P R E S E N TAT I O N G U I D E
Dear School District Administrator,
This PowerPoint presentation is intended to help initiate and facilitate community
engagement in budget planning during the Local Control and Accountability Plan
development process.
The information included in this presentation is an example of what would be helpful
share with stakeholders. Feel free to add or omit information to tailor this presentation
to the specific context of your district. We provide further guiding information
throughout the presentation indicated by this symbol:
This presentation is a companion to the Best Practices for Engaging Stakeholders in the
Budget document.
Sincerely,
1
S U P P O R T I N G O U R S T U D E N T S & FA M I L I E S
DISTRICT’S NAME
BUDGET OVERVIEW
District’s Logo
Date
2
O V E R V I E W O F P R E S E N TAT I O N
About LCFF and LCAP
• How the Local Control Funding Formula Works
• Local Control & Accountability Plans
• LCAP Timeline
The Big Picture
• Overview of our District
• Our District’s Student Achievement
• Our District’s Plans for Success
Budget Development
• District Fiscal Trends – General Fund Revenue
• New Revenue
• Increase in District Financial Commitments
• New Investments Being Considered
• Proposed Supplemental & Concentration
Reflections & Feedback
3
ABOUT LCFF AND LCAP
4
HOW THE LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) WORKS
In 2013, California dramatically reformed the way it funds our public schools.
LCFF established a funding system that provides school districts with base
funding and additional funds based on how many low-income students, English
learners, and foster youth they serve.
BASE
GRANTS
Every student generates a base
grant, which funds basic
educational costs, such as teacher
salaries, retirement costs,
instructional materials, etc.
S U P P L E M E N TA L
GRANTS
C O N C E N T R AT I O N
GRANTS
Every student who is low-income,
learning English, or in foster care
generates 20% more funding above
the base grant.
In districts where at least 55% of
students are high-need, those highneed students above the 55%
enrollment threshold generate an
extra 50% of the base grant.
These funds must be spent on
increasing and improving services
for these high-need student groups
in order to improve their
achievement.
These funds must also be spent to
increase or improve services for
high-need students in order to
improve their achievement.
5
T H E L O C A L C O N T R O L & A C C O U N TA B I L I T Y P L A N ( L C A P S )
All school districts must adopt a Local Control & Accountability Plan (LCAP), a 3-year
plan for how districts will use state funds to serve all students.
Each district’s LCAP must
include the following:
 Goals
LCAPs must include services
that target each major
student subgroup, including:
 Actions
 Racial/ethnic subgroups
 Related expenditures
 Low-income students
 English learners
 Students with disabilities
 Foster youth
 Homeless youth
LCAPs must address the
8 State Priorities*:
1. Basic Services
2. Implementation of
standards
3. Parental engagement
4. Student achievement
5. Student engagement
6. School climate
7. Access to courses
8. Other student outcomes
* For county offices of education there are 2
additional priorities: (9) Instruction for Expelled
Youth and (10) Foster Youth Services
6
THE TIMEFRAME TO DEVELOP THE LCAP
Late SummerFall 2015
Winter 2016
Spring 2016
Spring 2016
July 1, 2016
October 8,
2016
District
engages the
community to
solicit input on
the LCAP.
District and
community
assess student
needs.
District creates
first draft of
plan,
incorporating
community
input.
District
presents
proposed plan
to parent
advisory
committees for
feedback and
input.
District
responds in
writing to
feedback from
parent advisory
committees
and
incorporates
feedback into
plan.
School board
adopts plan by
July 1st in a
public hearing.
County office
of education
must approve
district LCAPs
by October 8th.
Required by
Statute
Required by
Statute
Suggested
Suggested
Suggested
Suggested
7
THE BIG PICTURE
8
OVERVIEW OF OUR DISTRICT
# of Schools
# of Students
# of Staff
# of Students by
Race/Ethnicity
# of Students by
Subgroup
Elementary:
TK-5:
Support Staff:
Latino:
Low-Income:
Middle:
6-8:
Teachers:
African
American/Black:
English Learners:
High School:
9-12:
Administrators:
Foster Youth:
Asian:
Alternative:
Homeless Youth:
White:
Charter:
Other:
% Unduplicated or
High Need:
9
OUR DISTRICT ’S STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
How many students are meeting or
exceeding English standards?
69%
60%
60%
40%
21%
20%
20%
11%
Low-Income
English Learner
White
Asian
Black
Latino
0%
21%
16%
11%
0%
Asian
30%
27%
Black
32%
49%
Low-Income
60%
40%
80%
English Learner
71%
White
80%
100%
Latino
100%
Choose student outcomes data that is relevant
to your district’s needs. Show achievement
data by grade levels if that is more helpful to
your district’s stakeholders.
How many students are meeting or
exceeding Math standards?
10
OUR DISTRICT ’S STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
How many of our students are
graduating?
100%
100%
90%
89%
84%
90%
91%
92%
92%
86%
87%
88%
88%
80%
74%
80%
76%
77%
61%
71%
70%
68%
61%
66%
How many of our students have
completed the courses they need
for UC/CSU eligibility?
68%
68%
67%
68%
46%
47%
71%
63%
60%
63%
60%
42%
44%
49%
40%
50%
28%
27%
40%
29%
28%
27%
29%
28%
29%
32%
31%
20%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Latino
Black
Asian
White
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Latino
Black
Asian
White
11
OUR DISTRICT ’S SCHOOL CLIMATE
20.0%
At what rates are we suspending
students?
20%
How many of our students feel
unsafe or very unsafe at school?
14.5%
13.5%
11.9%
12%
10.7%
10.0%
10%
9%
8%
6.2%
4.8%
1.8%
6%
5.5%
4.3%
4.6%
3.7%
1.5%
1.2%
5%
3.9%
3.3%
1.1%
0%
0.0%
2011-12
Latino
2012-13
Black
2013-14
Asian
2014-15
White
Latino
Black
Asian
White
All
Students
12
OUR DISTRICT ’S PLANS FOR SUCCESS
Answer the following questions for your stakeholders:
• Which LCAP goals are the district prioritizing to improve student
achievement?
• How will our LCFF investments support meeting our district’s
goals for improved student achievement?
• How does the LCAP reflect the district’s commitment to closing
opportunity and achievement gaps?
13
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
14
DISTRICT FISCAL TRENDS – GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Total General Fund Revenue, 2013-2017
in Millions
Increase in Revenue
from 2015-16 to
2016-17 = $16.8
million
$392
$400
2016-17 General Fund Revenue in Millions
$29/7%
$29/7%
$409
$331
$292
$300
$64/16%
$287/70%
$200
LCFF - Base
$100
LCFF - Supplemental &
Concentration
$0
Other State & Fed
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
Local Miscellaneous
15
PROJECTED GENERAL FUND EXPENITURES 2016 -2017
Expenditures in Millions
Salaries & Benefits
$8.0 /2%
Books & Supplies
Services/Operating
Expenses
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out/
Other Uses
$11.0 /3%
$39.3 /10%
$24.0/6%
$326.7 /80%
Define more obscure budget
terms like “Capital Outlay” and
“Transfers Out” for your
stakeholders.
Also, tell your stakeholders what
expenditures fall into the “Other
Uses” category.
16
BREAKDOWN OF SOURCES FOR $16.8 MILLION IN NEW REVENUE
Revenue Sources in Millions
$1.2 /7%
$0.6 /4%
$3/18%
$12.0 /71%
LCFF-Base
LCFF-Supplemental
& Concentration
Local
Miscellaneous
Other State & Fed
17
2016-17 INCREASE IN DISTRICT FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS
COMMITMENT
COST (In Millions)
Increase in Revenue
$
16.8
Salary Increases (required step-and-column)
$
0.5
Salary Increases (negotiated raises)
$
2.0
Increase in Health Care Benefits
$
1.0
Increase in Pensions (burden shifted from the state to the
district)
$
1.5
K-3 Class Size Reduction (required under LCFF)
$
1.0
Total Financial Commitments
$
6.0
Revenue Increase Remaining
$
10.8
18
2016-17 NEW INVESTMENTS BEING CONSIDERED
Remaining New Revenue for 2016-17 = $10.8 Million
Priority
Goal
LCFF-Base
(In
Millions)
LCFF-Suppl. &
Conc. (In
Millions)
Expanding summer school to 3
Improving Math and
additional school sites (add names of English Language
school sites)
Arts achievement
$
1.1
New tutoring program at 4 school
sites (add names of school sites)
Improving Math and
English Language
Arts achievement
$
0.2
Expanding restorative justice to 5
more schools (name schools)
Decreasing
suspensions
$
0.2
Use the “Goal” column in this
and the following tables to
show how district investments
will address the needs identified
by the data displayed earlier in
the presentation.
CONTINUED
19
2016-17 NEW INVESTMENTS BEING CONSIDERED
Remaining New Revenue for 2016-17 = $10.8 Million
Priority
Goal
Expanding dual-language learners
program; adding 8 new positions
Improving English
learner academic
achievement
LCFF-Base
(In Millions)
Additional need-based school-site Increasing support
allocations
for high-need
students
LCFF-Suppl. &
Conc. (In
Millions)
$
0.8
$
0.7
3.0
10 additional counselors
Increasing access to
college-prep
coursework
$
1.0
Districtwide teacher professional
development
Improving academic
achievement
$
6.8
$
7.8 $
Total
20
OTHER POTENTIAL NEW INVESTMENTS
Potential Investments
Goal
Cost (In
Millions)
Career technical course pathways
Preparation for career
$
4.0
3-5 New social workers
Socio-emotional supports
$
0.3-0.5
Transportation for extracurricular
activities
Student engagement/
graduation rates
$
0.2
Professional development in culturallyrelevant pedagogy
Student
engagement/school
climate
$
2.0
4 new parent liaisons
Parent engagement
$
0.4
21
2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING
(IN MILLIONS)
ACTION OR SERVICE GOAL
2 foster youth
liaisons
Ensuring
continuity of
educational
support for
foster youth
Professional
Improving
development for all English learner
teachers on the new academic
ELD Standards
achievement
4 Restorative justice Decreasing
trainers to train 80
suspensions
teachers at 10 school
sites (name schools)
CHANGE TO
ACTION OR
SERVICE IN
2016-17
Continued
CONTINUED
INVESTMENT
FROM
2015-16
$
0.2
PROPOSED
DISTRICTWIDE/
NEW
SCHOOLWIDE/
INVESTMENT
TARGETED
2016-17
Targeted
Continued
$
5.0
2 additional
trainers to
serve 5 more
school sites
(name
schools)
$
0.2 $
Districtwide
0.2 Schoolwide
CONTINUED
22
2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING
(IN MILLIONS)
ACTION OR SERVICE
GOAL
Dual-language
learners program
Improving
English learner
academic
achievement
Increasing
support for highneed students
Improving
graduation rates
Allocations to
highest-need school
sites
Summer school for
credit recovery/
academically at-risk
students at 5 school
sites (name schools)
CHANGE TO
ACTION OR
SERVICE IN
2016-17
CONTINUED
INVESTMENT
FROM
2015-16
PROPOSED
DISTRICTWIDE
NEW
/SCHOOLWIDE
INVESTMENT
/ TARGETED
2016-17
Adding 8
new
positions to
program
Increased
site funding
$
10.4 $
0.8
Targeted
$
44.5 $
0.7
Schoolwide
3 additional
school sites
(name
schools)
$
0.7 $
1.1
Schoolwide
CONTINUED
23
2016-17 PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL & CONCENTRATION SPENDING
(IN MILLIONS)
ACTION OR SERVICE GOAL
Tutoring services at
4 school sites
Improving
Math and
English
Language
Arts
achievement
CHANGE TO
ACTION OR
SERVICE IN
2016-17
CONTINUED
INVESTMENT
FROM
2015-16
Launching
program at
4 school
sites (name
schools)
PROPOSED
DISTRICTWIDE/SCH
NEW
OOLWIDE/TARGETE
INVESTMENT
D
2016-17
$
TOTALS
$
61.0 $
GRAND TOTAL
$64 MILLION
0.2 Schoolwide
3.0
24
REFLECTIONS & FEEDBACK
25
REFLECTIONS & FEEDBACK
Questions for discussion:
• What questions do you have about the information we
presented? Is there anything we need to clarify?
• In what ways do these spending priorities resonate with you?
In what ways do they not resonate with you?
• Which investments might we increase or add, and why?
Which investments might we decrease or eliminate, and why?
• In what ways is this spending plan helping to close opportunity
and achievement gaps within our district?
26
THANK YOU!
27