NHS DRAFT NHS Medway Best practice guidance on developing service specifications 1. Background World Class Commissioning requires commissioners to work with local stakeholders including clinicians and patients to develop a specification appropriate to local circumstances. This applies equally whether the service is being procured through a competitive process or through a process of cooperation. The development of service specifications in collaboration with partners and key stakeholders must include actively seek patient/service user views and experiences, and ensuring that existing services meet the best evidence and their patients’ needs and preferences. Service specifications should be developed in advance of the commencement of any competitive or negotiated process. This ensures that commissioners are able to be completely transparent and open about the services that they require. This guidance paper is written in the context of the NHS Medway Procurement Strategy and is a sub section of the NHS Commissioners Guide to Procurement. Service Commissioners should ensure that prior to entering into developing contract documents including service specifications that they are familiar with both these documents. 2. Aim The aim of this guidance is to: Provide a framework for service specifications. Suggest how specification should be developed and used to ensure high quality care is provided to local populations Identify how to provide stretching targets for service providers and to stimulate local debate about standards of care 3. Who is this guidance for and how should they use it? This paper is written for all those who could contribute to the commissioning process. That is, firstly for commissioners, but also for the clinicians, patient and service user groups who can contribute their expertise and local knowledge to the process and should be an integral part of any development. It is essential in order to secure local ownership and support that all stakeholder groups are included in the process of specification development. Where appropriate this may include current providers of services and the market. Three template specifications have been developed to support commissioners to structure requirements in a consistent and transparent way. These templates are for: Contracts with a value of over £96,000 over the term Contract with a value of under £96,000 but above £19,000 over the term and finally Contracts with of value of less than 96,000 over the term. These specifications are attached as Appendix 1. These templates should be used as the basis for specification development and adapted for local use. The templates reflect national guidance and recommendations. The templates also provide some examples of what can be included. The templates are intended to support those commissioners who are non-specialists. 4. General Principles 4.1 Legislation and guidance Specifications should reflect the key themes of Our NHS, Our Future. In summary these are: Care closer to home The thrust of policy is not only to provide care closer to a person’s home (where this provides at least equivalent quality and more conveniently than the care they currently receive) but also “involving the local community to provide services that meet their needs, beyond just treating them when they are ill, but also keeping them healthy and independent” Patient and service user engagement Therefore development of the service specification needs to involve service users/patients and their Carers, and should also describe how they and the public will be engaged in the delivery of care and be supported to take responsibility for their health and care, – that is, in co-creation of services, and in co-production of outcomes. Long term conditions policy The World Class Commissioning aspiration of ‘Adding life to years and years to life’ provides a framework that most people understand and use. These principles should be reflected in service specifications. Carers’ involvement There is a new national carers’ strategy that acknowledges the important role of carers in supporting people with health problems. Any service specification process should engage Carers as well as patients, and the standards should address their needs too. 4.2 Procurement Project Team The need to involve clinicians and patients is clearly set out in World Class commissioning (WCC) and in the process demonstrated in the Our NHS, Our Future review. WCC requires commissioners to: Lead continuous and meaningful engagement with clinicians to inform strategy, and drive quality, service design and resource utilisation (Competence 4) Promote and specify continuous improvements in quality and outcomes through clinical and provider innovation and configuration (Competence 8) Proactively seek and build continuous meaningful engagement with the public and patients, to shape services and improve health (Competence 3). Having established the need to develop a new specification a Procurement Project team should be established by the Lead commissioner. The Project team is the group of individuals that determine: How the procurement project will be managed How stakeholders will be involved, included and advised during the procurement process The procurement timetable, The contract and specification requirements The project team should be brought together as soon as the decision is made to procure a service. The project team is led by the lead service commissioner. In certain circumstances it may be appropriate to informally include service providers in this group. The purpose of such inclusion is to ensure that the market has the capability to respond to the specified requirements. Any such inclusion must be carefully managed in order to ensure that providers involved in the process are not given an unfair advantage in any subsequent procurement exercise. In forming this group Commissioners should seek to utilize and expand as necessary partnerships and strategy groups to ensure that there is representation of service users and Carers, clinicians, other commissioners upon whom the service will have a direct impact (e.g. Public Health, Informatics), Local authority partners and in particular social care, and other parties who have expertise and local knowledge to contribute. 4.3 Deciding what you want. Having prioritised attention to the service, it is most likely that whilst some elements of an integrated service are in place further consideration will be needed of how the service will actually work. The needs assessment process will have suggested in broad terms how resources need to be allocates based on geography, complexity, skill mix or balance between the levels of the relevant care pathway but further consideration of the practicalities of what is required will be essential. The task of describing what you want is important. Are you describing the total pathway of care, the missing elements, or the elements that need to be re designed and for which you are considering a competitive procurement process? Will the “upstream” primary prevention functions of health promotion and public education be commissioned separately as well as, or instead of, in the main specification? What about co-morbidities? For example in a study of national COPD needs analysis data suggests that about a third of people with chronic significant disease have depression; and 50% of those admitted to hospital have major depression; 67% of people with severe COPD have osteoporosis and more than 60% of people with COPD die from coronary heart disease. So they have to cope with multiple pathways, and the most important attribute of the service is continuity of care. Will the provision of primary care through locally enhanced service (LES) contracts as part of the General Medical Services contract options be included? 4.4 Who should be accountable for what? The service commissioner is ultimately responsible for the service specification and for the procurement of a service that best meets the local specification. It is therefore their responsibility to ensure no patient is excluded by the service, and to ensure it is provided as equitably as possible. (Completion of an equality impact risk assessments can support commissioners with this). This may require monitoring of referral patterns from primary care to ensure specialist services are available to all patients who would benefit; and monitoring emergency admissions as a way of seeing whether any particular practice’s patients are more likely to require unscheduled care. In terms of clinical accountability, it is imperative that the specification addresses this. There have been sufficient public inquiries into errors in health and social care that have concluded that no-one was in overall charge of a person’s care for us to know that it won’t “just happen” unless accountability is negotiated and documented at all stages in a person’s care. It might be assumed that if a patient is on a clinical pathway, then the accountability is defined in the pathway and the patient is therefore safe. However, many patients have more than one condition, and so need to be on more than one pathway, so they will only be safe and receiving the best possible care if there is someone responsible for their individual case. Typically, that would be the GP. However, it is best that the specification addresses the issue. Commissioners should have a strategic view of how the intertwining of pathways should work best. 4.5. Training and education The service commissioner is also responsible for ensuring the service meets quality standards, specified outcomes and is sustainable. Service sustainability would require the existence of an affordable strategy for continuing training and education of primary and secondary care professionals. The original needs assessment should be repeated regularly, and adapted to highlight new developments or challenges. Without this, the detection and diagnosis conditions may not be sufficient, and appropriate referrals to specialist care may not be made at the right time. 4.5 Governance The commissioner must establish standards and approaches for combined governance, including financial and clinical. Any organisation awarded a service level agreement or contract must have the competence and senior authority to be responsible for clinical professional behaviour and standards, to have appropriate systems to deal with risk, audit and information, appraisal, improvement and change and collaboration and networking with other organisations. 5. Contracting currency, incentives and penalties Services should be commissioned in as sophisticated way as possible. What this means is considering different and innovative options around service delivery. For example developing a hospital at home costed package, as well as considering options such as year of care that specify what level of support and clinical intervention a patient could expect over a year. In addition, follow-up telephone consultations with patients, and telephone calls between referring professionals and their specialist colleagues also need to be contracted for in a way that incentives the sharing of information, and encourages learning. Contracts1 and Service Level Agreements should typically set a threshold activity level (for example hospital spells or community contacts) above or below which the contract value will be reviewed by the commissioner and provider together. In order to incentivise providers by for example reducing emergency admissions by early response and strong case management, commissioners might choose to set a target about the numbers of admissions that is lower than the previous year (taking into account any pre-existing trend). For example, the target might be a 20% reduction in emergency admissions. The target could also be set in terms of financial value (that is, the numbers of admissions multiplied by the tariff). This latter option means that providers could choose to focus on a few individuals with multiple high-cost admissions, or on a more widespread approach. Both require the commissioner to validate the coding. If managing prescribing expenditure is a priority, for example, oxygen prescribing, then there is the possibility to set a financial target with or without a financial incentive for achieving that target. For example, if oxygen prescribing was contained at the budgeted level, when the trend is for an over-spend, the commissioner might offer 50% of that underspend as a reward in the first year, and perhaps set lower levels in subsequent years. 1 A contract is the legal agreement between two separate organisations, service level agreements are used where a similar agreement is needed but within the same organisation for example between NHS Medway and Medway Community Healthcare. Both legal documents should include a detailed service specification developed in accordance with this guidance. 6. The specification 6.1 General principles A service specification defines what is required, when it is required and the means of service delivery. It is essential that terms are clearly defined and set out I order to ensure transparency. A service specification should start with a brief description of the nature and scope of the service required, the user group for whom the service will be provided and the overall purpose and aims of the service. Locally agreed principles or values underpinning the service are normally included at this point as well as relevant information about partnership working in this area. It may also be useful to include an explanation/definition of any technical terms used in the document as well as the recent background of the service or client group, for example is it a new service or existing one? It should be made clear at the outset if the service specification is based on any national standards and related targets, or other national or local guidance as appropriate, or a local analysis of needs. The specification is the key way in which commissioners can satisfy themselves that service delivery accords with the agreed levels and standards. Specifications should be proportionate. What this means is considering if terms and conditions for the service are appropriate to the value of the contract. For example the expectations of a contract of £96,000 should be very different to that of a contract for £15, 000. 6.2 Outcomes and measures All specifications should be outcome based. Understanding of what outcomes and measures vary. These are therefore defined below: An Outcome is: The desired result or impact of the service for service users An example of an outcome would be continuing to live independently with improved health An outcome is different to an output though outputs can often be a good indicator of the outcome being achieved Outputs are defined as: The nature, type and volume of service required to deliver the outcomes An example of an output would be the number of service users seen per day/week/month. Underpinning the delivery of good outcomes are effective processes. Processes here are described as: The activities put in place so that outputs can be achieved An example of an activity would be the date for opening the new specialist unit. 6.2.1 Personal outcomes Some examples of personal outcomes are outlined below: I can walk at least two hundred yards further at the end of the year than could at the start. I can live in my own home with an end of life package that I choose 6.2.2 Strategic Outcomes Some examples of strategic outcomes would be: More people with dementia living in their own homes to death. Fewer older people who have had one stroke suffering from further strokes. Fewer people coming into care homes through carer breakdown. 50% of service users with a mobility problem at assessment have improved mobility six months later. 6.2.3 Linking outcomes, outputs and personal goals together It is essential in order for outcomes to make a real contribution to the delivery of strategic objectives that these are linked with organisational outputs and processes as illustrated below:. Strategic Outcomes Organisational Outputs Organisational Processes A higher proportion We will increase the We will appoint of the population capacity of the a specialist aged over 80 should continence service joint service lead by live within the community May 09 6.2.4 Linking outcomes, outputs and personal goals together Likewise the linking of outcomes, outputs and personal goals with ensure that the service has a real impact of improving people’s lives. An example of this is illustrated below: Linking outcomes, outputs and Personal goals together Strategic Outcomes A higher proportion of the population aged over 80 should live within the community Service Outcomes Fewer people admitted to care homes will have a previously undiagnosed continence problem. Personal goals or targets My worry about continence and its capacity to limit my lifestyle is no longer a problem. 6.2.5 Delivery Achieving real outcomes require real change It requires: Innovation Incentives Inclusion Joint commissioning Partnership working Meaningful service user engagement These requirements should be enshrined in the specification therefore ensuring delivery for the benefit of service users. 7. Content There are 3 template specifications that reflect the difference between the level of detail expected for contracts over £96,000, contract under £96,000 and over £20,000 and contracts under £20,000. There are 10 sections to the template specifications: 7.1 Purpose The Services Service Delivery Referral and access End of Service Self Care, Patient/ service and Carer Information Performance management and Monitoring Activity Continuous Improvement Costs and Pricing Purpose This section outlines the main purpose of the service including service aims, background and outline of requirements. 7.2 The Services This section should give a fuller description of the size and nature of the service required, including information about: The different client groups requiring services. The differing needs of the service users. The geographical location and spread of services. How it is intended that service users will be referred or otherwise enter the service. Any eligibility criteria for the service that will operate. The processes or activities to be provided under the contract and an indication of the volume. 7.3 Service Delivery This section should set out where and how the service will be delivered. This section should include the model of care, details of care pathway, and how service links to other pathways, services and strategic priorities and arrangements for managing integrated services. 7.4 Referral, Access and Acceptance This section sets out how service users access the service, referral arrangements and acceptance criteria. 7.5 End of Service. This section sets out how and where services should end, referrals onto other services and protocols and requirements regarding service completion. 7.6 Self Care, Patient/Service User and Carer Information This section sets out requirements regarding the providers responsibilities in providing information and guidance to service users and their Carers including signposting to other services and commitment to public health requirements. 7.7 Performance Management and Monitoring Arrangements 7.7.1 Setting targets This section should detail the model of care, specific outcome and output targets to be achieved. It will be necessary to differentiate between those that are requirements and those that offer some flexibility for the provider. It is normally considered good practice to get a balance between outcomes, outputs and inputs, and, in any event, for outcomes to be restricted to three or four vital issues, which are meaningful and measurable. To help the provider understand how these factors fit with the overall service requirements, it may be possible to include model care pathways for the different client groups. Key areas of focus in managing the performance of specific service providers are to: Only seek information on performance that has a clear purpose Review volume and quality with the objective of moving to measuring improvement in outcomes Establish a hierarchy of KPIs which provides flexibility in the level of scrutiny needed when providers perform well Ensure that the KPIs are consistent with those by which NHS Medway is measured e.g. National targets, LAA targets Set ‘stretch targets’ and offer incentives to deliver improved quality That for a particular service the expectation is the same for the NHS, independent or third sector providers; proportionate to the cost and size of the service Seek the views of service users and Carers as an important source of information on the patient experience This should all be clearly reflected in the specification. 7.7.2 Working with the Information and Performance team Before establishing measures and targets and the methods for collecting data contact should be made with the Information and Performance team who will support commissioners to develop frameworks and methodologies to meet the specified requirements. There are two main possibilities in respect of data collection. One, that commissioner systems dictate the way in which information is recorded, collated and transmitted by the provider. Two, that the commissioner is happy to leave the collection, collation and transmission systems to the provider, providing it is able to meet the overall information requirements. It is vital that the specification makes clear what is required of the provider in these terms. 7.7.3 Collaborating with other commissioners Commissioners should be aware of the effect that the service they will be commissioning with have on other parts of the organisation. Ideally all functions that will be affected through the commissioning of the service will be included in the project team. If this is not possible then serviced specification development should still take into account the needs of the organisation of a whole by considering measures and specified requirements that will meet these needs for example Medicines Management should be consulted on the development of any specfifcation where there is a direct or indirect effect on the prescribing or use of medicines. 7.7.4 Establishing how meeting outcomes will be measured and monitored. Having determined the outcomes and outputs of services required, it is important to identify any other quality aspects that you require. Examples of minimum practices and policy requirements in a specification are: – Expectations/requirements in relation to staffing levels, training, qualifications and experience. – Expectation/requirements in relation to the management of staff, professional supervision and HR/employment standards. – Compliance with local or national service standards and guidance. – Provider policies, procedures and systems ensuring a safe, consistent and quality service. – Involvement of users and Carers in agreeing care programmes and their review. – Expectation/requirements of provider involvement in the review of services. – Expectations of provider complaints procedures. The specification should also make clear the expectations of the commissioner in terms of the provider attending meetings and the sharing of information. A schedule of meetings and the main agenda items might be included as an appendix of the specification. As well as the performance indicators that the provider will be expected to report on, any other monitoring arrangements need to be outlined such as monitoring visits, complaints or the possibility of spot checks. 7.8 Activity This section sets out the main activities that are required in order to deliver the service. 7.9 Continuous Improvement This section sets out the requirements in terms of proactive continuous improvement and business planning. 7.10 Prices and costs This section contains the costed breakdown of this service. This section can not be completed until completion of the competitive or cooperative process. 7.11 Appendices Appendices (also sometimes referred to as schedules) should be cross referenced to the main body of the specification and contract. Appendices/schedules should add any additional detailed or requires. For example an Appendix may show the whole patient pathways and how aspects of this pathway are delivered. IT may also include detailed requirements such as insurance requirements etc.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz