United Kingdom Open University Open Content Initiative

Who learns from Open
Educational Resources?
Professor Andy Lane, Director, OpenLearn
Friday 3rd April 2009
This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales
License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/uk/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.
The meaning of open in OER? (Geser, 2007)
Open educational content types (resources = content + tools)
First generation (OER 1.0) usually known as
OpenCourseWare: support materials from
classroom based teaching in educational
institutions
Second generation (OER 2.0): self study
material devised for open, distance and/or elearning from educational institutions (and
publishers)
Third generation (OER 2.5?) or user generated
or augmented content: additional material not
from educational institutions but from individuals
and specialist groups or organisations
The Four Rs of Open Educational Content
• Reuse – Use the work verbatim, just exactly as
you found it
• Rework – Alter or transform the work so that it
better meets your needs
• Remix – Combine the (verbatim or altered work)
with other works to better meet your needs
• Redistribute – Share the verbatim work, the
reworked work, or the remixed work with others.
David Wiley, 2007
The value of OER is influenced by their:
Availability
– How many there
– Formats they are in
Accessibility
– How found and by whom
– Economic and technical factors
Acceptability
– Social and cultural factors
Major aims of OpenLearn
• Enhanced learning experiences for users of
open content (self study content plus open
learning environment);
• Greater involvement in higher education by
under-represented groups and empowerment
for various support networks that work with
them;
• Enhanced knowledge and understanding of
open content delivery, how it can be effective,
and the contribution it can make to further
development of e-learning;
• Enhanced understanding of sustainable and
scalable models of open content delivery.
Implications for Teaching of OER
(the creation of environments and opportunities from which
and in which to learn)
• Granularity of offerings – the size and interdependence of modules
• Greater resource based learning tempered
with greater interactivity to make them truly
stand-alone
• Tuition and support separated from content
• Generating many versions of the same
content for particular contexts
• Curriculum design in a content rich
environment
Implications for Learning of OER
(the self, peer and professional recognition of changed behaviours
expressed as knowledge, skills, competencies etc)
• Judging the appropriate mix between:
- Pedagogic support (built into content)
- Personal support (self reflection and guidance)
- Peer support (mutual reflection and guidance)
- Professional support (expert reflection and guidance)
• The importance of new social computing
technologies in facilitating support and interaction
• Co-creation of learning experiences in a full
partnership or being a learning broker for self
designed programmes
Motivations for institutions and individual
teachers to use OER (1)
• Pedagogic enhancements and cost reductions
• Direct students to appropriate units for updating
• Deliver OER in different formats e.g. print, CD
under cost recovery basis
• Download and reversion Units for targeted and
local delivery whether online, blended or f2f
• Mix OER from different sources into new
courses
Motivations for institutions and individual
teachers to use OER (2)
• Recognition for such teaching activities
• Investigate OU (or others) approach to teaching
a particular topic
• Share materials and ideas with other educators
worldwide
• Cooperate or collaborate with others in
developing new OER
• Provide tutorial or assessment services around
OER
Barriers for institutions and individual
teachers to use OER
• Lack of strategic direction and support
• Misplaced anxiety about copyright
• Believing it is about technology and not
pedagogy
• Thinking we are all in competition rather than
collaborating for a wider public good and
competing to provide the best educational
service to niche audiences - coopetition
Who are our users?
• Individual self learners
• Individual and groups of educators around
the world
• Lifelong learning groups in the UK wanting
informal study
• Educational and other organisations for
collaboration and staff development
What registered users want
• ‘Volunteer students’
– More content
– More interactivity
– Assessment opportunities
• ‘Social learners’
– More tools
– Multiple media
And what happens to our content?
• Accessed and used online by browsers and registered
users (‘use as-is’)
– 4 million unique visitors
– 80 thousand registered users
• Added to online by registered users (‘rework’)
– 10,000 postings and journal entries
– 500 uploads of new or revised content
• Referred to from another website (‘re-use’)
– 2,500 referring websites each month
– 5,400 in total
• Taken away and used elsewhere (‘re-use’, ‘rework’ or
‘remix’)
– 10,000 printings per week
– 10,000 downloads per week
Quality management or caveat emptor?
• LearningSpace:
–
–
–
–
Original material externally peer reviewed
Pre-publication internal peer review
5 star user ratings
User reviews
• LabSpace
– Badging of Units as
• Current OU OER
• Archived OU OER
• User generated contribution
• Project generated contribution
– 5 star user ratings
– User reviews
– Post publication external peer review?
– Institutional Lenses like Connexions?
Open educational content can act as a mediating
object between ‘teachers’ and ‘learners’
OER
Teachers
Learners
Teacher-content interaction
• Purpose of content
• Degree of meaning/sense-making in content
• Structure of content
– Learning outcomes
– Assessment
– Feedback
• Community involvement
– Teacher-learner
– Teacher-teacher
Learner-content interaction
•
•
•
•
•
Level of engagement
Prior sense-making
Testing sense-making
Augmented sense-making
Community involvement
– Learner-learner cooperation
– Learner-learner collaboration
So if we don’t value and use Open Educational
Resources, who will?
Further information
• OpenLearn Digital book
– http://labspace.open.ac.uk/file.php/4/
kmap/1221755314/book.html
• Knowledge network
– http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/workspac
e.cfm?wpid=6478
• OLnet research network
– www.olnet.org