What do you need to know before the exam about Religious Experiences? The arguments from William James for Religious Experiences Critical analysis with strngths and weaknesses The concept of revelation through sacred scripture Aims and main conclusions of William James from his book 'The Varieties of Rel Experience Knowledge and understanding of visions, voices, numinous, conversion and corporate experiences Key Terms Direct Religious Experience Indirect Religious Experience God is revealed directly to the person having the experience. EG-Paul on the road to Damascus Experiences, feelings or thoughts are prompted by events in daily life. EGObserving the starts and having thoughts about the greatness of God’s creation Richard Swinburne Key ideas His book was ‘The existence of God’ He suggested there were 5 recognisable types of Religious Experience These were split into 2 categories PUBLIC EXPERIENCES Ordinary experiences – interpreting a natural event Extraordinary experiences – Breaking the normal understanding of nature PRIVATE EXPERIENCES Describable in ordinary language – Such as dreams Non-describable experiences – Events going beyond the human powers of description Non-specific experiences – looking at the world for a religious perspective William James’ Argument from Religious Experience ****Very Important**** Background information He was a philosopher and psychologist His most famous book was ‘The varieties of Religious Experience’ He investigated a number of accounts of religious experience He thought that religious experiences were ‘solitary’ and were where the individual experienced the divine He thought religious experiences had a marked effect on a persons life Classic example is St Paul on the road to Damascus and the change in his life One of his achievements was to identify the characteristics of religious experiences He identified 4 main characteristics that were prominent in mystical experiences I,N,T,P (In Teepee) Imagine William James inside. 1. 2. 3. 4. Ineffable Noetic Transcient Passive William James’ 4 Characteristics of Mystical Experiences Ineffable – The experience goes beyond human experience (I can’t explain it!) Noetic – Mystics receive knowledge of God that is otherwise not available. (No-ledge) Transcient – Short term experiences and not permanent. They may feel like they have been a long time. The effects are long lasting and may involve a changed view of the Universe. (Transformers – quick changing) Passive – Experiences were not under control of the mystic. They were being acted upon. James saw this as evidence against those who say people ‘will’ events to happen to them. (Like passive smoking – I am not doing anything, it is acting on me). William James’ main conclusions The only possible sign that religious experiences are from God is a ‘good disposition’ that is the result of the experience (James, Varieties of Religious Experience) Religious Experiences only have authority and meaning for the individual who has the experience He did NOT deny the reality of the mystical experience and suggested that individuals could gain knowledge of God He examined the parallels and similarities between religious experiences and dreams and hallucinations He suggested that religious experiences could be linked to our ‘subconscious ideas’ (James, Varieties of Religious Experience) He claimed that religious experiences were ‘ psychological phenomena’ Experiences could be explained by a person’s psychological make-up He made it clear that he did not believe this was an argument against belief in God He meant that religious experiences were natural to a person, like selfawareness or thinking. Key conclusion Religious experiences on their own do not demonstrate God’s existence, although they can suggest the existence of ‘something larger’. “The only thing it unequivocally testifies to is that we can experience union with something larger than ourselves and in that union find the greatest peace” (William James, Varieties of Religious Experience). Responses to James’ Ideas 1. Some people have suggested that religious experiences are similar experiences to hallucinations or drugs such as LSD. Having said this, there is no evidence that every person who has a religious experience is a user of LSD. 2. James claimed that religious experiences were the primary cause of religious belief. However, many psychologists and sociologists claim that religious experiences only happen to people who are already member of a religious tradition. Although sometimes they do happen to people that have no connection to a religious tradition. 3. JL Mackie argued that is religious experiences are explainable psychologically I(which James does say) then they can carry no authority. Mackie claims that those who believe mystical experiences are authoritative are ‘insufficiently critical’ (Mackie, The miracle of Theism).
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz