EPP Quality Assurance System

EPP Quality Assurance System: Candidate Progress Monitoring
Assessment
Type
CAEP
Standard
Gateway
Scoring Criteria
Person
Responsible/Reporting
Candidate
Disposition
Evaluation
EPP-Created
1.1
3.1
3.3
3.4
#1
#2
Ratings of “Proficiency” to
indicate that the candidate is
consistent in performing the
disposition element 80% of the
time; “Developing” for a
disposition element which is
performed at least 50% of the
time; “Emerging when there is
some evidence that the candidate
performs the disposition element
but it is erratic (less than 50% of
the time); and “Never” when there
is no
evidence that the candidate
is performing the disposition
element.
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
20-items based on
performance in the field
and in sophomore level
courses (EDU 2100, 2110,
2200) or junior level
courses (EDU 4200, 3110,
and licensure-specific
courses).
Sophomore candidates scoring below 45
(75%) are asked to be interviewed prior
to admission to the program.
Junior candidates scoring below 50
(80%) or those with instructor concerns
based on comments noted will be
flagged for Junior Year Review.)
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
GPA
Transcript Evaluation
PPST/ACT/SAT
Proprietary
Assessment
Score Reports sent to
SOE by ETS or SAT/ACT
scores provided by Office
of Admissions.
1.1
3.1
3.4
3.5
1.1
3.1
#1, #2, #3,
#4, #5
2.75 (entering class of 2012)
3.0 or Higher (entering class of
2014)
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
#1
Passing Scores or Composite of
468 on Praxis I Core Academic
exam (reading, writing, and math)
Associate Dean:
Presented to Teacher Education Council
at time of admission to Program.
Score of 550 or higher (Verbal or
Math) Combined SAT of 1100
Or-
ACT 24 in English or Math
Depth and
Application Project
Rubric
Junior Year Review
Rubric
EPP-Created Rubric to
assess
Depth of Content
Knowledge
1.1
3.4
EPP-Created
To assess readiness for
Senior Methods
1.1
3.4
#2
80% Proficiency Rating Required
on Depth and Application Rubric
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
#2
A conference with the Associate
Dean is required if the score is
below 14 or more than one
category is marked as a 1.
Associate Dean:
Candidates scoring below “Proficiency”
will be flagged during the JYR.
Demonstration of proficiency in depth
of content is a prerequisite for
admission into methods courses.
Associate Dean to candidates through
letter and copy to advisor.
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
Literacy Infused
Curriculum Project
Rubric
EPP-Created Rubric to
assess
Ability to create a
curriculum unit integrated
with technology.
1.1
1.3
3.4
1.5
#3
Candidates must earn a score of
30 points (Proficiency) or higher
on the Literacy Infused
Curriculum Project Rubric
(maximum points =45) which has
been aligned to the N.C.
Professional Teaching Standards
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
Candidates earning a score of 29 or
below register for EDU 4111 to continue
to work on the project until it reaches
proficiency.
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
RUBRIC for
Internship Formal
Observations and
Impact on P-12
Learning Checklist.
EPP-Created to assess
the teaching of two
lesson plans from the
curriculum unit.
1.3
2.1
2.3
3.4
#3
#4
Reflection Rubric
EPP-Created to assess
candidate’s reflection
and growth in program.
1.1
3.4
#3
#4
Proficiency rating on the rubric
corresponds to a score of 86-97
points out of a total of 108 points.
Used to determine evaluation of both
Internship I and II and to generate a
Professional Growth Plan and final
evaluation scores.
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
Used to generate a Professional Growth
Plan.
Candidate
Internship
Evaluation Form
EPP-Created to assess
performance at the end of
Internship I and again at
the midterm of Internship
II.
Using Data to
Assess Student
Learning Rubric
EPP-Created to assess
proficiency in planning
formative and summative
assessments
LEA/IHE
Certification of
Teaching Capacity
Proprietary
Assessment
Pearson
Foundations of
Reading and
General Curriculum
Subtests
Praxis II Specialty
Exam
(effective 20142015)
Survey to
Elementary/Middle/
Secondary
Principals
Proprietary
Assessment
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.5
3.4
3.5
3.6
1.1
3.4
3.5
3.6
#4
1.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.5
#5
1.1
3.5
#5
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
Associate Dean/University Supervisor:
Any intern scoring at 56 or below points
for the midterm evaluation will be
required to develop an intervention plan
#4
See Evidence for Rubric and
Data
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
Candidates must earn a score of 20
points (Proficiency) or higher (maximum
points =26) which has been aligned to
the N.C. Professional Teaching
Standards.
Addendum to assess content
knowledge added by EPP in 20142015
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
License Eligibility requires the candidate
to meet all standards.
See Evidence for Data
Scores are verified.
Data Manager: SOE (Foliotek)
Passing scores required for licensure.
EPP-Created to assess
satisfaction of employers
of first and second year
teachers.
4.3
#6
See Evidence for Data
Item analysis in categories of Content
knowledge, instruction, planning,
disposition, 21st century skills,
technology. All data disaggregated by
program area and monitored for
cumulative trends.
Survey for
Graduates of
Elementary/
Middle/
Secondary
EPP-Created to assess
satisfaction of
completers.
4.4
#6
See Evidence for Data
Item analysis in categories of Content
knowledge, instruction, planning,
disposition, 21st century skills,
technology. All data disaggregated by
program area and monitored for
cumulative trends.
Employment Rate
Title II Report
Requires
EPP Tracks Records
Proprietary
Assessment
4.2
4.3
#6
See Evidence for Data
Administrative Assistant collects data
and posts on SOE website.
4.1
4.2
4.3
#6
See Evidence for Data
Ongoing efforts and strategies being
implemented.
Value-Added Data
Reports