Construction Quality Reviews House-Building Standards Construction Quality Reviews (CQRs) 1 In advance 2 Site Discussion 6 CQR Workshop / Follow-up 2 3 Site review 5 Distribution & follow-up 4 Site Manager meeting Revised Build Stages 1. FOUNDATIONS 1.1 Ground preparation 1.2 Excavations, piling and formwork 1.3 Reinforcement and concrete placement 2. SUBSTRUCTURE & DRAINAGE 2.1 Walls and columns 2.2 Waterproofing and ventilation 2.3 Sub-floor services 2.4 Ground floor 2.5 Drainage 2.6 Gas precautions 3. SUPERSTRUCTURE 3.1 Structural frame and/or loadbearing walls 3.2 External envelope 3.3 Cavities and insulation 3.4 DPCs and trays 3.5 Chimney and flues 3.6 Intermediate floor structure 3.7 Lintels beams and other structural elements 3.8 Balconies including fixings and weather proofing 3 4. ROOFS 4.1 Framing 4.2 Pitched roof coverings 4.3 Flat room coverings 4.4 Ventilation and underfelt, insulation and fire stopping 4.5 Flashing, gutters and downpipes 5. FIRST FIX 5.1 Windows and doors 5.2 Floor decking ad stairs, sound proofing and fire stopping 5.3 Services – electrical 5.4 Services – plumbing 5.5 Services – ventilation 5.6 Non-load bearing and compartment walls 5.7 Plaster and dry lining to walls and ceilings 6. SECOND FIX 6.1 Services – electrical including equipment 6.2 Services – plumbing including equipment 6.3 Joinery 7. SURFACE FINISHES 7.1 Internal finishes 7.2 Floor finishes 7.3 External finishes 8. FIRST FIX 8.1 Retaining walls and free standing walls 8.2 Hard and soft landscaping Score Logic 4 Builder Feedback 1. Site Level 5 2. Senior Management 6 7 8 Its not always the site team’s fault Input 9 Process Output Opportunities for improvement Design / Planning Feedback Compliance & Buildability checks Build Procurement Contractual 10 Build Stage Summary– 4.2 Pitched Roof Coverings – Score 5 Attention to detail on hips, verges, ridges and valleys was evidenced across the plots with good fixing details and mortar bedding to the tiles being of a uniform colour. Tight, neat looking interfaces of materials and elements deserves to be noted with particular attention given to the straightness and tidiness of hips. Key Considerations The Site Manager inducts all trades onsite emphasising expectations of required Standards and quality. This is further reinforced by the trades `Best Practice Guide` produced by xxxxxxx Manchester, and quality signoff process, requiring the Site Manager and Quantity Surveyor signoff prior to releasing payment of works. 11 12 Build Stage Summary– 4.2 Pitched Roof Coverings – Score 2 The pitched roof coverings on site were of a poor standard and did not comply with the technical requirements. Saw marks were noted to the installed GRP valleys and surrounding tiles with some cut tiles clipped and others not. Batten edges were not treated in accordance with the technical requirements. Key Considerations Roofing contractors are struggling to employ trades which have the knowledge and competency to carryout roofing works to a good standard. Lack of understanding from trades around what `good looks like`, no manufacturer installation details onsite. 13 14 Builder Feedback 1. Site Level 15 2. Senior Management Senior Management Feedback Looking at the detail… 16 One NHBC: Driving Standards Claims / CSS / Inspection CQRs / CIs / PiJ Industry Activities Smart Data CQR Builder Feedback 17 18 (Requires Improvement) (Poor Quality) (Very Poor Quality) (Sites Scoring 3 or 2) 3.6 Intermediate floor structure 3.5 Chimneys and flues 3.4 DPCs and trays 3.3 Cavities and insulation 3.2 External envelope 3.1 Structural frame loadbearing walls and/or 2.6 Gas precautions 2.5 Drainage 2.4 Ground floor SUPER-STRUC 2.3 Sub-floor services 2.2 Waterproofing and ventilation 2.1 Walls and columns SUB-STRUC 1.3 Reinforcement and concrete placement Site Address Site Reference Min Score Max Score Number of Sites Standard Deviation % of sites scoring 3 rovement) % of sites scoring 2 % of sites scoring 1 ality) 3 or 2) Overall Rank Population Rank 1.2 Excavations, piling and formwork e 1.1 Ground preparation SID FND Build Stage 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 15 52 102 201 162 80 209 137 41 197 289 306 292 12 275 0.80 0.85 0.78 0.82 0.88 0.67 0.81 0.79 1.18 0.83 0.81 0.96 0.92 0.66 0.67 7% 6% 19% 24% 33% 33% 38% 36% 17% 29% 31% 41% 40% 33% 27% 13% 2% 5% 3% 14% 3% 10% 6% 12% 12% 6% 13% 20% 8% 2% 0% 4% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 7% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 0% 29 38 28 25 5 15 3 11 23 12 14 2 1 10 24 38 37 31 19 11 28 5 18 33 9 4 2 1 35 10 Build Section Level - Percentage of Sites Scoring 4 (Good)- 6 (Outstanding) 1. Foundations 8. External Works 7. Surface Finishes 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 2. Substructure & Drainage Group level (6507) Central (816) 3. Superstructure South (3416) Industry Total (17782) 6. Second Fix 4. Roofs 5. First Fix 19 North (2275) Substructure & Drainage - Percentage of Sites Scoring 4 (Good)- 6 (Outstanding) 2.1 Walls and columns 2.6 Gas precautions 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Group level (830) 2.2 Waterproofing and ventilation Central (108) South (426) Industry Total (2254) 2.5 Drainage 2.3 Sub-floor services 2.4 Ground floor 20 North (296) Joinery - Percentage of Sites Scoring 4 (Good)- 6 (Outstanding) 80% 70% 60% Group Level (260) 50% Industry Total (692) 40% South (146) 30% 20% Central (27) 10% North (87) 0% 21 Very Poor Poor Requiers Requires Improvement Improvement Good Very Good Outstanding DPCs & Trays (Superstructure) Stepped cavity trays where installed successfully Use of truss template Good supervision Known trades Site specific QC measures House type details reviewed and amended 22 DPCs & Trays (Superstructure) 23 DPCs & Trays (Superstructure) Issues observed • Missing or incorrectly positioned, particularly on peripheral parts eg Bay windows • Mortar joints not raked out for lead flashing • Evidence of mortar debris on trays • Limited drawings / details & knowledge within trades & Management • Limited quality checks 24 DPCs & Trays (Superstructure) What produced good quality • Details available on site (e.g. section drawings) • Early discussions with trades • New trades to site thoroughly inducted • Importance • Details provided to trades • Benchmark agreed • Stage checklist in place and being used • ‘Focus areas of the month’ details displayed • Templates and void formers always used • Joint quality inspections (Site Manager & SC lead) 25 DPCs & Trays (Superstructure) 26 CQR Workshop Vision (Results) • Feedback results – Gain Priority, Identify what and why Focus Areas (Analysis) • Build areas at Industry / Group / Division level • Risk, Profit ££££ Direction (Response) • Business Change - Design / Procurement / Construction • Training 27 Follow up / Interim meeting - Embedment Progress update • Interim results (Division / Group and Industry level) • Comparison analysis • Focus on trends • Quality Indicator (Annual Comparisons) • Business change management 28 How can CQRs Benefit You? Quality Live view of build quality (SMART data) Platform to promote best practice (enriched with photos) Improve & track build and finish quality Improve consistency Reduce defects Impartial view of quality Financial – Reduce remediation costs – Commercial return (better profit, time & cost of Customer Care) 29 Process – Instant warnings of key issues / root causes (Group / site specific) before a defect manifests – Real time clear focus and direction in build quality at Industry / Group & Division level – Move focus on frontend processes rather than backend (firer fighting) Reputation – Reduce customer complaints – Reduce risk to brand and image – Improve ‘Customer Satisfaction’ levels Customer Feedback 30 Site Level - Promoting good practice 31 CQR Summary CQRs • Undertaking 4,000 CQRs PA • Build Stage Summaries – Review 72,000 Build Stages PA • Key Considerations – Identifying ‘Why it has occurred’ on extreme scores • Visit 30 Major Builders PA, Top 4 at Regional Level, c.100 Builder meetings PA • Key Trends – What is occurring at Site, Group and Industry level both positive and Analysis negative and Why (Root Cause) • Actions – Direction / Focus with Clear Vision & Clarity Impact/ • Motivational driver for change – Risk, Profit ££££ (Change behaviours) Benefit •Evaluation of Success - Quality Indicator, Monitor progress of actions, Record impact Follow-up by comparing additional CQR results 32 Visit: www.nhbc.co.uk/CQR Call: 0344 633 1000 and ask for ‘CQR’ Or Email: [email protected]
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz