Figure S3 Radon et al. 0.8 0.6 Sensitivity 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 Sensitivity 0.6 0.8 1.0 B 1.0 A 0.0 Training dataset (70%) Validation dataset (30%) 0.0 LYVE1 REG1A TFF1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 1 − Specificity 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1 − Specificity C AUC (95% CI) % SN (95% CI) at optimal cutpoint % SP (95% CI) at optimal cutpoint LYVE1 (cnorm) 0.775 (0.704 - 0.846) 76.9 (69.9 – 83.2) 69.4 (58.1 – 80.7) REG1A (cnorm) 0.722 (0.643 - 0.801) 78.3 (71.3 – 84.6) 66.1 (54.8 – 77.4) TFF1 (cnorm) 0.629 (0.540 - 0.717) 76.2 (68.5 – 83.2) 50.0 (37.1 – 61.3) Panel (+ creat + age) 0.815 (0.752 - 0.878) 68.5 (60.1 – 76.2) 80.6 (71.0 – 90.3) Panel (+ creat + age) 0.839 (0.751 - 0.928) 67.4 (53.1 – 79.6) 80.0 (63.3 – 93.3) Samples Biomarkers Training set (70%) Validation set (30%) 0.8 0.6 Sensitivity 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 Sensitivity 0.8 1.0 E 1.0 D 0.0 Training dataset (70%) Validation dataset (30%) 0.0 LYVE1 REG1A TFF1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 1 − Specificity F 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1 − Specificity AUC (95% CI) % SN (95% CI) at optimal cutpoint % SP (95% CI) at optimal cutpoint LYVE1 (cnorm) 0.732 (0.644 - 0.821) 76.8 (66.1 – 87.5) 62.1 (50.0 – 74.3) REG1A (cnorm) 0.723 (0.633 - 0.813) 75.0 (62.5 – 85.7) 69.7 (57.6 – 80.3) TFF1 (cnorm) 0.650 (0.553 - 0.748) 76.8 (64.3 – 87.5) 56.1 (43.9 – 68.2) Panel (+ creat + age) 0.831 (0.762 - 0.901) 85.7 (75.0 – 94.6) 66.7 (56.1 – 78.8) Panel (+ creat + age) 0.846 (0.730 - 0.963) 100.0 (100.0 – 100.0) 50.0 (30.8 – 69.2) Samples Biomarkers Training set (70%) Validation set (30%) 0.2
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz