Folie 1 - BayCEER

Natural Europe
Questionnaire for teachers (school visit)
The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information and on the features and tools of the
Natural Europe project. To analyze the quality of the project and its activities, all participants
are asked to fill in this questionnaire carefully. All data is going to be treated as confidential.
Thank you for your collaboration!
First, we need some core data about you:
Your gender: □ male
□ female
Your age: __________
Your home country: _____________
Which subject(s ) do you teach? ____________________________________________
What level do you teach?
□ primary
□ inferior secondary/ gymnasium
□ upper secondary/ high school
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE
1) Have you ever accessed digital educational resources in the Internet?
□ yes
□ no
If yes:
How often do you search and use digital educational resources on the Internet?
□ Every day
□ Several times a week
□ Once a week
□ Once a month
2) Do you use digital educational resources for teaching and for preparing learning activities?
□ Yes, often
□ Yes, rarely
□ Not at all
1
Which pathway did you implement with your students?
___________________________________________________________________
3) Please, rate the following aspects.
(Tick one box per phrase!)
Considering the implemented
Educational Pathway (EP)
Strongly
disagree
Strongly
agree
The EP fulfilled my requirements as a
teacher.
□
□
□
□
□
The content of the EP was excellent.
□
□
□
□
□
The structure of the EP was coherent.
□
□
□
□
□
It was easy to implement the EP.
□
□
□
□
□
The information material was
satisfying.
□
□
□
□
□
The digital learning material of the EP
was an enrichment.
□
□
□
□
□
The EP was appropriate to the level of
my students; it was neither too
difficult nor too easy.
□
□
□
□
□
It was easy to integrate the EP in the
normal curriculum.
□
□
□
□
□
The prescribed time for the EP was
sufficient.
□
□
□
□
□
The presented Educational Pathway …
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
agree
… is curriculum related.
□
□
□
□
□
… refreshes learning content.
□
□
□
□
□
… does not deepen learning content.
□
□
□
□
□
… repeats learning content.
□
□
□
□
□
… is not practicable in everyday school
life.
□
□
□
□
□
2
4) Please, rate the following aspects.
(Tick one box per phrase!)
Observed impact of the EP on the
students.
The Educational Pathway…
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
agree
… stimulated the interest and
motivation of students for learning
natural history/science.
□
□
□
□
□
… facilitated for themselves the
understanding and learning of natural
history/science.
□
□
□
□
□
… developed students ability to use
scientific methods.
□
□
□
□
□
… linked natural history/science more
easily and more closely with everyday
life.
□
□
□
□
□
… increased the students´
understanding of Information and
Computer Technologies (ICT) in
general.
□
□
□
□
□
...supported the students to apply ICT.
□
□
□
□
□
… made the students better
understand natural phenomena.
□
□
□
□
□
… facilitated more autonomous
learning of students at their own pace.
□
□
□
□
□
5) Any comments? Further suggestions?
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
3