Synthesis of a Carbazole Intermediate, a Dihydronaphthalene For Analysis of Antimicrobial and Anti-tumor Effects Tiffany Layport, Department of Biology, York College Glycosmis Mauritiana. Eflora.org The compound that was synthesized is a derivative of dihydronaphthalene, a naturally occurring carbazole intermediate. This key intermediate of Glycomaurrol can be extracted from the bark of Glycosmis mauritiana. The dihydronaphthalene was synthesized in order to test for anti-tumor and antimicrobial properties present at the intermediate level. The key intermediate was synthesized via a Diels-Alder strategy following preparation of the diene and dienophile. The target dihydronaphthalene derivative was synthesized in 5 steps. The final product was then exposed to E. coli, S.aureus, P. mirabilis, B. cereus, P. stuartii, C. albicans, S. cerevisiae and U87-MG Human Glioblastoma cells to determine medicinal benefits. The dihydronaphthalene derivative had no effect on microbial growth inhibition, however it showed 85% U87-MG cell death at maximum concentration. Results Methods Part I Scheme 1: Preparation of diene MgCl •Effect of synthetic dihydronaphthalene derivative, an intermediate of Glycomaurrol, in antimicrobial and anti-tumor bioassays is unknown. •This study examines the antimicrobial and anti-tumor activity of the dihydronaphthalene derivative at varying concentrations. Hypotheses Antimicrobial Assays H0: The dihydronaphthalene derivative will have no effect on microbial growth inhibition. HA: The dihydronaphthalene derivative with a concentration range of 0-25mg/mL will show a difference in microbial growth inhibition from the untreated organisms. Anti-tumor Assays H0: There is no difference between the effect of the dihydronaphthalene derivative with a concentration range of 0-0.044M and the untreated U87-MG cells on cell viability. HA: There is a difference between the effect of the dihydronaphthalene derivative within a concentration range of 0-0.044M and the untreated U87-MG cells on cell viability. Scheme 2: Preparation of dienophile NH2 NHTs NTs TsCl NaIO4 H2O/THF SiO2 OH OH Minimum Inhibitory Concentration DHN DMSO Untreated AMP MPA OH O Figure 2. U87-MG Human Glioblastoma cells treated with the dihydronaphthalene derivative in rows A, B, C, D, and E, columns 1-11. Cells were treated with DMSO in row E and F, columns 1-11. Cells were treated with cyclohexamine in row G, columns 1-4. Column 12 contained untreated cells. Row G, columns 5-12 were blank. no growth inhibition no growth inhibition no growth inhibition >0.0098mg/mL inhibits growth >0.001mg/mL inhibits growth Conclusions O Table 2. Percent of viable U87-MG Human Glioblastoma cells after exposure to a dihydronaphthalene derivative at varying concentrations. Scheme 3: Diels-Alder Reaction NHTs NTs % Viable Cellsa Concentration (M) DBU nb SEMc SDd + CH2Cl2 •Naturally occurring carbazoles isolated from the stem bark of Glycosmis mauritiana have demonstrated antimicrobial and antitumor activity. (Kumar et al. 1989) •Medicinal benefits of the synthetic carbazoles are unknown. Organism Control PTSA Grignard Introduction •Regiocontrolled carbazole synthetic strategies have been developed for cost efficiency of product yield. Several carbazoles, Glycomaurrol and its derivatives Eustifolines A-D have been successfully synthesized. (Lebold and Kerr 2007) Table 1. Minimum concentration of Dihydronaphthalene, DMSO, Ampicillin, Mycophenolic Acid, and no treatment required to inhibit organismal growth. O 0.044 0.022 0.011 0.006 0.003 0.001 0.0007 0.0003 0.0002 0.00009 0.00004 OH Dihydronaphthalene Derivative The synthesis of the dihydronaphthalene was monitored via thin layer chromatography (TLC) and purified via flash column chromatography (FCC). The success of the reactions was confirmed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR). Part II Antimicrobial and anti-tumor bioassays were performed in a 96 well microtiter plate. Antimicrobial •100 uL of appropriate media was placed in all rows for columns 2-12. •200 uL of DHN was placed in rows A, B, E, and F for column 1 only. •200 uL of DMSO was placed in rows D and H for column 1 only. •200 uL of specified control (AMP or MPA) was placed in rows C and G for column 1 only. •Each row was diluted via a 2-fold serial dilution in columns 110. •100 uL of appropriate organism was placed in all rows from column 1-11. •Column 11 contained organism and media only. •Column 12 contained media only. •Plate was allowed to incubate at 37oC for 48 hours before results were recorded. Anti-tumor •150 uL U87-MG cells were placed in all rows for columns 1-11. •The cells set for 24 hours to allow reattachment. •100 uL of DHN was placed in rows A, B, C, and D for column 1 only. •100 uL of DMSO was placed in rows E and F for column 1 only. •100 uL of cycloheximide was placed in rows G and H for column 1 only. •Each row was diluted via a 2-fold serial dilution in columns 111. •50 uL of U87-MG cell media was placed in all rows for columns 1-11. •Column 12 contained U87-MG cells and media only. •The cells were allowed to incubate at 37oC for 48 hours. •Celltiter 96 aqueous reagent proliferation assay was added to all wells. •The absorbance for each well was recorded at 490nm. 15.025 8.550 55.725 47.275 64.125 91.0 99.225 100.0 98.5 97.95 87.35 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.262 5.128 8.390 9.390 7.256 9.0 0.775 0.0 1.5 2.05 748 10.524 10.256 16.779 18.780 14.53 18.0 1.55 0.0 3.0 4.1 9.496 a mean b sample size c standard error of the mean d standard deviation Antimicrobial •The results showed that the dihydronaphthalene derivative had no effect on the growth inhibition for the organisms being tested. Therefore, the null hypothesis must be accepted, stating that there is no significant difference between the effect of the dihydronaphthalene derivative and the untreated organisms that were used as a control group. It is implied that the minimum inhibitory concentration if any is greater than the tested range of drug concentration. Anti-tumor •The P value= 0.0045 indicating that there is a significant difference in the mean percent of cell viability between maximum dihydronaphthalene derivative concentration and the untreated cells. Therefore, the null hypothesis can be rejected. Literature Cited •Abdel-Rahman, Taha M. 2006. Synthesis, Reactions, and Anticancer Activity of Some 1,3,4- Thiadiazole/Thiadiazine Derivatives of Carbazole. Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon. 181: 1737-1754. Table 3. Percent of viable cells present at minimum and maximum concentrations of a dihydronaphthalene derivative. Concentration (M) % Viable Cellsa Minimum (0.0) Maximum (0.044) 87.3 15.025 SDb SEMc 9.5 4.75 10.524 5.262 mean b standard deviation c standard error of the mean •Eflora.org •England, Dylan B. and Kerr, Michael A. 2005. Synthesis and CrossCoupling Reactions of Substituted 5-Triflyoxyindoles. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 70: 6519-6522. •Greger, H. and Zechner, G. 1996. Bioactive Amides from Glycosmis Species. Journal of Natural Products 59:1163-1168. •Kasai, Yuki, Shindo, Kazutoshi, Harayama, Shigeaki, and Misawa, Norihiko. 2003. Molecular Characterization and Substrate Preference of a Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Dioxygenase from Cycloclasticus sp. Strain A5. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 6688-6697. 120 •Knolker, Hans-Joachim; Reddy, Kethiri R. 2002. Isolation and Synthesis of Biologically Active Carbazole Alkaloids. Chemistry Reviews. 102: 43034427. 100 80 60 40 DM SO 20 DHN + DM SO 0 -20 0.00 •Asche, Christian. 2007. Antitumor Carbazoles. Anti-Cancer Agents in medicinal Chemistry. 7: 247. •Kamal, Ahmed; Reddy, S. J.; Bharathi, E. V.; Dastagiri, D. 2007. Base-free Monosulfonylation of Amines using Tosyl or Mesyl Chloride in Water. Tetrahedron Letters 49: 348-353. a Mean Percent Viable Glioblastoma Cells (%) Abstract 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Concentration of Dihydronaphthalene Derivative (M) Figure 1. Mean percent viable U87-MG Human Glioblastoma cells from absorbance values at 490nm after exposure to a dihydronaphthalene derivative at varying concentrations of a 2-fold serial dilution. Data are means and standard errors from five replicates for each concentration. P= 0.0045. •Lebold, Terry P. and Kerr, Michael A. 2007. Total Synthesis of Eustifolines A-D and Glycomaurrol via a Divergent Diels-Alder Strategy. Organic Letters. 9: 1883-1886. •McBride, James, Ingram, Paul, Henriquez, Fiona, and Roberts, Craig. 2005. Development of Colorimentric Microtiter Plate Assay for Assessment of Antimicrobials against Acanthamoeba. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43: 629-634. •Zhong, Yong-Li; Shing, Tony K. M. 1997. Efficient and Facile Glycol Cleavage Oxidation Using Improved Silica Gel-Supported Sodium Metaperiodate. Journal of Organic Chemistry 62: 2622-2624. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Thompson and Dr. Halligan for mentoring this research. I would also like to thank Dr. Singleton and Dr. Mathur for their guidance and contributions. Thank you to the Biology Department and faculty.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz