Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Course Enhancement Module on Multi-Tiered Systems of Support in Mathematics: Part 1—Introduction H325A120003 CEM Overview Part 1: Introduction Part 2: Universal Intervention Part 3: Supplemental Intervention Part 4: Intensive Intervention 2 Participant Goals By the end of this section, participants will be able to: Discuss the importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education Identify essential concepts in mathematics Identify areas where students commonly struggle Identify the essential components of a multi-tiered system of support 3 Part 1: Introduction Importance of STEM education Guiding principles in math Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and essential math concepts How students learn math Students with math disabilities Multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) 4 Note Part 1 uses content and resources from: The National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII) www.intensiveintervention.org The National Center on Response to Intervention http://www.rti4success.org/ National Council of Teachers of Mathematics www.nctm.org Innovation Configuration for Mathematics (CEEDAR) The National Math Advisory Panel Report (2008) 5 Why Is Mathematics Education So Important? 6 The Importance of STEM Education Prepares all students for college and career Is vital to meeting the needs of the future job market Eliminates disparities in math achievement (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], 2014) 7 Nation’s Report Card (2013) http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups (National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2013) 8 Nation’s Report Card (2013) Students Scoring Basic or Below Basic in Math Student Subgroup Grade 4 Grade 8 All students 58% 64% Students with disabilities 83% 92% English language learners 86% 95% http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2013/#/student-groups (National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2013) 9 Sample NAEP Grade 4 Math Question Fourth-grade students scoring at the basic level should be able to solve a problem like this: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/itmrl sx/default.aspx (National Assessment of Educational Progress, n.d.) 10 STEM Education: The President’s Charge The United States’ international math status is significantly lower than other well-developed countries. Implications for the nation’s future Implications for our quality of life (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 11 Interactive Activity STEM Education Video from www.whitehouse.gov, retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9NxFeCFApM&feature=player_detailpage, as posted by Mavericks Space Foundation, 2010 12 STEM Education: Job Outlook 3:1 increase in STEM jobs (National Science Board, 2008) “Close to half of all seventeen year olds cannot read or do math at the level needed to get a job at a modern automobile plant. Barring some other special knowledge or talent that would allow them to earn a living as, say, a plumber or artist, they lack the skills to earn a middleclass paycheck in today’s economy.” - Labor economists Richard Murnane and Frank Levy (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, p. 3) 13 Income by Graduation Status National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The condition of education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). Annual Earnings of Young Adults. 14 STEM Education: Life Skills Many Americans lack life skills that involve math. Many have difficulty with fractions, which are essential for algebra. Algebra is “gateway.” (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 15 Importance of STEM Education: College Success Success in math is essential for college. High school math beyond Algebra II is highly correlated with college attendance (Horn & Nuñez, 2000; Horowitz, 2005). College graduates produce multiple benefits for society. (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 16 STEM Education: Addressing Disparities College is a social escalator (Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991). College graduation rates differ between those who have and have not taken Algebra II. High school science and math course completion can relieve or eliminate the achievement gap. Math is for ALL. (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 17 Standards-Based Movement Six Principles of the StandardsBased Movement Equity Curriculum Teaching Learning Assessment Technology (Van de Walle et al., 2013) 18 Principles and Standards (NCTM, 2000) Five Content Standards Number and Operations Algebra Geometry Measurement Data Analysis and Probability (Van de Walle et al., 2013) Five Process Standards Problem Solving Reasoning and Proof Communication Connections Representation 19 Quest for Coherence (NCTM, 2006) Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence (NCTM, 2006) BIG ideas identified Three focal points along with process skills and connections are fundamental at each grade level (Van de Walle et al., 2013) 20 Birth of the Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards Five content standards Five process standards Coherence (CCSSO, 2010) 11 content domains 8 practice standards Watch the CCSS VIDEO (Van de Walle et al., 2013; Council on Great City Schools, 2013) 21 Characteristics of Successful Math Programs, Teachers, and Students 22 Activity: Successful Schools, Teachers, and Students Directions: 1. Move into your assigned group. • Choose one person to be the recorder and one person to be the reporter. 2. Travel to each chart as directed, read the topic on the chart, and record your ideas on the chart paper. 3. After you visit all three charts, return back to your original chart. 4. Read all of the additional ideas that have been added by the other teams and be ready to share out to the large group. 23 Math Guiding Principles I. Teachers must understand and demonstrate mastery of the mathematics content they teach. II. Teachers must understand how students learn math content. III. Teachers must understand how assessment guides and informs instruction. (VanDerHeyden & Allsopp, 2014) 24 Knowledge of Math Content Teachers must demonstrate: Competency in understanding the underlying concepts for the content they teach Understanding of math concepts and skills across domains Understanding of and engagement in the eight critical practices (CCSS) Understanding of effective teaching practices specific to the mastery of math (VanDerHeyden & Allsopp, 2014) 25 Teacher’s Knowledge (Hill, Ball, & Schilling, 2008) 26 Understanding Underlying Concepts Teachers must… Understand key ideas and skills Articulate prerequisite skills Explicitly connect the known to the new Explain why a problem worked Establish mastery objectives Select tools that align with key ideas to facilitate understanding (VanDerHyden & Allsopp, 2014) 27 Understand the Developmental Nature of Mathematics Teachers must also demonstrate understanding of math concepts and skills across domains and how they build on each other. 11 domains (CCSSO, 2010): 1. Counting and Cardinality 2. Operations and Algebraic Thinking 3. Number and Operations in Base Ten 4. Number and Operations– Fractions 5. Measurement and Data (Van de Walle et al., 2013) 6. Geometry 7. Ratios and Proportional Relationships 8. The Number System 9. Expressions and Equations 10. Functions 11. Statistics and Probability 28 Handout 1 Eight Math Practices K–8 students should be able to: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Use appropriate tools strategically Reason abstractly and quantitatively Attend to precision Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others Look for and make use of structure Model with mathematics Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/ (Van de Walle et al., 2013) 29 How Mathematical Thinking Develops 30 Math Proficiency What is math proficiency? Math proficiency means understanding key concepts with automaticity, developing “flexible, accurate, and automatic execution of standard algorithms, and [using] these competencies to solve problems” (NMAP, 2008). For example, to prepare students for algebra, teachers must “simultaneously develop conceptual understanding, computational fluency, and problem-solving skills” (NMAP, 2008). (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 31 Five Domains of Math Proficiency Van de Walle, Karp, Bay-Williams, Wray, & Rigelman, 2013 32 Understand the Developmental Nature of Mathematics (slide graphic from NCTM, 2012, as referenced by Common Core Math Library, n.d. Retrieved from http://ccssmlibrary.blogspot.com/p/grade-level-math-resources.html) Interactive K–8 chart Interactive K-8 chart linked above is LearnZillion (n.d.), retrieved from https://learnzillion.com/common_core/math/k-8 33 Students With Math Disabilities and Struggling Learners Number sense Working memory Phonological processing Processing speed Executive functioning Pattern of strengths and weaknesses (Compton et al., 2012) 34 Math Disabilities Dyscalculia: a neurologically based disorder affecting math abilities, this is evident by a discrepancy between a student’s general cognitive functioning (IQ) and math abilities (academic achievement). The three types of math disabilities are: – Semantic memory – Procedural memory – Visuospatial memory Prevalence: at least 6 percent Language difficulties (Wadlington & Wadlington, 2008) 35 Math Disabilities Math anxiety Additional factors: motivation, poor instruction, lack of prerequisite skills (Video from: www.NLCD.org or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVf_OHK2hHQ) 36 Poor Outcomes for Students With Disabilities Students with disabilities have a history of poor outcomes (compared with their non-disabled peers) in: Academic achievement Involvement with criminal justice system Employment (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008) 37 Multi-Tiered Systems of Support 38 Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) (Slide graphic and information taken from www.rti4success.org) 39 Multi-Level Prevention System Intensive level of prevention (~ 5% of students) Supplementary level of prevention (~15% of students) Universal level of prevention (~80% of students) (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 40 Multi-Level Prevention System Students with disabilities and English language learners receive services at all levels, depending on need Intensive level of prevention Supplemental level of prevention Universal level of prevention (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 41 MTSS Framework Multi-Level Prevention System Universal Focus: All students Instruction: District curriculum and instructional practices that are evidence-based; aligned with state or district standards; and incorporate differentiated instruction Setting: General education classroom Assessments: Screening, continuous progress monitoring, and outcome measures Supplementary Focus: Students identified (through screening) as at risk for poor learning outcomes Instruction: Targeted, supplemental instruction delivered to small groups Setting: General education classroom or other general education location within the school Assessments: Progress monitoring, diagnostic Intensive Focus: Students who have not responded to universal or supplementary instruction Instruction: Intensive, supplemental instruction delivered to small groups or individually Setting: General education classroom or other general education location within the school Assessments: Progress monitoring, diagnostic (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 42 MTSS: Screening Purpose: Identify students who are at risk of poor learning outcomes Focus: All students Tools: Brief assessments that are valid, reliable, and that demonstrate diagnostic accuracy for predicting learning or behavioral problems Timeframe: Administered more than once per year (e.g., fall, winter, and spring) (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 43 Progress Monitoring Purpose: Monitor students’ response to primary, secondary, or tertiary instruction in order to estimate rates of improvement, identify students who are not demonstrating adequate progress, and compare the efficacy of different forms of instruction Focus: Students identified (through screening) as at risk for poor learning outcomes Tools: Brief assessments that are valid, reliable, and evidence-based Timeframe: Students are assessed at regular intervals (e.g., weekly, biweekly, or monthly) (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 44 Data-Based Decision Making Data analysis is used at all levels of RTI implementation (e.g., state, district, school, grade level) and at all levels of prevention (e.g., universal, supplementary, intensive). It requires established routines and procedures for making decisions. It also requires explicit decision rules for assessing student progress (e.g., state and district benchmarks, level and/or rate). Data is used to compare and contrast the adequacy of the core curriculum and the effectiveness of different instructional and behavioral strategies. (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 45 Implementing the MTSS Framework Select and implement evidence-based practices and procedures. Implement essential components and the identified framework with integrity. Ensure that cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic factors are reflected in the RTI framework and its components. (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 46 Considerations for English Language Learners Provide interventions that: – Include high-quality vocabulary instruction – Take into account the student’s level of language proficiency – Address cultural and prior educational experiences (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 47 Linguistic and Cultural Factors to Consider Native language Current levels of proficiency in first language and in English Early exposure to first language and English Country of origin Educational and cultural experiences 48 (Information taken from www.rti4success.org) 48 How CCSS-M Aligns With MTSS (Information and graphic from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/NCII_Computation_Fractions_Example.pdf ) 49 Benefits of MTSS Maximize academic growth Minimize behavioral problems Culturally responsive (Slide graphic and information taken from www.rti4success.org) 50 Interactive Activity Reflect and Revise: Closure Activity Take three minutes to reflect on five to eight of the big ideas you learned from this module. Revisit the chart paper. Update your definition of “successful math instruction, teachers, and students.” Add or delete ideas in your definitions based on new information you learned from this module. 51
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz