Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between the HCV Protease Inhibitor Boceprevir and Digoxin in Healthy Adult Volunteers Patricia Jumes,1 Hwa-Ping Feng,1 Fengjuan Xuan,1 Stephen Youngberg,2 John Wagner,1 Joan Butterton1 1Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA; 2Celerion, Lincoln, NE, USA Background Boceprevir is a potent, orally administered ketoamide inhibitor targeting the active site of the HCV NS3 protease1-3 Boceprevir is metabolized by aldo-keto reductase and cytochrome P450 3A44 In vitro studies provide conflicting data about whether boceprevir is an inhibitor of the efflux transporter P-gp – Initial data from efflux studies using Caco-2 cells suggested that boceprevir is a P-gp substrate as well as a P-gp inhibitor (inhibition of digoxin efflux 50 ~25 µM) • However, Caco-2 cells express multiple transporters • Studies repeated using bidirectional transport studies in LLC-PK1 cells and LLC-PK1 cells stably expressing human MDR1 P-gp cDNA (LLCMDR1 cells) – LLC-PK1–derived cell lines can form a tight monolayer and more accurately assess vectorial transport of test articles from basolateral to apical and vice versa HCV, hepatitis C virus; NS3, nonstructural protein 3; P-gp, P-glycoprotein. 1. Malcolm BA, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1013-20; 2. Bacon B, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1207-17; 3. Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-206; 4. Ghosal A, et al. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:510-21. Boceprevir P-gp interaction These results suggest that boceprevir is unlikely to have an inhibitory effect on the P-gp efflux transporter at concentrations up to 300 μM However, local concentrations of boceprevir in the gut are anticipated to reach the limit of solubility (~1.7 mM). The effect of boceprevir on P-gp at these concentrations is unknown This drug interaction study was conducted to assess the ability of clinically relevant concentrations of boceprevir to inhibit P-gp using digoxin, a sensitive P-gp substrate P-gp, P-glycoprotein. Aims Primary – To determine the effect of steady-state boceprevir on the plasma concentrations of digoxin in healthy subjects Secondary – To assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of boceprevir and a single dose of digoxin in healthy subjects Methods: Study Design An open-label, randomized cross-over study in 16 healthy adult volunteers – Treatment A: Digoxin 0.25-mg single dose on day 1 – Treatment B: Boceprevir 800 mg TID for 10 days with single dose digoxin 0.25 mg on day 6 • 10-day minimum washout period between treatments – In both treatment periods blood samples for digoxin pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at specified time points for 120 hours post-dose TID, three times daily. Methods: Subjects Adult male and female subjects between 19 and 55 years old and with BMI 18-33 kg/m2 – Good health based on medical history, physical examination, vital sign measurements, and laboratory safety tests – Female subjects were required to be postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or to be using a medically accepted method of contraception No clinically significant disease Negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibodies, and HIV Provided written informed consent BMI, body mass index; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. Results: Patient Demographics Male, n = 5; female, n = 11 White, n = 14; Hispanic/Latino, n = 7 Mean age, 34 years (range 21 – 50 years) Mean BMI, 27 kg/m2 (range 21.7 – 33.0 kg/m2) All subjects completed the trial BMI, body mass index. Results: Digoxin Pharmacokinetics Arithmetic Mean Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles of a Single 0.25-mg Dose of Digoxin Alone or Following Multiple 800-mg Doses of Boceprevir (inset = semi-log scale) Coadministration of digoxin with boceprevir slightly increased digoxin AUC0-∞ and Cmax AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; Cmax, maximum observed concentration. Results: Digoxin Pharmacokinetics (cont) The geometric mean ratios of AUC0-∞ and Cmax (digoxin + BOC vs digoxin alone) and the 90% CI were 1.19 (1.12, 1.27) and 1.18 (1.07, 1.31) AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; CI, confidence interval; Cmax, maximum observed concentration. Results: Digoxin Pharmacokinetics (cont) Digoxin alone (n = 16) Digoxin plus boceprevir (n = 16) Digoxin plus boceprevir / digoxin alone GM 95% CI GM 95% CI GMR 90% CI %CVa AUC0-∞ (ng·h/mL)b 19.32 17.44, 21.40 23.07 21.32, 24.96 1.19 1.12, 1.27 9.623 Cmax (ng/mL)b 0.93 0.78, 1.11 1.10 0.94, 1.28 1.18 1.07, 1.31 16.190 Tmax (h)c 1.5 1.0, 3.0 1.5 1.0, 3.0 — — — t½d 41.4 21.5 45.4 18.8 — — — CL/F (mL/min)d 214.6 18.8 180.1 15.1 — — — The geometric mean (%CV) of the apparent terminal t½ of digoxin were similar (41.4 hours [21.5%] to 45.4 hours [18.8%] upon coadministration with BOC), indicating that BOC coadministration does not substantially affect digoxin elimination AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; CI, confidence interval; CL/F, apparent clearance; Cmax, maximum observed concentration; CV, coefficient of variation; GM, geometric mean; GMR, geometric mean ratio, t1/2, apparent terminal half-life; Tmax, time of maximum observed concentration. aPseudo within subject %CV. bBack-transformed LS mean and CI from linear effects model performed on log-transformed values. cMedian (min, max). dGMR (%CV). Results: Safety There were no serious AEs or treatment discontinuations due to an AE Twelve patients reported AEs considered to be possibly or probably related to treatment AEs – Digoxin, n = 3 (18.8%): • Fatigue, n = 1; headache, n = 2 – Boceprevir, n = 9 (56.3%): • Most common was dysgeusia, n = 8 – Digoxin + boceprevir, n = 10 (62.5%): • Most common were headache, n = 6, and dysgeusia, n=5 AE, adverse event. Conclusions Coadministration of digoxin and boceprevir is well tolerated Digoxin AUC0-∞ and Cmax were slightly increased by 19% and 18%, respectively, when coadministered with boceprevir 800 mg TID at steady state – This slight increase is not considered clinically important No dosage adjustment of digoxin is necessary when coadministered with boceprevir – Patients receiving concomitant digoxin and boceprevir should be monitored appropriately These results also demonstrate that boceprevir has a limited ability to inhibit P-gp at clinically relevant concentrations AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity; Cmax, maximum observed concentration; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; TID, three times daily. Disclosures P Jumes, H-P Feng, F Xuan, J Wagner, J Butterton are all employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA Stephen Youngberg has a financial relationship within the last 12 months relevant to these data with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ Acknowledgments Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Tim Ibbotson, PhD, and Santo D’Angelo, PhD, MS, of ApotheCom, Yardley, PA. This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz