Mid-term Evaluation Research Project - Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Name:
Student ID:
Supervisor:
1 = poor, 2 = needs improvement, 3 = sufficient, 4 = good, 5 = excellent
Assessment Criteria
Theoretical knowledge
Cognitive/ Neural knowledge
Technical skills
Independence/initiative
Original contribution
Interdisciplinary approach
Accuracy
Cooperation
Self-reflection
1
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
2
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
3
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
4
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
5
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
1
□
□
□
□
□
2
□
□
□
□
□
3
□
□
□
□
□
4
□
□
□
□
□
5
□
□
□
□
□
General Criteria
Quality and amount of the supervision of the research
Facilities
Progress research project
Progress report
Academic level
N.B. Please clarify when criteria are rated 1 or 2. Also describe the arrangements necessary
for improvement.
Will the final date of the research project remain unchanged?
If not, please indicate the reason of the delay below:
The old final date:
dd/mm/jjjj
Signatures
Student
The new final date:
Yes / No
dd/mm/jjjj
Supervisor
# See next page for explanation of assessment criteria.
Please send this form to the programme assistant of the Research Master Brain and
Cognitive Sciences, [email protected]
Clarification of the terms
Theoretical knowledge:
Cognitive/ Neural knowledge:
Technical skills:
Independence/initiative:
Original contribution:
Interdisciplinary approach:
Accuracy:
Cooperation:
Does the student acquire the knowledge needed to carry out the
project?
Did the student show good awareness for the cognitive / neural
context of his/her work?
Does the student show good experimental, programming and/or
mathematical skills or the ability to quickly learn the skills?
Does the student take initiatives of his/her own to carry out the
project, and could he/she make progress in the (temporary)
absence of close supervision?
Did the student make an original contribution to the project?
Did the student make use of contributions of other disciplines?
Does the student work accurately? And, if relevant, are the
experiments carried out safely, and are environmental issues well
respected?
Does the student actively participate in work discussions? How is
the cooperation with other group members during the research?
How are the student’s communicative skills?
Please send this form to the programme assistant of the Research Master Brain and
Cognitive Sciences, [email protected]