The returns to investments in adult skills in the UK, and the effectiveness of policies aimed at improving them Anna Vignoles Institute of Education What skills? Cognitive and non-cognitive skills Basic skills, particularly literacy and numeracy high value in the labour market in UK for individuals with same qualifications, those with better basic skills earn more Qualification levels - used as indicator of skill Policy Background The UK has a poor record in terms of the basic skills of its adult population • • • Moser report, DfEE, 1999 UK in bottom half of the OECD basic skill distribution UK has higher proportion of unqualified workers than many other countries • Leitch 2006 Literacy and Numeracy in the UK: Age 16-65 Skills for Life Survey 2001 Level Below target Level 1 Level 2 or above Average age expected to achieve Age 7-11 Age 11-16 Age 16 Literacy Numeracy (% of sample) (% of sample) 16 40 44 47 28 25 The proportion of the workforce with low, intermediate and high skills Low Intermediate High 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 USA Japan Germany Source: Leitch Interim Report, 2006 United Kingdom France Qualifications and basic skills No qualifications Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Literacy Below target Level 1 Level 2 24.5 43.2 32.3 12.0 38.6 49.4 10.4 31.7 57.9 5.3 32.2 62.6 2.3 23.7 74.0 0.6 15.1 84.4 Numeracy Below target Entry level 3 Level 1 Level 2 40.1 38.2 15.0 6.8 23.0 34.4 30.1 12.6 17.3 28.5 30.6 23.7 14.0 20.9 36.5 28.7 6.4 17.4 37.4 38.8 1.3 11.2 33.0 53.6 How are skills produced? Largely in childhood/ during schooling Socio-economic gaps in cognitive and non-cognitive skills emerge early Strong intergenerational component to education and not all of this is genetic Intergenerational component to basic skills too What policies in adulthood? Knowing that early interventions are more effective does not mean that it is impossible to design effective interventions for adulthood Only weak evidence that some adult policy interventions have been successful Basic skills – UK policy PSA target to improve the basic skills of 2.25 million adults by 2010 Improvement defined as movement up a level or the achievement of a qualification Skills for Life programme increased from £167 million in 2000-01 to £995 million in 2006-07 Investment per course: ESOL £1,000 Literacy / numreracy/ Level 1 and 2 qualifications £500 On course to meet the 2010 target but mainly through 16-18 year olds - not mature adults (NAO, 2008) Basic skills and adult learning Nil impact from taking numeracy or literacy courses Gains in basic skills modest for adult learners (some in reading/ none in writing) Some evidence that basic skills tuition reduces drop out Workplace basic skills training Gains in literacy/numeracy are very small from workplace literacy courses Courses can reach adults who are not engaged in other learning Course participants more likely to do other learning Courses are too short Often turn into ESOL provision – massive inc demand Systematic Review of Literacy Interventions Seven Random Control Trials(RCT) and 27 Control Trials (CT). Largely IT delivered basic skills training 2 RCTs and 3 CTs found positive impact Systematic Review of Numeracy Interventions Four RCTs and 8 CTs One RCT showed positive effect UK RCT no impact Studies so different “no conclusions could be drawn about the precise effect of particular instructional practices” Training programmes/qualifications Firm provided training Government subsidised training 2006 Train to Gain subsidised training to first Level 2 qualification £300 million spent in 2005-06 over £1 billion by 2010-11 ??? Vocational qualifications Work related adult training Work-based training by UK firms gives good economic return both in terms of wages and productivity Productivity gain > wage gain Partly because firms do not train low skilled Train to Gain Subsidised work related training for low skilled workers Pilots evaluated by IFS in 2003 and 2004 Small positive but insignficant effect on incidence of training Majority undertaking this training would have done so in the absence of the programme – deadweight Train to Gain benefiting employers that would train anyway The qualification route Acquiring most qualifications (apart from degrees) during adulthood has little impact on earnings Acquiring qualifications late leads to lower returns Qualifications can improve women’s employment prospects Qualifications for low skilled Main policy vehicle for delivering training to low skilled workers is the level 2 entitlement Some traditional level 2 vocational qualifications yield sizeable wage returns 13% for a BTEC First or General Diploma 5-7% for a City and Guilds Craft qualification Qualifications for low skilled Wage returns to National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) are negligible at levels 1and 2 Even for young workers, NVQs do not perform as well as other VQs and certainly not as well as academic qualifications Qualifications for low skilled Why the problem with NVQs? they accredit existing skills they impart the wrong skills in some sectors/occupations they are taken by the ‘wrong’ people they are target driven Conclusions Significant proportion of UK work force has low skills/ low levels of qualification Strong demand for cognitive, basic and noncognitive skills in labour market Early development of these skills essential 2006/7 45 % school leavers still not achieving Level 2 maths (GCSE grades A*-C) and 40 per cent not achieving Level 2 English Hard to design effective adult interventions, although firm provided training is beneficial Conclusions Why are adult interventions not successful? Poor quality provision e.g. poorly qualified teachers, particularly in basic skills area Target driven so focus on qualifications not content Courses not intense enough Comings (2003) concluded that time is an issue – learners need 100-150 hours of instruction Heckman argument that cognitive skill are less malleable later in life
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz