Lecture 5
Infinite Ordinals
Recall: What is “2”?
Definition: 2 = {0,1}, where 1 = {0} and 0 = {}.
(So 2 is a particular set of size 2.)
In general, we can define:
n = {0,1,2,…,n1} = {kN: k < n}
This is the so-called “von Neumann” notation.
We actually achieved to define the natural numbers
as sets.
In fact, in mathematics, everything is a set!
A Recursive Definition
Since n = {0,1,2,…,n1},
n+1 = {0,1,2,…,n1,n}
= {0,1,2,…,n1}{n}
= n{n}
Thus, we have the following recursive
definition of the natural numbers:
Base: 0 = {}
Step: n+1 = n{n}
The Infinite Ordinal
For n,mN, (n m n < m)
Thus, we actually defined the order structures:
(n,<) = (n,)
On each n, is a transitive relation, i.e.
(i,j,kN)(i j k i k)
Also, 0 1 2 3 … N
Definition:
= {0,1,2,3,…} = N
Well Ordering
Note that (N,<) = (,) is linearly ordered,
i.e. (n,mN)(n < m or n = m or m < n)
Moreover, the order (N,<) has the following nice
feature:
Every nonempty subset of N has a least element
Equivalently:
There is no infinite sequence x0,x1,x2, x3,…N,
such that … < x3 < x2 < x1 < x0.
Any linear order < with this feature is called a well
order.
But why stop at ?
Definition:
= {0,1,2,3,…} (= N) = 0123…
+1 = {} = {0,1,2,3,…,}
+2 = (+1)+1 = (+1){+1}
= {0,1,2,3,…,,+1}
+3 = (+2)+1 = (+2){+2}
= {0,1,2,3,…,,+1,+2}
...
+ = (+1)(+2)(+3)…
= {0,1,2,3,…,,+1,+2,+3,…} = 2
And continue…
Definition:
2 = {0,1,2,3,…,,+1,+2,+3,…}
2+1 = {0,1,2,3,…,,+1,+2,+3,…,2}
2+2 = {0,1,2,…,,+1,+2,…,2,2+1}
…
2+ = {0,1,2,…,,+1,+2,…,2,2+1,…}
= 3
…
= 2 = {0,1,…,,…,2,…,3,…}
And continue…
Definition:
2 = {0,1,…,,…,2,…,3,…}
2+1 = {0,1,…,,…,2,…,3,…,2}
…
2+ = {0,1,…,2,2+1,…}
…
2+2 = {0,…,2,…,2+,…,2+2,…} = 22
…
2 = {0,…,2,…,22,…,23,…} = 3
And continue…
Definition:
3 = {0,1,…,2,…,22,…,23,…}
3+1 = {0,1,…,2,…,22,…,23,…,3}
…
3+ = {0,1,…,3,3+1,…}
…
3+3 = {0,…,3,…,3+2,…,3+22,…}
= 32
…
..
.
4 ; … ; 5 ; … ; ; … ; ; … ; 0 = ; …
Ordinals versus Cardinals
Notes:
Cardinals measure sizes of sets
Ordinals measure lengths of well ordered sets
All ordinals
mentioned so far, e.g.
...
and
0 =
are actually countable sets.
There are however uncountable ordinals, 1 is the
least uncountable ordinal.
In fact, 1 = the set of all countable ordinals.
Need to define what ordinals really are.
More rigorously
Definition: An ordinal is a set X such that:
X is linearly ordered by , i.e.
(y,z,wX)(y z and z w y w)
and (y,zX)(y z or y = z or z y)
X is transitive, i.e. (yX)(y X)
Notes:
From the axiom of foundation, there is no infinite
sequence of sets x1,x2,x3,…, such that
… x3 x2 x1
Thus, an ordinal is well ordered by
The Class of Ordinals
Definition: Ordinals can be classified into three
classes:
The ordinal 0
Successor ordinals = + 1 = {}
Limit ordinals = sup{: < } = {: < }
Definitions of ordinal functions according to this
classification are said to use transfinite recursion.
Proofs of ordinal statements according to this
classification are said to use transfinite induction.
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition
Definition: We define the sum of two ordinals +
by recursion on :
Base ( = 0):
+0=
Successor ( = + 1): + ( + 1) = ( + ) + 1
= ( + ){( + )}
Limit ( = sup{: < }):
+ = sup{ + : < }
Note:. The definition generalizes the addition of
natural numbers.
Example: 1+ = < +1, so ordinal addition is
not commutative, i.e. + + , in general.
Ordinal Arithmetic: Multiplication
Definition: We define the product of two ordinals
by recursion on :
Base ( = 0):
0 = 0
Successor ( = + 1): ( + 1) = () +
Limit ( = sup{: < }):
+ = sup{: < }
Note:. The definition also generalizes the
multiplication of natural numbers.
Example: 2 = < 2, so ordinal multiplication
is not commutative, i.e. , in general.
Ordinal Arithmetic: Exponentiation
Definition: We define the exponentiation of two
ordinals by recursion on :
Base ( = 0):
0 = 1
Successor ( = + 1): + 1 =
Limit ( = sup{: < }):
= sup{: < }
Note:. The definition also generalizes the
exponentiation of natural numbers.
Example: 2 = , so ordinal exponentiation is not
the same as cardinal exponentiation.
Thank you for listening.
Wafik
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz