Kent Positive Pathway Workshop Jo Beck Youth Homelessness Adviser 22nd February 2017 Overview of Today 1. Introductions 2. Setting the Scene: National and Local Overview 3. A look at the Positive Pathway model and the Care Leavers accommodation and support framework - and what is innovative /interesting or working well elsewhere 4. Time for group discussions around challenges and models for the future – based on the Positive Pathway model 5. Action planning Young People Face Particular Challenges in gaining access to ‘Affordable’ Housing • Fewer Private Rented Sector (PRS) landlords remain in the ‘housing benefit market’ , especially in South East • Universal Credit (paid monthly in arrears direct to claimant, with 7 ‘waiting days’) will not help • Limited supply of social housing, and increasing competition for 1 bed lets due to ‘bedroom tax’ • Young people are only entitled to Shared Accommodation Rate (SAR)– shared housing is more expensive to manage, especially as HMO regulation improves standards • From 2019 the SAR will be applied to social housing tenancies that began since April 2016 - average SAR/rent shortfall in South East estimated (NHF) £27 pw. Care leavers exempt from SAR until 22, may be raised to 25 • Social and Private Sector Landlords are losing confidence in letting to YP Young People have less money to pay the rent…. • Lowest wages, 3 x more likely to be unemployed, 41% of all zero hours contracts • Lowest of the (frozen) benefit rates £57.90pw JSA- and are most at risk of sanctions. • 18 – 21s due to lose entitlement to ‘housing costs’ element of UC from April 2017 – care leavers and ‘vulnerable’ groups exempt but detail unclear. Will only apply to new UC claims in digital area • Benefit cap lowered to £ 385pw for familieswill this increase parental exclusions? Challenges For Service Providers • • • • • • Rising levels of homelessness and new duties on local authorities to prevent homelessness – Homelessness Reduction Bill Funding for supported housing changing – From 2019/20 LHA to be applied (but not SAR) with ring-fenced ‘top up’ funding to local authorities. 1% rent reductions to be applied from 2017 onwards Competing demands for social care and housing related support budgets – Care Act and aging population Rising numbers of looked after children and care leavers, and in children becoming LAC at 16-17 Complex and multiple needs rising as a proportion – supported housing may not meet their needs Year on year reductions in budgets, growing demands for a service Great Expectations: Government focus on improving outcomes for care leavers Keep on Caring’ - Government Care Leaver Strategy, July 2016 • Corporate parenting - across authorities and beyond - and more pro-active. It’s not just Children’s Social Care! • Improved outcomes on Education, training and employment, health (particularly mental health), staying stay, and suitable accommodation regardless of your local housing market Children and Social Work Bill 2016 • Corporate parenting principles • Must publish ‘Local Offer’ to care leavers, including your housing offer Percentage of children who started to be looked after by age - First Statistical Release 2016 DfE: In 2012 12% were 16/17s In 2016 18% were 16/17s Acceptances of the homelessness duty to single young people in last 5 years 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 16/17 yr olds 800 Care leavers 600 400 200 0 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 To be or not to be looked after 18+ not looked after YP • Not automatically entitled to ‘housing costs’ in UC if unemployed at 18-21 • Shared Accommodation Rate(SAR) until 35 • UC ‘waiting days’ apply • Not automatically in ‘priority need’ if homeless • LA limited housing and support duties 18+ Care Leavers Exempt from removal of housing costs for 18-21s Exempt from SAR till 22, may be raised to 25 Exempt from UC ‘waiting days’ Priority need if homeless 1820, and at 21+ if vulnerable LA has duty to provide housing, PA support, funding for university, setting up home monies … and more Likely to get some additional priority in social housing allocations schemes The Homelessness Reduction Bill Duty to provide advisory services, particularly to high risk groups including care leavers, people leaving prison or youth detention New duties to PREVENT and/or RELIEVE homelessness for ‘eligible’ person - but intentionality and Priority Need tests not applied at this point Old legislation still there as the final/third stage – i.e. if can’t relieve homelessness and person is eligible, homeless, priority need and not intentionally homeless The Homelessness Reduction Bill ALL applicants must have an assessment of circumstances and needs, agree what steps applicant and LA must take to prevent homelessness or to secure accommodation – 56 days for each Applicant has written record of agreement and must be notified if the LA changes plan Applicant needs to take actions as well as LA – has to reasonably co-operate. A key issue for care leavers. Failure to co-operate would mean a lesser duty would be owed to Priority Need groups and no duty owed to non Priority Need at the third stage Turning down a ‘suitable offer’ ( minimum of a 6 month AST ) would end the duty at the relief stage The Homelessness Reduction Bill – local connection and care leavers Care Leavers have more choice on local connection (LC) if homeless: will have LC with any housing authority within the County in 2 tier areas will gain LC to an area where they have lived for 2+ years, if that includes some time before the YP reached 16 Note this applies ONLY to homelessness duties NOT allocation of housing! HRB: The future for YP services? 16-17s/ Care Leavers: Better prevention and relief work to avoid YP becoming homeless a ‘child in need’, Planned move into supported housing (if meets YP’s needs) when cannot remain safely within family network Improved early identification of Care Leavers at risk of homelessness Notification and assessment arrangements for YP leaving custody Reciprocal arrangements for care leavers out of borough Non-priority 18+ Family mediation, negotiation and support to enable YP to remain/return until able to move on independently Prevention work to help YP maintain tenancy/license in PRS or supported accommodation Money/budgeting advice, use of DHP and/or prevention budget to minimise arrears Access to shared housing and to supported housing (for YP with support needs) essential The Kent Picture – YP Looked After • 2015-16: 1495 children became Looked After • 715 (48%) were 16-17 years old (18% nationally) • 31st March 2016 – 2310 children were Looked After, 995 of these (43%) were 16-17 year olds • 31st March 2016 - 865 Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children looked after by Kent - 21% of all UASC looked after in England • Nationally 31% of UASC granted asylum, 44% granted limited leave to remain The Kent picture- YP and homelessness • 2015-16: 18 x 16-17 year olds and 30 x care leavers accepted as statutorily homeless -4% of accepted cases (2% across England) • 30th June 2016 – 8 x 16-17s in B&B (under Housing Act duties) of which 4 had been there 6+ weeks. (42 across England, 1 in London) • Housing data from questionnaire (includes some estimates) indicate homelessness approaches across Kent are: 110-130 p.a. 16-17 year olds 80-90 pa Care Leavers 1500-2000 18-25 year olds Summary of feedback from 9 Districts and Boroughs Housing data (includes some estimates) indicate homelessness approaches across Kent are: • 110-130 p.a. 16-17 year olds • 80-90 pa Care Leavers • 1500-2000 18-25 year olds Most (6) LHAs say B&B is used, as there is no provision for emergency supported housing 3 LHAs that do have access to emergency supported have no 16-17s in B&B, although more than 50% of approaches Use of B&B for young people • The Homelessness (Suitability of Accommodation) (England) Order 2003 – B&B is privately owned, shared facilities (toilet, washing, cooking facilities) • Families must not be placed in B&B except where no alternative and for no longer than 6 weeks • DfE/DCLG Joint Guidance 2010 “Bed and breakfast accommodation is not considered suitable for 16 and 17 year olds even on an emergency accommodation basis”. • Ombudsman and use of B&B for 16/17s and families • January 2015, the DfE guidance: B&Bs unsuitable for care leavers, and should be used for no more than two working days in an emergency (paragraph 7.12). The Positive Pathway is up to date and relevant differentiates between different types of needs and responses is outcome focused, prevention focused is based on what works well is underpinned by the principles of Public Service Transformation Network is flexible for your local context has a ‘sister’ version we have done with Barnardos specifically for care leavers is being used by the majority of local authorities Stage 1: Information and advice for young people and families (a universal offer) Change the ‘word on the street’ Up to date, local information easily accessible to YP and parents that sets out the realities of their housing options, including availability and costs of accommodation Convey the message through various media websites/social media, work in schools and youth services, via services that work with YP YP preparing to leave care, and their professionals/carers understand the realities and offer good advice AIM: YP and families understand the link between housing choice and their financial position, and can plan transitions when time is right without specialist support Stage 2: Early Help(targeted) • Reach YP most likely to be at risk of homelessness • Involve local services working with these YP – Troubled Families, Youth Support, YOS – and ensure Early Help professionals are aware of risk of homelessness and able to take action to prevent crisis • Use commissioned family support programmes to prevent youth homelessness – e.g. Family Group Conferencing Aim: YP stay in the family network where safe to do so, and/or have support to move out in a planned way Feedback from one district….. “We perceive that there is a lack of knowledge and understanding about affordable and appropriate accommodation options for young people in the local area and across the county, from Social Services staff working with this client group. Earlier involvement with our services, as set out in the YP protocol for those leaving care, would mean we could provide realistic advice and a preventative stage”. Stage 1: “Hi Homie” website • Homeless Foundation’s Worcestershire website • Lots of information on leaving home for young people • Advice for parents • Based on local consultation • See http://www.hihomie.org Stages 1 & 2: St Basils: Schools Training and Mentoring Project • Peer led work in schools and colleges • Young people with experience of homelessness work with St Basils worker • Accreditation in mentoring and peer education • Delivery in classrooms and offer of one to one support • Advice/support to teachers Stage 1: Use of theatre in schools & colleges - ZEST • Performed in several areas in England • 30 minute production & then discussion ‘Jeremy Kyle’ style • Highly engaging excellent feedback • Re-written annually • Covers homelessness and other related issues: relationships, substance misuse, pregnancy, violence Stages 1 & 2: Board Game: Going It Alone, North Wales • 4 pay days and 4 bill days – make your way around the board • Various scenarios thrown at players • Developed with young people • Partnership - North Wales Housing, Grŵp Cynefin, Cartrefi Conwy and the Bus Stop Project Stage 2: Incentivised planned moves: Hull’s Passport To Property • Planned moves from home/family • Requires attendance at multi-agency run pre-tenancy training over half terms and workbook completion • Requires young people to attend college or training or be in employment • Additional points and help with bidding • Support with family relationships • Strong focus on realism of living alone Discussion Thinking about STAGEs 1 & 2 of the Positive Pathway • Information and Advice to YP and families • Early Help targeted at children most at risk of becoming homeless •What information/advice is already available and used? •Are professionals delivering Early Help aware of the reality of housing options and supporting efforts to prevent homelessness •What are some of the major gaps, pressures and challenges? •Identify opportunities or changes that could make a difference- for 16-17s, for 18+ young people Stage 3: Integrated response hub and gateway to commissioned accommodation and support • Children’s Services and Housing (and other partners where possible) provide integrated service hub or ‘virtual hub’ for YP at risk of homelessness • Comprehensive joint assessment of needs meet statutory duties, inform options and gathers data to assist with developing the pathway • Homelessness prevented or delayed wherever possible • YP provided with suitable accommodation and support where needed Stage 3 : Royal Borough of Greenwich Integrated Youth Services@ The Point • Children’s Services led integrated hub providing universal and targeted support • Service providers include Youth Support, Sexual Health Clinic, YOS and Care Leavers Team, Housing related floating support, Substance Misuse treatment service, Counselling, Family Nurse Partnership • 1st Base Housing Options and Support Team, including dedicated social worker. Initial prevention work led by housing staff, joint assessment if YP cannot return home, S20 and Supported Housing choices explained • YP come to get help with education, training, ,employment (ETE), because they are at risk of homelessness, to see their YOS worker or PA, for health services • Holistic assessments identify ALL needs and services the YP should access (with their consent) • Team Around the Child (TAC) used to agree action plan with YP and family Prevention Checklist Home visits within 48 hours to families where there is imminent/actual homelessness Mediation/negotiation delivered by commissioned service, or by inhouse staff with training Engage parents/family members in action planning to avoid homelessness -Team Around the Young Person/Child Prevention fund/S17 funding used to support YP to stay in the family home or with extended family or friends Floating support/family support/youth workers to support keeping young people at home/with extended family? Emergency short stay placements available whilst assessments/mediation underway Mediation and other support ongoing even after a YP placed in emergency accommodation to try to return them home or to a family member/friend? Protocols and procedures to prepare for YP leaving custody, and to avoid care leavers becoming homeless Child In Need and Housing Assessments • Protocol (2010) requires initial joint assessments completed within 2 days and CIN assessment within 10 days • YP provided with emergency accommodation by service first approached • A 16-17 year old who is 16-17 will be a ‘Child In Need’, to be accommodated under S20 unless s/he refuses to be • The YP must be fully informed of the implications for now and in the future including the possibility of being ‘intentionally homeless’ and assessed as competent to make the decision. Discussion Thinking about STAGE 3 of the Positive Pathway An integrated or joined-up response to prevent homelessness, assess needs and manage the gateway to commissioned accommodation • How joined-up is your service to YP at risk of homelessness? • Are there sufficient resources/expertise attached to prevention of homelessness? • Are YP who cannot be prevented from becoming homeless fully advised of the implications of becoming LAC and of housing options? • Identify possible opportunities or changes that could really start to make a difference- for 16-17s, for 18+ young people Key Principles of the Framework All YP leaving care (in all types of placement) are: Given as much information choice and control as possible Able to make mistakes and not ‘fall out’ of the framework Helped to succeed Offered flexible support to meet needs Offered supportive unconditional relationships The shared responsibility of their corporate parents Positive Pathway Stage 4 Commissioned Accommodation and Support • A (jointly) commissioned accommodation pathway with different types of accommodation and levels of support, to meet varying ages, needs and locations which enable ‘through-put’ • The ideal is a menu of options: • Supported housing hub and spoke – step up and down • Supported Lodgings – especially important in large geographical areas • Provision for complex needs - ‘Housing First’, ‘Fair Chance’ models – intensive floating support • Foyers – focus on ETE Stage 4: Commissioned Accommodation and Support • Services should be transformational, not just housing • New(ish) approaches e.g ‘psychological informed environments’ • YP gain knowledge and skills to manage independently • ALL options need an ETE focus – YP moving on are in employment or well on the way • AND sharing needs to be a key feature – learning how to share is a necessary life skill for most young people Stage 4: Nottinghamshire County Council and Districts Supported Accommodation Pathway • Developed in response to strained county/district relationships, reductions in funding, providers not delivering to meet needs • Shared data, information and knowledge– comprehensive needs assessment • Pooled budgets – Housing Related Support, Placements budget, Health • Designed pathway to meet greatest needs – 16-21 year olds • Built political support and strong alliance of local authority tiers and providers, who now meet regularly • Robust services with a pathway to independence • Agreement about which young people are a priority and how they will be managed • Weekly meeting with providers to manage provision, waiting lists and to problem solve • Reduced costs and improved quality of service to young people Discussion Thinking about STAGE 4 of the Positive Pathway • What would your ‘ideal’ supported housing pathway look like? • How will you ensure no YP are placed in B&B ? • How should Kent CC and Districts work together to identify an improved pathway and access arrangement? • Are YP well prepared to move on from supported housing/care? • Identify gaps and possible opportunities or changes that could really start to make a difference- for 16-17s, for 18+ young people Service Area 5: A Range Of Housing Options A range of safe, decent affordable housing options are available, shared and self-contained, in the private social and third sectors • Shared housing options across tenures • PRS access scheme offer landlord incentives (bonds, rent in advance, rent direct, 24 hour helpline, floating support, pre-tenancy training, landlord advice eg HMO registration) • Affordable housing schemes for young working people • Bond guarantee for single people who find their own accommodation – an offer for ALL • Allocation scheme supports prevention of homelessness and crisis Stage 5 : Move-On Options Affordable housing for YP with lower support needs E.G. St Basils Live and Work Scheme - low cost housing for YP with NHS apprenticeship http://www.stbasils.org.uk/how-we-help/our-services/live-and-work Crisis funded PRS Access schemes http://www.crisis.org.uk/pages/sharing-solutions-schemes.html Livshare – a proposal for new build affordable shared housing Information available if you might be interested St Vincent’s Housing Association’s Snug Bug Houseshare in Manchester: 45 units in shared general needs properties for young people: http://www.snugbughouseshare.co.uk Barnet ‘Get Real’ Scheme Council properties let to young people in EET as sharers http://thebarnetgroup.org/bh/2016/04/05/get-realproject-wins-155k/ Stage 5: Commonweal Peer Landlord London Scheme • • • • Commonweal provide properties, Catch-22 and Thames Reach deliver the service ‘Supportive’ rather than supported housing Low rents, affordable for people in work Peer Landlord is a service user or ex-service user who helps make house run smoothly – basic training in housing management, maintenance and financial awareness Thames Reach had noted some of their clients who had moved into self contained housing “were lonely, worried about managing visitors, couldn’t afford to heat the flat and had limited aspirations for their future”. They see the model as an opportunity to “recast shared housing as a positive experience for tenants” https://www.commonwealhousing.org.uk/ Stage 5: RB Greenwich/Thames Reach Shared Housing Scheme • 2 Thames Reach staff are ‘embedded’ within RBG Procurement Team • Identify landlords with large properties willing to let to sharers – some landlords on the scheme have bought additional properties • Advise and support landlords • Identify and prepare tenants • Provide ongoing support to landlord and tenants, trouble shooting and resolving problems Discussion Thinking about STAGE 5 of the Positive Pathway: A range of safe, affordable housing options, shared and selfcontained in the private social and third sectors • How will Kent respond to the considerable challenges you have to provide sufficient move on, in a planned way? • What options do you have/could you develop? • What is/will be your offer for non-priority customers? • What resources can you put into making move on work • Identify gaps and possible opportunities or changes that could really start to make a difference- for 16-17s, for 18+ young people
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz