NON-PAPER VERSION
Country Name
Competent Authority Name
and
Official LOGO
SURVEY PROGRAMME 2016
Organisms harmful to plants
MS_______ 2016 official survey
Table of Contents
Chapter
1.
Title
Page
Introduction and scope for Survey Programme 2016
2
1.1.
1.2.
General description of Survey Programme 2016 in the MS
2
2
1.3.
1.4.
Challenges for Survey Programme 2016 from national perspective
2.
2.1.
Geographical and administrative units in Survey Programme 2016
Description of the geographical and administrative areas in which the
programme is to be applied
4
4
2.2.
Description of the status of those areas as regards the survey of the
pests
4
2.3.
Geographical characteristics of the areas implemented in the
programme
MS organization structure and key responsibilities for Survey
Programme 2016
Name of the MS single authority responsible for supervising and coordinating the implementation of Survey Programme 2016
Structure and flowchart of the organisations, institutes, other public
bodies etc. responsible for the technical measures of the Survey
Programme 2016
Duration of the Survey Programme 2016
Overview of the production/host plants and priority groups in
Survey Programme 2016 and their relation to pests and
surveillance method
Types of production/host plants and priority groups in Survey
Programme 2016 and their relation to pests and surveillance method
Overview of the number of visual examinations, samples and tests for
the pests and plants, diagnostic methods used for the Survey
Programme 2016
Main diagnostic methods used for pests identification
Overview of estimated budget allocation
Targets for Survey Programme 2016
4
3.
3.1.
3.2.
4.
5.
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
6.
7.
Overview of previous Surveys Programmes in MS
Pests to be surveyed in 2016 and their current status
1
2
2
5
5
5
5
6
6
8
9
12
13
1. Introduction and scope for Survey Programme 2016
1.1. General description of Survey Programme 2016 in the MS
o
o
o
Scopes
Targets
Focus areas and priorities
1.2. Overview of previous Surveys Programmes in MS
o
Overview of Pest Surveys for the years 2014-2015
Example of MS entry
Number of pests included
Number of surveys
Number of analysis
2014
20
900
1500
2015
60
1100
3600
Table 1. Pests incidence and surveys programme overview for years 2014-15
1.3. Challenges for Survey Programme 2016 from national perspective
o
MS main pests priorities, outbreaks etc.
1.4. Pests to be surveyed in 2016 and their current status
a. The pests listed in Section I of Part A of Annex I and Section I of Part A of Annex II to
Directive 2000/29/EC as not known to occur in the Union territory.
Example of MS entry
Type of Pest
Pest (Latin Name)
Current Pest status
Insect
Agrilus spp.
Intercepted
Nematode
Bursaphelechus xylophilus
Fungi
Phyllosticta citricarpa
Absent
Bacteria
Xylella fastidiosa
Present
Virus
Table 2a. Pest Priority A for the Surveys programme 2016
2
Limited, Seasonal Distribution
b. The pests subject to Union measures adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article
16(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC
Example of MS entry
Type of Pest
Pest (Latin Name)
Pest status
Insect
Nematode
Fungi
Bacteria
Virus
Table 2b. Pest Priority B for the Surveys programme 2016
c. The pests which have the potential to generate a crisis situation with serious economic and
environmental consequences and pests which have an impact on trade within the Union and with
third countries
Example of MS entry
Type of Pest
Pest (Latin Name)
Pest status
Insect
Nematode
Fungi
Bacteria
Virus
Table 2c. Pest Priority C for the Surveys programme 2016
d. The pests which are not listed in Directive 2000/29/EC and which represent an imminent
danger to the Union territory ('non-listed pests')
Example of MS entry
Type of Pest
Pest (Latin Name)
Insect
Nematode
Fungi
3
Pest status
Bacteria
Virus
Table 2d. Pest Priority D for the Surveys programme 2016
4
2. Geographical and administrative units in Survey Programme 2016
2.1. Description of the geographical and administrative areas in which the programme is to be
applied.
o
Number of Administrative areas and Locations per area implemented in the programme
2.2. Description of the status of those areas as regards the presence of the pests
o
o
Number of Surveys per administrative area
Surveyed area covered (km²) within the administrative area
Example of MS entry
Administrative Area
Number of Surveys
Surveyed Area (km2)
Thessaly (Admin. Area 1)
10
100
Ipeiros (Admin. Area 2)
20
200
Pelopponisos (Admin. Area 3)
30
300
Makedonia (Admin. Area 4)
40
400
Ipeirotiki Chora (Admin. Area 5)
50
500
Total: 5 Admin Areas
150
1500
Table 2. Administrative areas in the MS for Surveys programme 2016
2.3. Geographical characteristics of the areas implemented in the programme.
o
o
Maps illustrating the areas implemented in the Survey Programme 2016
Other additional information's (histograms, photos etc.) of the administrative areas and
pests presence occurrence in the past & future. (if available)
5
3. MS organization structure and key responsibilities for Survey Programme 2016
3.1. Name of the MS single authority responsible for the supervising and co-ordinating the
implementation of Survey Programme 2016
o
Name of the Ministry, Authority, other public body
3.2. Structure and flowchart of the organisations, institutes, other public bodies etc. responsible
for the technical measures of the Survey Programme 2016 (inspections – sampling – analysis
etc.).
o
o
Description of the administrative role of the public bodies responsible for the Survey Programme
2016, relevant legislation giving the legal base to implement the Survey Programme 2016at
national level .
Official or contracted organisations, institutes, other public bodies etc. responsible for the
technical measures for the Survey Programme 2016 (inspections – sampling – analysis etc.)
Example of MS entry
Name of the Organisation
Official / Contracted
Type of Measure
Ministry of Agriculture
Official
Inspection
Institution of Agr. Research
Official
Sampling
University of Analysis
Official
Administrative, Analysis
Research centre
Contracted
Testing
Table 3. MS entities involved in Surveys programme 2016
4. Duration of the Survey Programme 2016
The program has duration of one year, starting at 1st January 2016 and ending at 31st of
December 2016.
6
5. Overview of the production/host plants and priority groups in Survey Programme 2016
and their relation to pests and surveillance method
5.1. Types of production/host plants and priority groups in Survey Programme 2016 and their
relation to pests and surveillance method
a. The pests listed in Section I of Part A of Annex I and Section I of Part A of Annex II to
Directive 2000/29/EC as not known to occur in the Union territory.
Example of MS entry
Location
Host plant
groups type
Pests
Aleurocanthus
spp.
Scirtothrips
spp.
Dendrolimus
sibiricus
Orchards
Citrus
Orchards
Coniferous
Epsilon
Deciduous
Hill
Fruit Plants
Diaphorthe
vaccinii
Hill
Citrus
Bactocera
dorsalis
Agrilus anxius
Surveillance method
Sampling for
laboratory
analysis
Visual survey for
symptoms (pathogens)
Sampling
Pest presence (insect
pests),
Sampling only if
symptoms are
visible
Collecting
and
trapping (insect pests)
Visual survey for
symptoms (pathogens)
Collecting
and
trapping (insect pests)
Sampling only in
case of suspicion
Soil Sampling
Sampling
Table 4a. Pest Priority A for the Surveys Programme 2016
b. The pests subject to Union measures adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article
16(3) of Directive 2000/29/EC
Location
Host plant
groups type
Pests
Surveillance method
7
Sampling for
laboratory
analysis
Table 4b. Pest Priority B for the Surveys Programme 2016
c. The pests which have the potential to generate a crisis situation with serious economic and
environmental consequences and pests which have an impact on trade within the Union and with
third countries
Location
Host plant
groups type
Pests
Surveillance method
Sampling for
laboratory
analysis
Table 4c. Pest Priority C for the Surveys Programme 2016
d. The pests which are not listed in Directive 2000/29/EC and which represent an imminent
danger to the Union territory ('non-listed pests')
Location
Host plant
groups type
Pests
Surveillance method
Table 4d. Pest Priority D for the Surveys Programme 2016
8
Sampling for
laboratory
analysis
9
5.2. Overview of the number of visual examinations, samples and tests for the pests and plants,
diagnostic methods used for the Survey Programme 2016
Example of MS entry
Plant / Tree
Pest
Scheduled
number of visual
examinations
Scheduled
number of
samples
Scheduled
number of
laboratory tests
Citrus orchards
Aleurocanthus spp.
Bactrocera zonata
Diaphorina citri
Leucaspis
japonica
Scirtothrips spp.
Saissetia nigra
Trioza erythreae
Radopholus similis
Diplocarpon mali
200
950
950
50
50
50
Apple
Table 5. Number of Visual examinations, samples and tests for the pests and plants, plant
products
10
5.3. Main diagnostic methods used for pests identification
Example of MS entry
Pest
Testing Method
Aleurocanthus spp.
Guignardia citricarpa
Microscopy
Isolation, microscopy, PCR
Bactrocera zonata
Microscopy
Diaphorina citri
Microscopy
Liberibacter africanus
Real-time PCR, sequencing
Trioza erythreae
Microscopy
Radopholus similis
Microscopy, PCR
Table 6. Main diagnostic methods used for pests identification
11
6. Overview of estimated budget allocation
The financial details for each pest included in the Survey Programme 2016 are presented in the
online IT Tool for Plant Health Survey 2016
1. The overall estimated budget for Survey Programme 2016 in___________(MS name) has a
total amount of _________ (amount) EURO, where:.
a) The total estimated costs for the official staff activities are of __________ (amount)
EURO, with 7 % overheads of _________ (amount) EURO.
b) The total estimated costs for the contracted activities are of ________ (amount)
EURO.
2. The total estimated costs for each priority group included in the Survey Programme 2016 are
presented in Table 7. The figures give an overview of the budgeted direct expenses relating to
both the total and to each of the four priority groups specified in the EU guidance document for
preparing the dossier.
:
Example of MS entry
Pest priority group
Percentage of
Cost
Estimated total
budget/priority group
A
Administrative Area
(hectares per priority
group)
30
30%
30000
B
35
35%
35000
C
25
25%
25000
D
10
10%
10000
Total
100
100%
100000
Table 7. Estimated budget details for the priority groups included in the Survey Programme
2016
12
7. Targets for Survey Programme 2016
Examples of different targets for Surveys Programme
2016
a) To improve knowledge of the phytosanitary status of citrus crops, deciduous
trees, olive trees and other not yet prospected crops. Reliable data need to be
given on the percentages of absence/presence pests per priority group.
b) Gather information about the pest status, distribution and prevalence of the
different harmful organisms throughout the years by making a comparison
(quantitative analysis: Pest Incidence, Pest commodity distribution) between
Survey Programme 2015 and 2016.
☐
☐
c) To improve knowledge about the prospected harmful organisms and the risk
that they pose in National and European level.
☐
d) To obtain data on the risks of specific types of import (type of import, pests
per import type) and monitoring of the follow‐up of interceptions.
☐
e) Develop guidance documents and procedure protocols for the correct
prospection of every harmful organism.
☐
f) Involve growers and stakeholders in the surveillance procedure and raise
awareness of the risk that harmful organisms pose.
☐
g) Create a surveillance network capable to detect early outbreaks of harmful
organisms.
☐
h) To develop and to improve Contingency Plans.
i)
_________________________(Space for inserting additional targets).
j)
_________________________(Space for inserting additional targets).
Table 8. Main target outline for Surveys programme 2016
13
☐
☐
☐