All Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy in the United

Fig 4.1 95% confidence limits for prevalence of 725 pmp for population
size 50,000 - 600,000
1000
Upper 95% CI
725 pmp
Lower 95% CI
900
Prevalence
800
700
600
500
400
0
100
200
300
400
500
Population (thousands)
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
600
Fig 4.2 95% confidence limits for prevalence of 725 pmp for
population size 50,000 – 4 million
1000
Upper 95% CI
725 pmp
Lower 95% CI
900
Prevalence
800
700
600
500
400
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Population (thousands)
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
4,000
Fig 4.3 Growth in prevalent patients, by treatment modality
at the end of each year, 1982-2006
40,000
PD
35,000
Home HD
HD
30,000
Transplant
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Year
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
0
1982
Number of patients
45,000
Fig 4.4 Percentage non-Whites in areas with significantly low, normal
and significantly high SPR values (median and quartiles) on 31/12/2006
40
35
% non-white
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Low
Normal
High
Prevalence group
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
Fig 4.5 Ethnicity and standardised prevalence ratio for all
covered local authorities on 31/12/2006
2.0
Standardised prevalence ratio
1.8
NE England
1.6
NW England
1.4
Yorkshire & the Humber
1.2
East Midlands
1.0
West Midlands
East of England
0.8
London
0.6
SE England
0.4
SW England
0.2
Wales
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
% non-White
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
Fig 4.6 Age distribution (1 year age bands) of prevalent RRT
patients split by treatment modality (dialysis or transplant)
on 31/12/2006
4.0
Transplant
3.5
Dialysis
Percentage of patients
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
Age (years)
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
95
Fig 4.7 Age profile of prevalent RRT patients by gender on
31/12/2006
5500
5000
Male
4500
Female
Number of patients
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
Age band
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
85+
Fig 4.8 Crude Rate per Million Population by Age and Gender for the
UK stock on 31/12/2006
2600
2400
2200
2000
Males
1800
Females
All UK
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
Age Group
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
90+
85-89
80-84
75-79
65-74
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
40-44
35-39
30-34
25-29
0
20-24
Pmp
1600
Fig 4.9 Treatment modality in prevalent RRT patients on
31/12/2006
Home - HD
1.1
Hosp - HD
26.0
Transplant
44.9
Satellite - HD
17.2
Cycling PD
4.0
CAPD Connect
0.1
CAPD
Disconnect
6.5
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
Fig 4.10 Treatment modality distribution by age in prevalent RRT
patients on 31/12/2006
100
Percentage by age band and treatment modality
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Transplant
Peritoneal dialysis
10
Haemodialysis
0
18-24
25-34
34-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
Age band
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007
85+
Centre
Fig 4.11 Proportion of prevalent dialysis patients on
HD by age group on 31/12/2006
UK
Wales
Scotland
N Ireland
England
Ipsw i
Inverns
Redng
Dundee
ManWst
Nottm
Bangor
Shrew
Klmarnk
Cardff
Exeter
Bradfd
Sw anse
Derby
L Barts
Brightn
Truro
Chelms
Oxford
Wrexm
Plymth
Ports
Glouc
Edinb
Dudley
York
Dunfn
Carsh
New c
Leic
Hull
D&Gall
New ry
Leeds
Bristol
Prestn
Belfast
L Rfree
Wirral
Norw ch
Dorset
Sheff
Glasgw
Liv RI
Antrim
L Kings
B QEH
Wolve
Airdrie
Covnt
Abrdn
Camb
Basldn
Carlis
Middlbr
L Guys
Sthend
Stevng
B Heart
Sund
Tyrone
L West
Clw yd
65+Ulster
Liv Ain
Chestr
< 65
Derry
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100
Percentage dialysis on HD
UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007