ҚАЗАҚСТАН РЕСПУБЛИКАСЫ БІЛІМ ЖӘНЕ ҒЫЛЫМ МИНИСТРЛІГІ
ҚАРАҒАНДЫ МЕМЛЕКЕТТІК ТЕХНИКАЛЫҚ УНИВЕРСИТЕТІ
МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РЕСПУБЛИКИ КАЗАХСТАН
КАРАГАНДИНСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ
dfc
Казахстан 2050
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
KARAGANDA STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
«Ғылым, білім және өндіріс- «Қазақстан - 2050»
Стратегиясының жетекші факторлары»
(№ 6 Сағынов оқулары) Халықаралық ғылыми-практикалық
конференциясының
ЕҢБЕКТЕРІ
26-27 маусым 2014 ж.
IБӨЛІМ
ТРУДЫ
Международной научно-практической конференции
«Наука, образование и производство - ведущие факторы Стратегии
«Казахстан - 2050» (Сагиновские чтения № 6)
26-27 июня 2014 г. ЧАСТЬ I
PROCEEDINGS
of the International scientific-practical conference
«Science, education and production as a leading factors in Strategy
«Kazakhstan - 2050»
(Saginov's readings № 6)
June 26-27, 2014
PARTI
Қарағанды 2014
СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
ПЛЕНАРНОЕ ЗАСЕДАНИЕ
Саринжипов А.Б. Приветственное слово .................................................................. 5
Газалиев A.M. Подготовка кадров для инновационной индустрии в условиях
Евразийского экономического союза ........................................................... 6
Hazotte A., Arlazarov A., Goune М., Bouaziz O.Tensile Properties Of Medium
Mn Steels Annealed In The Two Phase a+y Region ...................................... 11
Борисенко A.B. Развитие и инновации в сфере очистки воздуха ........................... 16
Будич В.В. Совместная учебная R&D лаборатория КарГТУ - ЕРАМ
SYSTEMS. Цели и перспективы .................................................................. 19
Выпих А., Брико Е.С. Компетентностный подход: от профессионального
образования к образованию профессионалов ............................................ 21
Kangwa Joseph, Olubodun Olufemi, Mary-Nelson Margaret, Ekyem George,
Rakhimov M.A. Perceived Barriers And Theats To Low-carbon Retrofit Of
UK's Historic Buildings .................................................................................
24
Кенжин Б.М. Стратегия развития машиностроения Казахстана на период до
2030 года ........................................ . ............................................................. 30
Лукас В.А. О подготовке специалистов по автоматизации в Германии ................ 32
Michot G. Criteria for Dislocftion Nucleation At Crack Tip ........................................ 35
Мухаметкалиев Б.С. Совместная работа с КарГТУ - фактор успешного
развития предприятия ................................................................................... 39
Margaret Nelson, Bobby Nisha, Танирбергенова A.A. A Critical Review Of
Decision Making Practice In Urban Regeneration In The UK ....................... 42
Огай Э. В. Совершенствование подготовки кадров Корпорации для горной
промышленности страны ............................................................................. 47
Cernasejus О., Lukauskaite R., Valiulis A., Skamat J. Investigation Of NICKEL
BASED Coating THERMAL Sprayed On Aluminium alloys ....................... 50
Тимухина E.H., Ещанов С.Ж., Балгабеков Т.К., Исина Б.М. Регулирование
вагонопотоков при рыночных условиях для повышения скоростей
доставки грузов ............................................................................................. 53
Толымбеков М.Ж. Марганцевая отрасль Казахстана ............................................. 56
АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ВЫСШЕГО ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОГО
ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ
Абильгазин Б.И., Поверникова С.Д., Андриянова А.Г. Пути повышения качества
знаний студентов, изучающих курс «Начертательная
геометрия и компьютерная графика» ......................................................... 60
Ақылтаева С.Д., Құрымбаева С.К., Акылтаев Д.С. Кәсіптік білім беру
мамандарын даярлауда заманауи оқыту құралдарын қолдану................. 63
Алимбаев С.Т., Сейтмуханова А.С. Использование современных
информационно-измерительных технологий при совершенствовании
комплексных лабораторных работ .............................................................. 66
344
Nelson М (The University of Bolton, UK) Nisha B.(The University
of Bolton, UK) Танирбергенова А.А. (КарГТУ)
УДК 621.8;537.A CRITICAL REVIEW OF DECISION MAKING PRACTICE IN URBAN
REGENERATION IN THE UK
Abstract
Regeneration initiatives in the UK have not always delivered forecasted results,
despite best interest and constant efforts of the concerned stakeholders. This failure to meet
the precise needs of its end users can be attributed in part to the decisions made at various
stages of the regeneration process. In a multi- stakeholder 'working' approach such as
regeneration, the process of decisionmaking is more often than not, limited to the review of
alternatives as presented by experts, leading to the selection of an action that earns a
preference, or occasionally a consensus. This paper offers a critical review of the current
decision-making practice in regeneration in the UK. It presents the issues and challenges in a
participatory-inquiry process, which significantly intensifies with increase in the number and
range of stakeholders. This paper is an excerpt from an on-going PhD research investigating
and integrating the principles of evidence-informed analysis and decision-making into the
urban regeneration process.
Keywords: Urban regeneration, empowerment, evidence-based decision making,
citizen community participation
Introduction
Urban regeneration, is defined as "a comprehensive and integrated vision and action
which leads to the resolution of urban problems and which seeks to bring about a lasting
improvement in the economic, physical, social and environmental condition of an area"
(Roberts and Sykes, 2000; BURA, 2009). It has evolved through various focuses since its
conception as a slum redevelopment scheme; and has the challenging task of reviving
human, economic, social, cultural and political activities (Pacione, 2005). The affliction of
industrial decline and the loss of economic base of many historic urban quarters have created
serious urban concerns with 'pronounced and persistent spatial disparities' (Tyler and
Warnock, 2011). The magnitude of the situation has led to increased acceptance that urban
regeneration is the way forward, to ensure sustainability in the long run. Therefore the
planning and delivery of urban regeneration has been an intense area of research and a key
focus of public policy (Tallon, 2010; Colantonio and Dixon, 2011) in the UK and Europe.
42
Urban regeneration drivers and approaches include: sports, tourism (Commonwealth
games and London Olympics), design, industry (Industrial Improvement areas), knowledge
quarters (Business districts) and culture (European capital of culture for Dundee and
Liverpool).However, critics view these approaches as 'a rationale to justify expenditure', and
involvement of local community in the process as an eye wash exercise to 'gain local support'
(Davies, 2012). Literature blames urban regeneration for its "focus on the short-term time
frames and needs of developers, often at the expense of those of local communities" (Raco et
al, 2008).This indicates a lack of continuum in translating regeneration efforts into
sustainable outcomes. Current issues in regeneration decision making practice
Regeneration has evolved overtime. Until the late 1950s, a less holistic approach was
taken of regeneration as a process of eradicating derelict districts of a city, typically through
slum clearance (Ball and Maginn, 2005). With the realisation that mass slum clearance
policies were failing to address the core problem and were only 'gentrifying' areas; by the late
1970s the multiplicity and complexity of issues involved in regeneration was starting to be
recognized.
Despite research and concentrated efforts to tackle urban deprivation, research
suggests that the magnitude of this problem is still on the rise. Webber et al (2011) state that
we 'should accept that using regeneration plans to 'go for growth' hasn't worked'. Statistical
research (Jones, 2010),# reinforce the gap between intentions and outcomes and imply that
many regeneration efforts have not 'turned around local economies or the lives of local
residents in the way that had been hoped'. Performance review figures further establish that
an average underperforming regeneration project in England spawn 40% lesser jobs than
anticipated, along with vacant housing and office spaces (Planning portal, 2010). With
regeneration efforts not delivering forecasted results (Tyler and Warnock, 2011), and the
tendency to displace problems elsewhere (Fischer et al, 2007); these establish that the
primary focus in regeneration has not been addressing the local community's needs (Webber
et al, 2010). They argue that 'physical regeneration in England's ex-industrial cities will not
work for local residents and a new way forward is needed'. This has brought in a major shift
towards community-led regeneration, which is backed up by strong political schema (Crown
Copyright, 2011).
Decision-making practice in regeneration is regarded to be challenging due to the
'complexity, uncertainties and ambiguities' (Marshall, 2009), surrounding urban
complexities. The partnership orthodoxy of end user consultation has not been effective in
negating these complexities (Ball and Maginn, 2005). Lombardi (1997) argues that
decision-making through consultation at local planning level is usually "concerned with
evaluation of alternatives and selection of a preferred
action" and in spite of increased focus on community-led regeneration, '"there remain few
examples of genuine involvement of residents in formal regeneration decision-making
processes" (Hall and Hickman, 2011). Ball (2004) claimed that decision-making through
consultation created "conditions that limit co-operation between divergent partners". It is
important to review the dynamics in the regeneration decision-making process to understand
the issues and complexities / involved in this process.
Wachowicz et al (2002) argue that in an interactive (participative) planning process,
the stakeholders have their own accumulated definition of reality based on relevance and
perceptions of social, cultural, economic and political factors. They analyse the nature of
such a participative approach by splitting planning into two interrelated systems - the
social-spatial system and the individual43 cognitive system. A socio-spatial system
encompasses elements that make a society comprising of cultural, economic, social and
political systems; whereas the individual cognitive system is made up of values, desires, and
ideas of individuals. The cognitive abilities create the stakeholders' own socio-spatial
system. This customized image of socio-spatial system guides an individual's decisions and
actions. This implies that the decisions and actions of individual stakeholders are
intentionally worked towards "narrowing the gap between the world as it is and the world as
it should be", based on subjective ideas, opinions, values and desires (Wachowicz et al,
2002). This analysis explains the rationale for conflicts that arise in participative
decision-making that involves multiple stakeholders, and is a major issue to be addressed in
the decision-making process. The traditional form of participation with citizens through
consultation in planning becomes the melting pot of conflicts, which arise due to a mismatch
between the perceived realities of its stakeholders. The effectiveness of citizen consultation
has been under critics' scanners for its limitations as a tick box exercise, and being 'a
breeding ground for conflict and mistrust' between partners (Maginn, 2007). Research has
constantly tried to innovate around this concept to minimize conflicts; while engaging with
stakeholders through strategies that range from local workshops that use instruments like
tracing paper and felt pens to web based e-platforms (Boero et al, 2012). In spite of these
efforts, the inadequacies of the decision-making process (Maginn, 2007), arguably leaves
citizens on the 'margins of partnerships and other initiatives' (Taylor, 2007), and 'do not
improve the decisions' that are made (Shipley and Utz, 2012).
The evidential learning from the past indicates that regeneration schemes which
"adopt a predominantly tokenistic approach towards community involvement" can have
negative impacts upon the regeneration process and outcomes (Syrett, 2011). This triggers
the need to raise the bar from mere consultation to genuine participation in the
decision-making process in order to
address the issues in regeneration decision-making practice and reequip this
process for enhanced sustainable outcomes.
Conclusion
The issues of regeneration outcomes not delivering consistent results, diluting the grass root
communities and not meeting end user's requirements, have caused a major policy shift towards involving
citizen participation in regeneration through the Localism Act 2011. This gives the communities the power
to decide on plans, and call a referendum to block undesired developments. In the light of this political
turn, the notions of social gain, community benefit and public interest needs to be embedded in the
regeneration decision-making process. All this collectively demand a need to review the urban
regeneration decision-making process to improve consistency of sustainable outcomes that can best serve
the interests of its beneficiaries. References
Ball, M. (2004) Co-operation with the community in property-led urban regeneration. Journal of Properly
Research, 21(2): 119-142
44
Ball, M. and Maginn, P. J. (2005) Urban change and conflict: Evaluating the role of partnerships in urban
regeneration in the UK. Housing Studies, 20(1), 9-28. Boero, R., E. Ferro, M. Osella, Y. Charalabidis, and
E. Loukis, (2012) Policy Intelligence in the Era of Social Computing: Towards a Cross-Policy Decision
Support System, ESWC 2011 Workshops, LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 7117, Berlin
Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag, pp. 2 1 7 - 2 2 8 BURA (2009), Ten ways to define regeneration British Urban Regeneration Association. Retrieved 29th
February,
2012
from
http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3062794
Colantonio, A., & Tim Dixon, T. (2011) Urban regeneration and social sustainability - best practice from
European cities. London: Wiley-Blackwell. Crown copyright (2011) The Localism Act, Norwich: The
Stationary Office, Retrieved
29th
February,
2012
from
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011 /20/pdfs/ukpga_20110020_en.pdf, Davies, E.L. (2012)
Beyond the Games: regeneration legacies and London 2012, Leisure Studies, DOI:
10.1080/02614367.2011.649779
Fisher, M., and Downey, G. (2006) Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy.
United States: Duke University press
Hall and Hickman (2011) Resident Participation in Housing Regeneration in France; Housing studies, Vol
26: 6; DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2011.593127 Jones, A. (2010) New approach is needed to revive our cities
Retrieved 29th February, 2012 from http://www.centreforcities.org/new-approach-is-needed-torevive-our-cities.html
45