PROGRAM B Recording plant responses to fire Lyndsey Vivian The Australian National University, Canberra © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Urban reserve, ACT Myrtle leaf milkwort, VIC Black cypress pine, NSW US Forest Service Eucalyptus fastigata (Brown Barrel) Eucalyptus delegatensis (Alpine Ash) Resprouters Obligate resprouters Facultative resprouters Seeders Obligate seeders © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Plant fire-response classifications: Issues 1) How general are fire-response classifications? 2) How useful are fire-response databases? • ACT/NSW/Vic Fires: January-February 2003 © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 284 sites 813 species NSW Flora Fire Response Database Compare to the observed surveys from post-2003 Plant responses to the 2003 fires: Responses across sites Obligate resprouters Facultative resprouters Obligate seeders 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Average percent (%) at a site © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Obligate seeders - woody 3 2 Number of species 1 0 ck Ro p ro c t ou et W le sc ro yl h p s re o lf t at He h e W s ra g t nd a l s ys Dr ro e l c y ph s re o ll f t d g an bo l / p od m o a w Sw ne i p al b Su n ria a p Ri s ra g y Dr n sla d © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Banksia marginata Eucalyptus delegatensis (Alpine Ash) But, weren’t always fire-killed Leptospermum micromyrtus (photo from Uni Melbourne) Plant responses to the 2003 fires: Classifying species always Obligate resprouters at least once always Facultative resprouters at least once always Obligate seeders at least once 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Number of species classified into each group (813 species total) © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Variability between sites: Resprouting Trees ( > 4 m) Shrubs (1 m to 4 m) Low shrubs ( < 1 m) Herbs Grasses/sedges Ferns Climbers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent (%) of total species © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Variability between sites: Seeding Trees ( > 4 m) Shrubs (1 m to 4 m) Low shrubs ( < 1 m) Herbs Grasses/sedges Ferns Climbers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent (%) of total species © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Effect of severity? • Gil (1981) Fire and the Australian Biota A simple classification of woody plant species to fire “The level used in the classification is 100 percent leaf scorch” © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Effect of severity? High Severity sites: resprouting Trees ( > 4 m) Shrubs (1 m to 4 m) Low shrubs ( < 1 m) Herbs Grasses/sedges Ferns Climbers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent (%) of total species © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Effect of severity? High Severity sites: seeding Trees ( > 4 m) Shrubs (1 m to 4 m) Low shrubs ( < 1 m) Herbs Grasses/sedges Ferns Climbers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent (%) of total species © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Use of the NSW Flora Fire Response Database (1) Within database… • • 28% of species with no information 21% species with conflicting information Rule 1 Separate category: ‘Variable’ Rule 2 Most frequently reported response Rule 3 Most sensitive response © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Use of the NSW Flora Fire Response Database (1) Comparisons to field data… Resprouting Seeding 80 80 60 60 Average % of species 40 per site 40 20 20 0 0 Observed Rule 1 Rule 2 Database Rule 3 Observed Rule 1 Rule 2 Rule 3 Database © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Observer Differences!? • Five different survey teams A. B. C. D. E. ACT Parks, Conservation and Lands Australian Alps Liaison Committee CSIRO NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water Consultancy 0.8 Herbaceous species A B C D E 0.7 0.6 Proportion 0.5 per site 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Obligate seeders Obligate resprouters Facultative resprouters © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Summary • Obligate resprouters dominant But obligate seeders still important • • • • Variation in responses across sites Information in the database was confusing Field observations didn’t match database Differences in classifications between observers, mostly for non-woody plants Classifying the responses of plants is complex! Can’t always assume a standard ‘species-level’ response © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 What does this mean? • Variability in responses Probability of sprouting Fire severity • Probability of sprouting Seedling density Post-fire rainfall Height of plant Variability between observers? © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 What does this mean? = single plant • Species level classification = population © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 What does this mean? • Population level classification • 2003 fires in this study area: 20 – 40%? Trees (70%)? © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 What does this mean? • Individual level? © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 What does this mean? • Planning a prescribed fire? • Managing effects of an unplanned fire? How do we know that a population will respond in the expected way? © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Some thoughts • Generality of classifications? - Doesn’t capture variability Useful as a generalisation e.g. large-scale modelling Unwieldy with more categories Useful as a guide, but should consider variation in relation to fire regimes, environment • Usefulness of databases? - Useful but need more data - Could help in determining the extent of variability in responses © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 Next steps? • Movement towards National Online Database? • Collection of data for the range of variability in fire responses • Classifications as a generalisation Be aware that variability could be quite considerable Increase our knowledge about the extent of variability © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009 More information • USDA Fire Effects Information System http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/abicon/all.html • • Fire note #47 “Plants and Fire”, available on CRC website Austral Ecology May 2010 (most recent edition), “Classifying the fire responses of plants”, pg. 264-273 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: Geoff Cary, Ross Bradstock, Malcolm Gill, Emlyn Williams Data collaborators: Margaret Kitchin (ACT PCL), Michael Doherty (CSIRO), Nic Gellie (EcoGIS), Keith McDougall (NSW DECC), Australian Alps Liaison Committee, NSW DECC (NSW Flora Fire Response Database) Funding: Bushfire CRC, Australian Geographic, Australian Post-Graduate Award © BUSHFIRE CRC LTD 2009
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz