AIPAC Lombardia e Scuola di Scienze Motorie - Università degli Studi Milano presentano: SEMINARIO DI AGGIORNAMENTO “L’ALLENAMENTO DEL GIOVANE CALCIATORE: DALLA TEORIA ALLA PRATICA” Lunedì 27 gennaio 2014 - aula “A. Miani” - via Mangiagalli, 31 - 20133 - Milano (Ore 13,30: Accredito partecipanti) Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva PROGRAMMA: Ore 14,15: Saluto autorità e presentazione programmi: E. Rampinini C. Sforza (Unimi) - A. Veicsteinas (Unimi) - A. Fiorilli (Unimi) - E. Arcelli (Unimi) Interverranno rappresentanti di Settori Giovanili professionistici Ore 14,55: PRIMA SESSIONEMapei Sport Research Center, Italy Università degli studi di Milano, Italy Crescita e sviluppo del giovane calciatore ANNI '70-'80 Distanza totale percorsa in una partita: 7-8 km Reilly T, 1976 OGGI Distanza totale percorsa in una partita: 10-11 km (+40%) Bradley PS et al, 2013 ~25% (~2.5 km) corsa >15 km/h ~10% (~1 km) corsa >20 km/h In una stagione: Fino a ~ 45 partite In una stagione: Fino a ~ 65 partite (+40%) Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini La Performance Fisica dei Giovani in Partita Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini tracting the chronological age at the time of measureme (as evidenced field tests results), andperformance 3) evaluate the magniTable 1 Physicalvia capacities and match running according to age. data anthropometric, maturity and physical capacities n =the 10 age at estimated n = 12 PHV [28]n.= 17 n = 14 U13 a,b,c,d,e U14 c,d,e U15 d,e U16 U17 U18 d,e e 0.7 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.4 year from PHV 1.7 ± 0.4 anthropometric, maturity 161 data Experimental procedures height (cm) 150 ± 6a,b,c,d,e 159 ± 7d,e ±and 6d,e physical capacities 163 ±9 170 ± 7 171 ± 9 b,c,d,e d,e danalyses number of players n = 7 n = 17 n = 10 n = 12 n = 17 n56.3 = 14against Methods Match were performed on 42 matches i body mass (kg) 39.3 ± 5.1 43.9 ± 5.2 48.8 ± 9.8 52.0 ± 7.2 58.1 ± 4.7 ± 7.5 a,b,c,d,e c,d,e d,e d,e e d,e 0.7±±3.1 0.5b,c,d,e 0.1±±4.1 0.7club 0.6played 0.8d,e over42.6 1.6 0.6 2.2±±5.2 0.4 year(cm) from PHV 1.7±±2.5 0.4a,b,c,d,e tional teams, a 4-month period. Each CMJ 27.5 32.0 39.2 37.9 ±±3.7 ±±4.0 44.5 Training & Testing a,b,c,d,ea,b,c,d,e d,e d,e b,c,d,e d,e e height (cm) 150 ± 6 159 ± 7 161 ± 6 163 ± 9 170 ± 7 171 ± 9 Acc (s) 1.96 ± 0.07 1.89 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.08 1.77 ± 1 0.05 ± 0.04 1.71 Subjects player was assessed –9 times.1.74 The high level of± 0.06 the op b,c,d,e d,e d 1 (kg) a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e e body mass 39.3 ± 5.1 43.9 ± 5.2 48.8 ± 9.8 52.0 ± 7.2 58.1 ± 4.7 56.3 ± 7.5 PV (km.h ) 25.4 ± 0.7was collected 27.0 ± 1.8 and the 29.4 ± 1.0 31.3 ±format 0.7 32.3 reduced ± 1.9 Time-motion match analysis data on± 1.5 99 young 29.0 teams same competition likely a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,ed,e d,ee a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e CMJ (cm) 27.5 ± 2.5 32.0 ± 3.1 39.2 ± 4.1 37.9 ± 3.7 42.6 ± 4.0 44.5 RSAmean players belonging to 65.15 0.08 age groups 4.88 ± 0.16 from 4.60 ± 0.20 4.51 ± 0.12 4.39 ± 0.12 4.31±±5.2 0.17 football di ±erent ranging a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e e 1 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e Acc (s) 1.96 ± 0.07 1.89 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.08 1.77 ± 0.05 1.74 ± 0.04 1.71 ± 0.06 VVam-eval (km.h ) 13.7 ± 0.8 15.3 ± 1.4 15.8 ± 1.3 15.8 ± 1.1 16.6 ± 0.9 17.4 ± 0.9 1 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e e PV (km.h ) 25.4 ± 0.7 27.0 ± 1.5match running 29.0 ± 1.8 29.4 ± 1.0 31.3 ± 0.7 32.3 ± 1.9 performance Table 1 Physical capacities and match running performance according to age. a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e e RSAmean of files ± 0.08 ± 0.16 ± 0.20 ± 0.12 ± 0.12 ± 0.17 number n = 5.15 18 files n = 4.88 40 files n =4.60 25 files n =4.51 21 files n =4.39 29 files n = 4.31 53 files 1 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e VVam-evaltime (km.h ) ± 0.8 ± 1.4 ± 1.3 ± 1.1 ± 0.9 ± 0.9 U15 U16 U18 playing 2 ×13.7 35U13 min 2 ×15.3 35U14 min 2 15.8 × 40 min 2 ×15.8 40 min 2 16.6 ×U17 40 min 2 ×17.4 45 min e match running 7383 ± 640b,c,d,e 8129 ± 879physical 8312 ± 1054 8707 ± 1101 8867 ± 859 TD (m) 6549 ± 597a,b,c,d,e anthropometric, maturity dataperformance and capacities b,c,d,e b,c,d,e number of fi les n = 18 fi les n = 40 fi les n = 25 fi les n = 21 fi les n = 29 fi les nn==53 les LIR (m) of players 5370 5799 6288 6480 6749 6650 number n = 7 ± 470 n = 17± 454 n = 10± 610 n = 12± 845 n = 17± 768 14±fi565 b,c,d,e playing time 2 ×1.7 35 min 2821 ×0.7 35±min 2954 ×0.1 40±± min 2968 ×0.6 40±min 2991 ×1.6 40±min 2976 ×2.2 45±min HIR 671 ± 180 297 ±231 0.5c,d,e 0.7d,e ±258 0.8d,e ±370 0.6e ±240 0.4 year(m) from PHV ± 0.4a,b,c,d,e a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e Authors M. Buchheit, A. Mendez-Villanueva , B. M. Simpson, P.d,e C. Bourdon b,c,d,e e a,b,c,d,e d,e 7383 ± 640 8129 ± 879 8312 ± 1054 8707 ± 1101 8867 ± 859 TD (m) 6549 ± 597 VHIR (m) 323 446± 7162 477±±6156 479±±9180 519± 7155 574± 9134 height (cm) 150±±87 6 159 161 163 170 171 b,c,d,e b,c,d,e b,c,d,e ed,e ed for Sports Excellence, eQatar e A liations Physiology5799 Unit, Sport Science Department, 6288 ASPIRE, ± Academy Doha, b,c,d,e LIR (m) 5370 ± 470 ± 454 610 6480 ± 845 6749 ± 768 6650 565 Sprinting (m) 186 ± 92 318 410 384 449 666 body mass (kg) 39.3 ± 5.1 43.9±±183 5.2 48.8±±204 9.8 52.0± ±163 7.2 58.1 ±147 4.7 56.3±±±256 7.5 b,c,d,e a,b,c,d,e d,e e e e a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e HIR 671 180 821±±±307 231 954±±±311 297 968 258 991±±±221 370 976±±±337 240 VHIA (m) 509 ±±156 763 887 864 967 1239 CMJ(m) (cm) 27.5 ± 2.5 32.0 3.1 39.2 4.1 37.9±±±314 3.7 42.6 4.0 44.5 5.2 b,c,d,e eb,c,d,e 1 a,b,c,d,e e e e a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e e VHIR (m) speed (km.h ) 323 ± 87 446 ± ±162 477 ± 156 479 ± ±180 519 ±± 155 574 ± 134 peak game 22.3 ±±1.4 24.4 26.0 ±±2.4 26.3 26.6 28.3 ± 2.2 Acc (s) 1.96 0.07 1.89 ±1.8 0.06 1.79 0.08 1.77 ±2.3 0.05 1.74 ±2.2 0.04 1.71 0.06 b,c,d,e e e ed,e e 1 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e e Sprinting 186 ± 92 318 ±±183 410 ±±204 384 ±±163 449 ±±147 666 ±14 PV (km.h ) 25.4 ± 0.7 running performances 27.0 1.5 1.8 29.4capacities 1.0 of the31.3 0.7 32.3 ±256 1.9 Mean ( ± SD)(m) values of anthropometric and match and least squared29.0 means ( ± SE) of physical Under 13 (U13), Under (U14), U a,b,c,d,e d,e b,c,d,e e d,e e e e a,b,c,d,e VHIA (m) 5095.15 ± 156 763 ± 307PHV peak height 887 ± 311 ± 314 ±± 221 1239 ± 337 (U15), Under 16 (U16), Under 17 (U17) and Under soccer players. velocity. Field tests:864 counter movement967 jump (CMJ), (Acc), RSAmean ± 0.0818 (U18) 4.60 ± 0.20 4.51 ± 0.12 4.39 0.12 acceleration 4.31 ± 0.17pe Abstract 4.88 ± 0.16 eta-squared ( 2): 0.20–0.45). When adjusted for Key words 1 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e e e 1 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e peak game speed ) football 22.3sprint 1.4 test (RSAmean) and 24.4 1.8 26.0 ± 2.4 2.3 26.6 ±running 2.2 performance: 28.3 ± 2.2 ity (PV), mean sprint time on the repeated peak running speed during incremental fi26.3 eld test (VVam-eval ). 16.6 Match running total d VVam-eval (km.h ) (km.h 13.7 ±±0.8 15.3 ± ±1.4 15.8 ±the 1.3 15.8 ±±1.1 ± 0.9 17.4 ± 0.9 age and individual playing time, match tude of these relationships for separate playing number of players n = each 7 n = 17position. Nei giovani calciatori, la performance fisica nel corso delle partite aumenta con l’aumentare dell’età Match Running Performance and Fitness in Youth Soccer Tempo di gioco: 70’ 70’ 80’ 80’ 80’ 90’ high-intensity running 1 les of highly trained young socactivity profi performance position-dependent covered low-intensity running (LIR; running speed The < 13.0 km · h ), high-intensity running (HIR; speedwas from 13.1 to · h(P1<13 ),0.001, very high-intensity runni match running performance Mean ( ±(TD), SD) values of anthropometric least squared means ( ±running SE) of physical capacities of 16 thekm Under (U13), Under 14 (U14), field tests and match running performances and 2 : 0.13 – 0.40). MD covered the greater TD; CB the cer players were examined in relation to age, 1 1 adolescents (VHIR; running speed from 16.117to(U17) 19 · hfiUnder ) and18 sprinting distance (Sprinting; running > 19.1Field km · tests: h n).=Very (VHIA) =nVHIR (U15), Under (U16), Under and (U18) soccer players. height velocity. counter jump (CMJ), acceleration (Acc), pe number of fi16 les n km = 18 les n = 40 files PHV peak n speed = 25 files 21 fihigh-intensity les movement n =activities 29 files = 53+fiSprinting les lowest (P < 0.05). Distance for VHIA was lower for playing position and physical capacity. Time2 CB compared with all other positions (P < 0.05); W motion meananalyses (global positioning system) were Vam-eval 1 players 1 Relaa,b,c,d,e performed on 77 b,c,d,e(U13–U18; fullbacks e and S displayed the highest VHIA (P < 0.05). tionships between match running performance [FB], centre-backs [CB], midfielders [MD], wide 1 b,c,d,e 1 b,c,d,e and physical capacities were position-dependmidfielders [W], second strikers [2ndS] and strik2 non-significant correlations b,c,d,e ers [S]) during 42 international club games. Total ent, with poor or distance covered (TD)e and very high-intensity within FB, CB, MD and W (e. g., VHIA vs. VVam-eval: 323 ± 87b,c,d,e 446 ± >162 ± 156 r = 0.06 in 479 ± 180 519within ± 1552ndS computed FB) but large associations activities (VHIA; 16.1 km · h 1) were 477 b,c,d,e e e e = 0.70e in during 186318 entire Physical g., VHIA vs. VVam-eval 186 ± 92 ±player-matches. 183 410capac± 204 and S positions 384 ±(e.163 449 :±r147 nd ity was via field (e.Med g., peak e 2 S). In highly trainede young soccer players, ethe Performance and Fitness inassessed Youth Intmeasures J Sports 509 ± 156a,b,c,d,e 763 ±Soccer. 307d,etest 887 ± 311 864 ± 314 967 ± 221 importance of fitness level as a determinant of running speed during an incremental field test, a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e e 22.3 ± 1.4 24.4 running ± 1.8 performance 26.0 ± 2.4 match running 26.3 ± 2.3 26.6 ± 2.2e showed performance should be regarded VVam-eval). Match global positioning system VHIR (m) Sprinting (m) Buchheit M et al. Match Running VHIA (m) peak game speed (km.h 1) ded by: Aldo Sassi. Copyrighted material. TD = U18 vs U13 +33% age-group e ect: all Ptime < 0.001. a: signifi di erence vs. U14 ()P2and <×0.05), b:running vs. U15,speed c: vs.2during U16, vs.incremental U17, e: vs.2VHIA, U18. : e(Vect size2 ity (PV), mean sprint on the repeated sprint test (RSA peak the eld min test ). ×Match running performance: playing time 2 ×cant 35 min 35 min × 40d: min ×fi40 40 min 2 × 45 min total distance > 16.1 km/h VHIA = U18 vs U13 +90% covered (LIR; running · h ± ), high-intensity running 13.1 to 16 km ·±h1101 ), very high-intensity 7383 640 8129 ±(HIR; 879 running speed 8312 ±from 1054 8707 8867 ± 859 runn TD (m) (TD), low-intensity running 6549 ± 597 speed < 13.0 km Sprinting, distance > 19.1 km/h (VHIR; km ·±h470 ) and sprinting distance running speed > 19.1 km · h 6480 ). Very high-intensity activities VHIR Sprinting LIR (m)running speed from 16.1 to 19 5370 5799 ±(Sprinting; 454 6288 ± 610 ± 845 6749 ± 768 (VHIA) =6650 ±+565 Sprinting = U18 vs U13 +141% Buchheit M et al. Match Running Performance and Fitness in Youth Soccer. Int J Sports Med age-group e ect: all P < 0.001. a: signifi cant di erence vs. U14 ( P < 0.05), b: vs. U15, c: vs. U16, d: vs. U17, e: vs. U18. : e ect size HIR (m) 671 ± 180 821 ± 231 954 ± 297 968 ± 258 991 ± 370 976 ± 240 134 Buchheit et574 al., ±2010 Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, 666 ± 256 1239 ± 337 E. Rampinini 28.3 ± 2.2 tude of these relationships for each separate playing position. Methods the age at estimated PHV [28]. Experimental procedures Match analyses were performed on 42 matches against in tional club teams, played over a 4-month period. Each o Match analyses were performed on 42 matches against in player was assessed 1–9 times. The high level of the op tional club teams, played over a 4-month period. Each o teams and the same competition Training format & Testing likely reduced m player was assessed 1–9 times. The high level of the op teams and the same competition format likely reduced m Experimental procedures Nei giovani calciatori, parallelamente si sviluppano anche le Time-motion match analysis data was collected on 99 young qualità atletiche Subjects football players belonging to 6 di erent age groups ranging from Methods Subjects Time-motion match analysis data was collected on 99 young football belonging 6 di running erent age groups ranging Match Running Performance Table 1 players Physical capacities andtomatch performance accordingfrom to age. Soccer U14 Table 1 Physical capacities and matchU13 running performance according to age. and Fitness in Youth U15 U16 U17 U18 anthropometric, maturity data and physical capacities U13 U14 U15 U16 U17 U18 number of players n=7 n = 17 n = 10 n = 12 n = 17 n = 14 d,e maturity data physical capacities 0.7 ± 0.5c,d,e 0.1and ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.8d,e 1.6 ± 0.6e 2.2 ± 0.4 year from PHV 1.7 ± 0.4a,b,c,d,e anthropometric, a,b,c,d,e d,e d,e number of players n = 7 n = 17 n = 10 n = 12 n = 17 n = height (cm) 150 ± 6 159 ± 7 161 ± 6 163 ± 9 170 ± 7 17114 ±9 a,b,c,d,e c,d,e d,e d,e e b,c,d,e d,e d 0.7 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.6 2.2 year from PHV 1.7 ± 0.4 body mass (kg) 43.9 ± 5.2 48.8 ±, 9.8 52.0 ± 7.2 58.1 ± 4.7 56.3±±0.4 7.5 Authors 39.3 ± 5.1 M. Buchheit , A. Mendez-Villanueva , B. M. Simpson P. C. Bourdon a,b,c,d,e d,e d,e a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e height (cm) 150 ± 6 159 ± 7 161 ± 6 163 ± 9 170 ± 7 171 ± 9 CMJ (cm) 27.5 ± 2.5 32.0 ± 3.1 39.2 ± 4.1 37.9 ± 3.7 42.6 ± 4.0 44.5 ± 5.2 A liations Physiology Unit, Sport Science Department, ASPIRE, Academy for Sports Excellence, Doha, Qatar b,c,d,e d,e b,c,d,e d d,e a,b,c,d,e e body mass (kg) 39.3 ± 5.1 43.9 ± 5.2 48.8 ± 9.8 52.0 ± 7.2 58.1 ± 4.7 56.3 ±± 7.5 Acc (s) 1.96 ± 0.07 1.89 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.08 1.77 ± 0.05 1.74 ± 0.04 1.71 0.06 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e 1 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e e CMJ (cm) 27.5 ± 2.5 32.0 ± 3.1 39.2 ± 4.1 37.9 ± 3.7 42.6 ± 4.0 44.5 ± 5.2 PV (km.h ) 25.4 ± 0.7 27.0 ± 1.5 29.0 ± 1.8 29.4 ± 1.0 31.3 ± 0.7 32.3 ± 1.9 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e ee a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e Acc (s) 1.96 ± 0.07 1.89 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.08 1.77 ± 0.05 1.74 ± 0.04 1.71 RSAmean 5.15 ± 0.08 4.88 0.16 4.60 0.20 4.51 ± 0.12 4.39 0.12 4.31±±0.06 0.17 1 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e d,e e 1 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e PV (km.h ) 25.4 ± 0.7 27.0 ± 1.5 29.0 ± 1.8 29.4 ± 1.0 31.3 ± 0.7 32.3 ± 1.9 VVam-eval (km.h ) 13.7 ± 0.8 15.3 ± 1.4 15.8 ± 1.3 15.8 ± 1.1 16.6 0.9 17.4 ± 0.9 a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e d,e e 2 RSAmean 4.60 ± 0.20 eta-squared 4.51 ± 0.12 4.39adjusted ± 0.12 for 4.31 ± 0.17 Abstract 4.88 ± 0.16 ( ): 0.20–0.45). When Key words 5.15 ± 0.08 match running performance football age and individual playing time, match running 1 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e V ±fi0.8 number of files ) n13.7 = 18running les n15.3 = 40 ±fi1.4 les n15.8 = 25±fi1.3 les n15.8 = 21 ±fi1.1 les n16.6 = 29±fi0.9 les n17.4 = 53 ±fi0.9 les Vam-eval (km.h high-intensity The activity profiles of highly trained young socperformance was position-dependent (P < 0.001, fi eld tests 2 match inrunning performance playing time 2 × 35 min 2 × 35 minexamined 2 × 40 × 40 min × 40 min : 0.132 –0.40). MD covered the2greater TD; CB the 2 × 45 min cer players were relation tomin age, adolescents a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e lowest ( P < 0.05). Distance for VHIA was lower for n playing position and physical capacity. Timenumber = 18±fi597 les n7383 = 40±fi640 les n8129 = 25±fi879 les n8312 = 21±fi1054 les n8707 = 29±fi1101 les = 53±fi859 les 8867 TD (m) of files 6549 globaln positioning system CB compared with all other positions ( P < 0.05); W motion analyses (global positioning system) were b,c,d,e b,c,d,e playing 25370 × 35±min 25799 × 35 min 26288 × 40 26480 × 40±min 26749 × 40 min × 45 ± min LIR (m) time 470 454 ±min 610 and S displayed 845 768 Rela- 26650 565 the highest VHIA (P <±0.05). performed on ±77 players (U13–U18; fullbacks a,b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e b,c,d,e between [FB], centre-backs [CB], midfielders8129 [MD],± 7383 879 8312 ±±1054 8707 ±±1101 8867 TD 6549 597 HIR(m) (m) 671 ±±180 821±±640 231 954 ±wide 297 tionships 968 258match running 991performance 370 976±±859 240 nd and physical capacities were position-dependmidfielders [W], second b,c,d,e b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e strikers [2 S] and strikLIR (m) 5370 470 5799 6288 6480 6749 6650 VHIR (m) 323 ±±87 446±±454 162 477±±610 156 479±±845 180 519±±768 155 574±±565 134 ers [S]) during 42 international club games. Total ent, with poor or non-significant correlations b,c,d,e b,c,d,e e e e e HIR (m) (m) 671 954 968 258 991 976 Sprinting 186±±180 92 318±±231 183 410±±297 204 within FB, 384 ± 163 449±vs. ±370 147 666±±240 256 distance 821 covered (TD) and very high-intensity CB,± MD and W (e. g., VHIA VVam-eval: a,b,c,d,e activities (VHIA; > 16.1 e associations withine2ndS b,c,d,e ed,ekm · h 1) were computed e r = 0.06 in FB) but large VHIA (m) (m) 509±±87 156 763±±162 307 887±±156 311 864±±180 314 967±±155 221 1239 337 vam VHIR 323 446 477 479 519 574 ±±134 Physical capac-e e and S positions (e. g., eVHIA vs. VVam-eval: r = 0.70 1 a,b,c,d,e during 186 entire player-matches. b,c,d,e e e in b,c,d,e e e peak game speed (km.h ) 22.3 ± 1.4 24.4 ± 1.8 26.0 ± 2.4 2ndS). In 384 26.3 ± 2.3 26.6 ± 2.2 the 666 28.3 ± 2.2 Sprinting (m) 186 ± 92 318 ± 183 410 ± 204 ± 163 449 ± 147 ± 256 highly trained young soccer players, ity was assessed via field test measures (e. g., peak Buchheit et al., 2010 a,b,c,d,e d,e e e e fi314 tness level a Under determinant of 1239 running speed incremental fi eld test, VHIA 509and ± 156 763 ±during 307 887 ± 311 864of±capacities 967 ± 221 337 Mean (m) ( ± SD) values of anthropometric match running performances andan least squared means ( ± SE)importance of physical of as the 13 (U13), Under±14 (U14), U performance showed e match running performance should be regarded 1 a,b,c,d,e VVam-eval). Match running b,c,d,e e e peak (km.h 22.3 1.4 18 (U18) soccer24.4 ± 1.8PHV peak height 26.0 ± 2.4 ± 2.3 ±(CMJ), 2.2 acceleration 28.3 ±(Acc), 2.2 pe (U15),game Underspeed 16 (U16), Under) 17 (U17) and±Under players. velocity. Field tests:26.3 counter movement jump Il modello prestativo in età26.6 evolutiva, E. Rampinini 70’ 70’ 80’ Altezza = U18 vs U13 +14% Peso = U18 vs U13 +43% CMJ = U18 vs U13 +62% an increasing trend with age (P < 0.001, partial 80’ 80’ 90’ nloaded by: Aldo Sassi. Copyrighted material. Tempo di gioco: PV = U18 vs U13 +27% RSA = U18 vs U13 +19% V = U18 vs U13 +27% as a function of playing position. ity (PV), mean sprint on the repeated sprint test (RSAperformances running during the( ±incremental fieldcapacities test (VVam-eval ). Match performance: totalUd mean) and peakand Mean ( ± SD) values oftime anthropometric and match running least speed squared means SE) of physical of the Underrunning 13 (U13), Under 14 (U14), test followed by Dunn’s post hoc tests. For each ANCOVA, partial eta-squared ( 2) was calculated as a measure of e ect size. Values of 0.01, 0.06 and above 0.15 were considered as small, medium and large, respectively [17]. Di erences between the first and second halves were examined using Student’s independent t-test. The relationships between match running speeds, match HR and physical fitness variables (MSS, MAS and Age-related di erences Age-related match play intensity distribution during the first and second halves, adjusted for individual playing time, are presented in Fig. 1. During the first half, there was a trend for the older players to cover greater total distance ( 2 = 0.09). U16, U17 and U18 players covered more distance at S1 than the other 3 Le qualità atletiche dei giovani calciatori divisi per ruolo tattico non sempre risultano diverse Table 2 Players’ physical characteristics and performance measures according to playing position. FB CB MD W-MD 2ndS S p-value n = 20 n = 15 n = 19 n = 24 n = 11 n = 14 2 Age (y) Height (cm) Body mass (kg) MAS (km · h 1) MSS (km · h 1) ASR (km · h 1) 14.5 ± 1.6 14.6 ± 1.7 14.3 ± 1.5 14.9 ± 1.7 14.6 ± 1.7 14.4 ± 1.7 0.80 0.02 159.6 ± 9.8 166.3 ± 9.7 162.0 ± 9.4 162.6 ± 11.7 161.9 ± 8.1 166.6 ± 11.2 0.30 0.05 46.8 ± 8.6 54.9 ± 9.9 48.6 ± 9.8 49.9 ± 11.8 48.5 ± 7.6 56.7 ± 15.7 0.06 0.09 16.0 ± 1.3 15.6 ± 2.4 16.0 ± 1.7 16.4 ± 1.1 16.1 ± 1.7 15.9 ± 2.0 0.69 0.02 28.4 ± 2.5 29.9 ± 2.3 28.7 ± 2.9 29.0 ± 2.8 28.7 ± 1.8 29.6 ± 2.9 0.32 0.04 12.3 ± 2.2a 14.3 ± 2.5 12.7 ± 2.1 12.6 ± 2.3 12.6 ± 1.3 13.7 ± 1.7 0.02 0.10 Mean ± SD. FB – Full backs, CB – centre backs, MD – midfielders, W-MD – wide midfielders, 2ndS – second strikers and S – strikers. MAS, maximal aerobic speed (see Methods); MSS, maximal sprinting speed; ASR, anaerobic speed reserve. a : significant di erence vs. CB (P < 0.05), 2 : e ect size Mendez-Villanueva et al., 2012 5 000 4 500 Distance Covered (m) 4 000 b,c,d,e 3 500 3 000 2 500 e c # e b,e e e # e e # # e # # e # # # # # c,d # 2 000 1 500 # d Fig. 1 Least squared means for match play running intensity distribution in U13, U14, U15, U16, U17 and U18 soccer players. Values are adjusted on total playing time. a: significant di erence vs. U14 (P < 0.05), b: vs. U15, c: vs. U16, d: vs. U17, e: vs. U18. # Significant lower vs. first half. MAS, maximal aerobic speed (see Methods). ASR, anaerobic speed reserve. a,b,c, Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini a,b,c, Table 2 Training & Testing Physical capacities and match running performance according to playing positions. FB CB MD W 2ndS S 2 P Mentre come per gli adulti, esistono differenze nella performance fisica della partita tra giocatori di diverso ruolo tattico anthropometric maturity data and physical capacities Table 2 Physical capacities and match running performance accordingand to playing positions. number of players n = 15 n = 16 n = 13 n = 13 n=9 n = 11 nd S P height (cm) 163FB ± 11 166CB ±8 164MD ±9 163W ±9 1592± 10 163S± 10 0.35 body mass (kg) 50.6 ± 9.8 53.8 ± 8.6 51.6 7.4 53.2physical ± 10.0 capacities 50.1 ± 7.8 51.3 ± 13.4 0.63 anthropometric and ± maturity data and year fromofPHV 0.20 number players n =0.5 15 ± 1.5 n =0.4 16 ± 1.1 n = 0.6 13 ± 1.3 n =0.6 13 ± 1.3 n =0.6 9 ± 1.2 n =0.1 11 ± 1.5 a,c,e e e e CMJ (cm) 36.0 ± 0.7 38.7 ± 0.6 36.8 ± 0.6 40.3 ± 1.0 37.6 ± 1.0 42.4 ± 0.9 < 0.001 Training & Testing height (cm) 163 ± 11 166 ± 8 164 ± 9 163 ± 9 159 ± 10 163 ± 10 0.35 Acc 1.81±±9.8 0.01 1.78±±8.6 0.01 1.81±±7.4 0.01 1.79±±10.0 0.01 1.82±±7.8 0.01 1.78±±13.4 0.01 0.16 body(s)mass (kg) 50.6 53.8 51.6 53.2 50.1 51.3 0.63 Training & 1 a,c,e b e e ) 28.7 30.0 29.0 30.0 29.0 30.7 < 0.001 PV year(km.h from PHV 0.5 ± 0.2 1.5 0.4 ± 0.2 1.1 0.6 ± 0.2 1.3 0.6 ± 0.4 1.3 0.6 ± 0.3 1.2 0.1 ± 0.3 1.5 0.20 a,c,e a,c,e e e c,e e RSA 4.73±±0.7 0.03 4.59±±0.6 0.02 4.65±±0.6 0.03 4.51±±1.0 0.04 4.60±±1.0 0.04 4.51±±0.9 0.03 < 0.001 CMJmean (cm) 36.0 38.7 36.8 40.3 37.6 42.4 1 c V 15.8 ±± 0.2 15.6 ±± 0.2 16.3 16.8 16.0 16.1 0.01 Acc (s) (km.h ) 1.81 0.01 1.78 0.01 1.81± ±0.2 0.01 1.79± ±0.3 0.01 1.82± ±0.3 0.01 1.78± ±0.3 0.01 0.16 Vam-eval 1 a,c,e b e e match running performance ) 28.7 ± 0.2running performance 30.0 ± 0.2 according29.0 ± 0.2 30.0 ± 0.4 29.0 ± 0.3 30.7 ± 0.3 < 0.001 PV (km.h Table 2 Physical capacities and match to playing positions. a,c,e c,e number of fi les n = 36 fi les n = 54 fi les n = 40 fi les n = 16 fi les n = 19 fi les n = 21 fi les RSAmean 4.73 ± 0.03 4.59 ± 0.02 4.65 ± 0.03 4.51 ± 0.04 4.60 ± 0.04 4.51 ± 0.03 < 0.001 a,b b,c,d e e e S143 S ±±136 P FB±±103 CB±±84 MD W±±155 2nd±± 7675 8665 ± ±98 8469 8429 7834 < 0.001 TD (m) (km.h 1) 8118 VVam-eval 15.8 0.2 15.6 0.2c 16.3 0.2 16.8 0.3 16.0 0.3 16.1 0.3 0.01 b b e e LIR (m) 6197 ± 81 6197anthropometric ± 66 6638 77runningdata 6231 122 capacities 6524 ± 112 5867 ± 106 < 0.001 match performance and± maturity and ± physical a,b b,c,d,e d,e e e HIR (m) 909 ± 33 732 ± 27 1150 ± 32 1037 ± 50 988 ± 46 766 ± 44 < 0.001 number of fiplayers les n = 36 n = 54 n = 40 n = 16 n = 19 n = 21 15 files 16 files 13 files 13 files 9 files 11 files aa,b b,c,d,e b,c,d e e e VHIR (m) 525 ±103 20 363±±±816 552±±998 19 612±±930 514±±10 27 516±±10 26 < 0.001 7675 84 8665 8469 155 8429 143 7834 136 TD (m) 8118 height (cm) 163 ±±11 166 164 163 159 163 0.35 a,b,e c,e c,e d ee b b e Sprinting (m) 487 ±±27 384 325 26 581 403 686 < 0.001 LIR (m) 6197 81 6197 ±±22 66 6638 6231 122 112 5867 106 body mass (kg) 50.6 9.8 53.8±M. 8.6 , A. Mendez-Villanueva 51.6± ±77 7.4 , B. M. Simpson 53.2 10.0 50.1±±38 7.8 51.3±±36 13.4 0.63 Authors Buchheit ,± P.±41 C. Bourdon 6524 a,e c,e c,e de e a,b b,c,d,e d,e VHIA (m) 1012 ± 41 747 ± 33 877 ± 38 1200 ± 61 917 ± 56 1202 ± 53 < 0.001 HIR 909 732 1150 1037 988 766 44 year(m) from PHV 0.5 ± 33 1.5 0.4Physiology ±27 1.1 Unit, Sport 0.6 ±32 1.3 0.6 ±50 1.3 for Sports Excellence, 0.6 ±46 1.2 0.20 A liations Science Department, ASPIRE, Academy Doha, Qatar 0.1 ± 1.5 1 b,e aa,c,e b,c,d,e eb,e ec,e ee peak game speed (km.h ) 25.9 ± 0.3 26.4 ± 0.2 24.6 ± 0.3 27.0 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 0.4 28.0 ± 0.4 < 0.001 VHIR (m) 525 ± 20 363 ± 16 552 ± 19 612 ± 30 514 ± 27 516 ± 26 CMJ (cm) 36.0 0.7 38.7 ± 0.6 36.8 ± 0.6 40.3 ± 1.0 37.6 ± 1.0 42.4 ± 0.9 < 0.001 Match Running Performance and Fitness in Youth Soccer 2 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.21 0.06 0.05 0.04 Testing 0.21 0.07 0.20 0.21 0.09 0.05 0.21 0.20 2 0.29 0.09 0.20 0.40 0.35 0.29 0.06 0.33 0.20 0.04 0.32 0.40 0.07 0.13 0.35 0.21 a,b,e c,e c,e d e Sprinting (m) 487 ±± 27 384 ±(22 325 ± 26 581 ± 41 403 ± 38 686 ± 36 < 0.001 0.33 Mean ( ± SD) values and least squared means ±±SE) for counter movement acceleration peak velocity (PV), mean sprint time on the repeated Acc (s)anthropometric 1.81 0.01 1.78 0.01 1.81 ± 0.01jump (CMJ), 1.79 ± 0.01 (Acc), 1.82 ± 0.01 1.78 ± 0.01 0.16 0.05 a,e c,eb c,ee d ee 1 a,c,e sprint test (RSA ) and peak running speed during the incremental fi eld test (V ), total distance (TD), low-intensity running (LIR), high-intensity running (HIR), very-highVHIA (m) 1012 ± 41 747 ± 33 877 ± 38 1200 ± 61 917 ± 56 1202 ± 53 < 0.001 0.32 28.7 0.2 30.0 ± 0.2 29.0 ± 0.2 30.0 ± 0.4 29.0 ± 0.3 30.7 ± 0.3 < 0.001 0.21 PV (km.h ) mean Vam-eval 1 b,e b,e running activities c,e e function of playing position (fullbacks (FB), a,c,e very-high-intensity c,e intensity running (VHIR), sprint running (Sprinting), (VHIA) and peak game speed reached as a peak game speed (km.h ) 25.9 ± 0.3 26.4 ± 0.2 24.6 ± 0.3 27.0 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 0.4 28.0 ± 0.4 < 0.001 0.13 RSAmean 4.73 ± 0.03 4.59 ± 0.02 4.65 ± 0.03 4.51 0.04 4.60 0.04 4.51 ± 0.03 < 0.001 0.20 Centrocampisti ed esterni > TD e Alta Intensità Difensori centrali < TD e Alta Intensità nd ldo Sassi. Copyrighted material. 1 midfi c for counter (CB), (MD), wide midfi elders (W), second (2 16.3 S)movement and strikers (S)).(CMJ), Values for age and playing(PV), time.mean signifi cant di on erence vs. CB Mean anthropometric ( ±elders SD) values and least squared means (±±0.2 SE)strikers jump (Acc), peak sprint time the repeated Vcentre-backs (km.h ) 15.8 ± 0.2 15.6 ± 0.2 16.8acceleration ±are 0.3adjusted 16.0 16.1 ±a:0.3 0.09 Vam-eval Abstract eta-squared (± 20.3 ): velocity 0.20–0.45). When adjusted for0.01 Key words nd 2 (sprint P < 0.05), vs. mean MD,) c: vs.peak W, d:running vs.football 2 S, e: vs.during S. : the e ect size testb: (RSA and speed incremental field testmatch (VVam-eval ), total distance (TD), low-intensity runningplaying (LIR), high-intensity running (HIR), very-highrunning performance age and individual time, match running high-intensity running The activity profi les of highly trained young socperformance was position-dependent ( P 0.001, (fullbacks (FB), intensity running (VHIR), sprint running (Sprinting), very-high-intensity running activities (VHIA) and peak game speed reached as a function of playing number of files n =field 36tests files n = 54 files n = 40 files n = 16 files n = 19 files n = 21 files <position 2 : 0.13 – 0.40). MD covered the greater TD; CB the cer players were in relation to age, nd examined a,b b,c,d e e e centre-backs (CB), midfielders (MD), wide midfielders (W), second S) and Values± are for age and playing time. a: significant erence vs. CB adolescents 7675 ± 84 strikers (2 8665 ± 98strikers (S)).8469 155adjusted8429 ± 143 7834 ± 136 < di 0.001 0.29 TD (m) 8118 ± 103 lowest (P < 0.05). Distance for VHIA was lower for playing position and physical capacity. Timend 2 global positioning bvs. S.system b e e ( P < 0.05), b: vs. MD, c: vs. W, d: vs. 2 S, e: : e ect size Fig. 2 Correlation coe cients (90 % confi dence TD LIR (m) 6197 ± 81 6197motion ± 66 analyses6638 ± 77 6231were ± 122 CB compared 6524 ±with 112all other5867 ± 106 0.20 VHIA positions (P < 0.05);<W0.001 (global positioning system) FB e and S displayed a,b b,c,d,e on 77 players d,e eCI)highest FB * intervals, between match running performthe VHIA ( P < 0.05). Relaperformed (U13 – U18; fullbacks HIR (m) 909 ± 33 732 ± 27 1150 ± 32 1037 ± 50 988 ± 46 766 ± 44 < 0.001 0.40 CB tionships between match running performance [FB], b,c,d,e [CB], midfielders [MD], wide CB et al., 2010 Buchheit ance and performance in fi eld tests, adjusted 0.35 for VHIR (m) 525 ± 20a 363 ± 16 centre-backs552 ± 19 612 ± 30 514 ± 27 516 ± 26 < 0.001 nd capacities were position-dependmidfic,e elders [W], second strikers [2 * S] and strikMD d and physical MD a,b,e c,e e age and individual playing time. Match running Fig. 2 Correlation coe cients (90 % confi dence Sprinting (m)TD 487 ± 27 384 ± 22[S]) during 42325 ± 26 581Total ± 41 ent, with 403poor ± 38or non-signifi 686cant ± 36correlations < 0.001 0.33 VHIA ers international club games. W FB d W performance: total distance (TD), very-high-ina,e c,e c,e eCI) between FB * intervals, match running performVHIA (m) 1012 ± 41 747 ± 33 1200 ± 61 within FB, 917 ± 56 1202 ± 53vs. VVam-eval < 0.001 0.32 : distance covered877 (TD)± 38 and very high-intensity CB, MD and W (e. g., VHIA nd ** 1 nd adjusted * ** 2CB S tensity running activities (VHIA), sprint running S 2nd e CB * computed ance and performance in fi eld tests, for ) were S r = 0.06 in FB) but large associations within 2 activities 16.1 km · h c,e Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini ** peak game speed (km.h 1) 25.9 ± 0.3b,e 26.4 ± 0.2b,e(VHIA; >24.6 ± 0.3 27.0 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 0.4 28.0 ± 0.4 < 0.001 0.13 ** * : r = 0.70 in running during 186 entire player-matches. *Physical capacand S positions (e. g., VHIA vs. Vgame ** SMD (Sprinting) and peak speed reached during S Vam-evaltime. * MD age and individual playing Match * Mean anthropometric ( ± SD) values and least squared means ( ± SE) for counter movement jump (CMJ), acceleration (Acc), peak velocity (PV), mean sprint time on the repeated Diversi autori hanno comunque suggerito che anche nei giovani la performance ad alta intensità nel corso delle partite è correlata alla performance nel test Yo-Yo (come per gli adulti) Fitness and Match Performance in Youth EFFECTS OF INTERMITTENT -ENDURANCE FITNESS ONSoccer MATCH PERFORMANCE IN YOUNG MALE SOCCER PLAYERS 5. High-in (HIR, s San Marino Football Federation (FSGC), Department of Research, San Marino; Corso di Laurea in Scienze Motorie, Facolta` di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universita` di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy; Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, 18.0 km Zurich, Switzerland; Human Performance Laboratory, S. S. MAPEI srl, Via Don Minzoni 34, Castellanza, Varese, Italy; and Facultad de Educacio´n y Humanidades de Melilla, Departamento de Educacio´n Fı´sica y Deportiva Universidad de Granada, 6. Sprintin Melilla, Spain km!h21) A players. Consequently, the Yo-Yo IR1 test may be Journal of Strength and Conditioning Researchsoccer | www.nsca-jscr.org 7. High-int regarded as a valid test to assess game readiness and guide Castagna, C, Impellizzeri, F, Cecchini, E, Rampinini, E, and training prescription in male youth soccer players. Barbero Alvarez, JC. Effects of intermittent-endurance fitness HIR+SP on match performance in young male players. J Strength K W evidence) association football, fitness, match analysis, activities) and Yo-Yo IR1soccer performance (convergent Cond Res 23(7): 1954–1959, 2009—The purpose of this study The com (28). Evidence for the construct validity of coaching, a fieldYo-Yo testtestis of was to examine the effect of specific endurance (Yo-Yo Intergreat importance in sport science because it assesses the mittent recovery test level 1, Yo-Yo IR1) on match performance vs. 11) wer in male youth soccer. soccersport players discipline in special relevance of a Twenty-one field testyoung, to amale given I (age 14.1 6 0.2 years) were involved in the study. Players were hour of t occer is a multifaceted sport that requires wellpopulations (test specificity) observed during international championship(5,23). games of corredeveloped physical fitness to be successfully played sponding age categories and completeda thenonexperimental, Yo-Yo IR1 on a In this investigation, descriptive– (28). Although no comparative studies have been a regular separate occasion. Physical (distance coverage) and physiocorrelation design was used to examine the relationship performed, physiological match demands (% of logical match demands were assessed using Global Positioning maximal heart rate and maximal aerobic power) have been soccer pit between Yo-Yo physical match performance in young System technology andIR1 heartand rate (HR) short-range telemetry, reported to be similar across competitive levels and gender respectively. Duringplayers. the match (two 30-minutes halves), players male soccer Players’ physical load, measured time in soccer (28),as with any differences being attributable mainly lasting 30 covered 6,204 6 731 m, of which 985 6 362 m (16%) were to game intensity (distance covered at high intensity) as a and distance spent in selected match activities, was assessed reflection of players’ fitness level (17,28). performed at high intensities (speed .13 km!h , HIA). A interval). A using Position System technology (GPS, The abilitySPElite, to perform intermittent, high-intensity exercise significantGlobal decrement (3.8%, p = 0.003) in match coverage was for prolonged periods plays a key role in competitive soccer evident during the second half. Physiological No significant (p = stress 0.07) GPsports, Australia). was assessed by relative hu (15–17,19,20). As a consequence, training and testing difference between halves was observed for HIA (p = 0.56) and monitoring heart rate (HR) during competitions strategies(11,12). have been proposed to monitor and enhance sprint (speed .18 km!h , SPR) distances. During the first and players’ ability to perform high-intensity activities during the matches w second halves, players attained the 86 6 5.5 and 85 6 6.0% of match (12,14,23). HRmax (p = 0.17), respectively. Peak HR during the first and Subjects Recently, with the aim to assess the intermittent endurance 35 6 second halves were 100 6 4 and 99.4 6 4.7% of HRmax, HIA, > 13and km/h abilityyears, of soccer players in field condition, the Yo-Yo Twenty-one soccer players (age 14.1 6 0.2 height respectively. Yo-Yo IR1 performance (842 6 352 m) was intermittent recovery test (Yo-Yo IR1) has been developed To avoid d significantly to match HIA (r =mass 0.77, p 52.5 , 0.001) totalkg)(4). 1.65 6 related 5.1 cm, body 6and25 were randomly The construct validity of the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery distance (r = 0.65, p = 0.002). This study’s results showed that test (level 1, Yo-Yo IR1) as a measure of match-related chosen among members of a national youth soccer academy tum drinki Il (HIA) modello prestativo in età evolutiva, specific endurance, as determined by Yo-Yo IR1 performance, physical performance has been demonstrated by studies Figure 1. Individual relationship between match high-intensity activity and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test E. Rampinini (Federazione Sammarinese Giuoco Calcio, Sana significant Marino). showing correlation between the Yo-Yo IR1 and positively affects physical match performance in male young the player the distance covered at high intensity during the match (15– CARLO CASTAGNA,1,2 FRANCO IMPELLIZZERI,3 EMILIO CECCHINI,1 ERMANNO RAMPININI,4 ´ CARLOS BARBERO ALVAREZ5 AND JOSE 1 2 3 4 5 the BSTRACT TM EY ORDS NTRODUCTION S 21 21 Normalizzazione per il tempo di gioco Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Normalizzando per il tempo di gioco le differenze tendono a diminuire ma restano Distanza$Totale$(m/min)$ 120# 115# 110# 105# 100# 95# 90# Tempo di gioco: U13$ U14$ U15$ U16$ U17$ U18$ 70’ 70’ 80’ 80’ 80’ 90’ PRO$ TD = U18 vs U13 +15% Buchheit et al., 2010 (mod) Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Normalizzando per il tempo di gioco le differenze tendono a diminuire ma restano Distanza$Totale$(m/min)$ 120# 115# 110# 105# 100# 95# 90# U13$ U14$ U15$ U16$ U17$ U18$ PRO$ Ma restano le differenze rispetto agli adulti Buchheit et al., 2010 (mod) Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Lo stato di maturazione: età cronologica vs età biologica Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Heights and cent male average, abo the general and young average, mo may reflect mass. The in is related, in logical mat Interrelation and functio implication soccer are o selection an chronologic soccer playe ier and mo delayed [15 based on cr changes in functional c limited. Fo dribbling a Ad esempio RSA strettamente legata all’età biologica dei ragazzi Training & Testing Modelling Developmental Changes in Repeated-Sprint Ability by Chronological and Skeletal Ages in Young Soccer Players Correspondence Prof. Manuel J Coelho-e-Silva, PhD University of Coimbra Estadio Universitario de Coimbra 3040-156 Coimbra Portugal Tel.: + 351/239/802 770 Fax: + 351/239/802 779 [email protected] b J. Valente-dos-Santos1, M. J. Coelho-e-Silva1, R. A. Martins1, A. J. Figueiredo1, E. S. Cyrino2, L. B. Sherar3, R. Vaeyens4, B. C. H. Huijgen5, M. T. Elferink-Gemser5, R. M. Malina6, 7 Authors 60 A liations A liation addresses are listed at the end of the article 62 60 58 58 56 Abstract Key words youth soccer longitudinal analysis skeletal age multilevel modelling growth skeletal maturation 54 52 50 11 12 This study investigated the influence of chronological (CA) and skeletal ages (SA), anthropometry, aerobic endurance and lower limb explosive strength on developmental changes in repeatedsprint ability (RSA) in soccer players aged 11–17 years. Participants were annually followed over 5 years, resulting in 366 measurements. Multilevel regression modelling analysed longitudinal data aligned by CA and SA (Model 1 and 2, respectively). After diagnosing for multicollinearity, it 13 possible 14 to 15 17 2-level hier-10 was predict16 RSA with archical models [Model 1 (CA as Level 2 predicCA (years) tor): Log-Likelihood = 1 515.29, p < 0.01; Model 2 RSA Real Score Valente dos Santos et al., 2012 Introduction Heights and weights of early- and mid-adoles- (SA as Level 2 predictor): Log-Likelihood = 1 513.89, p < 0.01]. Estimating sum of sprints for young soccer players are given by equations: sum of sprints = 84.47 1.82 × CA + 0.03 × CA2 0.05 × aerobic endurance 0.10 × lower limb explosive strength 0.09 × fat-free mass + 0.13 × fat mass (Model 1); 73.58 0.43 × SA 0.05 × aerobic endurance 0.10 × lower limb explosive strength 0.08 × fat-free mass 0.45 × training experience + 0.13 × fat mass (Model 2). The models produced performance curves that may be used to estimate individual performance across adolescent years. Finally, the 11 of 12 13 was 14confi15 16 on17 validity each model rmed based corresponding measurements taken on an indeSA (years) pendent cross-sectional sample. RSA Predicted Score ented soccer players aged 12–19 years were followed annually for 7 years, but interactions with growth and maturity status were not con- 56 54 RSA Score (s) RSA Score (s) Bibliography DOI http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0032-1308996 Published online: April 12, 2012 Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 773–780 © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York ISSN 0172-4622 loaded by: Università degli Studi di Milano. Copyrighted material. 62 a accepted after revision 773 January 16, 2012 Fig. 1 scores skelet 52 50 18 Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini La Fatica Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini p-value 0.80 0.02 2 0.30 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.69 0.02 0. 0. ± SD. FB – Full backs, CB – centre backs, MD – midfielders, W-MD – wide midfielders, 2 S – second strikers and S – strikers. ComeMean per gli adulti, nelle partite c’è calo di performance tra MSS, maximal sprinting speed; ASR, anaerobic speed reserve. : significant di erence vs. CB (P < 0.05), 2 : e ect size primo e secondo tempo nd a 5000 4500 Distance Covered (m) 4000 b,c,d,e 3500 3000 2500 # d e b,e e # e e # e e # c 1000 # # # # # # c,d # 2000 1500 # e e # Fig. 1 Lea ning intens U17 and U1 on total pla vs. U14 (P < U17, e: vs. U MAS, maxim anaerobic s a,b,c, d,e cde cde U14 U15 a,b,c, d,e # d,e # d,e # e # # # U13 U14 U15 U16 U17 U18 500 0 U13 U16 U17 U18 First Half 0–60% MAS 61–80% MAS Second Half 81–100% MAS 101% MAS–30% ASR > 31% ASR Mendez-Villanueva et al., 2013 Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Physical Fitness and Performance Effect of Match-Related Fatigue on Short-Passing Ability in Young Soccer Players ERMANNO RAMPININI1, FRANCO M. IMPELLIZZERI1,2, CARLO CASTAGNA3, ANDREA AZZALIN1, DUCCIO FERRARI BRAVO1, and ULRIK WISLKFF4 Human Performance Laboratory, Mapei Sport Research Center. Castellanza, Varese, ITALY; 2Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, SWITZERLAND; 3School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, ITALY; and 4Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Trondheim, NORWAY 1 ABSTRACT RAMPININI, E., F. M. IMPELLIZZERI, C. CASTAGNA, A. AZZALIN, D. F. BRAVO, and U. WISLKFF. Effect of Match-Related Fatigue on Short-Passing Ability in Young Soccer Players. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 934–942, 2008. Purpose: To examine whether the fatigue accumulated during match play or determined by short bouts of high-intensity intermittent activities affect short-passing ability in junior soccer players. A further aim was to examine the influence of physical fitness as measured using the YoYo Intermittent Recovery Test (YYIRT) on the changes in short-passing ability after a 5-min simulation of high-intensity activities (HIS). Methods: Sixteen players (mean T SD: age 17.6 T 0.5 yr, height 174 T 7 cm, body mass 68 T 6 kg) participated in the study. A quasi-experimental control-period design was used for the study. Short-passing ability was measured using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT). Players completed the LSPT in two sessions during the 1-wk control period, followed by two unofficial matches during which the LSPT was performed during and after the first and the second halves of the game. Furthermore, the change in LSPT performance was determined after 5 min of HIS. Results: A decline in LSPT performance was found during and after the game (P G 0.01). The accuracy of the LSPT decreased after the HIS. A significant correlation was found between the YYIRT scores and the decline in LSPT performance (accuracy, total time, total time with penalties) after HIS (r = j0.51 to j0.65; P G 0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that the fatigue developed during a match and after relatively short bouts of high-intensity intermittent activities has a detrimental effect on short-passing ability, and that the fatigue-related decline in technical proficiency for a given intensity is associated with the fitness level of the players. Key Words: EFFORT, PHYSICAL FITNESS, DETERIORATION, GAME, TECHNICAL SKILLS The Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT) S hort-passing ability is considered a relevant skill for soccer players (4,15,19,23). Sajadi and Rahnama (23) showed that 61% of 2006 FIFA World Cup goals were scored by direct shots, of which 47% were via short passes. This finding confirms previous results from the analysis of the 1986 FIFA World Cup during which 57% of goals were scored after passes shorter or equal to 3 m (19). Indeed, short-passing accuracy as measured using the two versions of the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT) Rampinini et al., 2008 Address for correspondence: Franco M. Impellizzeri, MSc, Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, is able to discriminate players of different competitive level (2,3). A recent study (21) has also shown that the players of the best teams in the Italian Serie A performed more short passes and had more involvement with the ball during official matches than the players belonging to the worst teams, as determined by the final ranking. Furthermore, these technical skills were the only skills showing a decrease between the first and second halves probably as a consequence of physical fatigue. Several studies have shown a decrement in physical performance during the match (12,16,20,22). In particular, some studies have shown that high-intensity running and sprinting decrease between the first and second halves Il modello (12,16,20) and following 5 min of very-high-intensity prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Nei giovani, anche le abilità tecniche (e.g. precisione passaggio) possono deteriorarsi nel corso di una partita FIGURE 4—Total performance in the Loughborough SoccerFIGURE Passing 2—Penalties in the Loughborough Soccer Passing Tes Test (LSPT) during the control period and during the soccer matchduring the control period and during the soccer match (N (LSPT) 2 PG N = 11). Significant main effect for time (P G 0.001; G = 0.46). 11). *Significant main effect for time (P G 0.001; G2 = 0.53). * P G 0.05 0.05, significant difference from the control period; # Psignificant G 0.05, difference from the control period; # P G 0.05, significan Rampinini et al., 2008 ignificant difference from the LSPT completed during the first half; from the LSPT completed during the first half; ‡ P G 0.05 difference ‡, P G 0.05, significant difference from the LSPT completed at the end difference from the LSPT completed at the end of the firs significant of the first half. Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini half. Il Livello Competitivo Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini I giovani di diverso livello competitivo sostengono un’intensità di esercizio diversa nel corso delle partite Physiological Profile and Activity Pattern of Young Soccer Players during Match Play JESPER STRØYER1, LONE HANSEN2, and KLAUS KLAUSEN3 1 Department of Work Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health Denmark, Copenhagen, DENMARK; and Institute of Medical Anatomy and 3Institute of Sports Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DENMARK 2 ABSTRACT STRØYER, J., L. HANSEN, and K. KLAUSEN. Physiological Profile and Activity Pattern of Young Soccer Players during Match 1. 168 Anthropometric data, The maturity and physiological Play. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 36,TABLE No. 1, pp. –174, 2004. Purpose: purposestatus, of this study was to examine parameters. aerobic demands and activity patterns during match play in young soccer players with respect to competition level, age, and biological maturity. NbP Methods: Ten nonelite players (NbP) and nine elite players (EbP) in their early puberty (12 yr), and seven elite players (EeP) in their Age (yr) pattern were recorded during match play, whereas corresponding V˙O12.1 $ 0.7 late puberty (14 yr) were studied. Heart rate (HR) and activity 2 mass (kg) tests in the laboratory. The maturity status was assessed from 40.6 $ 6.6 and HR values were obtained during submaximal andBody maximal treadmill ˙ O2max was testicular volume. Results: No difference in V observed Height (cm)between the nonelite and the elite players in the beginning of puberty 153.1 $ 5.1 (58.7 ! 5.3 vs 58.6 ! 5.0 mL O2·min"1·kg"1), whereas elite "2 players BMIthe(kg!m 17.2 $ 2.2 ) in the end of puberty were significantly more fit (63.7 ! 8.5 "1 "1 mL O2·min ·kg ). During match play, a higher HRTesticle was recorded in the elite players in the beginning of puberty than their nonelite5.3 $ 2.9 volume (mL) "1 1st half/2nd half—NbP: 162/157; EbP: 177/174; EeP: counterparts, whereas the two elite groups showed theV˙O same HR responses (HR 2352 $ 261 ) 2max (mL O2!min ˙ O2 (V ˙ O2·min"1 and mL "1 "1 178/173). The elite players in the end of pubertyV˙O thus performed a higher and relative V 58.7 $ 5.3 (mL O2!min !kgabsolute ) 2max "1 "1 "1 O2·min ·kg ) compared with the nonelite players during both halves, to more time spent in standing/walking in the BMR (mL O2!mincorresponding 201 $ 16 ) ˙ 2 values "1 "1 nonelite group. The elite players in the end of puberty showedeconomy higher absolute Running (mL V OO 233 $ 24 !kmduring ) match play than the young elite 2!kg ˙ O2max and was performing players but identical relative aerobic loads. It seems that the midfield/attack group had the highest absolute V HRmax (bpm) 198.0 $ 5.7 at the highest HR during the matches. Conclusion: The present study shows that young soccer players are highly specialized both HRrest (bpm) 65.5 $ 5.1 according to playing level and position on the field. Key Words: PUBERTY, OXYGEN UPTAKE, TIME-MOTION ANALYSIS, Values are means $ SD. NbP (nonelite players at the beginning of puberty), EbP (elite players TESTICLE VOLUME, MALE, HEART RATE EbP 12.6 $ 0.6 42.5 $ 7.2 154.1 $ 8.2 17.8 $ 2.0 6.7 $ 2.6 2466 $ 281 58.6 $ 5.0 206 $ 18 205 $ 31 202.1 $ 3.8 66.8 $ 6.0 at the beginning of puberty), EeP (elite # Denotes significant difference (P %0.05) between EeP and EbP. BMI, body mass index; V˙O2max, maximal oxygen uptake; BMR, basal meta-bolic rate. BMR is subtracted from the submaximal everal professional soccer schoolseconomy. for talented young players, surprisingly few studies have been published replayers have in recent years been established in Eugarding the physiological demand and the activity pattern of rope. More attention is being paid to the development young soccer players (6,8,13). Moreover, these studies fail of young talented players in the soccer clubs, and the physto couple the observed activity pattern and the aerobic load exhaustion were present. The beginning of puberty, !play. end ofet puberty). Alltheteams ical training and the tactical organization in the field seems duringeP match Klimt al. (14) measured HR during to˙ be implemented much earlier. Methods for analysis durcompetition and noncompetition games in 11to 12-yr-old submaximal employed a regular 4-4-2 formation, using four defenders, FIGURE 4 —HR during the first and second halves. Values are running means velociti ˙ O2 match " BMR)/ GURE 3—Relative aerobic load (%V O2 !play (V ing match have been developed and include heart rate boys but did not relate these measurements to the level and y-bars illustrate SD. Group codes are as in Figure 1. *Denotes gen uptake per body mass pe midfielders, and two attackers. Twelve of the subjects O2max " BMR)) during the first and second halves. Values four are (HR) measurements, and observational studies of motion of competition. significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups. #Denotes bolic ratesignificant (BMR). The BMR were defenders, 13 played midfield, and 3 were attackers. analysis and running pattern (3,9,23). Activity registration The purpose of the present study was to record the aerobic eans and y-bars illustrate SD. Group codes are as in Figure 1. differences between halves. has become easier and inexpensive by the use of small energy demand during match play and relate it to maturity mula of Schofield (22): [0.0 Because the attackers often played in the midfield, the enotes significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups. #Denotes microcomputers in field studies (19). The activity patterns status and competition level (elite vs nonelite) of young 2.157]MJ based on measure midfielders and attackers were treated as one group. The nificant differences (P < 0.05) between halves. demands have therefore and physiological been well-resoccer players. Furthermore, the activity pattern and the boys (mean 13.7 yr). Only the elitetoplayers were defined asspecialization subjects playing on the clubs ported in adult soccer players with regard competition influence of due to playing position on the S Stroyer et al., 2004 Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini HIM m min ' 14.5 ±2.3 11.5 ±3.7* 0.032 VHIM m min ' ±0.7 3.2 ± 1.4 avere una 0.068 I giovani calciatori di diverso livello3.4competitivo sembrano Sprints min' fisica e un’intensità di esercizio 0.4 ± 0.2differente 0.4 0.2 delle0.254 performance nel±corso partite Mean sprint distance (m) Pédiatrie Exercise Science, 2013, 25, 423-434 © 2013 Human Kinetics, Inc. 8.7 ± 4.3 6.5 ± 1.7 0.115 Peak sprint distancePerformance (m) 31.4 ±9.7 27.1 ±7.3 Abilities 0.129 Table 1 Match Characteristics and Physical A Comparison of Physical Abilities and ofPeak thespeed Elite(km andh')Subelite Under-14Characteristics Soccer (Mean Match Performance Among 26.8 ± 4.3 Players 25.8 ± 2.2 ± SD) 0.260 Elite and Subelite Under-14 Soccer Players Successful ball retention min' Mark Waldron 0.41 Elite (n±0.11 = 15) and 0.18 ± (n 0.02* 0.000 Subelite = 16)Abilities Sig. Table 1 Match Performance Characteristics Physical and Aron Murphy University of New England ofTotal themElite Subelite Under-14 Soccer (Mean Unsuccessful ball retention min' 0.14 ±0.04 min' and 0.06 ±±7.7* 0.02*± SD) 0.001 115.7 ±6.6 Players 0.000 105.4 Successful LIM m min"'passes min' This study aimed to identify characteristics of match performance and physical ability that discriminate between elite and subelite under-14 soccer players. Players were assessed for closed performance and movement, physiological responses, and technical actions during matches. Elite players covered more total m min' (115.7 ±6.6cf. 105.4±7.7m min') and high-intensity m min' (elite= 14.5±2.3c/. 11.5 ± 3.7 m min') compared with subelite players. Elite players also attempted more successful (0.41 ±0.11 ef. 0.18 ±0.02) and unsuccessful ball retentions min ' (0.14 ± 0.04 cf. 0.06 ± 0.02) compared with subelite players. Elite players were faster over 10 m (1.9 ± 0.1 c/. 2.3 ± 0.2 s) and faster dribblers (16.4 ± 1.4 c/. 18.2 ± 1.1 s) compared with subelite players. Speed (10m) and successful ball retention min ' contributed to a predictive model, explaining 96.8% of the between-group variance. The analysis of match performance provides a more thorough understanding of the factors underlying talent among youth soccer players. 0.47 46.5(n±0.19 ± =4.5 Elite 15) 0.21 42.4 ±0.08* ±(n 3.8* Subelite = 16) 0.000 0.039 Sig. Unsuccessful MIM Total m min' passes min' 0.18 0.06 51.2 ±±3.0 115.7 ±6.6 0.07 0.03* 48.3±±7.7* ±7.1 105.4 0.000 0.272 0.001 Successful tackling min' HIM m min ' LIM min"' 0.39 14.5 ±0.13 ±2.3 46.5 ± 4.5 0.18 11.5 ±0.07* ±3.7* 42.4 ± 3.8* 0.001 0.032 0.039 0.14 ±0.06 3.4 ±0.7 51.2 ±3.0 0.06 0.02* 3.2 ±±±7.1 1.4 48.3 0.000 0.272 0.068 Unsuccessful VHIM min 'tackling min' MIM mmmin' %HRpeak Sprints HIM m min' min ' The identification of young talented soccer players is traditionally a subjective process, whereby scouts and sports coaches are responsible for recognizing players with the capacity to perform at the elite level (19,25). However, talent identification in soccer is complicated by the growing number of participants and the vague concept of "talent" in team sports (13). More recently, the merits of integrating physical testing procedures into the talent identification process have been recognized. For example, it has been shown that under-14 Flemish youth players contracted to first or second division teams (elite), are faster over 30 m and perform better in dribbling and ball juggling skill tests than players competing at a regional level (nonelite; 24). However, compared with players of a higher standard (third and fourth division; subelite), there were no differences in speed, skill, agility or endurance until the under-16 age group (24). These results are consistent with research in French soccer, where a retrospective comparison between players reaching the international, professional, or amateur standard found no differences in physical performance in 86.7 2.4 0.4 ±± 0.2 14.5 ±2.3 83.8 ±3.5 0.4 ± 0.2 11.5 ±3.7* 0.051 0.254 0.032 RPE(O-IO) Mean sprint (m) VHIM m mindistance ' 4.9 ±±0.7 ±2.1 8.7 4.3 3.4 4.97 1.0 6.5 3.2 ±± 1.7 1.4 0.504 0.115 0.068 lO-msprint sprint time (s) (m) Peak Sprints min'distance 1.9 ±±0.1 31.4 ±9.7 0.4 0.2 HIM, > 13 km/h 2.3 0.2* 27.1 0.000 0.4 ±±±7.3 0.2 0.129 0.254 30-mspeed timeh') (s) (m) Peak Mean sprint(km distance età evolutiva, 0.260 E. Rampinini 4.3 ±±0.1 5.1 26.8 ± 4.3 4.3 Il modello prestativo 0.000 8.7 25.8 2.2 6.5 ±0.2* ±± in1.7 0.115 Peak speed (km h') 26.8 ± 4.3 25.8 ± 2.2 0.260 Successful ball retention min' 0.41 ±0.11 0.18 ± 0.02* 0.000 Successful passes min' 0.47 ±0.19 0.21 ±0.08* 0.000 0.18 ± 0.06 0.07 ± 0.03* 0.000 I giovani calciatori di diverso livello competitivo sembrano avere una Unsuccessful ball retention min' 0.14 ±0.04 0.06 ± 0.02* performance fisica e un’intensità di esercizio differente nel corso delle0.000 partite Pédiatrie Exercise Science, 2013, 25, 423-434 © 2013 Human Kinetics, Inc. Unsuccessful passes min' A Comparison of Physical Abilities and Successful tackling min'Match Performance 0.39 ±0.13 Among 0.18 ±0.07* Characteristics 0.001 Elite and Subelite Under-14 Soccer Players Table 1 Match Performance Characteristics and Physical Unsuccessful tackling min' 0.14 ±0.06 0.06 ± 0.02* Abilities 0.000 Mark Waldron and Aron Murphy of%HRpeak the Elite and Subelite Under-14 Soccer Players (Mean ± SD) University of New England 86.7 ± 2.4 83.8 ±3.5 0.051 Elite = 15) 4.9(n ±2.1 Subelite = 16) 4.97 ±(n1.0 Sig. 0.504 115.7 ±6.6 1.9 ±0.1 46.5 ± 4.5 4.3 ±0.1 105.4 2.3 ±±7.7* 0.2* 42.4 ± 3.8* 5.1 ±0.2* 0.001 0.000 51.2 41.1 ±3.0 ±4.4 48.3 ±7.1 40.7 ± 4.3 This study aimed to identify characteristics of match performance and physical ability that discriminate between elite and subelite under-14 soccer players. Players were assessed for closed performance and movement, physiological responses, and technical actions during matches. Elite players covered more total m min' (115.7 ±6.6cf. 105.4±7.7m min') and high-intensity m min' (elite= 14.5±2.3c/. 11.5 ± 3.7 m min') compared with subelite players. Elite players also attempted more successful (0.41 ±0.11 ef. 0.18 ±0.02) and unsuccessful ball retentions min ' (0.14 ± 0.04 cf. 0.06 ± 0.02) compared with subelite players. Elite players were faster over 10 m (1.9 ± 0.1 c/. 2.3 ± 0.2 s) and faster dribblers (16.4 ± 1.4 c/. 18.2 ± 1.1 s) compared with subelite players. Speed (10m) and successful ball retention min ' contributed to a predictive model, explaining 96.8% of the between-group variance. The analysis of match performance provides a more thorough understanding of the factors underlying talent among youth soccer players. RPE(O-IO) Total min'time (s) lO-m m sprint LIM min"'time (s) 30-m msprint MIM jump m min' CMJ height (cm) 0.039 0.000 0.272 0.393 The identification of young talented soccer players is traditionally a subjective HIM m min ' 14.5 ±2.3 11.5 ±3.7* Predicted vertical powerprocess, (W) whereby scouts and sports2816.2±4I4.7 coaches are responsible for recognizing players 2759.5 ± 382.5* 0.032 0.000 VHIM min ' (s) Slalom m dribble Sprintspassing min' test (n) Cone 0.068 0.039 0.254 0.378 with the capacity to perform at the elite level (19,25). However, talent identification in soccer is complicated by the growing number of participants and the vague concept of "talent" in team sports (13). More recently, the merits of integrating physical testing procedures into the talent identification process have been recognized. For example, it has been shown that under-14 Flemish youth players contracted to first or second division teams (elite), are faster over 30 m and perform better in dribbling and ball juggling skill tests than players competing at a regional level (nonelite; 24). However, compared with players of a higher standard (third and fourth division; subelite), there were no differences in speed, skill, agility or endurance until the under-16 age group (24). These results are consistent with research in French soccer, where a retrospective comparison between players reaching the international, professional, or amateur standard found no differences in physical performance in 3.4 ±0.7 16.4 ± 1.4 Ma anche abilità atletiche 0.4 ± 0.2 Mean distance (m) Slalomsprint agility (s) Peak sprint distance (m) 4.7 ± 1.3 8.7 ±±0.5 4.3 10.3 3.2 ± 1.1* 1.4 I8.2± diverse 0.4 4.2 ± ± 0.2 1.5 6.5 ± 1.7 0.115 11.6 ± 1.4* 0.043 Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini CONCLUSIONI ✓ La performance fisica nelle partite aumenta con l’età in maniera simile a quanto succede alle abilità atletiche ✓ Non sempre esistono delle strette correlazioni tra livelli atletici (risultati test) e performance fisica nelle partite (ruoli) ✓ Il livello di maturazione biologica influenza pesantemente la capacità atletica dei ragazzi (test) e la prestazione fisica in partita ✓ Come per gli adulti, la fatica che si genera nel corso delle partite sembra influenzare negativamente la prestazione fisica e l’abilità tecnica dei giovani calciatori ✓ I giovani calciatori di più alto livello competitivo nel corso delle partite mostrano un’intensità di esercizio maggiore e una performance atletica maggiore (grazie anche alla maggior maturazione biologica) Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Grazie per l’attenzione… Domande… Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini Il modello prestativo in età evolutiva, E. Rampinini
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz