NUR 854 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF NURSING TITLE: NUR 854 - Advanced Concepts in Professional Nursing CREDIT HOURS: 4 credits PRE-REQUISITES: Admission to the RN-BSN/MSN Nursing Program. This is a writing-intensive (W) course approved to fulfill the upper tier of the graduation writing requirement (GWR). To receive W credit for this course, you must have successfully completed the first-year writing requirement (ENG 104 or its equivalent) and have completed at least 30 hours of coursework. PLACEMENT: First semester in the RN-BSN/MSN curriculum COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course provides experiences that will enable students to become acclimated to a self-directed learning environment and to develop skills pertinent to advanced concepts of professional nursing practice with diverse populations. These skills include: effective professional writing, the efficient use of computers to enhance nursing practice, the performance of effective patient teaching, and the judicious use of theory and literature to guide clinical decision-making. COURSE OBJECTIVES: At the end of this course, students will be able to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Communicate through writing, speaking, and teaching in a style appropriate to the professional nurse. Retrieve, analyze, and use nursing literature in clinical case studies. Discuss selected theories and their applicability to nursing practice. Become part of a community of self-directed, life-long learners. Begin development of a professional portfolio. WRITING INTENSIVE OUTCOMES: At the end of this course, students will be able to: 1. Write a paper that is essentially free of mechanical errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, and syntax) and awkwardness, using a style that is appropriate to the professional nurse. 2. Demonstrate an ability to discover, evaluate, and clearly present evidence in support of an argument in the subject area and utilize documentation that conforms to APA style. Note: An APA workshop will be provided the first day of class. 3. Be aware that composing a successful text frequently takes multiple drafts, with varying degrees of focus on generating, revising, editing, and proofreading. 4. Write a capable, interesting essay about a complex issue in nursing for a general university audience. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 2 FACULTY: Sherry Warden, PhD, RN Room 439, CON Bldg. (859) 323-6640 [email protected] Gina Lowry, PhD (c), RN Room 441A, CON Bldg. (859) 257-5258 [email protected] OFFICE HOURS: Faculty will be available by phone, by e-mail, and by office appointment. The syllabus will be posted on Blackboard, along with a bulletin board for announcements and timesensitive assignments. TEACHING/LEARNING METHODS: The assumption is made that all students have access to computer facilities, the Internet, and e-mail. NUR 854 will be taught using a combination of methods. One-third of the course will be taught in-class, through lecture, discussions, case studies, small group work, and student presentations. One-third of the course will be taught using the internet as a teaching tool; students will utilize the internet to perform literature searches, respond to case studies by applying the literature, participate in discussions on the internet, and use e-mail to interact with faculty and other students. One-third of the course will be completion of out-of-class assignments: readings, video assignments, and papers. ATTENDANCE: This class will meet in 4-hour blocks; a total of 5 classes will be spread across the semester. Class attendance is required. Students who miss one class will receive an incomplete; students who miss two classes will fail the course. EVALUATION: General: Evaluation will be based on in-class assignments and out-of class assignments, including internet assignments. Students are to complete class activities by the due date. A grade reduction of 2 percent of the assignment grade will be assessed for each day an assignment is late. Remember also that computers do fail and always seem to fail at the worst possible time. Please send your papers early enough to allow for breakdowns. We will reply to your assignment e-mails with a message that we received the assignment. Writing Intensive Specific: Papers written in this class will be submitted through Blackboard and reviewed by faculty. Faculty will return the papers with suggestions and corrections using Blackboard. For further assistance students may make an appointment for review conferences with faculty. Students are required to revise their papers after receiving suggestions and corrections and to resubmit their paper. Re-submissions will follow the same review process. A grade will be assigned to the third submission. REVISED PAPERS SHOULD BE RESUBMITTED WITHIN ONE WEEK OF RECEIPT OF FACULTY COMMENTS. To receive an A, papers must demonstrate correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and APA style. The paper should have a logical flow, be clear and concise, yet contain all necessary information. B papers must demonstrate correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and APA style. *Please note that a minimum grade of B must be achieved on the final submission of all papers to pass this course. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 3 COURSE GRADES: The percentage of the course grade applied to assignments as follows: Writing Intensive Assignments Analytical Papers (2 ) Theory Paper Other Assignments Web Assignment Interview GroupTeaching Experience Plan 5% Presentation 15% Threaded discussions (2) Class Participation 25% 15% 5% 10% 20% 20% 5% COURSE GRADING SCALE: 92-100= 84-91= 76-83= < 76= A B C E *Please note that a minimum grade of B must be achieved on the final submission of all writing intensive assignments to pass this course. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 4 ACADEMIC OFFENSES: Course faculty and the College of Nursing will enforce the University policy on cheating and plagiarism. Part II of Student Rights and Responsibilities (available online at http://www.uky.edu/ StudentAffairs/Code/part2.html) states that all academic work, written or otherwise, submitted by students to their instructors or other academic supervisors, is expected to be the result of their own thought, research, or self-expression. In cases where students feel unsure about a question of plagiarism involving their work, they are obliged to consult their instructors on the matter before submission. When students submit work purporting to be their own, but which in any way borrows ideas, organization, wording or anything else from another source without appropriate acknowledgment of the fact, the students are guilty of plagiarism. Plagiarism includes reproducing someone else’s work, whether it be published article, chapter of a book, a paper from a friend or some file, or whatever. Plagiarism also includes the practice of employing or allowing another person to alter or revise the work which a student submits as his/her own, whoever that other person may be. Students may discuss assignments among themselves or with an instructor or tutor, but when the actual work is done, it must be done by the student, and the student alone. When a student’s assignment involves research in outside sources or information, the student must carefully acknowledge exactly what, where and how he/she has employed them. If the words of someone else are used, the student must put quotation marks around the passage in question and add an appropriate indication of its origin. Making simple changes while leaving the organization, content and phraseology intact is plagiaristic. However, nothing in these Rules shall apply to those ideas which are so generally and freely circulated as to be a part of the public domain. (Section 6.3.1) The minimum penalty for an academic offense, such as cheating or plagiarism, is an E in the course (Section 6.4.1). WRITING INITIATIVE CONTACT Questions about the W option should be referred to the Director of the UK Writing Initiative, Professor Janet Carey Eldred, [email protected], 257-4831, 211 Funkhouser Building. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 5 REQUIRED TEXTS: Carpenito-Moyet, L. J. (2005). Nursing diagnosis: Application to clinical practice (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bastable, S. B. (2003). Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett. CONTENT OUTLINE: I. II. III. IV. Introduction A. APA Workshop B. What is a profession C. The role of nursing diagnoses Teaching/Learning A. Learning theory 1. Defined 2. Assessment of personal learning style B. Educational theories 1. Defined 2. Application to learning style 3. Development of teaching plan 4. Design of teaching materials a. Reading level assessment b. Visual impact Health Promotion/Health Maintenance A. Wellness focus B. Assessment C. The role of alternative therapies D. Intervention Theory explication and application CLASS PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES Class participation, including web activities, is an integral part of this course. At times it is the springboard for future class assignments and other times it culminates several individual and group activities. It helps us formulate new ideas from studies, theories, and literature. It is therefore required that all students participate in class discussions both during class and over the web utilizing threaded discussion. Effective participation involves preparation, asking thoughtful questions that contribute to class discussions, and the sharing of experiences and learned information. These experiences will help the student move toward new understandings. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 6 CLASS PLAN Reminder: Students are required to complete class activities on a timely basis. A grade reduction of 2 percent of the assignment grade will be assessed for each day an assignment is late. Assignment due dates are underlined, bolded, and on the course calendar. Assignments are due by 4 PM unless otherwise specified. CLASS 1 -- WEEK 1 (August 26, 2006) Introduction: Socialization, review of syllabus, research articles vs opinion vs clinical, scholarly sources, plagiarism, APA Discussion: Nursing as a profession, Gordon's patterns Choose a book to read Books will be discussed beginning November 4, 2006. Introduction to Blackboard Review upcoming assignments ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 2 Read: Go To: Bastable text Chapters 3, 4, 10; Carpenito-Moyet text Section 1, pp 1-75. http://www.advisorteam.com/user/ktsintro.asp and complete the online personality test, the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II, to determine your learning personality. Go To: http://www.gsu.edu/~dschjb/wwwmbti.html to read about teaching to the different personality types. Assignment folder to review the Teaching Plan format. You will be preparing a teaching plan using this format later in the class. If you have questions about the format, please come prepared to discuss them during Class 2, Week 5, September 23, 2006. Web Search Assignment: See Assignment guidelines. E-mail your assignment to Gina by Friday, September 29, 2006. Go To: Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 7 ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 3 Read: Case Study #1 (Assignments folder). Identify 5 nursing diagnoses and e-mail your diagnoses to Sherry by September 8, 2006. Read: Bastable text, Chapter 5 Analytical Paper #1: See assignment guidelines. E-mail the report to faculty by Friday of Week 5, September 22, 2006. ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 4-5 Read: Bastable text, Chapter 11 Application: You should find an announcement listing several nursing diagnoses on September 11, 2006. Choose 2 nursing diagnoses and e-mail Sherry with your choices. Sherry will e-mail you with the nursing diagnosis you have been assigned. In preparation for the discussions to follow, write a goal and outcome measures for the goal, and write three interventions with rationale. The rationale for the interventions should be supported by research literature. Be prepared to discuss the diagnosis, interventions, and your research articles during Threaded Discussion #1. Threaded Discussion #1: Nursing Diagnoses, Goals, and Interventions Discussion begins September 18 and closes on September 22, 2006. Your group assignment will be posted as an announcement. CLASS 2 -- WEEK 5 (September 23, 2006) Discussion of nursing diagnoses from Case Study 1 Teaching methods and teaching plans Formation of groups for teaching practice. Time to set up meeting times, etc. Theory explication and application. Choose a theory topic Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 8 ACTIVITIES FOR WEEKS 6-7 Group Work: Write: Theory Paper: Web Assignment: Work with group on preparation of teaching presentation. Teaching presentation will be presented during Class 3, Week 9, October 21, 2006. Group Teaching Plan. E-mail the group teaching plan to faculty by Wednesday, October 4, 2006. Write a six to seven page paper on a theory (Leadership theory, Stress & Coping theory, Systems theory, or Change theory) See guidelines for theory papers in the Assignments folder. Submit the finished paper to faculty through Blackboard by Monday of week 9, October 16, 2006. Due September 29, 2006 ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 8-9 Read: Case Studies #2 and #3 (Assignment folder) CLASS 3 -- WEEK 9 (October 21, 2006) Presentation of Group Teaching Presentations Discussion of theories ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 10 Begin Interview: See assignment guidelines. ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 11-12 Threaded Discussion #2: Books Discussion begins November 4 and ends November 10. See announcements for group assignments. CLASS 4 -- WEEK 13 (November 18, 2006) Discussion of books read. Examination of cultural diversity Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 9 ACTIVITIES FOR WEEK 14-16 Either Final Gifts or watch three of the videos in the series “On Our Own Terms” with Bill Moyers.(Copies will be on reserve in the 6th floor Audio-Visual Library). Read: Search the journals and find two research articles on caregiver stress; be prepared to discuss the articles during Class 5, Week 16, December 9, 2006. Read: Case Study #4 (Assignments folder) Analytic Report #2: Reading application See assignment guidelines. Submit the paper to faculty by Monday of Week 15, November 27, 2006. Read: CLASS 5 – WEEK 16 (December 9, 2006) Discussion of Case 4. Patient, Family & Caregiver concerns. Discussion of Interviews. Written report of interview due. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 10 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES: ANALYTICAL PAPERS Analytical Paper #1 (10% of course grade) Analytical papers are written assignments that ask the student to reflect on past or current experiences and/or course readings for the purpose of relating those experiences to current course content. This purpose of this assignment is to ask you to reflect on an educational event or a need for education, analyze this event, and to apply information from your textbook to the analysis. Reflect on a problem from your clinical experience where there was/is a need for professional education of a client or family. Explain the situation and the need. Was the need met appropriately? Explain why or why not? Use references from the Bastable text to support your explanation – additional readings (other than those assigned) may be helpful to you as well. Your grade will be based on the inclusion of the following areas: A description of the problem/question (10 points) A thoughtful, thorough reflection/explication of the issues involved (context, related factors, etc.) (20 points) An explanation of how your readings relate to this problem/question (45 points) An explanation of what you learned through the examination of this problem/question (15 points) Writing and APA style (10 points) This paper should be 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference page. The papers, when completed, should be sent as an e-mail attachment to faculty by Friday of Week 5, September 22, 2006. Analytical Paper #2: Readings Application (15% of course grade) Analytical papers are written assignments that ask the student to reflect on past or current experiences and/or course readings for the purpose of relating those experiences to current course content. The purpose of this assignment is to ask you to apply readings to help a family make a decision on end-of-life care. To answer this question, place yourself as an advisor to the family in the Case Study – do NOT write this assignment from the perspective of your own family. Topic: Should the Case Study patient die at home with hospice or in the hospital? How do we make that decision? What are the costs/benefits/family impact to the decision. Literature support required. Your grade will be based on the inclusion of the following areas: A description of the problem/question (10 points) A thoughtful, thorough reflection/explication of the issues involved (context, related factors, etc.) (20 points) An explanation of how your readings relate to this problem/question (45 points) An explanation of what you learned through the examination of this problem/question/interview (15 points). Writing and APA style (10 points) Note: You must make a decision about which option to recommend for terminal care is best for this patient. This paper should be 7-8 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference page. The papers, when completed, should be sent as an e-mail attachment to faculty by Monday of Week 15, November 27, 2006. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 11 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES -- Threaded Discussions Threaded discussions are scholarly group discussions conducted on-line through Blackboard. The class will be divided into small groups to facilitate ease of discussion. Questions will be posted for each discussion group; these questions will relate to course content. These discussions are designed to stimulate thought, interest, and analysis between and among participants. The class will be divided into discussion teams; the teams will be posted on the announcements page. A team leader will be appointed. The team leader will facilitate discussion and encourage group member participation. Another classmate will be appointed to summarize the group discussion and to send a report via e-mail to faculty and to other class members. Your presence in the discussion will be monitored. Each threaded discussion will be worth 10% of your grade. To receive the full 10%, you must actively participate in the discussion and support your arguments with the literature. Each discussion will span several days so that each student should have multiple opportunities to participate in each discussion. As in a face-to-face discussion, during threaded discussion you may raise questions, ask for clarification, answer questions, and comment on the remarks of others. Your responses to the original question and to postings from your fellow classmates should be thoughtful, meaningful, informed, and polite. The dates of the discussions are posted in the Class Plan. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 12 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES NUR 854 TEACHING PLAN FORMAT TITLE OF PRESENTATION: GROUP MEMBERS PRESENTING: Length of Presentation: 20 Minutes MAXIMUM. Description of Target Audience: Estimated Number in Attendance: Goals of Teaching/Learning Plan -- Outcome Statement At the end of this presentation, the audience will be able to ....... Specific Behavioral Objectives Evaluation Techniques Instructor Materials / Equipment / Supplies Needed: Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 13 Teaching Plan Format -- Page 2 Presentation Outline*: Presenter: Instructional Method: Time Allotted: References: Please include a minimum of two references. Reference page using APA format is required. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 14 PREPARING A PRESENTATION OUTLINE * There are several parts to a presentation: the introduction, the content, and the closure. Your presentation outline should address specifically how you will cover each of these parts. Part I. The Introduction A. Introduce the topic. Try to catch the attention of the audience. B. Establish a common base of knowledge. C. Establish the need for further knowledge. D. Describe the benefits of learning the content you will present. E. State the objectives. Objectives should be action oriented and should be in the form of the sentence: At the end of the presentation the audience member will be able to .... Part II. The Content Outline. Provide an outline of the actual content you will teach. A minimum of two references is required. A reference page in APA format is also required. Part III. Closure A. Summarize the main points. B. Provide the audience with a sense of achievement. C. Try to relate back to your introduction. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 15 EVALUATION OF THE TEACHING PRESENTATION The teaching presentation will be evaluated according to the behaviors and skills listed below. A. Introduction A1. Explication of the teaching method is thorough (5%) A2. Explain how the topic you have chosen to demonstrate application of the method is appropriate for the method you are using. (5 pts). A3. Describe the developmental age of the audience and how you have taken that into consideration when planning your teaching. (5 pts) A4. The introduction of the demonstration of teaching presentation was clear and understandable. This introduction includes describing the audience/clients, the prerequisite knowledge of the audience/clients; and the objectives, setting, and timing (week before admission, day of discharge, second and fourth post-operative day, second class of a four part series). (10 pts). B. Demonstration of the teaching method B1. The teaching process began with a method to catch the interest of the clients/patients. (5 pts). B2. Instructions to the clients/patients were clear and concise and appropriate to the level of their understanding. (10 pts). B3. The selected method of teaching was correctly implemented. Interaction with the clients/patients was appropriate for the specific teaching methodology. (15 pts) B4. The outcome of the teaching experience was evaluated. (5 pts) B5. The summary brought the experience together and to a close. (5 pts) B6. The teaching presentation was creative. (10 pts) Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 16 C. C1. Presentation Skills The teaching experience was organized. The room arrangement was conducive to learning for the audience/clients. The teachers knew their roles and presented in a coordinated and logical sequence. (15 pts) C2. Audiovisuals were appropriate for the specific teaching methodology, for the level of understanding of the patient, and for content. Transparencies, handouts, posters, or powerpoint were appropriate, clear, neat, and large enough to be easily read by the audience. (10 pts) Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 17 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES WEB ASSIGNMENT The World Wide Web makes a large amount of medical information easily available to anyone with access to a computer. Every day information providers add new information to the Web; the information available is increasing at an exponential rate. Consumers are exploring this information. This healthcare consumer exploration can be a good thing because it means that clients are informed about their health conditions and can participate more knowledgeably in healthcare decisions. However, what assurance do consumers have that the information they obtain from the Web is accurate? How can we help consumers to sort out the vast array of information to find valid information? One way to begin is to search the Web ourselves to see what is out there. The purpose of this assignment is to begin to explore the information that is readily available to consumers on the World Wide Web in your area of interest, and to evaluate the information. So ….. choose a medical diagnosis of interest and begin. To begin to search, you must access a search engine. Some useful links to explain the use of search engines are http://daphne.palomar.edu/TGSEARCH/ and http://www.monash.com/spidap1.html Once you've found the sites you're interested in, you need to determine the credibility of the sites. This link, http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html will give you information on how that can be accomplished. Something to Think About: Do these criteria have limitations too? Once you've found some credible sources, prepare a written report. The guidelines for this report follow. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 18 WEB SEARCH ASSIGNMENT WRITTEN REPORT GUIDELINES The written report (3-5 pages, typed, including the bibliography) should include: A. The five best sites you found. For each site 1. Give the name of the site (note: this is not the site address, http://www......) 2.. Explain why you feel this is one of best sites. (70 points) B. Prepare a bibliography of the 5 sites in APA style. A bibliography is similar to a reference page, but there is no requirement that the works listed have been cited in the paper. For assistance with electronic references in APA format, see your APA manual (30 points) The report should submitted through Blackboard by Friday, September 29, 2006. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 19 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES THEORY PAPER The purpose of this assignment is to help you and your fellow classmates become familiar with selected theories. We will examine stress & coping theory, systems theory, change theory, and leadership theory. You will write six to seven pages on an assigned theory. This paper should explain the theory and discuss application of the theory in the clinical setting. A minimum of four to five scholarly sources should be used to support your explanation. The assignment will be evaluated as follows: Explanation of the theory (40 points) This may include historical development of the theory, what the theory says, how the theory may be used, etc. Application of the theory (45 points) Spelling, grammar, logical sequence, clear language (10 points) APA style (5 points), including the use of scholarly sources NOTE: Accepted scholarly sources are primarily professional journals and books. Unless articles and/or books are classics in their field, sources should be no more than 7 years old. No more than 2 credible web sites may be utilized. Basic nursing texts are not considered scholarly sources. Revised 8/2006 NUR 854 20 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES INTERVIEW The purpose of this assignment is to learn more about another culture. This will be accomplished by getting to know someone from another culture, by an exploration of how that person views health and illness through an interview, and reflection to discover how this person’s beliefs differ from your own beliefs and values. In this assignment you will interview a person from another culture and write a paper about the interview and your self-reflection. Some guidelines you might use for interview questions are: How do you define health? What do you do to promote and maintain your health? What are your most urgent health needs? How does spirituality effect your health? What are your beliefs about life after death? What do you think causes illness? Do you take any herbs or have any rituals that promote your health? How is healthcare in your native country different from that in the US? Just as when taking a health history you would further question a statement that the patient has a history of heart disease to find out more specifics, explore information that your interviewee gives you. The aim is to learn more about another culture – not just to get answers to specific questions. GRADING CRITERIA: Introduction (10%) Who are you interviewing? Describe the culture of origin. Where did the interview take place? Body (60%) What did you find out in the interview? Reflection (30%) How do the views of the interviewee differ from your views? Is there anything you might have done differently which would have improved your interview? This paper should be 6-7 pages in length and typed in APA format. Note: This paper is a report of a personal experience and may be written in first person (using I). Revised 8/2006 Modified APA Guidelines University of Kentucky College of Nursing NUR 854 21 Please Note: These APA modifications will be insufficient for acceptance when submitting scholarly work in APA style outside of the College of Nursing. General Document Guidelines A. Margins – 1 inch all sides B. 12 pnt font, Times New Roman or Courier C. Spacing – Double spaced throughout. Double space between ALL lines of text. This includes the reference page. D. Headings – centered, uppercase and lowercase E. Title page -- to include title (upper and lower case), course affiliation, author’s name. All lines double spaced, centered on page. No running heads. 1. Text Citations: Source material must be documented in the body of the paper by citing the author(s) and date(s) of the sources. A. When the names of the authors of a source are part of the formal structure of the sentence, the publication year appears in parentheses following identification of the authors. Wirth and Mitchell (1994) found that although there was a reduction in insulin dosage over a period of two weeks………………. B. When the authors of a source are NOT part of the formal structure of the sentence, both the authors and years of publication appear in parentheses, separated by semicolons. Reviews of research on religion and health have concluded that at least some types of religious behaviors are related to higher levels of physical and mental health (Gartner, Larson, & Allen, 1991; Koenig, 1990; Levin & Vanderpool, 1991) [Note: & is used when multiple authors are identified in parenthetical material. When several sources are cited parenthetically, they are ordered alphabetically by first authors’ surnames.] C. When a source that has two authors is cited, both authors are included every time the source is cited. When a source that has three, four, or five authors is cited, all authors are included the first time the source is cited. When that source is cited again, the first author’s surname and “et al.” is used. Larson et al. (1991) showed that…………………. D. Every effort should be made to cite only sources that you have actually read. When it is necessary to cite a source that you have not read that is cited in a source that you have read, use the following format for the text citation and list only the source you have read in the references list: Grayson (as cited in Murzynski & Degelman, 1996) identified four….. Revised 8/2006 NUR854 Page 22 2. Quotations: When a direct quotation is used, always include the author, year, and page number as part of the citation. A. A quotation of fewer than 40 words should be enclosed in double quotation marks and should be incorporated into the formal structure of the sentence. Patients receiving prayer had “less congestive heart failure, required less antibiotic therapy, had fewer episodes of pneumonia, had fewer cardiac arrests, and were less frequently intubated and ventilated” (Byrd, 1988, p. 839). B. A lengthier quotation of 40 or more words should appear (without quotation marks) apart from the surrounding text, in block format, with each line indented five spaces from the left margin. When quoting, always provide the author, year, and specific page citation in the text. Miele (1993) found the following: The placebo effect, which had been verified in previous studies, disappeared when behaviors were studied in this manner. Furthermore, the behaviors were never exhibited again, even when real drugs were administered. Earlier studies (e.g. Abdullah, 1984; Fox, 1979) were clearly premature in attributing the results to a placebo effect. (p. 276). 3. References A. The first lines of all references are aligned at the left margin, with each subsequent line indented 5 spaces. B. All entries are organized alphabetically by surnames of first authors. C. Authors are listed in the same order as specified in the source, using surnames and initials. Commas separate all authors. If no author is identified, the title of the document begins the reference. D. Year of publication: In parentheses following authors, with a period following the closing parenthesis. If no publication date is identified, use “n.d.” in parentheses following the authors. E. Source reference:: Include title, journal, volume, pages (for journal article) or title, city of publication, publisher (for book). Italicize titles of books, titles of web sites and titles of periodicals, and periodical volume numbers. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 23 F. Examples of sources 1. Journal article Murzynski, J., & Degelman, D. (1996). Body language in women and judgments of vulnerability to sexual assault. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1617-1626. 2. Book Paloutzian, R.F. (1996). Invitation to the psychology of religion (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 3. Stand alone web document, no date Degelman, D., & Harris, M.L. (n.d.). APA style essentials. Retrieved May 18, 2000, from http://www.vanguard.edu/faculty/ddegelman/index.cfm?doc_id=796 4. Stand alone web document, no date/author Gender and society. (n.d.). Retrieved December 31, 2001, from http://www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/gender.html 5. Journal article from database Hien, D., & Honeyman, T. (2000). A closer look at the drug abuse-maternal aggression link. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 503-522. Retrieved May 20, 2000, from ProQuest database. 6. Article or chapter in an edited book Shea, J.D. (1992). Religion and sexual adjustment. In J. F. Schumaker (Ed.), Religion and mental health (pp. 70-84). New York: Oxford University Press. For examples of electronic reference formats go to: http://www.apastyle.org/elecref.html For examples of APA-formatted references go to: http://www.vanguard.edu/psychology/references.pdf For an example of a complete article formatted according to APA style, go to http://www.vanguard.edu/psychology/prayer.pdfr evised/8.18.04/bohannon,riker,chlebowy . Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 24 References Coping theory Azar, R., & Solomon, C. R. (2001). Coping strategies of parents facing child diabetes mellitus. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 16 (6), 418-328. Baker, C. F., & Scholz, J. A. (2002). Coping with symptoms of dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rehabilitation Nursing, 27 (2), 67-74. LaMontagne, L., Johnson, B., & Hepworth, J. (1995). Evolution of parental stress and coping process: A framework for critical care practice. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families, 10 (4), 212-218. Reynaud, S., & Meeker, B. (2002). Coping styles of older adults with ostomies. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 28 (5), 30-36. Richardson, C. & Poole, H. (2001). Chronic pain and coping: A proposed role for nurses and nursing models. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34 (5), 659-667. Crisis theory Cope, D.N., & Wolfson, B. (1994). Crisis intervention with the family in the trauma setting. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9 (1), 67-81. Hendricks Ferguson, V.L. (2000). Crisis intervention strategies when caring for families of children with cancer . Journal of Pediatric-Oncology Nursing, 17(1), 3-11. Crompton, N. (1996). Crisis theory and crisis management: The way forward. Mental-Health-Nursing, 16(5), 16-18. Hutchinson, S.A. (1992). Nurses who violate the Nurse Practice Act: Transformation of professional identity. Image: Journal-of-Nursing-Scholarship, 24 (2), 133-139. Kettunen, S., Solovieva, S., Laamanen, R., & Santavirta, N. (1999). Myocardial infarction: Spouses' reactions and their need of support. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30 (2), 479-488. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 25 Shaw, M.C., & Halliday, P.H. The family, crisis and chronic illness: An evolution model. Journal of Advanced Nursing,17 (5), 537-543. Turner, R.J., & Avison, W.R. (1992). Innovations in the measurement of life stress: Crisis theory and the significance of event resolution. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33 (1), 36-50. Walsh, J. (1998). The clinical case management of clients with major depression. Journal of Case Management, 7 (2), 53-61. Woolley, N. (1990). Crisis theory: A paradigm of effective intervention with families of critically ill people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15 (12), 1402-1408. Gordon’s Funtional Health Patterns Anderson, L. K., & Vincent, N. (1991). Orientation based on nursing diagnoses: Old concepts in today’s practice. AORN Journal, 54 (4), 826-830. Cameron, S. J., Keil, J., Rajacich, D., & Dunham, K. (1996). Using functional health patterns to predict outcome with seniors. Canadian Nurse, 92 (10), 34-38. Decker, S., D., & Knight, L. (1990). Functional health pattern assessment: A seasonal migrant farmworker community. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 7 (3), 141-151. DiBlasi, M., & Savage, J. (1992). Revitalizing a documentation system. Rehabilitation Nursing, 17 (1), 27-29. *Griffiths, P. (1998). An investigation into the description of patients’ problems by nurses using two different needs-based nursing models. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28 (5), 969-977. Hartman, D., & Knudson, J. (1991). A nursing data base for initial patient assessment. Oncology Nursing Forum, 18 (1), 125-30. Priest, C. S., & Holmberg, S. K. (2000). A new model for the mental health nursing change of shift report. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 38 (8), 36-43. Recker, D., & O”Brien, C. (1992). Using Gordon’s functional health patterns to organize a critical care orientation program. AACN: Focus on Critical Care, 19 (1), 21-28. Rengucci, L. M. (1992). Neonatal nursing assessment by functional health patterns. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 4 (3), 471-480. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 26 Leadership theory Allen, D.W. (1998). How nurses become leaders: Perceptions and beliefs about leadership development. Journal of Nursing Administration, 28 (9), 15-20. *Atwater, L. (1995). the relationship between supervisory power and organizational characteristics. Group & Organization Management, 20 (4), 460-486. Brandt, M.A. (1994). Caring leadership. Nursing Management, 25 (8), 68-72. Bultema, J.K. (1995). Theory, quality, and economy: A winning combination. Journal of Nursing Administration, 25 (7-8), 38-45. *DeLillis, A. (2000). Clarifying the concept of respect: Implications for leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7 (2), 35. Drayton-Hargrove, S. (1996). Leadership behaviors of nurse managers in traditional and participatory settings. Journal of Nursing Science, 1 (3/4), 77-87. *Kennerly, S., (1996). Effects of shared governance on perceptions of work and work environment. Nursing Economics, 14 (2), 111-117. *Krejci, J. W., & Malin, S. (1997). Impact of leadership development on competencies. Nursing Economics, 15 (5), 235-242. Lambert, V.A., & Nugent, K.E. (1999). Leadership style for facilitating the integration of culturally appropriate health care. Seminars for Nurse Managers, 7 (4), 172-178. Laurent, C.L. (2000). A nursing theory for nursing leadership. Journal of Nursing Management, 8 (2), 83-7. Lett, M. (1999). The need for leadership. Contemporary Nurse, 8 (4), 136-141. Rajotte, C.A. (1996). Empowerment as a leadership theory. Kansas Nurse, 71(1), 1. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 27 *Taccetta-Chapnick, M. (1996). Transformational leadership. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 21 (1), 60-67. *Vance, C., & Larson, E. (2002). Leadership research in business and health care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34 (2), 165-172. Systems theory *Benko, S. S. & Sarvimaki, A. (2000). Evaluation of patient-focused health care from a systems perspective. systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17 (6), 513. Dacher, E. S. (1995). A systems theory approach to an expanded medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 1 (2), 187-96. McClowry, S.G. (1992). Family functioning during a critical illness: A systems theory perspective. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 4 (4), 559-64. *Raak, A., & Paulus, A. (2001). A sociological systems theory of interorganizational network development in health and social care. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18 (3), 207. Death, dying, and palliative care Andershed, B. & Ternestedt, B. (1998). Involvement of relatives in the care of the dying in different care cultures: Involvement in the dark or in the light? Cancer Nursing, 21 (2), 106-116. Brant, J. (1998). The art of palliative care: Living with hope, dying with dignity. Oncology Nursing Forum, 25 (6), 995-1004. Buckman, R. (1998). Communication in palliative care: A practical guide. In D. Doyle, G. Hanks & N. McDonald (Eds.). Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine (2nd ed., pp. 141-156). Oxford, UK: Oxford Medical Publication. Degner, L.F., Gow, C.M., & Thompson, L.A. (1991). Critical nursing behaviors in care for the dying. Cancer Nursing, 14 (5), 246-253. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 28 Field, M.J. & Cassel, C.K. (Eds). (1997). Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Haynor, P. (1998). Meeting the challenge of advance directives: How to help ensure that your patient has the type of end-of-life care he wanted. American Journal of Nursing, 98 (3), 27-32. Kemp, C. (1995). Terminal illness: A guide to nursing care. Philadelphia, PA: J.B.Lippincott. Lindley-Davis, B. (1991). Process of dying. Cancer Nursing, 6 (4), 328-333. Maeve, M.K. (1998). Weaving a fabric of moral meaning: How nurses live with suffering and death. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 1136-1142. Storey, P. (1998). Symptom control in dying. In A. M. Berger, R. K. Portenoy, & D. E. Weissman, (Eds.). Principles and practice of supportive oncology (pp. 741-748). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Pub. Change theory Baird, A. (1998). Change theory and health promotion. Nursing Standard, 12 (22), 34-36. *Barr, B. J. (2002). Manageing change during an information systems transition. AORN Journal, 75 (6), 1085-1092. Byrd-Bredbenner, C. & Finckenor, M. (2000). Putting the transtheoretical model into practice with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Topics in Clinical Nutrition, 15 (3), 44-58, 78-82. Brooks, G. (1998). Care plans: A theory of change put into practice. Nursing in Critical Care, 3 (4), 171-5. *Burbank, P. M., Reibe, D., Padula, C. A., & Nigg, C. (2002). Exercise and older adults: Changing behavior with the transtheoretical model. Orthopaedic Nursing, 21 (4), 51-62. Conger, M.M. (1992). Application of change theory to a clinical problem. Nursing Management, 23 (10), 89-90. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 29 Kreidler, M.C., Campbell, J., Lanik, G., Gray, V.R. & Conrad, M.A. (1994). Community elderly. A nursing center’s use of change theory as a model. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 20(1), 25-30. Ochieng, B.M.N. (1999). Use of reflective practice in introducing change on the management of pain in a pediatric setting. Journal of Nursing Management, 7 (2), 113-8. Pallonen, U.E. (1998). Transtheoretical measures for adolescent and adult smokers: Similarities and differences. Preventive Medicine, 27 (5 part 3), A29-38. *Saarmann, L., Daughtery, J., & Riegel, B. (2002). Teaching staff a brief-behavioral intervention. Med-Surg Nursing, 11 (3), 144-156. Skelton-Green, J.M. (1995). How a better understanding of change theory can help improve your practice as a nurse administrator. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 8 (2), 8-29. *Tigges, B. B. (2001). Affiliative preferences, self-change, and adolescent condom use. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33 (3), 231. Wellness Bland, J.S. (1998). The use of complementary medicine for healthy aging. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 4 (4), 42-48. Dossey, L. (1995). What does illness mean? Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 1 (3), 6-10. Engebretson, J. (1998). A heterodox model of healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medici ne, 4 (2), 37-42. Hahn, Y.B., Ro, Y.J., Song, H.H., Kim, N.C., Kim, H.S., & Yoo, Y.S. (1993). The effect of thermal biofeedback and progressive muscle relaxation training in reducing blood pressure of patients with essential hypertension. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarshp, 25 (3), 204-207. Revised 8/04 NUR854 Page 30 McCaleb, R.S. (1996). Alternative and complementary medicine, preventive medicine, and natural healthcare. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 2 (2), 104-103. Moch, S.D. (1998). Health-within-illness: Concept development through research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28 (2), 305-310. O’Quinn, J.L. (1995). Worksite wellness programs and lifestyle behaviors. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 13 (4), 346-360. Pert, C.B., Dreher, H.E., & Ruff, M.R. (1998). The psychosomatic network. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 4 (4), 50-67. Wells-Federman, C.L., Stuart, E.M., Deckro, J.P., Mandle, C.L., Baim, M. & Medich, C. (1995). The mind-body connection: The psychophysiology of many traditional nursing interventions. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 9(1), 59-66. Revised 8/04
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz