Gastroprotective Effect of Tectona Grandis in Experimental animals

Gastroprotective Effect of Tectona Grandis in Experimental animals
Anupama A Suralkar*, Avinash D Deshpande, Abhijeet R Borate, Kishor N Rodge, Rahul
D Kamble, Sandeep R Khandeshe
Department of Pharmacology,
Padm. Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research,
Pimpri, Pune-411 018.
Name and address of corresponding author*:
Anupama A Suralkar*,
Department of Pharmacology,
Padm.Dr.D.Y.Patil Institute of
Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research,
Pimpri, Pune-411 018.
E-mail: [email protected]
Mobile: +91-7798444002
ABSTRACT:
The gastroprotective activity of ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis bark (EtOH-TG) was
investigated by using ethanol induced ulcer model in rats. In this model ulcer index, antioxidant
parameters like Superoxide dismutase, Catalase, Reduced glutathione, Lipid peroxidation and pH
of gastric juice were determined. Administration of EtOH-TG for a period of 15 days at the dose
of 100 and 200 mg/kg p.o. /day body weight reduced the chances of the gastric mucosal lesions
induced by ethanol administration to the rats. EtOH-TG at the dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o.
/day produced significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01) decrease in ulcer index and significant (p<0.05
and p<0.01) increase in antioxidant parameters and pH of gastric juice when compared to the
ethanol control group respectively. Thus the EtOH-TG showed significant gastroprotective
activity which may be due to its increase in mucin secretion as well as free radicals scavenging
activity in the stomach which reduces the gastric ulcer production. Thus the results obtained
indicates that ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis may prove to be useful in treatment of gastric
ulcer this may be due to its significant antiulcer and cytoprotective effect on gastric mucosa.
Key words: Gastroprotective, EtOH-TG, ethanol induced ulcer, ulcer index.
INTRODUCTION:
Gastric ulcer is a very common global problem today. The pathophysiology of these ulcers
involves an imbalance between offensive (acid, pepsin, and Helicobacter pylori) and defensive
factors (mucin, prostaglandin, bicarbonate, nitric oxide and growth factors). Today, there are two
main approaches for treating peptic ulcer. The first deals with reducing the production of gastric
acid and the second with re-enforcing gastric mucosal protection.
(1)
Modern approach includes
proton pump inhibitors, histamine receptor blockers, drugs affecting the mucosal barrier and
prostaglandin analog but clinical evaluations of these drugs have shown incidences of relapse,
side effects and drug interactions.
(2)
For examples, H2- receptor antagonists like cimetidine may
cause gynecomasia in men and galactorrhea in women.(3) while proton-pump inhibitors like
omeprazole and lansoprazol can cause nausea, abdominal pain, constipation and diarrhea.(4)
These therapeutic limitations have provided incentive anti-ulcer drugs. Due to those side effects,
there is a need to find new anti-ulcerogenic compound(s) with potentially less or no side effects
and medicinal plants have always been the main sources of new drugs candidates for the
treatment of gastric ulcer. (5, 6)
Tectona grandis Linn. (Verbenaceae) is a large deciduous tree. Branchlets are quadrangular,
channeled and stellately tomentose. The tree is growing in higher situations, native to central
India, Konkan, Western Deccan peninsula, South India and Burma. It is commonly known as
sagwan (Hindi), saka (Sanskrit) and teak tree (English). Teak is a hardwood species of
worldwide reputation. Root contains lapachol, tectol, tectoquinone, β-sitosterol and a diterpene,
tectograndinol. Bark is useful in bronchitis, hyperacidity, vitiated conditions of pitta; dysentery,
burning sensation, diabetes, leprosy and skin diseases. (7)
T. grandis has been investigated for its nitric oxide scavenging activity and various
phytochemicals present in plants have been reported to possess great potential in treatment of
various diseases, many of them have been shown to be very useful in wound care i.e. promoting
the rate of wound healing, bringing about decrease in pain, discomfort, and scarring
(8)
and
naphthoquinones like juglone, lapachol and deoxylapachol reported in teak also possess
antimicrobial activity. (9) T. grandis contains tannin, which is used as an anti-inflammatory agent
and is also used topically for the treatment of burns. (7)
Traditionally this plant is used as anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, cytotoxic, anti-anemic, antiulcer, anti-viral, wound healing. Lapachol is the main chemical constituent which is reported in
this plant.
(10)
Thus, the present study involves the gastroprotective activity of the ethanolic
extract of T. grandis bark in ethanol induced ulcer model in rats.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Plant material and preparation of extract
Fresh bark of Tectona grandis Linn. (Verbenaceae) was collected from Nanded, Maharashtra,
India. The specimen was authenticated at Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Pune. The bark was
washed with distilled water and shed dried and latter powdered. This powder was then defatted
with petroleum ether and then macerated with ethanol for 72 h with occasional shaking. It was
then filtered and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum (11). The yield of ethanolic extract of
bark of Tectona grandis (EtOH-TG) was 3.1% (w/w).
Experimental animals
Wistar albino rats weighing 150-200g were housed in standard cages at room temperature 22 ± 2
°C and 50±5% relative humidity, under a light/dark cycle of 10/12 h, for 1 week before the
experiments. Animals were provided with standard rodent pellet diet (Amrut, India), and water
ad libitum. The animals were deprived of food for 24 hrs before experimentation, but had free
access to drinking water. All experiments were performed in the morning. Experimental
protocols were approved by our Institutional Ethical Committee which follows guidelines of
CPCSEA (Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals)
and complies with international norms of INSA (Indian National Science Academy).
Acute oral toxicity study and selection of doses
A safe oral dose of EtOH-TG was determined through the acute oral toxic test in rats as
described by the Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) as per 423
guidelines. The EtOH-TG, at different doses up to 2000 mg/kg, was prepared by dissolving the
extract in distilled water and the concentration was adjusted in such a way that it did not exceed
1 ml/100 g of the rat. The extract was then administered by oral route and animals were observed
for behavioural changes, any toxicity and mortality up to 48 h. Two different doses (100 and 200
mg/kg, p.o) of EtOH-TG were later chosen for this study based on the acute toxicity testing.
Gastric Ulcer Induction in Rats: (12)
One ml of 80% ethanol was used orally to induce gastric ulcer. The animals were divided into
four groups (n=6). Group-I represented the normal control group, which received 5 ml/kg body
weight of vehicle (1% gum acacia, p.o. /day). Group-II received ethanol (80%, 1.0 ml) and
served as ethanol control. Group-III received Omeprazole (20 mg/kg p.o. /day) one hour before
ethanol (80%, 1.0 ml) administration and served as standard. Group-IV and Group-V received
EtOH-TG at the dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o/day) respectively of one hour before ethanol
(80%, 1.0 ml) administration and served as test.
EtOH-TG was administered by oral intubation at a dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o/day) and was
given for a period of 15 days. After the experimental period of 15 days, prior to sacrifice,
animals were fasted for 24 h. Group-II to Group-V animals received 1.0 ml of 80% ethanol
orally. One hour after the ethanol administration the animals were sacrificed by cervical
dislocation and the abdomen was incised and irrigated with normal saline. Subsequently, the
stomach was incised along the greater curvature and its mucosal erosion was determined
randomly by measuring the area of the lesions. The following arbitrary scoring system was used
to grade the incidence and severity of lesions, (13)
0 = No ulcer, 1 = Superficial ulcer, 2 = Deep ulcers, 3 = Perforations
The Mean Ulcer Index UI was calculated using following formula:
UI =UN+US+UP X 10-1
Where UI=Ulcer Index, UN = Average of number of ulcer per animal, UN = Average of severity
score, UP = Percentage of animals with ulcers.
Effect on antioxidant enzyme parameters:
The stomach was weighed and then further processed for antioxidant enzymes, in which the
stomach was homogenized in chilled Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4) at a concentration of 10%
(w/v). The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 x g at 0oC for 20 min using Remi C-24 high
speed cooling centrifuge. The clear supernatant was used for the assays of lipid peroxidation
(MDA content), endogenous antioxidant enzymes [superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase
(CAT), and reduced glutathione (GSH)].
Biochemical Estimations
Superoxide dismutase was determined by the method of Mishra and Fridovich. (14)Catalase was
estimated by the method of Hugo Aebi as given by Colowick et al.(15) Reduced glutathione was
determined by the method of Moron et al.(16) Lipid peroxidation or malondialdehyde formation
was estimated by the method of Slater and Sawyer. (17)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
The values expressed as mean ± SEM from 6 animals. The results were subjected to statistical
analysis by using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test to verify the significant
difference if any among the groups. P<0.05*, P<0.01**and P<0.001*** were considered
significant.
RESULTS:
Study of Anti-Ulcer and Antioxidant Activity Using Ethanol-Induced Ulcer Method
Administration of ethanol produced significant ulcers in the ethanol control group. There was a
significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01) reduction in ulcer index at the selected dose of 100 and 200
mg/kg, p.o/day of EtOH-TG and % protection was found to be 54.17 and 63.01 % respectively
which was comparable to standard drug Omeprazole (75.61%).
Ethanol administration was found to increase lipid peroxidation and decrease SOD, catalase, and
reduced glutathione in the ethanol control group when compared to normal control rats.
Administration of EtOH-TG significantly (p<0.05 and p<0.01) decreased lipid peroxidation and
increased the levels of SOD, catalase and reduced glutathione level at the dose of 100 and 200
mg/kg p.o. /day respectively. The results of this work are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Effect on Gastric Mucosa of Ethanol Treated Rats
Histologically, ethanol treated rats showed ulcerated mucosa with marked mucosal hemorrhage
and destruction of glandular elements and these were characterized by multiple red bands
(patches). Pretreatment with EtOH-TG showed significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01) protection
against ethanol induced gastric mucosal damage when compared to ethanol control group.
Animals in ethanol control group (Fig.1) showed total mucosal ulceration, hemorrhage and
segmental mucosal necrosis of gastric epithelium when compared to the animals treated with
Omeprazole (standard). In animals treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg p.o. /day of EtOH-TG (test),
EtOH-TG at the dose of 200 mg/kg p.o. /day the gastric mucosal epithelium showed maintenance
of normal architecture than 100 mg/kg dose of EtOH-TG when compared to ethanol control
group.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:
It is generally accepted that gastric ulcer results from an imbalance between aggressive factors
and the maintenance of the mucosal integrity through the endogenous defense mechanism. To
regain the balance, different therapeutic agents including herbal preparations are used to inhibit
the gastric acid secretion or to boost the mucosal defense mechanism by increasing mucus
production. Experimental studies have demonstrated that oxygen-generated free radicals (ROS)
and lipid peroxidation are involved in the pathogenesis of acute gastric lesions induced by
ethanol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or Helicobacter pylori. Absolute ethanol method
of inducing gastric lesions is rapid and convenient way of screening plant extracts for anti-ulcer
potency and cytoprotection in macroscopically and microscopically visible lesions. Disturbances
in gastric secretion, damage to gastric mucosa, alterations in permeability, gastric mucus
depletion and free-radical production are reported to be the pathogenic effects of ethanol.
Absolute ethanol is highly corrosive to the gastric mucosa and it causes superficial necrosis of
gastric mucosa and release of histamine and leukotriene-C4 as tissue-derived mediators. These
mediators act on gastric microvasculature and result in destruction of mucosa and submucosa of
gastric wall. Extensive experimental evidences indicate that certain substances, through
scavenging of free radicals, protect the gastric mucosa. (12)
In the present study, The EtOH-TG was subjected for phytochemical investigation and acute
toxicity studies. In phytochemical evaluation EtOH-TG showed the presence of beta-sitosterol,
terpenoids, phenolic compounds, saponins, flavonoids, quinones, glycosides and tannins. In
acute toxicity studies, EtOH-TG has shown it to be safe up to a dose of 2000 mg/kg p.o. body
weight of rat. Further EtOH-TG was evaluated at a dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg p.o. /day body
weight for its potential gastroprotective activity in ethanol induced gastric mucosal ulceration in
rats and we found that EtOH-TG exhibited significant gastric mucosal protection in a dose
dependent manner against this model, with maximum protection observed at 200 mg/ kg, p.o.
/day when treatment is given for 15 days.
From the results obtained, the gastroprotective activity of ethanolic extract of TG bark may be
due to its free radicals scavenging activity as well as increase in mucin secretion in the stomach
which reduces the chances of gastric ulcer production. Earlier studies have shown that TG exerts
anti-ulcer activity in experimental gastric ulcer models but the mechanism of actions through
which it mediates gastroprotective effects were not elucidated.
Though we have not studied the active principles responsible for the anti-ulcer activity of
ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis, this may be due to the presence of tectoquinone, lapachol,
deoxylapachol & flavonoidal compounds such as rutin and quercitin in the extract. Lapachol
have been reported to possess significant anti-ulcer activity in various experimental models of
gastric and duodenal ulceration. (18, 19)
CONCLUSION:
Thus the results obtained in the present investigation indicates that ethanolic extract of Tectona
grandis may prove to be useful in preventing gastric ulcer owing to its ability to increase the
mucin secretion and antioxidant activity in the stomach. Thus our studies establish a significant
antiulcer and cytoprotective effect of EtOH-TG. However, further studies are required to
establish its exact mode of action and the active principles involved in its anti-ulcer effect.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are grateful to Dr. A. D. Deshpande, Director Pad. Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of
Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune, M.H., India, for providing laboratory
facilities.
CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Rao N.V., Kola V., Sowmya U., Reddy J.G., Anirudh K. Evaluation of Anti -Ulcer
activity of Momordica Charantia in Rats. International Journal of Pharmacy and
Biological Sciences, 2011, 1 (1), 1-16.
2. Vinothapooshan G. and Sundar K. Anti-ulcer activity of Mimosa pudica leaves against
gastric ulcer in rats., Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical
Sciences 2010, 1(4), 606-614.
3. Feldman M. Burton M.E. Histamine2-Receptor Antagonists -Standard Therapy for AcidPeptic Diseases. N. Engl. J. Med., 1990, 323, 1672-1680.
4. Reilly J.P. Safety profile of the proton-pump inhibitors. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.,
1999, 56(23), S11-S17.
5. Borrelli F., Izzo A.A. The plant kingdom as a source of anti-ulcer remedies. Phytother.
Res., 2000, 14: 581-591.
6. Khan M.S.A., Hussain S.A., Jais A.M., Zakaria Z.A and Khan M. Anti-ulcer activity of
Ficus religiosa stem bark ethanolic extract in rats, Journal of Medicinal Plants Research,
2011, 5(3), 354-359.
7. Varma S. B. and Jaybhaye D. L. Antihyperglycemic activity of Tectona grandis Linn.
Bark extract on alloxan induced diabetes in rats, International Journal of Ayurveda
Research, Int J Ayurveda Res, 2010, 1(3), 163–166.
8. Naira N., Karvekar M.D. Isolation of phenolic compounds from the methanolic extract of
Tectona grandis. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical
Sciences, 2010, 1(2), 221-225.
9. Krishna M.S., Nair A.J. Anthraquinones from leaves of Tectona grandis: A detailed
study on its antibacterial activity and other biological properties, International Journal of
Phytomedicine, 2011, 3, 50-58.
10. Samanta K.C., Sharma P., Sharma V and Garg V.
Free radical scavenging activity of
tectona grandis roots. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research,
2010, 1 (12), 159-163.
11. Ghaisas M., Navghare V., Takawale A., Zope V., Tanwar M., Deshpande A. Effect of
Tectona grandis Linn on dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance in mice. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology, 2009, 304–307.
12. Suralkar A.A., Chitlange S.S., Sarda P., Borate A.R., Malusare P.V., Bangale P.A.,
Deshpande A.D. Protective Effect of Polyherbal Drug, Acisim in Ethanol-Induced
Gastric Mucosal Lesions in Experimental Rats., Inventi Rapid: Ethnopharmacology ,
2011, (3), 477.
13. Dubey N., Mehta R.S., Saluja A.K and Jain D.K. Antiulcer Activity of a Traditional Pearl
Preparation: Mukta Bhasma., Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2009, 2(2), 287-290.
14. Mishra H.P., Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the auto-oxidation of
Epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Journal of Biological
Chemistry. 1972, 247, 3170–3175.
15. Colowick S.P., Kaplan N.O., Packer L. Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press,
London. 1984, 105,121–125.
16. Moron M.S., Depierre J.W., Mannervik B. Levels of glutathione, glutathione
reductase and glutathione S-transferase activities in rat lung and liver. Biochimica et
Biophysica Acta. 1979, 582, 67–78.
17. Slater T.F, Sawyer B.C, The stimulatory effects of carbon tetrachloride and other
halogenoalkanes or peroxidative reactions in rat liver fractions in vitro. Biochemical
Journal. 1971, 123, 805–814.
18. Aradhana R., Rao K.N.V., Banji D. and Chaithanya R.K. A Review on Tectona grandis.
Linn. Chemistry and Medicinal uses, Herbal Tech Industry, 2010, 06.
19. Singh N., Shukla N., Singh P., Sharma R., Rajendran S.M., Maurya R., Palit G.
Verbascoside isolated from Tectona grandis mediates gastric protection in rats via
inhibiting proton pump activity. FitoterapiaI. 2010, 81, 755–761.
Table 1: Effect of Ethanolic Extract of Tectona grandis Bark (EtOH-TG) on ulcer index &
% inhibition of ulcers.
Group
I
II
III
IV
V
Dose (mg/kg)
Normal Control
(Vehicle 5 ml/kg p.o)
Ethanol Control
(80% Ethanol, 1.0 ml)
Standard Omeprazole
(20 mg/kg p.o)
EtOH-TG
(100 mg/kg, p.o)
EtOH-TG
(200 mg/kg, p.o)
Total no. of Ulcers
Ulcer Index
% protection
-
-
-
20.37±0.98
61.1
-
3±0.46**
14.9
75.61**
7.27±0.71*
28
54.17*
5.87±0.53**
22.6
63.01**
EtOH-TG: Ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis bark; Values are expressed as mean ± SEM
(n=6). Ethanol control group was compared with normal control group. EtOH-TG treated groups
were compared with ethanol control group; *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Values in parenthesis indicate
the % reduction in ulcer index in relation to the ethanol control group.
Table 2: Effect of Ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis Bark (EtOH-TG) on antioxidant
parameters in stomach of ethanol-treated rats.
Normal
Parameters
Control
(Vehicle 5
ml/kg p.o)
Ethanol
Control
Standard
EtOH-TG
EtOH-TG
(80%
Omeprazole
(100mg/kg,
(200mg/kg,
Ethanol,
(20mg/kg p.o.)
p.o.)
p.o.)
8.09 ± 1.25**
4.21± 0.95*
7.61 ± 1.13**
4.59± 1.25*
4.65 ± 6.25**
1.48± 3.32*
1.43 ± 0.08**
2.14± 0.45*
5.50 ± 0.87**
3.72± 0.33*
1.0 ml)
SOD
5.61 ±
2.23
(unit/mg protein)
0.33
±0.03**
(μmoles of H2O2
8.25 ±
5.93 ±
consumed/min mg
0.27
0.61*
3.25 ±
0.79 ±
0.15
0.17**
3.56 ±
6.75 ±
0.33
0.70**
6.39 ±
0.79**
Catalase
6.68 ±
1.55**
protein)
Reduced glutathione
(μg of GSH/mg
protein)
Lipid peroxidation
(nmoles of MDA/mg
protein)
pH of gastric juice
1.22 ±
0.07
2.6± 0.15
2.26 ±
4.10**
1.69 ±
0.08**
4.2± 0.18**
EtOH-TG: Ethanolic extract of Tectona grandis bark; Values are expressed as mean ± SEM
(n=6). Ethanol control group was compared with normal control group.
EtOH-TG treated groups were compared with ethanol control group; *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Values
in parenthesis indicate the % reduction in ulcer index in relation to the ethanol control group.
Ulcerated mucosa
(Normal control)
(Ethanol control)
Ulcerated mucosa
Standard, Omeprazole (20 mg/kg)
EtOH-TG (100 mg/kg)
Ulcerated mucosa
EtOH-TG (200mg/kg)
Figure 1: Effect of Ethanolic Extract of Tectona grandis Bark (EtOH-TG) on gastric
mucosa of stomach.