitled “Sativex-like combination of phytocannabinoids is
neuroprotective in malonate-lesioned rats, an inflammatory model of Huntington’s disease: role of CB1
and CB2 receptors” published on ACS Chemical Neuroscience in May 2012 [106].
The first study tests a 1:1 botanical combination of extracts enriched in either О”9-THC or CBD (the
main constituents of the cannabis-based drug SativexВ®) on rats stereotaxically subjected to unilateral
injection into left striatum of the complex II inhibitor malonate, inducing HD through: (1) increasing the
volume of edema; (2) reducing the number of Nissl-stained cells and enhancing the number of
Molecules 2014, 19
degenerating cells (3) causing reactive microglia and astrogliosis (4) increasing oxidative stress.
According to these authors, the reversion of these effects would be mediated by a CB1 and CB2
receptor-independent mechanism provided by both cannabinoids [106].
Differently by other studies, but in accordance with evidences also reported by FernГЎndez-Ruiz
et al. [107], the above-reported study ascribes a balanced role to CB1/CB2 receptors with a likely
involvement in drug treatment showing an up-regulation of CB2 followed by a down-regulation of CB1
receptors, suggesting that CB2 receptors could play a particularly important role in the protective effect
of SativexВ®.
Furthermore, about synthetic cannabinoids HU210 and WIN 55,212-2, they seems to work in
transgenic R6/1 mice, expressing exon 1 of the human HD gene carrying a 115 CAG repeat, through a
mechanism mediated by G-protein alpha subtype i/o (G(i/o))-linked and ERK-dependent signal
transduction [108]. This promotes the coupling of CB1 receptors to Gi/o and attenuate toxicity associated
with Htt aggregation [108].
Despite the encouraging results obtained by the experimental investigations about the potential
therapeutic use of cannabinoids in HD symptoms management, clinical trials have not confirmed these
results. Particularly, studies performed using cannabinoids have not shown expected improvement in the
hyperkinetic symptoms of HD. Consroe et al. [109] published one of the first clinical trials in which
CBD was evaluated for symptomatic efficacy and safety in 15 neuroleptic-free patients with HD.
Authors demonstrated that CBD, was neither symptomatically effective nor toxic in these patients. Also,
in literature, are reported two uncontrolled, single patient studies evaluating efficacy of nabilone, but
these studies yielded conflicting results for reducing chorea severity [110,111]. Thus, although nabilone
induced signs of improvement in one of these studies, in the other study [110] it made symptoms
worse [111]. Nabilone was also used in a double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study in which it
induced improvements in motor and cognitive indices [112].
The data obtained recently in animal models led to suggest that the combination of different
cannabinoids, such as SativexВ® may be an interesting tool for developing novel therapies in HD although
to date there have been no results.
5.3. Cannabinoids in Alzheimer’s Disease
AD is the most frequently form of dementia, with an incidence of about 34 million people
worldwide [113]. AD is characterized by lesions in CNS due to the formation of beta-amyloid (AОІ)
plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and cortical atrophy [114,115].
It has been demonstrated that in microglia of AD patients, CB1 and CB2 receptor expression is
significantly increased, while in basal ganglia and hippocampus neuronal CB1 receptor expression is
decreased [116]. Therefore, endocannabinoid system might play an important role in AD pathogenesis.
To date, the majority of drugs in use for AD treatment are acetylcholine esterase (AChE) inhibitors.
According to Eubanks and colleagues [117], О”9-THC competitively inhibits enzyme AChE and prevents
AОІ peptide aggregation in the brains of Alzheimer patients.
In rat pheocromocytoma PC12 cells and in vivo models, it was shown that CBD also inhibits
ОІ-amyloid plaques formation, reducing ROS production and lipid peroxidation [118].
Molecules 2014, 19
Also, using mice inoculated with human Aβ (1–42) peptide into the right dorsal hippocampus,
Esposito et al. [119] have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions of CBD. Indeed, CBD
is able to attenuate a ОІ-amyloid plaques formation modulating iNOS expression and also decreasing
p38MAP kinase and NF-ОєB levels. Thus, limiting propagation of neuro-inflammation and oxidative stress.
In addition, Martin-Moreno and colleagues [120] have showed that in AОІ-mice, CBD and synthetic
cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 are able to modulate microglial cell function and cytokine expression,
improving learning behavior.
Also, CBD appears able to exert a beneficial effect in the amyloidogenic pathway, through a specific
molecular mechanism involving peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-Оі (PPARОі) [121]. Scuderi
et al. [121] investigated CBD as a possible modulating compound of amyloid precursor protein (APP)
in transfected human neuroblastoma SHSY5YAPP+ cells. Achieved results indicated the CBD capacity
to induce the ubiquitination of APP protein, which led to a substantial decrease in APP full length protein
levels in SHSY5YAPP+ with the consequent decrease in AОІ production. As consequence, CBD has
promoted an increased survival of SHSY5YAPP+ cells reducing their apoptotic rate and increasing their
survival in long-term period of cell culture. All CBD effects showed were dependent on the selective
activation of PPARОі [121].
In a recent paper, Aso and co-workers [122] tested the therapeutic properties of combination of
О” -THC + CBD (0.75 mg/kg each) in a AОІPP/PS1 transgenic mice, an experimental model of AD, which
replicates the most relevant features of disease, including cognitive impairment and several pathological
alterations, such as AОІ deposition, dystrophic neurites, synaptic failure, mitochondrial dysfunction, and
oxidative stress damage. Authors demonstrated that mixture of the two compounds preserved memory
and reduced learning impairment in AОІPP/PS1 transgenic mice when chronically administered during
the early symptomatic stage [122].
A significant decrease in soluble AОІ (1-42) peptide levels and a change in plaques composition were
also observed in О”9-THC + CBD-treated AОІPP/PS1 transgenic mice, due to a reduced microgliosis and
expression of several cytokines and related molecules of neuro-inflammation [122]. In this study authors
suggest that combination of О”9-THC + CBD exhibits a better beneficial effect than each Cannabis
component alone and support the consideration of a Cannabis-based medicine as potential therapy in
AD [122].
Currently, there are only limited data displaying clinical effects of phytocannabinoids on human AD.
A single, open-label, non-placebo controlled study [123] performed with AD patients reported that
Dronabinol derived from О”9-THC has a beneficial role in reducing anorexia and improving behavior,
like nocturnal motor activity and agitation.
Despite these encouraging results, the usefulness of cannabinoid based medicines for the treatment
of AD awaits the results of severe clinical trials. Also, to date there are no significant data reported in
the literature on the use of phytocannabinoids in the treatment of vascular dementia.
5.4. Cannabinoids in Multiple Sclerosis
MS is an autoimmune inflammatory neurodegenerative disease characterized by nerves demyelination in
CNS [124]. However its etiology is still unknown. Therefore, in order to better understand the
etiopathogenesis of MS and to find new therapeutic strategies, researchers use some experimental
Molecules 2014, 19
models. The most used is the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which mimics the
main features of human MS.
Numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the role of cannabinoids on treatment of
EAE-associated spasticity as well as on modulation of the neurodegenerative process.
According to a study performed using CB1-knockout mice, it was demonstrated that the mechanism
of improvement spasticity was dependent on CB1 receptors, not CB2 [125]. Also, О”9-THC was reported
to delay or prevent signs of spasticity in EAE mice, as well as increasing survival rates and reducing
neuro-inflammation via a CB1-dependent mechanism [126].
Using synthetic cannabinoid agonists of CB1 and CB2 receptors, such as dexanabinol (HU210,
(–)-1,1-dimethylheptyl analog of 11-hydroxy-Δ8-THC) and WIN 55,212-2 in EAE mice, it was
demonstrated that they promote oligodendrocytes survival via CB1 and CB2 receptor-mediated effects,
potentially reducing demyelination and apoptosis [127,128]. Also, these cannabinoids were able to
reduce inflammation, probably by suppression of TNF-О± and IL-1ОІ and enhances the release of
anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 in brain and peripheral blood [129]. Same results were
confirmed by Arevalo-Martin et al. [130], using Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced
demielinating disease (TMEV-IDD) model of chronic-progressive MS. Indeed, it was demonstrated that
systemic treatment with synthetic cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 in TMEV-IDD
mice can limit axonal loss and neuro-inflammation in animal models of MS, by modulating microglia
and lymphocytre infiltration in spinal cord [130].
Also, it was demonstrated that CB52, a newly developed cannabinoid compound (AEA and О”9-THC
hybrid), is more effective than other commonly used cannabinoids and its protection on oligodendrocytes
is mediated by the activation of the CB2 receptor [131].
Using EAE mice, Ribeiro et al. [131], proved that CB52 reduced microglia activation, nitrotyrosine
formation, T cell infiltration, production of TNF-О±, oligodendrocyte toxicity, myelin loss and axonal
damage in the mouse spinal cord white matter and alleviates the clinical scores when given either before
or after disease onset.
Moreover, significant alterations of the endocannabinoid system have been found in the brain of EAE
and Chronic Relapsing Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis (CREAE) mice. Particularly, increased
levels of AEA and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG), were detected in areas associated with nerve damage
in CREAE [4] and in EAE [132], when compared to non-spastic mice.
Also, reduced CB1 expression was showed during acute phases of CREAE [133] and CB2
transcription may be increased in EAE [33]. Administration of SR141716A and SR144528, CB1 and
CB2 antagonists, has been shown to worsen tremor and spasticity in CREAE mice, whilst WIN 55,212-2,
methanandamide and JWH-133 CB2 agonists reduced both tremor and spasticity in diseased mice [134,135].
In addition, spasticity could also be ameliorated by the inhibition of AEA reuptake and enzymatic
hydrolysis, causing a subsequent increase in AEA concentration in the CNS [4].
As well-known endocannabinoids are to be released in response to a wide range of neuronal insults [136],
and levels are increased in the CSF and peripheral lymphocytes of patients with MS [137]. Centonze
et al. [137] indeed reported a relevant increase in AEA, but not 2-AG levels, in the CSF of
relapsing-remitting MS patients experiencing current relapse with a strong correlation between AEA
levels and the number of inflammatory lesions visible on imaging. AEA concentrations were also higher
in peripheral lymphocytes of these patients; an effect associated with increased synthesis and reduced
Molecules 2014, 19
degradation of this endocannabinoid [137]. Another study also showed elevated AEA levels in MS
patients when compared with healthy controls, across the clinical spectrum, this time in the plasma, again
suggesting that the peripheral endocannabiboid system ma reflect those occurring centrally [138].
Benefits from cannabinoids use seen in animal studies have also been shown in the treatment of MS
patients suffering spasticity, with a significant associated disability and quality of life impairment. It is
clear that spasticity results from alterations in the balance, possibly secondary to selective neuronal loss,
between excitatory and inhibitory neural circuits. Under physiological conditions, inhibitory signals are
sent via the corticospinal tract to the spinal cord, but following injury, damage to the corticospinal tract,
causes disinhibition of the stretch reflex, leading to reduction in the triggering threshold. This leads to
loss of control of neurotransmission between muscles and CNS, resulting in uncontrolled spastic
movement [139].
Current therapies for spasticity include GABA receptor agonist, baclofen, tizanidine, benzodiazepine
and anxioltyics [140]. Also, local administration of botulinum toxin have also shown efficacy in clinical
trials [140]. The use of phytocannabinoids may be useful in MS patients, which show resistance to these
conventional therapies, as shown in clinical studies reported in literature.
The Cannabinoids in MS (CAMS) study [141], a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial,
was the first large-scale study designed to test the hypothesis that cannabinoids may have a beneficial
effect on spasticity associated with MS. This study involved 630 MS patients treated with dronabinol (a
synthetic О”9-THC), cannador (2.5 mg of О”9-THC, 1.25 mg of CBD, and 5% of elements other than
cannabinoids per capsule) and placebo. It did not show any significant improvement in spasticity at 15
weeks [141], but this was evinced with both Cannabis compounds after one year of treatment [142].
Also, MS patients perceived a significant improvement in pain and sleep disorders [142]. Other studies
performed with smaller numbers of patients and crossover studies [14] have confirmed the same results
previously obtained.
Following CAMS study, comes the Cannabinoids Use in Progressive Inflammatory brain Disease
(CUPID) study [143], another double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (duration of three
years) in United Kingdom involving 493 patients with progressive MS. The full results from this study
are pending, but initial data shows that dronabinol has no overall effect on MS progression, measured
with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scale.
Analysis of a subgroup of patients in this study suggested a possible benefit from dronabinol in those
who began the trial with milder disability, but not in those who began the trial with more severe
disability [143].
A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 15 relapsing-remitting MS
patients with MS-induced neurophatic pain was conducted to evaluate Nabilone combined with
gabapentin. Results suggest that Nabilone as an adjunctive to gabapentin is an effective, well-tolerated
combination for MS-induced neurophatic pain and thus can be used as a novel therapeutic combination
in MS treatment [144].
In addition, use of SativexВ® has been extensively investigated in the management of patients with
MS [14,15]. Currently, this spray preparation is used as treatment to alleviate symptoms of spasticity
and neurophatic pain in adult MS patients that did not show an appropriate response to other drugs during
an initial trial period of therapy. It has also been reported that SativexВ® shows efficacy in the treatment
of bladder dysfunction, frequent in MS patients, showing a decrease of incontinence episodes and an
Molecules 2014, 19
increase in bladder retention volume. According to another study [145], MS patients treated with
Cannabis extract; О”9-THC, showed an important reduction in events of urge incontinence compared to
placebo. Thus, suggesting that phytocannabinoids might compensate for the bladder neural circuitry
disregulation that often accompanies disease progression in MS.
Spasticity, neuropathic pain and uncontrollable bladder and bowel are symptoms observed also in
patients affected by spinal cord injury (SCI).
Therefore, use of cannabinoids and mixture of extracts could be useful in treatment of this pathology.
Unfortunately, in the literature there are only a few studies that do not report interesting data.
5.5. Cannabinoids in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
ALS is the most prevalent form of motoneuron disease, characterized by degeneration and death of
motor neuron populations in the cerebral cortex, brainstem and spinal cord [146]. Several mechanisms
have been involved in ALS pathogenesis, such as neuro-inflammation, mostly mediated by
excitotoxicity and oxidative damage on motor neurons [147,148].
There is rapidly emerging evidence that the cannabinoid receptor system has the potential to reduce
both excitotoxic and oxidative cell damage.
Numerous studies reported in literature, have been conducted using ALS hSOD(G93A) transgenic
mice, the strain predominantly used. Indeed, the disease in these animals closely mimics human ALS.
It was shown that mice treated with О”9-THC exhibited an improvement of motor impairment by
administration of the molecule, either before or after signs onset, a prolonged survival by 5% [149].
According to Bilsland et al. [150], a significant delay was found in disease progression when CB1/CB2
receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 was administered to ALS hSOD(G93A) mice beginning after onset of
motor impairment and tremor (at 90 days old), however, survival was not extended.
Furthermore, using the same experimental model of ALS, it was demonstrated that CB1 deletion, had
no effects on disease onset, but extend lifespan by 15 days, a 13% increase in survival [150].
Also, it is important determining CB2 receptor role, since microglia from ALS hSOD(G93A) mice
seems to possess increased cytotoxic potential [151]. Indeed, CB2 activation blocks ОІ-amyloid induced
microglia activation [152]. On the contrary, with other stimuli, CB2 activation showed increasing
microglial migration and proliferation.
Using selective CB2 agonist, AM1241, it was reported that ALS hSOD(G93A) mice showed slowing
of disease progression if administered after disease onset [153]. Administration at the onset of tremors
delayed motor impairment in treated mice when compared with vehicle controls. Also, in these mice an
increase of 56% in survival interval was shown [153].
In a recent study, Moreno-Martet et al. [154] evaluated neuroprotective effects of SativexВ® in
SOD(G93A) transgenic mice. SativexВ® has proven to be effective in delaying ALS progression in the
early stages of disease and in animal survival, although the efficacy was decreased during progression
of disease. Also, it has been demonstrated that changes occur in endocannabinoid signaling, particularly
a marked up-regulation of CB2 receptors in SOD(G93A) transgenic mice. Thus, SativexВ® may be used
as an adjunctive therapy with only one medicine already approved, RilutekВ®, which shows modest
efficacy on disease progression.
Molecules 2014, 19
To date, there have been few studies on human ALS. According to Yiangou et al. [155], in human
ALS patients, spinal cord demonstrates motor neurons damages marked by CB2-positive
microglia/macrophages. Moreover, a recent study analyzing activated microglia from spinal cord in
human ALS patients demonstrated a CB2 increase. So all these data show how editing CB2-mediated
processes could change ALS progression and how much the endocannabinoid system is potentially
involved in reducing neuro-inflammation, excitotoxic, and oxidative cell damage [156].
Finally, in literature it has been reported in a single case study of patients with ALS, the 10% who
admitted consuming Cannabis, have reported moderate relief of several symptoms, including appetite
loss, depression, spasticity and drooling [157].
5.6. Cannabinoids in Cerebral Ischemia and Hypoxia
Ischemia is the result of a transient or permanent reduction in cerebral blood flow caused by occlusion
of a cerebral artery via an embolus or local thrombosis, sufficient to alter cerebral functions. This causes
a complex sequence of events, including mechanisms of excitotoxicity, release of neurotransmitters,
breakdown of blood-brain barrier, inflammation, cytokines production, adhesion molecules upregulation,
oxidative and nitrosative stress and programmed neuronal cell death [158–160].
Recently, cannabinoids have emerged as promising neuroprotective agents in several experimental
model of brain damage. It seems that the endocannabinoid signaling system has various features for
which appears to be involved in ischemic damage. Among these, endocannabinoids and related lipids
accumulate in ischemic tissues and play a role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and responsiveness
of the brain to stress [161].
It was demonstrated that CBD can invert brain damage following cerebral ischemia in mice,
decreasing brain edema and seizures associated with temporary occlusion of carotid arteries [162]. CBD
was able to reduce cerebral hemodynamic impairment and ameliorate brain metabolic activity
post-injury [162]. Also, it seems that CBD exerts a neuroprotective effect toward brain ischemia, causing
an increase in cerebral blood flow mediated by 5-HT1A receptor and/or be secondary to its cannabinoid
receptor-independent anti-inflammatory activity [163].
To date, few studies were carried out in patients with cerebral ischemia, because the limiting factor
seems to be that only some compounds results are useful, and only if taken shortly before or within a
few hours after cerebral damage. Clinical trials using dexabinol a synthetic О”9-THC, showed no efficacy
in cerebral ischemia treatment [164].
Similarly, the same mechanisms involved in cerebral ischemia, were found in hypoxic-ischemic brain
injury events. Frequently, this devastating condition is one of the most important causes of neonatal
brain injury and also results in adverse developmental outcomes [165].
To date, there are few reports on the possible neuroprotective effect of cannabinoids in newborns and
existing publications consider their beneficial effects against excitotoxicity. CBD demonstrated
neuroprotective effects in the brain of newborn Wistar rats following hypoxia-ischemia, associated with
the modulation of excitotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation [166]. Indeed, CBD modulates
glutamate and cytokines release, as well as the induction of iNOS and type 2 cyclooxygenase (COX2) [167].
Also, using a hypoxic-ischemic brain injury model in newborn pigs, Pazos et al. [168] confirmed that
CBD modulates these mechanisms acting on CB2 and 5HT1A receptors.
Molecules 2014, 19
Moreover, CBD activity was tested in newborn piglets, subjected to temporary occlusion of both
carotid arteries plus hypoxia [162]. CBD administration reduced short-term brain damage, in a manner
that can be attributed to a CBD-induced reduction of cerebral hemodynamic impairment, improvement
of brain metabolic activity post-insult, reduction of brain edema, and reduction of seizures. These
neuroprotective effects were not only free from side effects but also associated with some cardiac,
hemodynamic, and ventilatory benefits [162].
Therefore, CBD may be considered an important candidate for future clinical trials with
hypoxic newborns.
6. Other Therapeutic Applications of Cannabinoids
The use of Cannabis has been shown in the treatment of many diseases through time. Among these,
treatment of epilepsy seems to be one of the most ancient.
Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease that affects 50 million people worldwide, characterized by
recurrent seizures and often accompanied by cognitive deficits and mood disorders [169]. The targeting
of neuronal ion channels and both GABA and glutamate receptors has been the primary approach to
eliminate convulsions. Despite the availability of a wide range of antiepileptic drugs, about one-third of
individuals with epilepsy still experience seizures that do not to respond to medications [170].
The biological reason to believe that cannabinoids could suppress epileptic seizures is the abundance of
CB1 receptors in some areas of the brain (hippocampus and amygdala) where partial seizures originate [171].
Various cannabinoids have been show in several clinical studies to have significant anticonvulsive
properties, especially CBD and more recently CBDV and Δ9-THCV [172–174].
The antiepileptic mechanisms of CBD are not well known, since CBD has low affinity for CB1 and
CB2 receptors [23], it seems that CBD may exert its effects through different mechanisms, including
effects on the equilibrative nucleoside transporter, GPR55, TPRV-1, 5-HT1A, and the О±3 and О±1 glycine
receptors. Also, antiepileptic mechanism of action of CBD might involve a reduction of Ca2+, via
interaction with the mitochondrial Na2+/Ca2+ exchanger [175].
Likewise CBDV and, to a far smaller extent, О”9-THCV produces anticonvulsant effects in animal
models of epilepsy. Scutt and Williamson [176] reported that CBDV acts via CB2 cannabinoid
receptor-dependent mechanisms but direct CB2 receptor effects were not shown. Recently, it was also
demonstrated by other studies that CBDV acts via non-CB1/CB2 mechanisms. These compounds in fact
interact with TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPA1, and TRPM8 channels, but their molecular pharmacology and
mechanisms of action are less well known [177].
Additionally, CBDV has been shown to inhibit the primary synthetic enzyme of the endocannabinoid,
2-arachidonoylglycerol, diacylglycerol lipase О± in vitro [178]. While the pharmacological significance
of these effects remains unconfirmed in vivo and the targets identified have not yet been linked to
epilepsy, they support the emergent role of multiple non-CB receptor targets [179].
Moreover, О”9-THCV has demonstrated interesting potential use in treatment of convulsions.
О”9-THCV increases, in a GABA antagonist sensitive manner, inhibitory neurotransmission in mouse
cerebellum and also exhibits anticonvulsant activity in a rat piriform cortical (PC) model of epilepsy [180].
Possible mechanisms underlying cannabinoid actions in the CNS include CB1 receptor antagonism or
inverse agonism at constitutively active CB1 receptors [180].
Molecules 2014, 19
Also, Hill et al. [173] have shown that О”9-THCV reduced Purkinje cell firing via an increase in
inhibitory neurotransmission at interneuron-Purkinje cell synapses in mouse acute parasagittal cerebellar
brain slices, most likely by reducing CB1 receptor-mediated, endocannabinoid-induced inhibition of
GABA release. Interestingly, О”9-THCV was shown to modulate GABA release onto Purkinje cells at a
network level, as it did not affect Purkinje cell spike firing following GABA-receptor blockade [181].
It is well know that CBD has therapeutic potential over a wide range of non-psychiatric and
psychiatric diseases, such as anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, psychosis and sleep disorders.
Although pharmacological effects of CBD in several biological systems have been widely
investigated, mechanisms responsible for its therapeutic potential are still not clear. From studies on
different animal models, it seems that CBD exerts anxiolytic-like effects by activating post-synaptic
5-HT1A receptors in key brain areas related to defensive responses, including the dorsal periaqueductal
grey, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial prefrontal cortex [59,182].
Other effects, such as anti-compulsive, blockade of the anxiogenic consequences of chronic
unpredictable stress, increased extinction and impaired reconsolidation of aversive memories, and
facilitation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis may depend on potentiation of anandamide-mediated
neurotransmission. Activation of TRPV1 channels may be invoked to explain the antipsychotic effect
and the bell-shaped dose-response curves commonly observed with CBD [59].
In addition to these mechanisms, CBD can interfere in different other important biological processes
(inhibition of adenosine uptake, inverse agonism at CB2, CB1 antagonism, GPR55 antagonist, intracellular
Ca2+ increase). Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate their possible involvement on CBD
behavioral effects.
Russo et al. [183], reviewed the effects of Cannabis, and highlighted the benefits that can accrue in
this regard, particularly with respect to symptom reduction permitting better sleep, as opposed to a mere
hypnotic effect. In several clinical studies, it has been found that low doses of Cannabis improve mood,
in particular, О”9-THC increase serotonin levels in the brain, interacting with CB1 receptors.
Therefore, non-psychotropic compounds require further studies to propose these as a potentially
useful drug in the treatment of a variety of intractable conditions, at least in association with current
conventional therapy.
Finally, cannabinoids have been shown to be potent analgesics in animal models of hyperlgesia and
thus might be useful in the treatment of inflammatory pain as well as neuropathic pain [184].
Neuropathic pain is a debilitating form of chronic pain resulting from peripheral nerve injury, toxic
insults, and disease states, such as diabetes, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, MS, and herpes
zoster infection [185–187]. Neuropathic pain remains a significant clinical problem because it responds
poorly to available therapies, needing validation of novel analgesic drugs. More recently, CBD was
shown to be effective in well-established experimental models of neuropathic pain. It is believed that
the analgesic effect of CBD is mediated, at least in part, by TRPV1 [188]. There is also evidence to
suggest that cannabinoids can induce antinociception via supraspinal mechanisms and peripheral CB2
receptors [189]. Also, the analgesic effects may be mediated in part at the level of spinal cord via CB1
receptors activation [190].
Table 1 summarizes cannabinoid therapeutic targets for each disorder considered.
Molecules 2014, 19
Table 1. Therapeutic targets for cannabinoid medicines.
WIN 55,212-2
HU210 and WIN55,212-2
Lastres-Becker et al. [81]
Lastres-Becker et al. [81]
Maneuf et al. [80]
Hyperkinesia and choreic
Hyperkinesia and choreic
Behavior disorders and motor
Garcia et al. [84]
WIN 55,212-2
Cognitive impairment
Memory and learning
Nocturnal motor activity,
agitation and anorexia
Chiarlone et al. [102]
Valdeolivas et al. [104]
Sagredo et al. [106]
Scotter et al. [108]
Eubanks et al. [117]
Esposito et al. [119];
Martin-Moreno et al. [120]
Martin-Moreno et al [120]
Aso et al. [122]
Walther et al. [123]
HU210 and WIN
Tremor and spasticity
Tremor and spasticity
Motor impairment
Lyman et al. [126]
Molina-Holgado et al. [127];
Cabral et al. [128];
Arevalo-Martin et al. [130]
Baker et al. [134];
Buccellato et al. [135]
Ribeiro et al. [131]
Neuropathic pain
Turcotte et al. [144]
Spasticity, neuropathic pain
and bladder dysfunction
Motor impairment and
Tremor and motor
Tremor and motor
Vaney et al. [14]; Wilkinson et al.
[15]; Freeman et al. [145]
WIN 55,212-2
Dystonia and discinesia
Learning behavior
and Hypoxia
Therapeutic Targets
Motor impairment
Reduction of brain edema,
cerebral hemodynamic
impairment and seizures
Raman et al. [149]
Bilsland et al. [150]
Kim et al. [153]
Moreno-Martet et al. [154]
Alvarez et al. [162];
Pazos et al. [166,168]
Jones et al. [172]
Scutt et al. [176];
de Petrocellis et al. [177]
Dennis et al. [180]; Ma et al. [181]
Molecules 2014, 19
7. Conclusions
In this review, we showed how the Cannabis plant, an ancient industrial crop, is drawing increasing
attention as a pharmaceutical plant, and is today considered a true “bioreactor” source of botanical raw
material from which high amounts of potentially valuable cannabinoids can be extracted. In the future,
these molecules will be increasingly used in clinical trials necessary to assess the potential of each
phytocannabinoid for the treatment of several diseases, among which CNS disorders.
Whereas, current treatments for CNS diseases are partially effective and have risks of side effects that
are not easily tolerated by patients, the development of new synthetic cannabinoids or cannabinoid-derived
drugs may represent an alternative strategy to pursue.
The observations from experimental models of neurological diseases, and now increasingly from
clinical trials, underline the therapeutic usefulness of cannabinoids-based medicines for treatment of
symptoms associated to these. In addition, there is growing evidence from experimental studies that О”9-THC
and other cannabinoids, notably CBD, have neuroprotective effects as a result of their antioxidant,
anti-inflammatory and anticytotoxic properties which may prove disease modifying in CNS disorders.
Despite emerging evidence regarding putative therapeutic activities of cannabinoids, their effective
introduction in the clinical use is still controversial and strongly limited by unavoidable psychotropic
effects, exhibited by many of them.
The possibility of overcoming these side effects and developing novel approaches represents the main
open question about the use of cannabinoids as new therapeutic drugs for the treatment of
neurological disorders.
The authors would like to thank the Giuseppe Galletta and Massimo Messina belonging
to the secretary office of IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”-Messina, for their excellent
technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Sabrina Giacoppo performed bibliographic research and drafted and reviewed the manuscript.
Giuseppe Mandolino contributed to the manuscript drafting. Galuppo Maria performed bibliographic
research and supported manuscript correction. Emanuela Mazzon and Placido Bramanti designed the
paper and supervised manuscript drafting.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sakamoto, K.; Akiyama, Y.; Fukui, K.; Kamada, H.; Satoh, S. Characterization, genome sizes and
morphology of sex chromosomes in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Cytologia 1998, 63, 459–464.
Molecules 2014, 19
Mandolino, G. Marker assisted selection and genomics of industrial plants. In Improvement of
Crop Plants for Industrial End Uses; Ranalli, P., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007;
pp. 59–82.
Forapani, S.; Carboni, A.; Paoletti, C.; Moliterni, V.M.C.; Ranalli, P.; Mandolino, G. Comparison
of Hemp Varieties Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Markers. Crop. Sci. 2001, 41,
Baker, D.; Pryce, G.; Croxford, J.L.; Brown, P.; Pertwee, R.G.; Makriyannis, A.; Khanolkar, A.;
Layward, L.; Fezza, F.; Bisogno, T.; et al. Endocannabinoids control spasticity in a multiple
sclerosis model. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 300–302.
Russo, E.B.; Jiang, H.E.; Li, X.; Sutton, A.; Carboni, A.; del Bianco, F.; Mandolino, G.; Potter, D.J.;
Zhao, Y.X.; Bera, S.; et al. Phytochemical and genetic analyses of ancient cannabis from Central
Asia. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 4171–4182.
Russo, E.B. History of cannabis and its preparations in saga, science, and sobriquet. Chem. Biodivers.
2007, 4, 1614–1648.
Russo, E.; Guy, G.W. A tale of two cannabinoids: The therapeutic rationale for combining
tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Med. Hypotheses 2006, 66, 234–246.
Mechoulam, R.; Gaoni, Y.A. Total Synthesis of Dl-Оґ-1-Tetrahydrocannabinol, the Active
Constituent of Hashish. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3273–3275.
Jackson, S.J.; Diemel, L.T.; Pryce, G.; Baker, D. Cannabinoids and neuroprotection in CNS
inflammatory disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2005, 233, 21–25.
Orgado, J.M.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Romero, J. The endocannabinoid system in neuropathological
states. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2009, 21, 172–180.
Slatkin, N.E. Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting:
beyond prevention of acute emesis. J. Support. Oncol. 2007, 5, 1–19.
Lutge, E.E.; Gray, A.; Siegfried, N. The medical use of cannabis for reducing morbidity and
mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 4. Available online: (accessed on
10 November 2014)
Sutton, I.R.; Daeninck, P. Cannabinoids in the management of intractable chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and cancer-related pain. J. Support Oncol. 2006, 4, 531–535.
Vaney, C.; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, M.; Jobin, P.; Tschopp, F.; Gattlen, B.; Hagen, U.; Schnelle, M.;
Reif, M. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of an orally administered cannabis extract in the treatment
of spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
crossover study. Mult. Scler. 2004, 10, 417–424.
Wilkinson, J.D.; Whalley, B.J.; Baker, D.; Pryce, G.; Constanti, A.; Gibbons, S.; Williamson, E.M.
Medicinal cannabis: Is О”9-tetrahydrocannabinol necessary for all its effects? J. Pharm. Pharmacol.
2003, 55, 1687–1694.
Brenneisen, R. Chemistry and analysis of phytocannabinoids and other Cannabis constituents.In
Marijuana and the Cannabinoids; ElSohly, M.A., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2007;
pp. 17–49.
Molecules 2014, 19
Happyana, N.; Agnolet, S.; Muntendam, R.; van Dam, A.; Schneider, B.; Kayser, O. Analysis of
cannabinoids in laser-microdissected trichomes of medicinal Cannabis sativa using LCMS and
cryogenic NMR. Phytochemistry 2013, 87, 51–59.
De Zeeuw, R.A.; Wijsbeek, J.; Breimer, D.D.; Vree, T.B.; van Ginneken, C.A.; van Rossum, J.M.
Cannabinoids with a propyl side chain in cannabis: Occurrence and chromatographic behavior.
Science 1972, 175, 778–779.
De Meijer, E.P.; Bagatta, M.; Carboni, A.; Crucitti, P.; Moliterni, V.M.; Ranalli, P.; Mandolino, G.
The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics 2003, 163, 335–346.
Mandolino, G.; Carboni, A. Potential of marker assisted selection in hemp genetic improvement.
Euphytica 2004, 140, 107–120.
Mahlberg, P.G.; Kim, E.S. Accumulation of cannabinoids in glandular trichomes of Cannabis
(Cannabaceae). J. Ind. Hemp. 2004, 9, 15–36.
Basile, A. Understanding the Regulating Mechanisms behind Cannabinoid Biosynthesis. Ph.D.
Thesis, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy, May 2014.
Pertwee, R.G. The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids:
Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br. J. Pharmacol.
2008, 153, 199–215.
Morimoto, S.; Komatsu, K.; Taura, F.; Shoyama, Y. Purification and characterization of
cannabichromenic acid synthase from Cannabis sativa. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1525–1529.
Shoyama, Y.; Tamada, T.; Kurihara, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Taura, F.; Arai, S.; Blaber, M.; Shoyama, Y.;
Morimoto, S.; Kuroki, R. Structure and function of 1-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA)
synthase, the enzyme controlling the psychoactivity of Cannabis sativa. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 423,
Shire, D.; Carillon, C.; Kaghad, M.; Calandra, B.; Rinaldi-Carmona, M.; le Fur, G.; Caput, D.;
Ferrara, P. An amino-terminal variant of the central cannabinoid receptor resulting from alternative
splicing. J. Biol. Chem.1995, 270, 3726–3731.
Ryberg, E.; Vu, H.K.; Larsson, N.; Groblewski, T.; Hjorth, S.; Elebring, T.; Sjogren, S.; Greasley, P.J.
Identification and characterisation of a novel splice variant of the human CB1 receptor. FEBS Lett.
2005, 579, 259–264.
Matsuda, L.A.; Lolait, S.J.; Brownstein, M.J.; Young, A.C.; Bonner, T.I. Structure of a cannabinoid
receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature 1990, 346, 561–564.
Biegon, A.; Kerman, I.A. Autoradiographic study of pre- and postnatal distribution of cannabinoid
receptors in human brain. NeuroImage 2001, 14, 1463–1468.
Glass, M.; Dragunow, M.; Faull, R.L. Cannabinoid receptors in the human brain: A detailed
anatomical and quantitative autoradiographic study in the fetal, neonatal and adult human brain.
Neuroscience 1997, 77, 299–318.
Munro, S.; Thomas, K.L.; Abu-Shaar, M. Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for
cannabinoids. Nature 1993, 365, 61–65.
Van Sickle, M.D.; Duncan, M.; Kingsley, P.J.; Mouihate, A.; Urbani, P.; Mackie, K.; Stella, N.;
Makriyannis, A.; Piomelli, D.; Davison, J.S.; et al. Identification and functional characterization
of brainstem cannabinoid CB2 receptors. Science 2005, 310, 329–332.
Molecules 2014, 19
Maresz, K.; Carrier, E.J.; Ponomarev, E.D.; Hillard, C.J.; Dittel, B.N. Modulation of the
cannabinoid CB2 receptor in microglial cells in response to inflammatory stimuli. J. Neurochem. 2005,
95, 437–445.
Ashton, J.C.; Rahman, R.M.; Nair, S.M.; Sutherland, B.A.; Glass, M.; Appleton, I. Cerebral
hypoxia-ischemia and middle cerebral artery occlusion induce expression of the cannabinoid CB2
receptor in the brain. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 412, 114–117.
Pertwee, R.G.; Ross, R.A. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent.
Fatty Acids 2002, 66, 101–121.
Maccarrone, M.; Finazzi-Agro, A. Endocannabinoids and their actions. Vitam. Horm. 2002, 65,
Mackie, K.; Devane, W.A.; Hille, B. Anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid, inhibits calcium
currents as a partial agonist in N18 neuroblastoma cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993, 44, 498–503.
Buckley, N.E. The peripheral cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: An update. Br. J. Pharmacol.
2008, 153, 309–318.
Valverde, O.; Karsak, M.; Zimmer, A. Analysis of the endocannabinoid system by using CB1
cannabinoid receptor knockout mice. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2005, 117–145.
Chuang, H.H.; Prescott, E.D.; Kong, H.; Shields, S.; Jordt, S.E.; Basbaum, A.I.; Chao, M.V.;
Julius, D. Bradykinin and nerve growth factor release the capsaicin receptor from
PtdIns(4,5)P2-mediated inhibition. Nature 2001, 411, 957–962.
Caterina, M.J.; Leffler, A.; Malmberg, A.B.; Martin, W.J.; Trafton, J.; Petersen-Zeitz, K.R.;
Koltzenburg, M.; Basbaum, A.I.; Julius, D. Impaired nociception and pain sensation in mice
lacking the capsaicin receptor. Science 2000, 288, 306–313.
Cristino, L.; de Petrocellis, L.; Pryce, G.; Baker, D.; Guglielmotti, V.; di Marzo, V.
Immunohistochemical localization of cannabinoid type 1 and vanilloid transient receptor potential
vanilloid type 1 receptors in the mouse brain. Neuroscience 2006, 139, 1405–1415.
Mezey, E.; Toth, Z.E.; Cortright, D.N.; Arzubi, M.K.; Krause, J.E.; Elde, R.; Guo, A.; Blumberg, P.M.;
Szallasi, A. Distribution of mRNA for vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (VR1), and VR1-like
immunoreactivity, in the central nervous system of the rat and human. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2000, 97, 3655–3660.
Brown, A.J. Novel cannabinoid receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 152, 567–575.
Pertwee, R.G.; Howlett, A.C.; Abood, M.E.; Alexander, S.P.; di Marzo, V.; Elphick, M.R.;
Greasley, P.J.; Hansen, H.S.; Kunos, G.; Mackie, K.; et al. International Union of Basic and
Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIX. Cannabinoid receptors and their ligands: Beyond CB(1) and
CB(2). Pharmacol. Rev. 2010, 62, 588–631.
Ryberg, E.; Larsson, N.; Sjogren, S.; Hjorth, S.; Hermansson, N.O.; Leonova, J.; Elebring, T.;
Nilsson, K.; Drmota, T.;Greasley, P.J. The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 152, 1092–1101.
Baker, D.; Pryce, G.; Davies, W.L.; Hiley, C.R. In silico patent searching reveals a new
cannabinoid receptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27, 1–4.
Henstridge, C.M.; Balenga, N.A.; Schroder, R.; Kargl, J.K.; Platzer, W.; Martini, L.; Arthur, S.;
Penman, J.; Whistler, J.L.; Kostenis, E.; et al. GPR55 ligands promote receptor coupling to
multiple signalling pathways. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 604–614.
Molecules 2014, 19
Oka, S.; Kimura, S.; Toshida, T.; Ota, R.; Yamashita, A.; Sugiura, T. Lysophosphatidylinositol
induces rapid phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and activating transcription
factor 2 in HEK293 cells expressing GPR55 and IM-9 lymphoblastoid cells. J. Biochem. 2010,
147, 671–678.
Buhl, A.M.; Johnson, N.L.; Dhanasekaran, N.; Johnson, G.L. G alpha 12 and G alpha 13 stimulate
Rho-dependent stress fiber formation and focal adhesion assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270,
McHugh, D.; Hu, S.S.; Rimmerman, N.; Juknat, A.; Vogel, Z.; Walker, J.M.; Bradshaw, H.B.
N-arachidonoyl glycine, an abundant endogenous lipid, potently drives directed cellular migration
through GPR18, the putative abnormal cannabidiol receptor. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11,
Gantz, I.; Muraoka, A.; Yang, Y.K.; Samuelson, L.C.; Zimmerman, E.M.; Cook, H.; Yamada, T.
Cloning and chromosomal localization of a gene (GPR18) encoding a novel seven transmembrane
receptor highly expressed in spleen and testis. Genomics 1997, 42, 462–466.
Fredriksson, R.; Hoglund, P.J.; Gloriam, D.E.; Lagerstrom, M.C.; Schioth, H.B. Seven evolutionarily
conserved human rhodopsin G protein-coupled receptors lacking close relatives. FEBS Lett. 2003,
554, 381–388.
Overton, H.A.; Babbs, A.J.; Doel, S.M.; Fyfe, M.C.; Gardner, L.S.; Griffin, G.; Jackson, H.C.;
Procter, M.J.; Rasamison, C.M.; Tang-Christensen, M.; et al. Deorphanization of a G protein-coupled
receptor for oleoylethanolamide and its use in the discovery of small-molecule hypophagic agents.
Cell Metab. 2006, 3, 167–175.
Barnes, N.M.; Sharp, T. A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology
1999, 38, 1083–1152.
Sprouse, J.S.; Aghajanian, G.K. (в€’)-Propranolol blocks the inhibition of serotonergic dorsal raphe
cell firing by 5-HT1A selective agonists. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1986, 128, 295–298.
Araneda, R.; Andrade, R. 5-Hydroxytryptamine2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptors mediate
opposing responses on membrane excitability in rat association cortex. Neuroscience 1991, 40,
Pacher, P.; Batkai, S.; Kunos, G. The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of
pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 389–462.
Campos, A.C.; Moreira, F.A.; Gomes, F.V.; del Bel, E.A.; Guimaraes, F.S. Multiple mechanisms
involved in the large-spectrum therapeutic potential of cannabidiol in psychiatric disorders. Philos.
Trans R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 3364–3378.
Kunos, G.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Batkai, S.; Sharkey, K.A.; Makriyannis, A. Should peripheral CB(1)
cannabinoid receptors be selectively targeted for therapeutic gain? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009,
30, 1–7.
Izzo, A.A.; Borrelli, F.; Capasso, R.; di Marzo, V.; Mechoulam, R. Non-psychotropic plant
cannabinoids: New therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009,
30, 515–527.
Jean-Gilles, L.; Gran, B.; Constantinescu, C.S. Interaction between cytokines, cannabinoids and
the nervous system. Immunobiology 2010, 215, 606–610.
Molecules 2014, 19
Esposito, G.; de Filippis, D.; Maiuri, M.C.; de Stefano, D.; Carnuccio, R.; Iuvone, T. Cannabidiol
inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase protein expression and nitric oxide production in
beta-amyloid stimulated PC12 neurons through p38 MAP kinase and NF-ОєB involvement.
Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 399, 91–95.
Rajesh, M.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Batkai, S.; Hasko, G.; Liaudet, L.; Drel, V.R.; Obrosova, I.G.;
Pacher, P. Cannabidiol attenuates high glucose-induced endothelial cell inflammatory response
and barrier disruption. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2007, 293, H610–H619.
Fagan, S.G.; Campbell, V.A. The influence of cannabinoids on generic traits of neurodegeneration.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 1347–1360.
Alexander, G.E. Biology of Parkinson’s disease: Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of a multisystem
neurodegenerative disorder. Dialog. Clin. Neurosci. 2004, 6, 259–280.
Tabrez, S.; Jabir, N.R.; Shakil, S.; Greig, N.H.; Alam, Q.; Abuzenadah, A.M.; Damanhouri, G.A.;
Kamal, M.A. A synopsis on the role of tyrosine hydroxylase in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Neurol.
Disord. Drug Targets 2012, 11, 395–409.
Adams, J.D., Jr.; Chang, M.L.; Klaidman, L. Parkinson’s disease—Redox mechanisms. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2001, 8, 809–814.
Brotchie, J.M. CB1 cannabinoid receptor signalling in Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Opin.
Pharmacol. 2003, 3, 54–61.
Gubellini, P.; Picconi, B.; Bari, M.; Battista, N.; Calabresi, P.; Centonze, D.; Bernardi, G.;
Finazzi-Agro, A.; Maccarrone, M. Experimental parkinsonism alters endocannabinoid degradation:
Implications for striatal glutamatergic transmission. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 6900–6907.
Pisani, A.; Fezza, F.; Galati, S.; Battista, N.; Napolitano, S.; Finazzi-Agro, A.; Bernardi, G.; Brusa,
L.; Pierantozzi, M.; Stanzione, P.; Maccarrone, M. High endogenous cannabinoid levels in the
cerebrospinal fluid of untreated Parkinson’s disease patients. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 57, 777–779.
Pisani, V.; Moschella, V.; Bari, M.; Fezza, F.; Galati, S.; Bernardi, G.; Stanzione, P.; Pisani, A.;
Maccarrone, M. Dynamic changes of anandamide in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson’s disease
patients. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 920–924.
Hurley, M.J.; Mash, D.C.; Jenner, P. Expression of cannabinoid CB1 receptor mRNA in basal
ganglia of normal and parkinsonian human brain. J. Neural. Transm. 2003, 110, 1279–1288.
Pisani, V.; Madeo, G.; Tassone, A.; Sciamanna, G.; Maccarrone, M.; Stanzione, P.; Pisani, A.
Homeostatic changes of the endocannabinoid system in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2011,
26, 216–222.
Buchanan, R.J.; Darrow, D.P.; Meier, K.T.; Robinson, J.; Schiehser, D.M.; Glahn, D.C.; Nadasdy, Z.
Changes in GABA and glutamate concentrations during memory tasks in patients with Parkinson’s
disease undergoing DBS surgery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00081.
David, H.N. Towards a reconceptualization of striatal interactions between glutamatergic and
dopaminergic neurotransmission and their contribution to the production of movements. Curr.
Neuropharm. 2009, 7, 132–141.
Johnson, K.A.; Conn, P.J.; Niswender, C.M. Glutamate receptors as therapeutic targets for
Parkinson’s disease. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2009, 8, 475–491.
Koutsilieri, E.; Riederer, P. Excitotoxicity and new antiglutamatergic strategies in Parkinson’s
disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2007, 13, S329–S331.
Molecules 2014, 19
Marjama-Lyons, J.; Koller, W. Tremor-predominant Parkinson’s disease. Approaches to
treatment. Drugs Aging 2000, 16, 273–278.
Maneuf, Y.P.; Crossman, A.R.; Brotchie, J.M. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212–2
reduces D2, but not D1, dopamine receptor-mediated alleviation of akinesia in the reserpine-treated
rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol.1997, 148, 265–270.
Lastres-Becker, I.; Molina-Holgado, F.; Ramos, J.A.; Mechoulam, R.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.
Cannabinoids provide neuroprotection against 6-hydroxydopamine toxicity in vivo and in vitro:
Relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 19, 96–107.
Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Moreno-Martet, M.; Rodriguez-Cueto, C.; Palomo-Garo, C.; Gomez-Canas, M.;
Valdeolivas, S.; Guaza, C.; Romero, J.; Guzman, M.; Mechoulam, R.; et al. Prospects for
cannabinoid therapies in basal ganglia disorders. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 1365–1378.
Garcia-Arencibia, M.; Garcia, C.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J. Cannabinoids and Parkinson’s disease. CNS
Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2009, 8, 432–439.
Garcia, C.; Palomo-Garo, C.; Garcia-Arencibia, M.; Ramos, J.; Pertwee, R.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.
Symptom-relieving and neuroprotective effects of the phytocannabinoid О”9-THCV in animal
models of Parkinson’s disease. Br. J. Pharmacol 2011, 163, 1495–1506.
Consroe, P. Brain cannabinoid systems as targets for the therapy of neurological disorders.
Neurobiol Dis. 1998, 5, 534–551.
Muller-Vahl, K.R.; Kolbe, H.; Schneider, U.; Emrich, H.M. Cannabis in movement disorders.
Forsch Komplement. 1999, 6, 23–27.
Brotchie, J.M. Adjuncts to dopamine replacement: A pragmatic approach to reducing the problem
of dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 1998, 13, 871–876.
Meschler, J.P.; ConleyT.J.; Howlett, A.C. Cannabinoid and dopamine interaction in rodent brain:
Effects on locomotor activity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000, 67, 567–573.
Sieradzan, K.A.; Fox, S.H.; Hill, M.; Dick, J.P.; Crossman, A.R.; Brotchie, J.M. Cannabinoids
reduce levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot study. Neurology 2001, 57,
Carroll, C.B.; Bain, P.G.; Teare, L.; Liu, X.; Joint, C.; Wroath, C.; Parkin, S.G.; Fox, P.; Wright, D.;
Hobart, J.; et al. Cannabis for dyskinesia in Parkinson disease: A randomized double-blind
crossover study. Neurology 2004, 63, 1245–1250.
MacDonald, M.E.; Ambrose, C.M.; Duyao, M.P.; Myers, R.H.; Lin, C.; Srinidhi, L.; Barnes, G.;
Taylor, S.A.; James, M.; Groot, N. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded
and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993, 72, 971–983.
Zuccato, C.; Valenza, M.; Cattaneo, E. Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutical targets
in Huntington’s disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 905–981.
Francelle, L.; Galvan, L.; Brouillet, E. Possible involvement of self-defense mechanisms in the
preferential vulnerability of the striatum in Huntington’s disease. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8,
Kumar, P.; Kalonia, H.; Kumar, A. Huntington’s disease: Pathogenesis to animal models.
Pharmacol. Rep. 2010, 62, 1–14.
Molecules 2014, 19
Swerdlow, N.R.; Paulsen, J.; Braff, D.L.; Butters, N.; Geyer, M.A.; Swenson, M.R. Impaired
prepulse inhibition of acoustic and tactile startle response in patients with Huntington’s disease.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1995, 58, 192–200.
Sagredo, O.; Pazos, M.R.; Valdeolivas, S.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J. Cannabinoids: Novel medicines for
the treatment of Huntington’s disease. Recent Pat. CNS Drug. Discov. 2012, 7, 41–48.
Ross, C.A.; Tabrizi, S.J. Huntington’s disease: From molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment.
Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 83–98.
Groves, P.M. A theory of the functional organization of the neostriatum and the neostriatal control
of voluntary movement. Brain Res. 1983, 286, 9–32.
Penney, J.B., Jr.; Young, A.B. Speculations on the functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders.
Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1983, 6, 73–94.
Palazuelos, J.; Aguado, T.; Pazos, M.R.; Julien, B.; Carrasco, C.; Resel, E.; Sagredo, O.; Benito,
C.; Romero, J.; Azcoitia, I.; et al. Microglial CB2 cannabinoid receptors are neuroprotective in
Huntington’s disease excitotoxicity. Brain 2009, 132, 3152–3164.
Sagredo, O.; Gonzalez, S.; Aroyo, I.; Pazos, M.R.; Benito, C.; Lastres-Becker, I.; Romero, J.P.;
Tolon, R.M.; Mechoulam, R.; Brouillet, E.; et al. Cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists protect the
striatum against malonate toxicity: Relevance for Huntington’s disease. Glia 2009, 57, 1154–1167.
Chiarlone, A.; Bellocchio, L.; Blazquez, C.; Resel, E.; Soria-Gomez, E.; Cannich, A.; Ferrero, J.J.;
Sagredo, O.; Benito, C.; Romero, J.; et al. A restricted population of CB1 cannabinoid receptors
with neuroprotective activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8257–8262.
Mangiarini, L.; Sathasivam, K.; Seller, M.; Cozens, B.; Harper, A.; Hetherington, C.; Lawton, M.;
Trottier, Y.; Lehrach, H.; Davies, S.W.; et al. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat
is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell 1996, 87, 493–506.
Valdeolivas, S.; Navarrete, C.; Cantarero, I.; Bellido, M.L.; Munoz, E.; Sagredo, O.
Neuroprotective Properties of Cannabigerol in Huntington’s Disease: Studies in R6/2 Mice and
3-Nitropropionate-lesioned Mice. Neurotherapeutics 2014, 1–14, doi:10.1007/s13311-014-0304-z.
Valdeolivas, S.; Satta, V.; Pertwee, R.G.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Sagredo, O. Sativex-like combination of
phytocannabinoids is neuroprotective in malonate-lesioned rats, an inflammatory model of
Huntington’s disease: Role of CB1 and CB2 receptors. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2012, 3, 400–406.
Sagredo, O.; Pazos, M.R.; Satta, V.; Ramos, J.A.; Pertwee, R.G.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J. Neuroprotective
effects of phytocannabinoid-based medicines in experimental models of Huntington’s disease. J.
Neurosci. Res. 2011, 89, 1509–1518.
Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Romero, J.; Velasco, G.; Tolon, R.M.; Ramos, J.A.; Guzman, M. Cannabinoid
CB2 receptor: A new target for controlling neural cell survival? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28,
Scotter, E.L.; Goodfellow, C.E.; Graham, E.S.; Dragunow, M.; Glass, M. Neuroprotective
potential of CB1 receptor agonists in an in vitro model of Huntington’s disease. Br. J. Pharmacol.
2010, 160, 747–761.
Consroe, P.; Laguna, J.; Allender, J.; Snider, S.; Stern, L.; Sandyk, R.; Kennedy, K.; Schram, K.
Controlled clinical trial of cannabidiol in Huntington’s disease. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1991,
40, 701–708.
Molecules 2014, 19
110. Curtis, A.; Rickards, H. Nabilone could treat chorea and irritability in Huntington’s disease.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2006, 18, 553–554.
111. Muller-Vahl, K.R.; Schneider, U.; Emrich, H.M. Nabilone increases choreatic movements in
Huntington’s disease. Mov. Disord. 1999, 14, 1038–1040.
112. Curtis, A.; Mitchell, I.; Patel, S.; Ives, N.; Rickards, H. A pilot study using nabilone for
symptomatic treatment in Huntington’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2009, 24, 2254–2259.
113. Barnes, D.E.; Yaffe, K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease
prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 819–828.
114. Walsh, D.M.; Selkoe, D.J. A beta oligomers—A decade of discovery. J. Neurochem. 2007, 101,
115. Mi, K.; Johnson, G.V. The role of tau phosphorylation in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2006, 3, 449–463.
116. Benito, C.; Tolon, R.M.; Pazos, M.R.; Nunez, E.; Castillo, A.I.; Romero, J. Cannabinoid CB2
receptors in human brain inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, 277–285.
117. Eubanks, L.M.; Rogers, C.J.; Beuscher, A.E., IV; Koob, G.F.; Olson, A.J.; Dickerson, T.J.; Janda, K.
A molecular link between the active component of marijuana and Alzheimer’s disease pathology.
Mol. Pharm. 2006, 3, 773–777.
118. Iuvone, T.; Esposito, G.; Esposito, R.; Santamaria, R.; di Rosa, M.; Izzo, A.A. Neuroprotective
effect of cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive component from Cannabis sativa, on beta-amyloid-induced
toxicity in PC12 cells. J. Neurochem. 2004, 89, 134–141.
119. Esposito, G.; Scuderi, C.; Savani, C.; Steardo, L., Jr.; de Filippis, D.; Cottone, P.; Iuvone, T.;
Cuomo, V.; Steardo, L. Cannabidiol in vivo blunts beta-amyloid induced neuroinflammation by
suppressing IL-1β and iNOS expression. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 1272–1279.
120. Martin-Moreno, A.M.; Reigada, D.; Ramirez, B.G.; Mechoulam, R.; Innamorato, N.; Cuadrado, A.;
de Ceballos, M.L. Cannabidiol and other cannabinoids reduce microglial activation in vitro and in
vivo: Relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 79, 964–973.
121. Scuderi, C.; Steardo, L.; Esposito, G. Cannabidiol promotes amyloid precursor protein
ubiquitination and reduction of beta amyloid expression in SHSY5YAPP+ cells through
PPARgamma involvement. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1007–1013.
122. Aso, E.; Sanchez-Pla, A.; Vegas-Lozano, E.; Maldonado, R.; Ferrer, I. Cannabis-Based Medicine
Reduces Multiple Pathological Processes in AbetaPP/PS1 Mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014.
Available online: (accessed on 10
November 2014).
123. Walther, S.; Mahlberg, R.; Eichmann, U.; Kunz, D. О”9-tetrahydrocannabinol for nighttime
agitation in severe dementia. Psychopharmacology 2006, 185, 524–528.
124. Siffrin, V.; Brandt, A.U.; Herz, J.; Zipp, F. New insights into adaptive immunity in chronic
neuroinflammation. Adv. Immunol. 2007, 96, 1–40.
125. Pryce, G.; Baker, D. Control of spasticity in a multiple sclerosis model is mediated by CB1, not
CB2, cannabinoid receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 150, 519–525.
126. Lyman, W.D.; Sonett, J.R.; Brosnan, C.F.; Elkin, R.; Bornstein, M.B. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol:
A novel treatment for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 1989, 23,
Molecules 2014, 19
127. Molina-Holgado, E.; Vela, J.M.; Arevalo-Martin, A.; Almazan, G.; Molina-Holgado, F.; Borrell, J.;
Guaza, C. Cannabinoids promote oligodendrocyte progenitor survival: Involvement of cannabinoid
receptors and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt signaling. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 9742–9753.
128. Cabral, G.A.; Harmon, K.N.; Carlisle, S.J. Cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of inducible nitric
oxide production by rat microglial cells: Evidence for CB1 receptor participation. Adv. Exp. Med.
Biol. 2001, 493, 207–214.
129. Klein, T.W.; Lane, B.; Newton, C.A.; Friedman, H. The cannabinoid system and cytokine network.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 2000, 225, 1–8.
130. Arevalo-Martin, A.; Vela, J.M.; Molina-Holgado, E.; Borrell, J.; Guaza, C. Therapeutic action of
cannabinoids in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 2511–2516.
131. Ribeiro, R.; Yu, F.; Wen, J.; Vana, A.; Zhang, Y. Therapeutic potential of a novel cannabinoid
agent CB52 in the mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Neuroscience
2013, 254, 427–442.
132. Cabranes, A.;Venderova, K.; de Lago, E.; Fezza, F.; Sanchez, A.; Mestre, L.; Valenti, M.;
Garcia-Merino, A.; Ramos, J.A.; di Marzo, V.; et al. Decreased endocannabinoid levels in the brain
and beneficial effects of agents activating cannabinoid and/or vanilloid receptors in a rat model of
multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 20, 207–217.
133. Cabranes, A.; Pryce, G.; Baker, D.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J. Changes in CB1 receptors in motor-related
brain structures of chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis mice. Brain Res.
2006, 1107, 199–205.
134. Baker, D.; Pryce, G.; Croxford, J.L.; Brown, P.; Pertwee, R.G.; Huffman, J.W.; Layward, L.
Cannabinoids control spasticity and tremor in a multiple sclerosis model. Nature 2000, 404, 84–87.
135. Buccellato, E.; Carretta, D.; Utan, A.; Cavina, C.; Speroni, E.; Grassi, G.; Candeletti, S.; Romualdi, P.
Acute and chronic cannabinoid extracts administration affects motor function in a CREAE model
of multiple sclerosis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133, 1033–1038.
136. Bahr, B.A.; Karanian, D.A.; Makanji, S.S.; Makriyannis, A. Targeting the endocannabinoid system
in treating brain disorders. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2006, 15, 351–365.
137. Centonze, D.; Bari, M.; Rossi, S.; Prosperetti, C.; Furlan, R.; Fezza, F.; de Chiara, V.; Battistini, L.;
Bernardi, G.; Bernardini, S.; et al. The endocannabinoid system is dysregulated in multiple
sclerosis and in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain 2007, 130, 2543–2553.
138. Jean-Gilles, L.; Feng, S.; Tench, C.R.; Chapman, V.; Kendall, D.A.; Barrett, D.A.; Constantinescu,
C.S. Plasma endocannabinoid levels in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 287, 212–215.
139. Nielsen, J.B.; Crone, C.; Hultborn, H. The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity—From a basic
science point of view. Acta Physiol. 2007, 189, 171–180.
140. Paisley, S.; Beard, S.; Hunn, A.; Wight, J. Clinical effectiveness of oral treatments for spasticity
in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult. Scler. 2002, 8, 319–329.
141. Zajicek, J.; Fox, P.; Sanders, H.; Wright, D.; Vickery, J.; Nunn, A.; Thompson, A.; Group, U.M.R.
Cannabinoids for treatment of spasticity and other symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (CAMS
study): Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003, 362, 1517–1526.
142. Zajicek, J.P.; Sanders, H.P.; Wright, D.E.; Vickery, P.J.; Ingram, W.M.; Reilly, S.M.; Nunn, A.J.;
Teare, L.J.; Fox, P.J.; Thompson, A.J. Cannabinoids in multiple sclerosis (CAMS) study: Safety
and efficacy data for 12 months follow up. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2005, 76, 1664–1669.
Molecules 2014, 19
143. Zajicek, J.; Ball, S.; Wright, D.; Vickery, J.; Nunn, A.; Miller, D.; Gomez Cano, M.; McManus, D.;
Mallik, S.; Hobart, J. Cupid investigator group. Effect of dronabinol on progression in progressive
multiple sclerosis (CUPID): A randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12,
144. Turcotte, D.; Doupe, M.; Torabi, M.; Gomori, A.; Ethans, K.; Esfahani, F.; Galloway, K.; Namaka, M.
Nabilone as an Adjunctive to Gabapentin for Multiple Sclerosis-Induced Neuropathic Pain: A
Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Med. 2014, doi:10.1111/pme.12569.
145. Freeman, R.M.; Adekanmi, O.; Waterfield, M.R.; Waterfield, A.E.; Wright, D.; Zajicek, J. The
effect of cannabis on urge incontinence in patients with multiple sclerosis: A multicentre,
randomised placebo-controlled trial (CAMS-LUTS). Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.
2006, 17, 636–641.
146. Nicholson, S.J.; Witherden, A.S.; Hafezparast, M.; Martin, J.E.; Fisher, E.M. Mice, the motor
system, and human motor neuron pathology. Mamm. Genome 2000, 11, 1041–1052.
147. Ludolph, A.C.; Meyer, T.; Riepe, M.W. The role of excitotoxicity in ALS—What is the evidence?
J. Neurol. 2000, 247, I7–I16.
148. Robberecht, W. Oxidative stress in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2000, 247, I1–I6.
149. Raman, C.; McAllister, S.D.; Rizvi, G.; Patel, S.G.; Moore, D.H.; Abood, M.E. Amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis: Delayed disease progression in mice by treatment with a cannabinoid. Amyotroph.
Lateral Scler. Other Motor Neuron. Disord. 2004, 5, 33–39.
150. Bilsland, L.G.; Dick, J.R.; Pryce, G.; Petrosino, S.; di Marzo, V.; Baker, D.; Greensmith, L.
Increasing cannabinoid levels by pharmacological and genetic manipulation delay disease
progression in SOD1 mice. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1003–1005.
151. Weydt, P.; Hong, S.; Witting, A.; Moller, T.; Stella, N.; Kliot, M. Cannabinol delays symptom
onset in SOD1 (G93A) transgenic mice without affecting survival. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler.
Other Motor Neuron. Disord. 2005, 6, 182–184.
152. Ramirez, B.G.; Blazquez, C.; Gomez del Pulgar, T.; Guzman, M.; de Ceballos, M.L. Prevention
of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by cannabinoids: Neuroprotection mediated by blockade of
microglial activation. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 1904–1913.
153. Kim, K.; Moore, D.H.; Makriyannis, A.; Abood, M.E. AM1241, a cannabinoid CB2 receptor
selective compound, delays disease progression in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 542, 100–105.
154. Moreno-Martet, M.; Espejo-Porras, F.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; de Lago, E. Changes in endocannabinoid
receptors and enzymes in the spinal cord of SOD1(G93A) transgenic mice and evaluation of a
Sativex((R)) -like combination of phytocannabinoids: Interest for future therapies in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2014, 20, 809–815.
155. Yiangou, Y.; Facer, P.; Durrenberger, P.; Chessell, I.P.; Naylor, A.; Bountra, C.; Banati, R.R.;
Anand, P. COX-2, CB2 and P2X7-immunoreactivities are increased in activated microglial
cells/macrophages of multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord. BMC Neurol.
2006, 6, doi:10.1186/1471-2377-6-12.
Molecules 2014, 19
156. Carter, G.T.; Rosen, B.S. Marijuana in the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am. J.
Hosp. Palliat. Care 2001, 18, 264–270.
157. Amtmann, D.; Weydt, P.; Johnson, K.L.; Jensen, M.P.; Carter, G.T. Survey of cannabis use in
patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2004, 21, 95–104.
158. Brouns, R.; de Deyn, P.P. The complexity of neurobiological processes in acute ischemic stroke.
Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2009, 111, 483–495.
159. Sahota, P.; Savitz, S.I. Investigational therapies for ischemic stroke: Neuroprotection and
neurorecovery. Neurotherapeutics 2011, 8, 434–451.
160. Jin, R.; Yang, G.; Li, G. Inflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: Role of inflammatory cells.
J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 87, 779–789.
161. Velayudhan, L.; van Diepen, E.; Marudkar, M.; Hands, O.; Suribhatla, S.; Prettyman, R.; Murray, J.;
Baillon, S.; Bhattacharyya, S. Therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in neurodegenerative
disorders: A selective review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 2218–2230.
162. Alvarez, F.J.; Lafuente, H.; Rey-Santano, M.C.; Mielgo, V.E.; Gastiasoro, E.; Rueda, M.; Pertwee,
R.G.; Castillo, A.I.; Romero, J.; Martinez-Orgado, J. Neuroprotective effects of the
nonpsychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol in hypoxic-ischemic newborn piglets. Pediatr. Res.
2008, 64, 653–658.
163. Mishima, K.; Hayakawa, K.; Abe, K.; Ikeda, T.; Egashira, N.; Iwasaki, K.; Fujiwara, M. Cannabidiol
prevents cerebral infarction via a serotonergic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor-dependent
mechanism. Stroke 2005, 36, 1077–1082.
164. Maas, A.I.; Murray, G.; Henney, H., ІІІ; Kassem, N.; Legrand, V.; Mangelus, M.; Muizelaar, J.P.;
Stocchetti, N.; Knoller, N.; Pharmos, T.B.I.I. Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe
traumatic brain injury: Results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 38–45.
165. Ferriero, D.M. Neonatal brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1985–1995.
166. Pazos, M.R.; Cinquina, V.; Gomez, A.; Layunta, R.; Santos, M.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.;
Martinez-Orgado, J. Cannabidiol administration after hypoxia-ischemia to newborn rats reduces
long-term brain injury and restores neurobehavioral function. Neuropharmacology 2012, 63, 776–783.
167. Castillo, A.; Tolon, M.R.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Romero, J.; Martinez-Orgado, J. The neuroprotective
effect of cannabidiol in an in vitro model of newborn hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in mice is
mediated by CB(2) and adenosine receptors. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 37, 434–440.
168. Pazos, M.R.; Mohammed, N.; Lafuente, H.; Santos, M.; Martinez-Pinilla, E.; Moreno, E.;
Valdizan, E.; Romero, J.; Pazos, A.; Franco, R.; et al. Mechanisms of cannabidiol neuroprotection
in hypoxic-ischemic newborn pigs: Role of 5HT(1A) and CB2 receptors. Neuropharmacology
2013, 71, 282–291.
169. Chang, B.S.; Lowenstein, D.H. Epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1257–1266.
170. Kwan, P.; Brodie, M.J. Emerging drugs for epilepsy. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2007, 12, 407–422.
171. Compton, D.R.; Aceto, M.D.; Lowe, J.; Martin, B.R. In vivo characterization of a specific
cannabinoid receptor antagonist (SR141716A): Inhibition of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced
responses and apparent agonist activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 277, 586–594.
Molecules 2014, 19
172. Jones, N.A.; Hill, A.J.; Smith, I.; Bevan, S.A.; Williams, C.M.; Whalley, B.J.; Stephens, G.J.
Cannabidiol displays antiepileptiform and antiseizure properties in vitro and in vivo. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 2010, 332, 569–577.
173. Hill, A.J.; Weston, S.E.; Jones, N.A.; Smith, I.; Bevan, S.A.; Williamson, E.M.; Stephens, G.J.;
Williams, C.M.; Whalley, B.J. О”9-Tetrahydrocannabivarin suppresses in vitro epileptiform and in
vivo seizure activity in adult rats. Epilepsia 2010, 51, 1522–1532.
174. Hill, A.J.; Mercier, M.S.; Hill, T.D.; Glyn, S.E.; Jones, N.A.; Yamasaki, Y.; Futamura, T.;
Duncan, M.; Stott, C.G.; Stephens, G.J.; et al. Cannabidivarin is anticonvulsant in mouse and rat.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 167, 1629–1642.
175. Ryan, D.; Drysdale, A.J.; Lafourcade, C.; Pertwee, R.G.; Platt, B. Cannabidiol targets
mitochondria to regulate intracellular Ca2+ levels. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 2053–2063.
176. Scutt, A.; Williamson, E.M. Cannabinoids stimulate fibroblastic colony formation by bone marrow
cells indirectly via CB2 receptors. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2007, 80, 50–59.
177. De Petrocellis, L.; Ligresti, A.; Moriello, A.S.; Allara, M.; Bisogno, T.; Petrosino, S.; Stott, C.G.;
di Marzo, V. Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoid-enriched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels
and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 1479–1494.
178. Bisogno, T.; Howell, F.; Williams, G.; Minassi, A.; Cascio, M.G.; Ligresti, A.; Matias, I.;
Schiano-Moriello, A.; Paul, P.; Williams, E.J.; et al. Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points
to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. J. Cell. Biol. 2003,
163, 463–468.
179. Pertwee, R.G. Receptors and channels targeted by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists and
antagonists. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 1360–1381.
180. Dennis, I.; Whalley, B.J.; Stephens, G.J. Effects of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin on
[35S]GTPgammaS binding in mouse brain cerebellum and piriform cortex membranes. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2008, 154, 1349–1358.
181. Ma, Y.L.; Weston, S.E.; Whalley, B.J.; Stephens, G.J. The phytocannabinoid
О”9-tetrahydrocannabivarin modulates inhibitory neurotransmission in the cerebellum. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2008, 154, 204–215.
182. Campos, A.C.; Guimaraes, F.S. Involvement of 5HT1A receptors in the anxiolytic-like effects of
cannabidiol injected into the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray of rats. Psychopharmacology 2008,
199, 223–230.
183. Russo, E.B.; Guy, G.W.; Robson, P.J. Cannabis, pain, and sleep: Lessons from therapeutic clinical
trials of Sativex, a cannabis-based medicine. Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 1729–1743.
184. Rahn, E.J.; Hohmann, A.G. Cannabinoids as pharmacotherapies for neuropathic pain: From the
bench to the bedside. Neurotherapeutics 2009, 6, 713–737.
185. Borsook, D. Neurological diseases and pain. Brain 2012, 135, 320–344.
186. Koltzenburg, M.; Scadding, J. Neuropathic pain. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2001, 14, 641–647.
187. Galuppo, M.; Giacoppo, S.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Use of natural compounds in the
management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Molecules 2014, 19, 2877–2895.
188. Costa, B.; Trovato, A.E.; Comelli, F.; Giagnoni, G.; Colleoni, M. The non-psychoactive cannabis
constituent cannabidiol is an orally effective therapeutic agent in rat chronic inflammatory and
neuropathic pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 556, 75–83.
Molecules 2014, 19
189. Calignano, A.; la Rana, G.; Giuffrida, A.; Piomelli, D. Control of pain initiation by endogenous
cannabinoids. Nature 1998, 394, 277–281.
190. Farquhar-Smith, W.P.; Egertova, M.; Bradbury, E.J.; McMahon, S.B.; Rice, A.S.; Elphick, M.R.
Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor expression in rat spinal cord. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2000, 15, 510–521.
В© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
bakalare2   документа Email
Health and Medicine
File Size
734 Кб
neurological, diseases, treatment, agents, promising, new, cannabinoids
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа