Presented by: Dana Pavlotzky, M.A. CCC-SLP Contributions by: Deborah Presutti-Petrone, M.S. Kathleen Soreth-Harman, M.A. Vanessa Edwards, M.S. Debra Eisen, M.A. ASHA Convention Orlando November 21, 2014 CCC-SLP CCC-SLP CCC-SLP CCC-SLP Financial : Dana Pavlotzky is a full-time employee of MossRehab, Einstein Healthcare Network. Nonfinancial: No relevant nonfinancial relationship. Acute inpatient/outpatient rehabilitation Responsiveness Program Assessment and treatment of minimally responsive patients with acquired brain injury Multidisciplinary team Research team Changes in healthcare ◦ Improved survival rates after TBI ◦ Insurance coverage for rehabilitation ◦ Continuum of care Nontraditional role of SLP 40% misdiagnosis rate Littlewood, 1996) (Andrews, Murphy, Munday, & 1. 2. 3. Participants will be able to describe the various states of consciousness Participants will be able to describe the role of a multi-disciplinary team with patients with disorders of consciousness Participants will explain the role of the speech-language pathologist in clinical assessment and treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness Coma Vegetative state Minimally conscious state No arousal/eye opening Absent sleep/wake cycle Reflex and postural responses only (Giacino et al., 2002) No behavioral evidence of awareness of self or environment Sleep/wake cycle Posture or withdraw to noxious stimuli Occasional non-purposeful movement Exhibit visual and auditory startle responses Brief orienting to sound Brief visual fixation Reflexive crying or smiling (Giacino et al., 2002) Evince some awareness of self and their environment in an unambiguous, albeit inconsistent manner through at least one of the following behaviors: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Follow simple commands Gestural or verbal yes/no communication system Intelligible verbalization Purposeful behavior Visual fixation/pursuit Localizes to noxious stimuli (Whyte, Hart, Laborde, & Rosenthal, 2004) (Giacino et al., 2002) Consistent and accurate responses ◦ Functional yes/no communication system ◦ Functional object use for at least 2 different objects (Giacino et al., 2002) Physician Physical Therapist Occupational Therapist Speech-Language Pathologist Neuropsychologist Recreational Therapist Nurse Research Assistant Patient & Family JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) Systematic Observation Develop clinical questions protocols (Giacino, Kalmar, & Whyte, 2004) ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Arousal Movement Vision Communication Response to environment Developed to answer clinical questions ◦ Can the patient see? ◦ Are they able to follow commands? ◦ Do they have a reliable yes/no communication system? ◦ Do they respond to pharmacologic treatments? Completed daily in each discipline’s therapy session(s) ◦ (Whyte et al., 2004) Auditory Comprehension ◦ Object identification/recognition ◦ Command following ◦ Yes/no responses Attention/interaction with environment ◦ Cause/effect apps ◦ Single switch activation Swallowing PMV trials Andrews, K., Murphy, L., Munday, R., & Littlewood, C. (1996). Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. British Medical Journal, 313, 13-16. Giacino, J.T., Ashwal, S., Childs, N., Cranford, R., Jennett, B., Katz, D.I., . . . Zasler, N.D. (2002). The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58, 349-353. Giacino, J.T., Kalmar, K., Whyte, J. (2004). The JFK coma recovery scale—revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 2020-2029. Giacino, J.T., Schnakers, C., Rodriquez-Moreno, D., Kalmar, K., Schiff, N., Hirsch, J. (2009). Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard of fool’s gold. Progress in Brain Research, 177, 33-48. Whyte, J., Hart, T., Laborde, A., & Rosenthal, M. (2004). Rehabilitation Issues in Traumatic Brain Injury. In J.A. Delisa et al. (Eds.), Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practices 4th Edition (pp. 1677-1713). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Bernat, J.L. (2006). Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet, 367, 1181-1192. Whyte, J., & DiPasquale, M. (1995). Assessment of vision and visual attention in minimally responsive brain injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 804-810 Whyte, J, DiPasquale, M.C., & Vaccaro, M. (1999). Assessment of commandfollowing in minimally conscious brain injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 653-660. Whyte, J., Katz, D., Long, D., DiPasquale, M.C., Polansky, M., Kalmar, K., . . .Eifer, B. (2005). Predictors of outcome in prolonged posttraumatic disorders of consciousness and assessment of medication effects: a multicenter study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 453-462. Whyte, J., Nakase-Richardson, R., Hammond, F.M., McNamee, S., Giacino, J., Kalmar, K., . . . Horn, L. (2013). Functional outcomes in traumatic disorders of consciousness: 5-year outcomes from the national institute on disability and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1855-1860.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz