Curriculum Design
Mid-term Oral Report
Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang
Erin 9610002M
97/05/01
Outline
 Foreword
 Introduction of Junior High School
English Lesson Plan in Taiwan
 Compare the English Lesson Plan
and Our Book
Conclusion
Foreword
＊ English learning is a basic subject in school
curriculum in Taiwan
＊ Educational Policy: Grade 1-9 Curriculum (九年一貫)
＊ There are some differences and similarities between
our book and Taiwanese lesson plan in junior high
schools
Introduction of Junior High School
English Lesson Plan in Taiwan
＊Fifteen Parts should be covered:
1. Unit (單元名稱)
2. Class (班級)
3. Members (人數)
4. Materials (教材來源)
5. Time (教學時間)
6. Periods (節次)
7. Analysis of materials (教材分析)
8. Students’ background knowledge (學生學習條件分析)
9. Teaching Approach (教學方法)
Introduction of Junior High School
English Lesson Plan in Taiwan
10. Teaching Aid (Resource) (教具)
11. Teaching Aim (Unit aim & concrete aim) (教學目標:
單元目標、具體目標)
12. Ability Index (相關能力指標) model
13. Time arrangement (時間分配)
14. Learning Aim (學習目標)
15. Teaching process (preparation, presentation, and
practice) (教學活動: 準備活動、發展活動、綜合活
動)
16. Evaluation (評量)
model
Compare the English Lesson Plan
and Our book
＊ Similarity
1) Students’ background knowledge (學生學習條件分析)
= students’ need analysis => students’ background
information for identifying a gap between what students
are able to do and what they need to be able to do
2) Concrete Aim (具體目標) = Objectives
=> more specific and concrete description of purpose
(be able to…)
Compare the English Lesson Plan
and Our book
＊ Difference:
1)
Aim:
◎Our
book: language skill domain
◎ Teaching
a)
Plan:
Teaching Aim: for teachers
* Unit Aim: three domains: cognitive, affective,
and psychomotor (Bloom, 1956)
b)
Learning Aim: for students
Bloom’s three teaching domain
1. Cognitive domain: understanding of knowledge
2. Affective domain: motivation, interests, cultural
understanding…
3. Psychomotor domain: practice (listening,
speaking, reading, and writing)
=> language outcome (cognitive & psychomotor )
non-language outcomes (affective)
Compare the English Lesson Plan
and Our book
＊ Difference:
◎ Ability
Index (能力指標): Grade 1-9 Curriculum Policy
=> To know whether the aim and concrete
objectives can let students achieve the specific
ability no matter in language skills, learning
interest and approaches, and culture and
custom
Compare the English Lesson Plan
and Our book
Ex: reading parts/ learning interest / culture and custom
1. 3-2-5 To be able to understand the main point of the
text
2. 6-2-6 To use reference books (dictionary) to
understand the content actively
3. 7-2-3 To be able to realize and respect different
culture and custom from multiple cultural viewpoints
Conclusion
 Curriculum design should be followed
educational policy: Grade 1-9 Curriculum
(Ability Index)
 Three domains of aims should be included:
cognitive, affective, and psychomotor
 The purpose of curriculum design is to let
students have both of language outcomes
and non-language outcomes.
* Thank You*