Storyboard Entry Form 2015 Main author: Melanie Thomas Email: [email protected] Telephone: 07939 115 974 1. Storyboard title: Reducing Waste, Harm and Variation in Lymphoedema Services in Wales through collaboration with Community Pharmacy Wales and Medicine Management Teams 2. Brief outline of context: Improvement work was identified at the All Wales Lymphoedema Services Clinical Leads Meetings held in the Programme Management Unit. Followed by discussions with the All Wales Medicine Management group addressing lymphoedema compression garments issues and complaints and then subsequent further collaboration was developed with Community Pharmacy Wales (CPW). The audit was held in two Health Board lymphoedema Services ABMU and CT. Staff including nurses, physiotherapists and pharmacists and lymphoedema patients were involved in the audit. 3. Brief outline of problem: Lymphoedema is a chronic condition which causes gross swelling to a limb or limbs. Compression garments are the mainstay of treatment as they reduce the amount of swelling thereby improving pain and discomfort. Since the development of lymphoedema services in Wales, specialists have recommended specific garments be prescribed from primary care and issued to patients based on their clinical need. However in 2012, it became apparent through numerous patient and professional complaints that incorrect garments were being prescribed and supplied causing significant harm to patients and waste for NHS Wales. Patients were disappointed in not accessing the right garments at the right time and felt disheartened. Professionals too felt that the process was taking them away from clinical interaction as they had to duplicate prescription requests and administrative duties. Ultimately, the current process of patients accessing garments was a problem. 4. Assessment of problem and analysis of its causes: Although patient’s complaints were taken seriously assessment of the problem had to be undertaken to quantify the concerns. Following the PDSA format, emails were sent to the Medicine Management teams in ABM to discuss the problem encountered. To quantify the problem an audit was undertaken with a prescribing adviser. Fifty, randomly selected ABM Lymphoedema patients were selected and the garments requested were cross checked with garments issued from the prescription catalogue and CASPA database. The results showed that of the 50 patients 25 (50%) had been dispensed wrongly. This included wrong size, shape, colour and quantity. Harm was identified in the garments being dispensed were causing more swelling e.g. an arm garment dispensed which ended at the wrist instead of the fingers caused massive hand swelling. A leg garment was issued 3x smaller than should have been causing a superficial would on the ankle. It was also highlighted that the average time taken for a patient to receive a garment was 42 days. The audit was repeated at another HB and showed similar findings. It was agreed that this current process was not fit for purpose and changes needed to occur. It was believed that as a result of a lack of familiarity and the vast range of available compression garments, sometimes incomplete information on prescriptions were causing incorrect garments inadvertently being supplied to patients causing waste, harm and variation. A possible solution maybe improved communication/education for pharmacists and utilising non-medical independent prescribers. 5. Strategy for change: Based on the audit results, collaborative meetings were held with LNW, Medicines Management Teams and CPW to agree a way forward. Staff and patient representation were present to ensure all groups were given a voice. It was agreed that changes to the process be developed which would include: Education for all community pharmacies on compression garments Creation of a generic all Wales Lymphoedema Prescription Recommendation form which would be faxed to the community pharmacist of the patient’s choice. This form is designed to capture the key information necessary to facilitate the correct prescribing and supply of lymphoedema garments. Two HB’s were keen to implement this new process based on current patient complaints. 1. ABMUHB where two non-medical independent prescribers would directly issue prescriptions to patients and as well as faxing the nominated pharmacy the AWLS Prescription Recommendation Form. 2. CTUHB where the Lymphoedema Specialist will be issuing the AWLS Prescription Recommendation Form to the patients GP for them to issue a prescription. The main objectives of this change would be Ensuring patients are supplied with the correct garments Improving patient outcomes Reducing delays in patients receiving garments Reducing harm, waste and inconsistency Improving flow of information to pharmacies Improving communication, knowledge and awareness of compression garments to community pharmacies Time was given for further discussions and dissemination amongst teams and the change was agreed to commence 6 weeks later in December 2013 the new process would be initiated and audited for 6 months. An audit was vitally important to ensure measurements were taken to quantify an improvement. 6. Measurement of improvement: To facilitate the audit, community pharmacies were asked to complete a time frame on the following data: The The The The date date date date the the the the prescription was received. garment was ordered. garment was received from the manufacturer. garment was supplied to the patient Additionally similarly to baseline data analysis 50 new patients would be randomly selected and data would be analysed on the prescription catalogue & CASPA database utilising and comparing information to the Prescription Recommendation sheets. This data was collated by the National Clinical Lead for Lymphoedema and her deputy with a medicine management prescription adviser from ABUHB To improve knowledge two education sessions were created for all community pharmacists and technicians in the ABMUHB and CTUHB areas. This education was part of the collaboration with the Wales Centre for Pharmacy Professional Education (WCPPE). 7. Effects of changes: Following analysis of data returned from 160 ABMUHB and 58 CTUHB community pharmacies the following results have been identified 1. Some delays are due to patient’s untimely pick up of prescriptions not the NHS process The longest a patient took to take a prescription to a community pharmacist was 65 days. The average was 5.4days. This has a bearing on the overall time a patient is waiting for a garment at no fault to the NHS. In certain cases the community pharmacists actually ordered the garments based on the faxed recommendation sheet without a prescription thus resulting in negative days waiting. Health board Average days wait % ordered same day by prescription to pharmacy pharmacists ABMUHB 4.2 81% CTUHB 6.6 62% 2. The collaboration has significantly improved pharmacists knowledge 34 pharmacists and pharmacy technicians attended the two hour training sessions. All evaluated the events very highly and all stated they had learned something new. Based on this, WCPPE asked for pre-graduate pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to have dedicated training on an annual basis. So far over 220 pharmacists have been educated on lymphoedema and compression garments in Wales. 3. The time waiting for an off shelf patient garment has decreased from 42 days to an average of 10 days Average off the shelf garments days wait ABMUHB CT Average 7.75 12.1 10 days Average Made to measure garments days wait 13.8 22.3 18 days There are significant improvements made in both HB’s in reducing wait times for garments. However there are differences in the process from utilising Non-medical independent prescribers and asking the GP to prescribe. Utilising NMIP nearly halves the time. This is also supported by auditing against the targets set by the manufacturers. 4. Wrong garments issued has decreased from 50% to 5% This is highly significant in decreasing waste and harm as well as increasing patient benefit. Patient data was analysed on the prescription catalogue and CASPA database utilising and comparing information to the AWLS Prescription Recommendation sheets. Patients complaints and concerns have significantly reduced since the introduction of the recommendation form and pharmacy education however further work is still needed once the National Lymphoedema Compression Garments Formulary is introduced in spring 2015. 8. Lessons learnt: We assumed that community pharmacists had prior knowledge of compression garments which was misleading as nearly all expressed learning needs about the differences in compression classes. This led to a larger piece of work with the WCPPE. Additionally compression garment manufacturers expected community pharmacists to pay pre delivery with a credit card leading to unnecessary delays. Through collaboration all manufacturers now deliver to all community pharmacists and invoice within 31 days as per secondary care procurement process. Based on the results this new process of prescribing, education and dispensing has now been agreed to be rolled out across Wales from the All Wales Medicine Management Group and Community Pharmacy Wales and by November 2014 every Lymphoedema HB Service is following this process- all for the improvement of care for our patients. 9. Message for others: Sometimes the simplest of things can have the biggest effect- like faxing a form to the community pharmacist so they have correct pertinent information and contact details. Who would have anticipated that something so simple can have huge impact in patient care. Additionally, we should never underestimate how important communication is and collaborating with professionals for the benefit of care to our patients. 10. Please summarise how your entry reflects the principles of prudent healthcare: People often ask why Lymphoedema services in Wales are often tagged as an example of a prudent service. Limited funding was available, therefore our focus centred on ensuring that we maximised the impact of the investment by identifying opportunities to improve the service for the population of Wales. We follow the 6 principles in every programme of work ensuring equitable care, greatest need are prioritised, not doing harm, evidence based care, coproduce with our patients and openly work with the third sector.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz