SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND Kayla LocklearBehavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist Purpose Describe rationale, features, & outcomes Prevention Continuum of Evidence-based Practices Academic-Behavior Link Systems Capacity 4 Challenges •Negative school-wide disciplinary climate •“Get Tough” discipline •“Train-n-Hope” professional development •Lack of effective minutes PBIS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable (Zins & Ponti, 1990) Non-responsive problem behavior….”Get Tough!” Disciplinary RtI • Clamp down & increase monitoring • Re-re-re-review rules • Extend continuum & consistency of consequences • Establish “bottom line” When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!” •Zero tolerance policies •Increased surveillance •Increased suspension & expulsion •In-service training by expert •Alternative programming …..Predictable systems response ! But….false sense of safety/security! •Fosters environments of control •Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior •Shifts accountability away from school •Devalues child-adult relationship •Weakens relationship between academic & social behavior programming Science of behavior has taught us that students…. •Are NOT born with “bad behaviors” •Do NOT learn when presented contingent aversive consequences ……..Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback Prevention PSRC is about…. Improving classroom & school climate Integrating Decreasing academic & reactive behavior management initiatives Improving Maximizing support for academic students w/ achievement BIPs WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT PREVENTING VIOLENCE? • • • • • • Positive, predictable school-wide climate High rates of academic & social success Formal social skills instruction Positive active supervision & reinforcement Positive adult role models Multi-component, multi-year school-familycommunity effort • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) What is RtI? PSRC detour Comprehensive screening Early & timely decision making Data-based decision making Implementation Fidelity Support for nonresponders Need for better Instructional accountability & justification Assessmentinstruction alignment Resource & time use IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING STUDENT & PROBLEM PERFORMANCE SOLVING CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING RtI: Good “IDEA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators •NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention •NOT limited to special education •NOT new Quotable Fixsen • “Policy is • Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” • Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” • “Training does not predict action” • “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications” Precision Teaching CBM Early Screening & Intervention Applied Behavior Analysis Behavioral & Instructional Consultation Prereferral Interventions Diagnostic Prescriptive Teaching Teacher Assistance Teaming Where’d “triangle” come from….a PBIS perspective? “Triangle” ?’s •Why triangle? •Why not pyramid or octagon? •Why not 12 tiers? 2 tiers? •What’s it got to do w/ education? •Where’d those %’s come from? Public Health & Disease Prevention Kutash et al., 2006; Larson, 1994 •Tertiary (FEW) • Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases •Secondary (SOME) • Reduce current cases of problem behavior •Primary (ALL) • Reduce new cases of problem behavior Prevention Logic for All Walker et al., 1996 Decrease development of new problem behaviors Prevent worsening of existing problem behaviors Redesign learning & teaching environments to eliminate triggers & maintainers of problem behaviors Teach, monitor, & acknowledge prosocial behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive RtI Application Examples EARLY READING/LITERACY SOCIAL BEHAVIOR TEAM General educator, special educator, reading specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. UNIVERSAL SCREENING Curriculum based measurement SSBD, record review, gating PROGRESS MONITORING Curriculum based measurement ODR, suspensions, behavior incidents, precision teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS 5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting, group contingency management, function-based support, selfmanagement DECISION MAKING RULES Core, strategic, intensive Primary, secondary, tertiary tiers Responsiveness to Intervention Academic + Social Behavior Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Curricular & instructional decisions Families & community interactions Implementation accountability Measurement, assessment, & evaluation Special education functioning General education functioning PSRC Features Implementation Levels Student Classroom School District State PSRC Conceptual Foundations Behaviorism ABA PBIS CIP Basics: 4 PBIS Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior CONTINUUM of PSRC TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound/PCP Audit • Special Education ~5%• 1. Identify existing practices • ~15% • • • • • by tier 2. Specify outcome for each effort SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out 3. Evaluate implementation Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports accuracy & outcome Social skills club effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on PRIMARY4. PREVENTION • Teach & encourage positive outcomes SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline 5. Establish decision rules (RtI) • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • ~80% of Students “Train & Hope” WAIT for New Problem Expect, But HOPE for Implementation Hire EXPERT to Train Practice REACT to Problem Behavior Select & ADD Practice PBIS Systems Implementation Logic Funding Visibility Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation N u m b e r o f O ffic e R e fe rr a ls Referrals by Location 50 40 30 20 10 0 Bath R Bus A Bus Caf Class Comm Gym Hall Libr School Locations Play G Spec Other PSRC Subsystems Classroom Family Non-classroom Student School-wide 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation Non-classroom •Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged •Active supervision by all staff • Scan, move, interact •Precorrections & reminders •Positive reinforcement Classroom • Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged • Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged • Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult-student interaction • Active supervision • Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors • Frequent precorrections for chronic errors • Effective academic instruction & curriculum Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources PSRC investments in Prevention Continuum of Evidence-based Behavioral Interventions Systems Capacity for Accurate & Sustainable Implementation
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz