Regulatory Response to Rising Residential Rates Trevor R. Roycroft, Ph.D. Presented at the 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 [email protected] 508-896-0151 Case Study: Rate Deregulation in California 2006 CPUC implemented a “Uniform Regulatory Framework” for the four largest ILECs in the state. AT&T, Verizon, Surewest, Frontier CPUC concluded that market power has been eliminated, and that competition is statewide due to the availability of UNEs. Identifies wireless and VoIP as contributing to the elimination of ILEC market power. Rate regulation removed from bundles and ancillary services in 2006. Transitional price caps for basic service. 2 2008 CPUC Order allowed $3.50 per month basic service increases for January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010, with full pricing flexibility beginning January 1, 2011. Proof of any pudding is in the eating... AT&T California Residential Rate Increases Basic Flat Basic Measured Basic LifeLine Percent Increase Rate When URF Since URF Increased Rate was Implemented 26% $13.50 $10.69 28% $7.28 $5.70 14% $6.11 $5.34 Local Toll 13-20 Miles, Day >21 Miles, Day 111% 71% $0.36 $0.42 $0.17 $0.25 Calling Features Caller ID Anonymous Call Rejection Call Forwarding Call Waiting Three-Way Calling Call Screen Repeat or Speed Dialing Call Trace 62% 242% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 29% $9.99 $6.50 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.17 $1.90 $3.23 $3.23 $3.23 $3.23 $3.23 $4.65 Directory Services Non-Published Listing DA Service 346% 226% $1.25 $1.50 $0.28 $0.46 101% 276% 346% 614% 36% 14% $6.00 $25.00 $1.25 $1.00 $15.31 $25.37 $2.99 $6.65 $0.28 $0.14 $11.26 $22.32 Miscellaneous Services WirePro Returned Check Non Published Listing - White page & DA Non Published - white page only 3 uSelect Package 3 Advantage Plan/The Works CLEC Competition CLEC UNE and Resale Lines in AT&T CA’s Service Area 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 AT&T California CLEC Lines 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2002 4 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Residential CLECs Still Operating in California Lowest Basic Unlimited CLEC Prepaid-Only? Rate Bundle ACN Communication Services No $25.94 $38.99 Asian American Association No $24.95 Blue Casa Communications No $27.99 $49.99 Budget Phone (Budget Prepay) Yes $49.95 Connectto Yes $27.99 $54.95 Curatel Yes $14.40* $29.40 dPi Teleconnect Yes $39.99 $56.99 EarthLink No $49.95 $69.95 Excel Communications No $39.95 $59.95 MCI No $41.99 $59.99 Midwestern Telecommunications Yes $35.29 $40.29 Phoneco Yes $29.99 $37.98 PNG Telecommunications (Powernet Global) No $21.99 $39.99 Sage Telecom No $24.99 $39.99 TC Telephone No $16.99 $49.99 Telscape No $24/$28 $47/$53 Trinsic No $59.68 *Price for LifeLine eligible customers. This price is roughly double the LifeLine rate available from an ILEC. 5 Cord Cutting—General Substitute or Niche Market? NHIS Survey July-December 2008. Households With: Both Wireless and Landline Landline Only Wireless Only 59.60% 17.40% 20.20% No Phone 1.90% Summary of Statistical Analysis of Wireless-Only Choice Variable Number of Cell Phones in HH Number of Individuals in the HH Number Under Age 18 in the HH Number Over Age 65 in the HH Number in HH that need help with chores Number in HH that have trouble walking Number that received homecare Number using telephone for health info Home Ownership Male HH Head Hispanic HH Head Non-white HH Head Age of HH Head Married Couple Higher HH Income Chi Square of the Regression: 6,508; Significance Level 0.00 6 **Significant at 1%. Increases or Decreases Chances of Wireless Only? Increases Decreases Increases Decreases Decreases Decreases Decreases Decreases Decreases Increases Increases Decreases Decreases Decreases Decreases *Significant at 5%. Significance Level 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.09† 0.02* 0.01** 0.02* 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** 0.00** †Significant at 10%. Telco-Cable Duopoly 7 Duopoly at Best 8 Duopoly Pricing: Follow the leader! Cox Communications--only California cable operator that offers basic telephone service as a stand-alone option: Rather than establishing price for basic service based on its costs, Cox offers basic service prices to reflect prices offered by either AT&T or Verizon, depending on the customer’s location. Cox raised basic rates in response to AT&T and Verizon’s rate increases. Basic service rates by 25% à la carte calling features like call waiting and three-way calling, 25% per month for the first feature, and by 100% per month for additional features. Increased Caller ID prices by 25% after AT&T increased its Caller ID rates. Evidence of price leadership, where Cox follows the ILEC’s lead on price increases, does not support the proposition that “competition” protects consumers. 9 Dominant ILECs set prices, and other firms “follow the lead.” Regulatory Response: Fresh Look at Market Structure is Needed Duopoly markets (or duopoly markets with a fringe of resalebased CLECs) are not sufficient to protect consumers. Regulatory decisions made based on the UNE-driven “competition” should be revisited. Legislative regulatory plans are based on doubtful foundation. Investigation into market performance needed. Evaluate remaining CLECs. Determine where facilities-based providers are serving. Evaluate pricing behavior. 10 Price-increase triggers to initiate reviews? Is investment occurring? Is previous broadband “commitment” enough? Other Regulatory “Hooks” Price cap plan reviews. Evaluate plans in light of market changes. GDP-PI Inflation. Continued availability of capped à la carte services for the ILEC constrains cable price increases. Merger review. Service quality review. 11 California Competition Study Available At: http://www.turn.org/article.php?id=839 12
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz