Dynamic Modeling of TwoPhase Helium Pipe Flow in the Cryosystem at the Canadian Light Source Chris Regier, Ph.D. Candidate University of Calgary Schulich School of Engineering Dept. of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Calgary, Alberta, Canada June 11, 2008 Overview The CLS and the RF Cavity The Cryogenic System The Liquid Helium (LHe) Supply Line Modeling and Simulation Procedure Results The CLS and the RF Cavity RF Cavity 500 MHz VHF Replenishes lost electron beam energy Superconducting Operates ~ 4.5 K Requires LHe Cryogenic system The Cryogenic System LHe Transfer Line The Cryogenic System Computer Model of entire cryo system desired Dynamic system model – Controls perspective Can answer questions about system operation Model individual components and connect The LHe Supply Line The LHe Supply Line LHe Line is one component of the system Possibly most complex model LHe Line Exhibits Two-Phase Flow Much more difficult to simulate May be required to create effective dynamic model Flow boiling due to: Temperature increase Pressure decrease causes majority of boiling Modeling and Simulation Objectives of LHe Supply Line Simulation: 1. Ability to simulate liquid and gas flowrates exiting the LHe line 2. Determine whether gas has impact on flow 3. Determine whether a simpler model can produce accurate results Quasi-Steady-State? Simple dynamic model? TF s z1 s z2 .... s p1 s p2 .... Modeling and Simulation Two-Phase Flow Modeling 1-D Conservation equations Mass of Gas g g t Mass of Liquid Momentum Energy g g v x Q b l l l l v Q b t x v v 2 P Ff Fg t x x e ev Pv Q Ff v t x x Modeling and Simulation Discretize conservation equations Use upwind scheme to solve Solution depends only on upstream properties Can start at inlet of line and solve each grid cell in sequence to end of line. Pj, gj, vj, Tj Pj+1, gj+1, vj+1, Tj+1 Cell j Cell j+1 Modeling and Simulation BCs complicate solution LHe line inlet velocity not known Outlet pressure known instead 1. Guess inlet velocity 2. Solve P, v, g, T for each cell along pipe 3. If outlet P is correct then go to next time step 4. If outlet P is not correct then adjust guess of inlet v and repeat Modeling and Simulation To solve P, v, g, T for a grid cell Solution of each equation depends on all 4 Start Set state ij = state i-1 j Solve Liquid Mass Cons. vij = vij-1 No Is g ij > 0? (Is there 2-phase flow?) Is delta Pij, ag ij, vij and Tij small enough? Yes Yes Solve Momentum Cons. Pij Solve Energy Cons. Q b ij Solve Energy Cons. Tij Solve Gas Mass Cons. g ij Solve boiling temp Tb ij = 0.232Pij0.252 Is Tij > Tb ij? (Is there 2-phase flow?) No Yes Set Tij to boiling T Tij = 0.232Pij0.252 Solve Momentum Cons. Pij Solve Liq Mass Cons. vij No End Results Objective 1: Ability to simulate various flows R2 value = 0.91 Based on measured rates at CLS Simulated various valve positions & heat loads Average error 6.3% 0.06 Lhe Flowrate (L/s) 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 Experimental Simulated 0.01 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 Valve opening (%) 25 30 Results Objective 2: Determine if gas impacts flow 0.25 16 14 0.20 12 10 0.15 8 0.10 6 4 0.05 2 0.00 0% 10% 20% 30% Valve Position 40% 0 50% Mass Flow (g/s) Maximum g ~0.12 at pipe exit g varies slightly with control valve position Some impact on flow of LHe Void Fraction Gas at Exit Void Fraction Gas: 1.21 bar Void Fraction Gas: 1.00 bar LHe Mass Flow: 1.21 Bar LHe Mass Flow: 1.00 bar Results Objective 3: Can a simpler model be used? Quasi-steady-state has problems g dynamics are very slow QSS can incorrectly predict oscillation size and phase Results Objective 3: Determine if a simpler model can be used 2.8 108 s 0.005s 0.05 s 0.8 s 0.5 s 0.4s 0.025 2 4 2 Acknowledgements J. Pieper – U of C Elder Matias - CLS Mark deJong – CLS Mark Silzer – CLS Jon Stampe - CLS Abdulmajeed Mohammad – U of C John Swirsky - CLS J. Bugg – U of S Carey Simonson – U of S Tom Regier - CLS Questions? [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz