Protein Phosphorylation and Sample Prep Johan Öhman Senior Scientist GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB Outline Introduction Case Study 1 pervanadate treated CHO cells Case Study 2 phosphoproteomics Case Study 3 drug treatment of cancer cells Summary 2 Background protein phosphorylation Over 200 PTM’s exist but only a few are reversible. Phosphorylation is vital for many cellular functions: •signal transduction •cell differentiation •cell cycle control •”on-off” switch 3 Background protein phosphorylation ~15% of total proteins (some cellular state) O O Differences between Ser/Thr and Tyr phosphorylations. P Ser Thr Tyr 1000 / 100 / 1 O O N O O O P O O N O Relative abundance: OO P O O Tyrosinephosphate N O Threonine-/ Serine-phosphate 4 Phosphorylation - research areas Cellular processes Therapeutic • apoptosis • cancer • cell cycle / DNA repair • diabetes / obesity • kinases • immunology • signaling • angiogenes • oncogenes / tumor suppressors • pathogenes Other • phospho proteomics • interaction proteome • localization and dynamics 5 Phosphorylation - detection Techniques • PAGE / 2-D PAGE • Immunoblot • Direct staining • DIGE + separation power, sensitivity, overview of complex sample poor protein representation, limited Mw range, membrane proteins.. • MS after proteolytic digestion • MALDI-ToF/ToF • LC-MS/MS + precise location of phosphorylation site(s), identification, membrane proteins, automation.. complex sample mixtures, incomplete fragmentation MS/MS 6 Sample preparation Workflow Sample specific Downstream Core specific procedure Downstream application Sample Sample preparation Analysis 7 Sample prep - improves the quality Minimize • degradation • sample loss optimize the quality of the sample • contamination • in vitro chemical modifications … leads to enhanced • signal for low abundance molecules • analytical resolution maximize the quality of the result 8 Sample prep - enrichment techniques Sample mixture Immunoprecipitation pTyrantibody pSer/pThrantibody Affinity matrix IMAC Chemical modification MOAC Fe3+ Ga3+ Zr4+ Al3+ TiO2 9 Sample prep – workflow phosphoproteins 10 Sample prep - phosphoproteins Important considerations • Phosphatase inhibitors • Reduce phosphatase activity • Low abundance Amount material needed: • Obscured (hidden) PO4 groups 100-200 fmol peptide in LC-MS/MS • Mapping protein interactions 10-200 million cells, 1-20 ml cell extract • Multi-protease approach may be needed (LC-MS/MS) • Reduce ”background” by using good controls 11 Mag TM Sepharose Attractive sample preparation made easy 12 Products for enrichment of proteins and phosphopeptides Magnetic beads Additional material Specific Ligands, e.g.: Antibodies Other Binders NHS Mag Sepharose™ Protein A Mag Sepharose Protein G Mag Sepharose TiO2 Mag Sepharose MagRack 6 Low µg scale Variable amount of beads Variable sample volume Enzyme inhibitors, e.g.: Protease inhibitors Phosphatase inhibitors Extraction and immunoprecipitation buffers Your Sample – Cells or tissue 13 Enrichment of phosphoproteins and peptides Case study 1: Finding low abundant tyrosine phosphoproteins in CHO cells 14 Key sample preparation issues for phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide analysis Coverage of the phosphoproteome: Selective enrichment of phosphoproteins and –peptides Alteration of the phosphoproteome: Stop in vitro dephosphorylation 15 Sample prep - enrichment techniques Sample mixture Immunoprecipitation pTyrantibody pSer/pThrantibody Affinity matrix IMAC Chemical modification MOAC Fe3+ Ga3+ Zr4+ Al3+ TiO2 16 Sample prep – workflow phosphoproteins 17 Changes in tyrosine phoshorylation in CHO cells upon pervanadate treatment Biological system CHO cells Treatment with pervanadate (H2O2 + vanadate), known to introduce a decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation Tools and methods Phospo tyrosine specific antibody, PY20 Protein G Mag Sepharose™ beads Trypsin Mass spectrometry, LC-MS/MS 18 Enrichment of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in CHO cells ™ Trypsin digestion 19 Changes in tyrosine phoshorylation in CHO cells upon pervanadate treatment • 76 potential tyrosine phosphoproteins identified Single analysis , simple MS method.. • Enrichment with Protein G Mag Sepharose™ immobilized with an anti-pTyr-antibody offers a sensitive and efficient capture of the low abundant pTyr proteins Oxidative stress indicated ! 20 Enrichment of phosphopeptides Case Study 2: Phosphopeptides in a leukemia cancer cell line enriched by TiO2 21 Sample prep – workflow phosphoproteins 22 Enrichment and identification of phosphopeptides in cancer cells Workflow for analysis of phosphopeptides from leukemia cell line Cell lysis Trypsin digestion of proteins in cell lysate Desalting of peptides (C-18) TiO2 Mag Sepharose ™ protocol LC-MS/MS analysis and peptide identification 23 Identified proteins & phosphopeptide sequences Accession number 1 Gene name Protein name Phosphopeptide sequence IPI00012442 G3BP1 Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 IPI00009032 SSB IPI00009032 2 3 Site SwissProt sssPAPADIAQTVQEDLR S230/S231/S232 Yes, for all 3 Lupus La protein FAsDDEHDEHDENGATGPVKR S366 Yes, by CK2 SSB Lupus La protein TKFAsDDEHDEHDENGATGPVKR S366 Yes, by CK2 IPI00025512 HSPB1 Heat-shock protein QLsSGVSEIR Nobeta-1 phosphopeptides identified S82 Yes IPI00185526 SAMSN1 SAM-domain protein SAMSN-1 before S11 No IPI00017297 MATR3 Matrin-3 RDsFDDRGPSLNPVLDYDHGSR S188 Yes IPI00184330 MCM2 DNA replication licensing factor MCM2 GLLyDSDEEDEERPAR Y137 (or S139) No, S139 known IPI00017659 RCSD1 Enriched Protein kinase substrate CapZIP S179 Yes, by MAPKAPK2 and MAPKAPK3. IPI00023503 CDK3 Cell division protein kinase 3 Y15 Yes IPI00013721 PRPF4B binds TiO2PRP4 Serine/threonine-protein kinase homolog Y849 Yes IPI00337465 KLC1 Isoform P of Kinesin light chain 1 AssLNVLNVGGK S546/S547 No, sequence specific for isoform P IPI00163505 RMB39 Isoform 1 of RNA-binding protein 39 DKsPVREPIDNLTPEER S136 Yes IPI00014177 Septin-2 Septin-2 IYHLPDAEsDEDEDFKEQTR S218 Yes IPI00299254 EIF5B Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B NKPGPNIEsGNEDDDASFK S214 Yes IPI00178667 TOP2A 183 kDa protein/DNA topoisomerase 2 yLEESDEDDLF Y1601 No SSsFGNFDR enrichment ! sample identified SQsDCGELGDFR 15 phosphopeptides IGEGTyGVVYK to both LCDFGSASHVADNDITPyLVSR Ser/Thr and Tyr phosphopeptides * Data were kindly provided by Sara Lind, Lu Lu, Lioudmila Elfineh (PhD) and Prof. Ulf Pettersson, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University; and Konstantin Artemenko (PhD) and Prof. Roman Zubarev, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Molecular Biometry Group, Uppsala University. 24 Enrichment of phosphoproteins and peptides Case Study 3: Changes in tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells upon drug treatment 25 Sample prep – workflow phosphoproteins 26 Challenges for low abundant proteins Low abundant proteins are often biologically important but difficult to detect Regulatory proteins are often present in low amounts and only for a short time. Labeling or staining will result in very weak or no signal due to limits in detection or sensitivity of label or stain 27 How can we improve the possibility for detection of low abundant proteins? Use more sensitive stains or labels Enrich the protein or group of proteins Use antibody based detection and amplify the signal Perform selective labeling Remove high abundant proteins Over express your protein of interest 28 Select a separation method for optimal resolution of protein of interest Method: •1-D SDS-PAGE •2-D electrophoresis •1-D Western •2-D Western Parameters: •pH interval •Gel size •Acryl amide content •IEF gels 29 Quantification range Deep Purple™ ECL Plex™ Sypro™ Ruby Radio isotopes high (pg) CyDye™ Silver sensitivity Coomassie™ Blue low (ng) 30 What sets limit of detection? Amount of sample Signal intensity Background Variation in background (noise) Signal intensity (counts) Signal: noise ratio ≥ 3 is limit of detection Lane 22 Lane 23 Lane 24 Pixel position Lane 25 31 Changes in tyrosine phoshorylation in cancer cells upon drug treatment Biological system K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells Treatment with imatinib (Gleevec), known to introduce a decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation Questions Can we detect and analyze changes in the very low abundant tyrosine phosphorylated proteins? Can we identify the proteins that are differentially regulated? Collaboration with Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden: Dr. Sara Lind et al, Rudbeck laboratory 32 Simplified DIGE experiment CyDye™ pre-labeling 2-D Electrophoresis Imaging Total protein samples Control (Cy™2) Imatinib treated (Cy3) 33 No significant change in protein abundances in total protein samples control treated overlay Immobiline™ drystrip: pH 4-7, 7 cm SDS-PAGE gel: 4-20 % Tris Glycine, 8 x 7 cm Data courtesy: Sara Lind, Rudbeck laboratory, Uppsala , Sweden 34 How can we improve the possibility for detection of low abundant proteins? Use more sensitive stains or labels Enrich the protein or group of proteins Use antibody based detection and amplify the signal Perform selective labeling Remove high abundant proteins Over express your protein of interest 35 Enrichment of proteins and peptides using Mag Sepharose™ beads NHS Mag Sepharose Protein A Mag Sepharose Protein G Mag Sepharose TiO2 Mag Sepharose (peptides) 36 Analysis of low abundant phosphoproteins Tools and methods Phospho tyrosine specific antibody, 4G10 Protein G Mag Sepharose™ beads 2-D fluorescence differential gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) DeCyder™ 2-D differential analysis software Mass spectrometry 37 Work flow enrichment of pTyr proteins Protein G Mag Sepharose™ Anti phospho tyrosine antibody, 4G10 Overnight incubation with K562 cell lysate at +4ºC Phenyl phosphate (phospho tyrosine analogue) Desalting, concentration and exchange into DIGE labeling buffer Vivaspin ultracentrifugation columns (MWCO 5 kDa) VivaSpin™ 38 Down regulation detected by DIGE after enrichment control treated overlay Protein G Mag Sepharose™ + anti pTyr 4G10 Immobiline™ drystrip: pH 4-7, 7 cm SDS-PAGE gel: 4-20 % Tris Glycine, 8 x 7 cm 39 DIGE results before and after enrichment Non-enriched Immobiline™ drystrip: pH 4-7, 7 cm SDS-PAGE gel: 4-20 % Tris Glycine, 8 x 7 cm Enriched Protein G Mag Sepharose™ + anti pTyr 4G10 Immobiline™ drystrip: pH 4-7, 7 cm SDS-PAGE gel: 4-20 % Tris Glycine, 8 x 7 cm 40 Many tyrosine phosphoproteins are down regulated upon drug treatment Control Imatinib treated overlay DeCyder™ 2-D differential analysis software 41 Large down regulation Control Imatinib treated Fold change -5.14 -11.52 -11.13 42 Protein Identification results Ratio control/treated Spot no Protein Protein full name Protein accession1 Gel 12 Gel 22 1 - n/a - -2.68 -2.07 2 - n/a - -2.93 -1.94 3 CRKL v-crk sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog (avian)-like gi 4885153 -2.64 -2.47 n/a - -2.93 -1.95 4 5 TPM3 Tropomyosin 3 isoform 5 gi 114155148 -3.09 -1.48 6 14-3-3 ε 14-3-3 protein epsilon gi 5803225 -5.14 -9.98 7 14-3-3 γ 14-3-3 protein gamma P61981 -11.62 -11.56 8 - n/a - -3.14 -8.81 9 - n/a - -2.65 -2.39 GRB2 Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 isoform 1 gi 4504111 -11.13 -2.33 10 43 2-D Western blotting showed decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation Total protein pre-labeled with Cy™3 Unlabeled total protein Control Cy 3 2-D electrophoresis Transfer to membrane Drug treated Antibody probing Cy 5 P Anti phospho tyrosine primary, 4G10 ECL Plex™ Cy 5 secondary Membrane image Cy 3/Cy 5 overlay 44 Conclusions, case study 3 Enrichment enabled the detection of differences in very low abundant proteins Tyrosine phosphoproteins were decreased in response to drug treatment Results from analysis of CyDye™ labeled enriched proteins and Western blotting were in good agreement It was necessary to enrich the proteins to get protein identity with MS 45 Summary Enrichment of low abundant phosphoproteins is necessary for detection and identification Good sample prep methods are necessary for high quality results 46 Thank You for your attention! 47 Questions! 48 GE, imagination at work, and GE monogram are trademarks of General Electric Company. Cy, CyDye, DeCyder, ECL Plex, Immobiline, Deep Purple, and Sepharose are trademarks of GE Healthcare companies. All third party trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2-D Fluorescence Difference Gel Electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) technology is covered by US patent numbers US6,043,025, US6,127,134, US6,426,190, and equivalent patents and patent applications in other countries and exclusively licensed from Carnegie Mellon University. CyDye: this product or portions thereof is manufactured under an exclusive license from Carnegie Mellon University under US patent numbers 5,569,587, 5,627,027 and equivalent patents in other countries. The purchase of CyDye DIGE Fluors includes a limited license to use the CyDye DIGE Fluors for internal research and development, but not for any commercial purposes. A license to use the CyDye DIGE Fluors for commercial purposes is subject to a separate license agreement with GE Healthcare. The cyanine dyes in the product are manufactured under an exclusive license from Carnegie Mellon University under US patent numbers 5,268,486 and equivalent patents in the US and other countries. The purchase of CyDye products includes a limited license to use the CyDye products for internal research and development but not for any commercial purposes. A license to use the CyDye products for commercial purposes is subject to a separate license agreement with GE Healthcare. Commercial use shall include: 1. Sale, lease, license or other transfer of the material or any material derived or produced from it. 2. Sale, lease, license or other grant of rights to use this material or any material derived or produced from it. 3. Use of this material to perform services for a fee for third parties, including contract research and drug screening. If you require a commercial license to use this material and do not have one, return this material unopened to GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Bjorkgatan 30, SE-751 84 Uppsala, Sweden and any money paid for the material will be refunded. DIGE Gel and DIGE Buffer Kit: The buffer system in this gel and buffer kit is covered by patent application WO9616724 granted in US, EP and JP. DeCyder: This release of DeCyder version 2 (software) is provided by GE Healthcare to the customer under a nonexclusive license and is subject to terms and conditions set out in the 2-D Differential Gel Electrophoresis Technology Access Agreement. Customer has no rights to copy or duplicate or amend the Software without the prior written approval of GE Healthcare. © 2010 General Electric Company – All rights reserved First published, October 2010 All goods and services are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale of the company within GE Healthcare that supplies them. A copy of these terms and conditions is available on request. Contact your local GE Healthcare representative for the most current information. www.gelifesciences.com/sampleprep GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB Björkgatan 30 SE-751 84 Uppsala Sweden 49 Recently Launched Sample Prep Products Target protein analysis in crude samples – protein activity Desalting Concentration Crude sample Conditioning Various assays Know your protein activity 51 Antibody binding –Fluorescent Western blotting Quantification of target protein relative to an internal, endogenous standard ECL Plex™ RuvB (house-keeping protein) His- GFP (target protein) t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 Relative increase of His-GFP Multiplexed fluorescent detection for reliable quantification 52 Antibody bindingFluorescent Western blotting C y™ 5 y C 5 C y 3 y C 3 ECL Plex™ secondary antibody CyDye™ Conjugated Primary antibody Targets on membrane = Target protein = House-keeping protein (internal standard) 53 Minimal CyDye™ DIGE fluors Minimal labeling • 50 µg protein • single label (1-3 %) • ε-amino group of lysine 3 dyes: Cy™ 2, Cy 3, Cy 5 • • • • • charge matched (+1 charge) size matched (~450Da) labeled samples co-migrate detection limit ~0.25 ng linear dynamic range: over 4 orders of magnitude 54 Target protein analysis in purified sample Target protein property Assay Amino acid sequence Chemical or MS/MS Mass MS Protein activity Depending on type of activity Western blotting, ELISA etc. UV/VIS spectroscopy Antibody binding Unique fluorescence / absorbance Size / apparent molecular SDS-PAGE weight Gel Filtration Decreasing specificity 55
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz