Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research A Guide to Becoming an Action Rese A Guide to Becoming An Action Researcher Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services 2004 This is one of many publications available through the Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services, Florida Department of Education, designed to assist school districts, state agencies that support educational programs, and parents in the provision of special programs. For additional information on this publication, or for a list of available publications, contact the Clearinghouse Information Center, Florida Department of Education, Room 628 Turlington Bldg., Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400. telephone: (850) 245-0477 fax: (850) 245-0987 Suncom: 205-0477 email: [email protected] website: www.myfloridaeducation.com/commhome T 2 Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research A Guide to Becoming An Action Researcher Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services 2004 3 This document was developed by Project CENTRAL, a special project funded by the State of Florida, Department of Education, Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services, through federal assistance under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B. For more information about action research and effective instructional practices, contact Project CENTRAL, University of Central Florida 1673 Mason Avenue, Suite 207 Daytona Beach, FL 32117 telephone: (386) 274-0175 fax: (386) 274-0179 email: [email protected] website: http://reach.ucf.edu/~CENTRAL Copyright State of Florida Department of State 2004 Authorization for reproduction is hereby granted to the state system of public education consistent with section 1006.39(2), Florida Statutes. No authorization is granted for distribution or reproduction outside the state system of public education without prior approval in writing. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Primary Authors D’Ann Rawlinson, M.A. Mary Little, Ph.D. Project CENTRAL wishes to express its gratitude to the following individuals for their guidance and contributions: Susan Kelly, FLaRE, Regional Coordinator, UCF Laura King, Doctoral Student, UCF Enrique Puig, FLaRE, Regional Coordinator, UCF Karli Ruscoe, Volusia County Public Schools Dedicated to all of the teachers and professional developers in Florida who have provided invaluable information about this process and who have celebrated their positive and improved student results. 5 Table o f Contents 6 Table of Contents Introduction Page 1 Anticipation Guide Page 2 Chapter 1: Understanding the Action Research Process Page 3 Chapter 2: Investigating and Identifying a Classroom Problem Page 11 Chapter 3: Developing and Implementing an Action Research Plan Page 23 Chapter 4: Collecting and Analyzing Data Page 33 Chapter 5: Using and Sharing Results Page 45 Appendix Anticipation Guide Activity 1: Action Research Rationale Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process Activity 3: Identifying a Classroom Problem Activity 4: Action Research Plan Activity 5: Implementation Schedule Observation Checklist Observation (Anecdotal Records) Observation (Chart – Individual Student) Observation (Grid – Small Group or Class) Interview: Reading at Home Interview: Reading and Writing Interview Writing Rubric Cool Tools: Informal Reading Assessments (Examples) Sharing the Results: A Format for Reporting Action Research Resources Grants and Websites References Page 57 Page 111 Page 113 7 8 Introduction Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research Classroom Action Research Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research is an interactive, practical guide to conducting action research in the classroom and school with the goal of improving student learning. This guide provides teachers with a scaffolded approach to conducting action research, including descriptions of each phase, reflection activities, planning forms to focus the action research, and concrete, real-life examples of the process. Action research is a cyclical and continuous process. However, for the purpose of describing and modeling the process in this guide, the phases of action research will be introduced in a linear fashion. This guide can be used in many different contexts. Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research was originally designed as a companion guide for Project CENTRAL’s (Coordinating Existing Networks To Reach All Learners) professional development in action research. This guide may also be used as a teaching tool for educators interested in learning about action research and conducting action research studies, a learning guide for students in college courses, or as a resource for educators working towards National Board Certification or development of individual professional development plans. In addition to Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research, Project CENTRAL has also created the following resources focusing on the topic of action research: Facilitator Guide Online Module Video CD Online Action Research Journal Case Studies and Examples. Please visit our website at http://reach.ucf.edu/~CENTRAL to obtain more information on these professional development resources. 9 Anticipation Guide An anticipation guide is a series of statements connected to a certain text. The use of an anticipation guide can activate prior knowledge and allow the reader to make predictions about the text. Directions: Each of the following statements is connected to the content in this guide. Before reading, specify whether you agree or disagree with each statement by circling your answer. In addition, provide an explanation of your opinion. Consider the statements as you read. After reading the guide, complete the final anticipation guide and specify your level of agreement. You will find the final anticipation guide on page 60. Statements 1. Educators should follow the steps of action research in a linear fashion. Explanation: Agree or Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree 3. In order to get the maximum benefits from action research, educators should have a working knowledge of statistics. Explanation: Agree Disagree 4. An educator has completed the action research process once all steps have been implemented. Explanation: Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree 2. One piece of data can provide teachers with enough information needed to identify the specific needs of a particular student or group of students. Explanation: 5. Most educators participate in action research to some degree. Explanation: 6. Because action research involves the collection of data, it alleviates the need for educators to make educated guesses regarding student learning. Explanation: 7. Engaging in action research allows educators to assess and reflect on the effectiveness of their teaching practices. Explanation: Adapted from FLaRE Action Research Module (Kelly & Rawlinson, 2003) 10 Chapter 1 Understanding the Action Research Process Process Chapter 1 Educational Change: A Call to Action “The action of action research…implies change in people’s lives, and therefore in the system in which they live.” ~Jean McNiff “You can either take action, or you can hang back and hope for a miracle. Miracles are great, but they are so unpredictable.” ~Peter Drucker In the field of education there has been a major emphasis on the term change. Change seems to be the only constant in education. The term “change” is expressed when describing systems, education, schools, classroom s, and teachers. Generally, change is seen as providing opportunities to improve education in significant ways. Chapter Outcomes Define the term “action research.” Describe the process of action research. List and describe the three approaches to action research. List the benefits of action research for the student, teacher, and school. In order for positive change to take place, educators need to be aware of what needs to be changed, create a plan for change, and then support the process. For purposeful changes in the teaching and learning process to occur, teachers and students must be involved in the decisions that directly affect that process. “The idea of action research is that educational problems and issues are best identified and investigated where the action is; at the classroom and school level. By integrating research into these settings and engaging those who work at this level in research activities, findings can be applied immediately and problems solved more quickly” (Guskey, 2000). As teachers engage in the action research process, they become agents of change. Teachers are deliberately planning for changes in their classroom and using data to monitor their practices to ensure that all students are learning. 11 What Is Action Research? “Teachers cannot create and sustain the conditions for the productive development of children if those conditions do not exist for teachers.” ~ Seymour Sarason “While research is labor intensive, so is good teaching. And the labor is similar for teachers, because the end goal is the same – to create the best possible learning environment for students.” ~Bissex Action research is a model of professional development where educators study student learning related to their own teaching, a process that allows them to learn about their own instructional practices and to continue to monitor improved student learning. Richard A. Schmuck (1997) compares action research to looking into a mirror at oneself taking action. Conducting action research provides educators with an avenue to reflect on one’s own teaching practices and engage in self-directed learning, with the ultimate goal of improving student learning. In order for students to reach optimal learning, teachers must continuously build upon their knowledge of student learning and intentionally study the instructional practices they are implementing in the classroom. “Action research is planned inquiry – a deliberate search for truth, information, or knowledge” (Schmuck, 1997). For teachers, specific questions to reflect on include the following: Do you purposefully observe and assess your students to determine areas of change? Do you design instructional plans to actualize the change? Do you continuously monitor your instruction to ensure that the change has occurred to impact student learning? These are practices that teachers use when they conduct action research. Jeffery Glanz (2003) refers to action research as “disciplined inquiry.” When educators conduct action research, they are deliberate about the data they collect, the decisions they make, and the lessons they teach. “Action (teacher) research is a natural extension of good teaching. Observing students closely, analyzing their needs, and adjusting the curriculum to fit the needs of all students have always been important skills demonstrated by fine teachers” (Hubbard & Power, 1999). When teachers conduct action research, they ask themselves a critical question, “Am I making an impact on student learning?” When teachers notice a breakdown in learning, they systematically and intentionally plan instruction to meet the needs of their students. The primary goal of action research is to improve student learning by developing and refining the skill of teaching. This is empowering for teachers, giving them opportunities to grow within their professional role and responsibilities. 12 Action research is a continuous and reflective process in which educators make instructional decisions in their classrooms based on student needs as reflected by classroom data. The process of action research involves four phases: identifying a classroom problem developing and implementing an action research plan collecting and analyzing data using and sharing results. Figure 1.1 portrays the continuous nature of the process. Action research never really ends because learning is a cyclical process. An action researcher is always observing, analyzing, designing, assessing, and adjusting. The cyclical nature of action research provides teachers with ongoing opportunities to reflect on and refine their own teaching practices. Identifying a Class room Problem Using & Sharing Results Action Research Developing & Implementing an Action Research Plan Collecting & Analyzing Data Figure 1.1. The Action Research Process Approaches to Action Research Action research is a process that teachers can use in their classrooms to address instructional questions and challenges. Within this process, teachers and schools may choose to focus their study on one student, a small group of students, a class or several classes, or a whole school. The focus and level of participation among school and district colleagues depends on the level of support, needs, and interests of the teacher(s) and school. Emily Calhoun (1993) described three approaches to action research: individual teacher research, collaborative action research, and school-wide action research. Even though the environments are different, the process of action research remains the same. This process uses data to identify classroom/school problems, creates and implements a plan of action, collects and analyzes data, uses and shares the results, and makes instructional decisions to continuously improve student learning. 13 Individual teacher research focuses on studying a problem or issue within a single classroom. The teacher who engages in individual teacher research may or may not have support from colleagues and administration to share, brainstorm, and discuss the topic of action research. Although just one teacher may become directly involved in action research, support from knowledgeable educators at the school or district site is still important for successful teacher research to occur. Also, universities, educational agencies, and districts may encourage teacher action research by providing ongoing professional development related to the needs of the individual teacher researcher. These resources may also provide different venues for sharing the successes of the action research. Collaborative action research focuses on studying a problem or issue within one or more classrooms. Teachers may collaborate and work together to study a particular problem in many different ways: co-teachers in one classroom studying a specific group of students a team of teachers focusing on a grade level issue a teacher and district, educational agency, or university personnel learning and studying a particular instructional practice a group of teachers in the same school studying the same instructional concern. This collaborative action research approach fosters a joint effort because more than one teacher is involved in a specific area of study. Opportunities for sharing and dialogue are more likely to occur. School-wide action research is a school reform initiative. Every faculty member of the school is involved in studying a specific issue identified from school data. This approach requires a great deal of support from the administrators and lead teachers/personnel, but the results can lead to school-wide change. Successful school-wide action research is directly related to initiatives contained within the school improvement plan. An environment that is most supportive of the school-wide action research process provides the following: a venue for sharing the action research process (topics, strategies, results, barriers, benefits, etc.) a school or environment that fosters teacher learning, including professional development and coaching (lead coach or peer coach) planned time to re-analyze action research a supportive environment, including administration. Adapted from Watson & Stevenson (1989), McKay, (1992) Please refer to figure 1.2 to read examples of research questions that were studied using the different approaches to action research. 14 Approaches Individual Level of Focus Single classroom Level of Participation Individual teacher Example of Research Question 1. What impact can daily phonemic awareness activities have on my kindergarten students’ oral language development? (Kindergarten teacher) 2. How can using concrete objects (manipulatives) improve my students’ ability to identify and extend patterns in mathematics? (Third grade teacher) Collaborative School-wide One or more classrooms Schoolimprovement Co-teachers, teams, departments, educational agencies & teachers, university faculty & teachers, teachers within a district, etc. 1. How can students with disabilities experiencing deficits in phonemic awareness show improvement in those skills by participating in additional and intensive instruction in phonemic awareness activities at least four times per week? How will it affect their overall reading ability? (Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Teacher & Literacy Coach) Whole faculty 1. How can we teach our students to organize, analyze, synthesize, and interpret what they read? (School-wide question) How can modeling through readalouds improve students’ abilities to organize, analyze, synthesize, and interpret what they read? There are several action research teams within the school. The above example is one question being studied by one action research team. 2. How can implementing a school-wide positive behavior support program improve students’ safety and increase appropriate student behaviors within the school? (All faculty) 2. How can implementing “Organizing Together,” a Strategic Instruction Model curriculum, improve 6th graders’ abilities to come to class organized and prepared? (6th grade teachers in a middle school team) Figure 1.2. Approaches to Action Research 15 Activity 1: Action Research Rationale Why Conduct Action Research? Take a moment and reflect on why you should conduct action research. What are the benefits of action research to teachers and students? How could participating in this model of professional development impact your professional practice? Do you have concerns about conducting action research in your classroom? Use this space to record your personal reflections. 16 Benefits of Action Research Action research provides many benefits to students, teachers, and schools. STUDENTS benefit because their learning is being studied. Instructional practices are being designed to accelerate learning and build upon student knowledge. Close monitoring is occurring throughout the process to ensure that appropriate progress is being made and, if not, adjustments in instruction will occur. TEACHERS benefit because the process allows them to think about, study, and refine their own professional practice. By participating in action research, the teacher develops a sense of ownership in the knowledge constructed, and this sense of ownership heavily contributes to the possibilities for real change to take place in the classroom (Dana & Yendol-Silva, 2003). As a teacher, how often do you attend professional development and then implement the new learned practices or knowledge in your classroom? Conducting action research that focuses on implementing the recently learned knowledge can bridge the professional development into actual practice. Many teachers who participate in action research find it very empowering because they have actual evidence that they have made an impact on their students’ learning. Strickland (1988) found that teachers engaged in action research depended more on themselves as decision makers and gained more confidence in what they believed about curriculum and instruction. This process encourages collaboration at many different levels, which can break the common feeling of isolation among teachers. SCHOOLS benefit because student achievement can improve when student learning is being studied and specific learning needs are being addressed. When teachers are engaged in collaborative action research and the process is well-supported, a learning community can be developed that encourages professional dialogue, learning, and research with the focus of impacting all students. Additionally, this process can assist schools in gathering data to evaluate the effectiveness of their instructional practices and professional development. Summary Action research is a process that allows teachers to make considerable changes in their classrooms by focusing on student learning through reflection and data analysis. The four phases of action research are discussed in the remaining chapters of this guide. Each phase is described in detail, with examples and activities provided. 17 Chapter 1: Understanding the Action Research Process Take several minutes to reflect upon and answer the following questions. Summary Questions Define the term “action research.” Describe the process of action research. List and describe the three approaches to action research. Identify benefits of action research for the student, teacher, and school. Reflection Questions Thinking about your classroom and students, how can engaging in action research benefit you as a teacher and your students? Describe which action research approach best fits your teaching situation. 18 Chapter 4 Chapter 2 Investigating and Identifying a Classroom Problem “A problem adequately stated is a problem well on its way to being solved.” ~R. Buckminster Fuller Meeting the learning needs of all students in a class can be a daunting task, especially given diverse Chapter Outcomes learning needs. With so many demands on teachers’ time – including some not related directly to Name and describe the teaching – even finding time to learn about students guiding questions for and their learning can be difficult. The bottom line investigating classroom for each teacher, however, must be, “Are all of my concerns. students learning?” In order for a teacher to Describe the components accurately answer this question, it is critical to of a problem statement. continuously observe, think about, and analyze students’ learning relative to his or her teaching and the standards and expectations of that curriculum and grade. This may seem timeconsuming. However, the action research process may help teachers become more efficient and effective as specific instructional needs based upon student data are identified. When instructional decisions are made based on classroom data, the resulting instruction is purposely designed to target specific identified strengths and needs of the students. In terms of action research, this period of analysis and reflection provides information needed to identify the classroom problem or issue. Think of teaching as a science. Before scientists conduct a study, they must first identify a problem to address, a question to be answered, or a phenomenon to be explained. As an action researcher, teachers begin the process by identifying an issue in the classroom that is an area of concern, i.e., a need that is reflected in a level of student learning that does not meet the teacher’s expectations. To adequately identify a classroom problem, a teacher must take the time to investigate the initial areas of concern by collecting and analyzing information specifically aligned to the students’ learning needs. “Teachers who rush to complete the problem formulation stage are more likely to flounder in their later efforts, whereas teachers who take their time to reflect on and define their problem are more likely to pursue questions yielding meaningful results” (Sagor, 1992). 19 Beginning the Action Research Process “A problem is the discrepancy between unsatisfactory present situations and more desirable goals.” ~Richard Schmuck To begin the action research process, teachers must first observe, question, and reflect on the actual current situation (of the entire classroom or a group of students) in order to investigate the classroom concerns. Through this investigation, teachers will need to gather additional specific data to help identify the classroom problem. It may take time to observe and interview students while engaged in learning, to analyze their work samples, and to collect classroom assessments. It can be helpful to collaborate with another teacher, mentor, or instructional coach at this point – especially a knowledgeable resource who has observed the students in the class. Take time to refer to and complete Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process (page 22 and also located in the appendix). Activity 2 consists of five probing statements to guide this initial phase of observation, reflection, and analysis of student work. Carefully address these five statements and review specific classroom data. Participating in this activity will provide needed information for identifying a specific classroom problem. Before beginning activity 2, refer below as there will be a brief description of each question and an example. 1. Currently in my classroom, I am concerned about: When responding to this statement, think about what you are noticing in your classroom that is drawing attention to you as an educator. Do you notice that student learning is breaking down or there is an issue that needs to be changed? Explicitly describe your concern related to student learning. You may have some work samples or initial assessments that you may want to refer to at this time. Example Mrs. Levine, a 3rd grade teacher, and Ms. Rollins, an ESE teacher, noticed that two of their students are having difficulties writing and reading independently. The students entered 3rd grade reading at the pre-primer level. On writing rubrics, Danny and Janice scored Level 1, the lowest level of performance. Danny and Janice are performing significantly below their peers. Danny refuses to attempt any writing or reading assignment. He puts his head on his desk when asked to engage in any of these activities. Janice will attempt to read and write initially, but often gets frustrated and demands continuous support or behavior problems occur. Her writing is very immature and she rewrites the same message every day regardless of the writing prompt. 20 Examples of Student Data (Danny’s Initial Writing Samples) Writing Sample 1 Writing Sample 2 Danny’s writing prompt focused on telling a story about his family. He drew a picture of his family, but was unable to write a story. Danny wrote about his pet turtle. The teacher transcribed his story after Danny read his story aloud. (I have a pet turtle.) Janice (Observations of Writing) 9/3/02, Language Arts Activity: Writing in Journal Janice wrote, “I love my pig. My pig is fun. I like to play. My pig like to play. I love my pig.” After writing her message, she began to draw a picture of a pig playing in a park. 9/5/02, Language Arts Activity: Writing Prompt (Topic: Family) Janice wrote, “My pig is fun. I love to play and I love my pig. I love my pig. My pig is fun.” When Janice was asked to write about her family, she said, “No, I want to write about a pig.” 2. In order to investigate my concern, I need to collect information on: After explicitly stating your concern, think about what information you want to gather based on student learning needs. Why is learning breaking down? Why is there an issue that needs to be changed? In order to attempt to answer these questions, determine what kind of information you are missing or need to know. 21 Example Danny and Janice are having significant difficulties learning to read and write. Mrs. Levine and Ms. Rollins asked themselves, “Why are they not progressing in reading and writing?” They decided to collect information on the students’ reading readiness skills. The teachers already knew that both students were reading at the pre-primer level, but did not have substantial information on why they were still reading at that level. Ms. Rollins and Mrs. Levine wanted to learn about Danny’s and Janice’s knowledge of letters and sounds, repertoire of sight words, phonemic awareness, and phonics abilities. 3. I will gather this information by collecting the following data: Once you have considered what information you want to collect, decide how you are going to collect the information. What specific data sources or tools will you use to collect the information to accurately identify a problem to study? Classrooms and schools are rich with data. Making time to carefully analyze different sources of information will help you determine your students’ needs and strengths. Below you will find a quick reference chart of data collection sources. Refer to chapter 4 for specific information on data collection sources that can be used to provide evidence of student learning. Data Collection Sources Student Work Samples Rubrics Formal & Informal Observations Grades, Report Cards, Cumulative Records Informal Assessments (Teacher-made or published) Interviews/Surveys (Student or parent) Checklists Formal Tests Performance Assessments Example Ms. Rollins and Mrs. Levine already reviewed the students’ initial assessments in reading and writing. They chose to administer informal assessment surveys on letter identification, letter/sound correspondence, phonemic awareness, sight words, and phonics. Refer to templates taken from Cool Tools located in the appendix beginning on page 72. 4. After analyzing my data, I found my students are having difficulties with: Specify the particular areas of weakness by stating student needs that were discovered after careful analysis of your data. 22 Example After administering and analyzing several data sources, Ms. Rollins and Mrs. Levine found that Danny and Janice both had poor knowledge of letter/sound correspondence, weak phonemic awareness (segmenting and blending), a limited repertoire of sight words, and a lack of reading and writing strategies. 5. To meet my students needs, I need to focus my instruction on: Once you have stated needs, think about where you need to focus instruction to accelerate your students’ learning. Example Danny and Janice will require instruction specifically designed to target building phonemic awareness and letter-sound correspondence in a comprehensive approach connecting reading to writing. 23 Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process Investigating Classroom Concerns Reflect on and complete the following open-ended probes to assist you in investigating your initial concerns and identifying a classroom problem or area of change. Name: Mrs. Levine (3rd grade teacher) and Ms. Rollins (ESE co-teacher) Currently in my classroom, I am concerned about Danny and Janice, two of our third graders with specific learning disabilities, are having difficulties reading and writing independently. They entered 3rd grade reading at the preprimer level. On the 3rd grade writing rubrics, Danny and Janice consistently scored Level 1, the lowest level of performance. Danny refuses to attempt any writing or reading assignment. He shuts down when asked to engage in any of these assignments. At the beginning of the school year, we reviewed his cumulative records and found that he has made very little progress in reading and writing. Janice will attempt to read and write initially, but often gets frustrated and demands continuous support or behavior problems will occur. Her writing is very immature and she rewrites the same message every day, regardless of the writing prompt or topic. In order to investigate my concern, I need to collect information on We need to investigate why Danny and Janice are not reading and writing by assessing their reading readiness skills such as their knowledge of letters and sounds, repertoire of sight words, phonemic awareness abilities, and knowledge of phonics. I will gather this information by collecting the following data In addition to the reading and writing assessments currently used, we will gather more information through the following informal assessment surveys focusing on letter identification, letter/sound correspondence, phonemic awareness, phonics, and sight words. 24 After analyzing my data, I found that my students are having difficulties with After analyzing various assessments, we found Danny and Janice both have poor letter/ sounds correspondence, weak phonemic awareness, a limited repertoire of sight words, and a lack of reading and writing strategies. Danny was unable to identify letters of the alphabet or produce the sounds of the letters. Furthermore, the only sight words in his current vocabulary were “Danny,” “I,” and “a.” It seems Janice continuously wrote the same message because those were the only words in her sight vocabulary. She too had significant difficulties with letter/sound correspondence and she struggled with hearing and recording sounds in words. To meet my students’ needs, I need to focus my instruction on Danny and Janice will require instruction specifically designed to target building phonemic awareness and letter/sound correspondence in a comprehensive approach connecting reading to writing. Figure 2.1. Example of Investigating Your Classroom Concerns 25 Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process Investigating Classroom Concerns Reflect on and complete the following open-ended probes to assist you in your investigating your initial concerns and identifying a classroom problem or area of change. Name: Currently in my classroom, I am concerned about In order to investigate my concern, I need to collect information on I will gather this information by collecting the following data After analyzing my data, I found that my students are having difficulties with To meet my students’ needs, I need to focus my instruction on 26 After completing activity 2, identify several instructional concerns to target for several students or an entire class. Then choose one concern that is most important for the students, that is a priority learning need, and that can produce positive results for students. Select a target you can impact. Additionally, it is critical to choose a problem aligned with the curricular standards for your students as determined within your grade level, school, district, and state. The last component of this phase is to develop the problem statement. The problem statement will become the framework of the action research study. It will provide not only a description of the problem but also the goal for improvement related to the problem. As described in the beginning quote for this chapter from R. Buckmister Fuller, a (classroom) problem adequately stated is a (classroom) problem well on its way to being solved. Identifying a classroom problem adequately will help lead to an appropriate goal of improvement for students that can result in accelerated learning. The problem statement needs to answer these four questions: Who is affected by the problem? What might be causing the problem? What is the goal for improvement? What might be done about the problem? Activity 3: Identifying a Classroom Problem Name(s): Mrs. Levine and Ms. Rollins School: ABC School Grade Level: 3rd Grade, Language Arts (Inclusive Classroom) Problem Statement: Compose a problem statement specifically describing who is affected, supported causes of the problem, goal for improvement, and what might be done about the problem. Provide as much information as possible. Two of our 3rd grade students with specific learning disabilities and language impairments are having difficulty learning to read and write. They entered 3rd grade reading at the pre-primer level and consistently scoring a Level 1 on their writing rubrics. After further investigation, we found that Danny and Janice have poor knowledge of letter/sound correspondence, weak phonemic awareness and phonics, and a limited repertoire of sight words. Our goal for these two students is to build their knowledge of letter/sound correspondence while improving their ability to hear and record sounds in words. In addition to their regular reading and writing instruction, Danny and Janice will receive small group instruction geared to meeting their goal for improvement. Figure 2.2. Example of Identifying a Classroom Problem 27 Once you have chosen a classroom problem to study, develop a problem statement by engaging in activity 3, found on page 25 and also in the appendix. Begin to write down a clear, concrete, specific description of the problem by answering the four questions. Summary The first phase of action research will focus instruction and lead to a more effective and efficient way to teach because it is specifically targeted on student learning. The next chapter will focus on phase two of the action research process – developing and implementing an action plan that includes posing a research question, choosing an instructional focus, identifying data collection strategies, and creating an implementation schedule. 28 Activity 3: Identifying a Classroom Problem Name(s): School: Grade Level: Problem Statement: Compose a problem statement specifically describing who is affected, supported causes of the problem, the goal for improvement, and what might be done about the problem. (Provide as much specific information as possible.) 29 Chapter 2: Investigating and Identifying a Classroom Problem Take several minutes to reflect upon and answer the following questions. Summary Questions Name and describe the guiding questions for investigating classroom concerns. Describe components of a problem statement. Reflection Questions Thinking about your own situation, reflect and record initial classroom concerns related to student learning that need investigation. What support will you need to effectively investigate your classroom concerns related to student learning? 30 Chapter 3 Developing and Implementing an Action Research Plan “Plan your work, then work your plan.” Anonymous Developing the Action Research Plan The framework for action research is built by developing an action research plan. Before engaging in the “research” of action research, it is helpful to outline actions by answering the “what?” the “how?” and the “when?” Hubbard and Power (1999) described the action research plan as a kind of backbone for the study – a skeletal frame on which to hang all emerging thoughts about the research question, data collection, and how to sustain the research. The action research plan is a blueprint or framework for change within the classroom. Before creating the plan, take time to consider different instructional approaches geared towards meeting students’ instructional goals. Many teachers work with knowledgeable resources during this phase while planning their implementation. Chapter Outcomes Name and describe four specific components to consider when posing a research question. Describe topics included in an action research plan. List the three guiding principles for implementing action research. In developing an action research plan, teachers reflect, study, and answer a series of questions that will focus their research. The action research plan includes the following topics: Research question Learner outcomes What student learning will be studied? What instructional practices will be studied? What specific student learning will occur? Support What instructional practices will I implement that will focus on the classroom problem to be addressed? What evidence do I need to collect? How will I collect the data? How often will I collect data? Are the data sources aligned to the instructional focus? What support do I need from my colleagues? Implementation Schedule How will I implement my action research? What is my timeline? Instructional focus Data collection 31 Posing a Research Question A research question is a carefully formed question that will be answered by conducting action research. The research question must be even more specific than the problem statement and should focus on a measurable change or improvement. A good research question must have four specific characteristics. 1. Identify a desired change in student learning When composing a research question, specify the area of learning to improve or change. Avoid focusing on improving test scores as the desired change, as in, “How can teaching research-based metacognitive strategies in content classes improve FCAT scores?” The FCAT might be used as one data source (a source to measure student learning). However, improved FCAT performance should not be considered as the desired change in student learning. What specific knowledge or skill is being targeted for change? An example focusing on student learning is, “How will modeling and providing practice in research-based metacognitive strategies affect my students’ ability to monitor their comprehension when reading textbooks in content classes?” 2. Be specific and measurable The research question should be specific to student learning and the instructional practice that will be implemented. A research question guides the process of action research, so specificity is important. 3. Be answerable in a reasonable amount of time It’s important to pose a research question that can be studied and answered in a reasonable amount of time. Remember to choose a topic of study that is important and attainable. 4. Cannot be answered with a “yes” or “no” response Avoid formulating a research question that will have a “yes” or “no” answer. Instead, begin the question with words such as “how,” “when,” or “why.” Action research is planned inquiry, so the research question should be worded to foster the inquiry process. An example is, “How can modeling through read-alouds improve students’ abilities to organize, analyze, synthesize, and interpret what they read?” Defining Learner Outcomes When completing the action research plan, think about the goals for student learning. After implementing action research, what growth is expected for each of the students? Establishing high expectations and ambitious goals are important; however, the goals or outcomes must be attainable within a reasonable amount of time. Studying and Developing an Instructional Focus In action research, the instructional practice(s) that the teacher chooses to implement and study with a specific group of students is called the instructional focus. Finding a particular instructional focus may take time, depending on the teacher’s current 32 knowledge and experience working with the identified classroom problem. During this research, teachers study professional literature, attend professional development activities, engage in study groups and coaching, and consult knowledgeable support professionals within the school or district to continuously build upon their knowledge. The practices that are selected as the instructional focus should directly target the identified classroom problem. At times, the instructional focus may be determined at the school or district level. For example, instructional decisions about the purchase and use of a particular research-based program may be made at the school or district level. Identifying Data Collection Sources A very important part of the action research process is data collection. Action researchers continuously collect data to measure whether the instructional practices have had the desired effect. The collected data are going to provide information to answer the research question. Refer to chapter 4 for more in-depth information on data collection and the various sources of data. Determining Level of Support Educators rarely engage in action research without some support from their colleagues, support personnel, educational agencies, or university faculty. When planning action research, think about the needed information, resources, and support. Do you need further professional development? Will you need assistance with data collection and analysis? Could working with a coach provide you with the support that is needed to conduct your action research? Perhaps having opportunities to discuss action research with colleagues will prove to be a necessary support system. Creating an Action Research Plan Activity 4 consists of a planning tool used to structure action research. This action research plan focuses on outlining the “what,” “how,” and “when.” After reflecting and deciding upon the instructional focus, use the action research plan found on page 31 and also in the appendix to create the framework of action research. The planning tool focuses on the following components: research question, learning outcomes, instructional focus, data collection, and support. 33 Activity 4: Action Research Plan Name(s): Mrs. Levine & Ms. Rollins School: ABC Elementary School Grade Level: 3rd Grade Research Question: Pose a question that will focus your study. Be sure to include what student learning will occur and what instructional practices will be implemented. How will incorporating visible prompts and hands-on manipulatives into small group reading instruction affect my students’ ability to hear and record sounds in words? Learning Outcomes: What specific student learning will occur? Danny and Janice will improve their letter/sound correspondence. Danny and Janice will improve their ability to hear and record sounds in words (phonemic awareness and phonics). Instructional Focus: Describe the specific instructional practice(s) that will be implemented and studied. Specify when and how the practices will be implemented. Danny and Janice will receive small group reading instruction following a systematic instructional plan that includes daily word work that will incorporate the following teaching techniques and manipulatives: Providing explicit instruction in developing letter/sound correspondence Building the ability to hear and record sounds in words by incorporating Elkonin Boxes (tokens and letters) and other visible prompts into daily word work Using letter magnets, white boards, shaving cream, chalkboard/water for practicing building and manipulating words Data Collection: Specify the data you will collect that are aligned to the classroom problem. How often will you collect the data? Data Source 1: Letter-Sound Identification Survey, weekly Data Source 2: Phonemic Awareness Survey, bi-weekly (specific sub-tests) Data Source 3: Hearing and Recording Sounds in Words (Writing Samples & Observations), Daily Data Source 4: School-required reading and writing assessments, every 9 weeks Data Sources 1 and 2 are taken from Cool Tools. Refer to appendix for examples of templates. Support: What support will you need from your colleagues? Coaching and guidance from our literacy coach Observe literacy coach model lessons Time to dialogue and analyze classroom data with colleagues and literacy coach (study group) Figure 3.1. Example of Action Research Plan 34 Activity 4: Action Research Plan Name(s): School: Grade Level: Research Question: Pose a question that will focus your study. Be sure to include what student learning will occur and what instructional practices will be implemented. Learning Outcomes: What specific student learning will occur? Instructional Focus: Describe the specific instructional practice(s) that will be implemented and studied. Specify when and how the practices will be implemented. Data Collection: Specify the data that you will collect that are aligned to the classroom problem. How often will you collect the data? Data Source 1: (What & How?) Data Source 2: (What & How?) Data Source 3: (What & How?) Support: What support will you need from your colleagues? 35 Developing an Implementation Schedule The final planning step for this phase is developing an implementation schedule. The implementation schedule lists the tasks to be completed, the beginning and ending dates for each task, and the necessary resources. Essentially, this is a timeline of activities within the phases of action research. The implementation schedule includes the following topics: tasks, timeline, and resources. By completing an implementation schedule, the teacher is breaking down the action research plan into specific tasks, identifying a time line for completing the tasks, and specifying what particular resources (materials, assessments, time, professional development, etc.) are needed to accomplish the specific tasks. Once you have completed the action research plan, take time to outline your specific steps by completing the implementation schedule found on page 33 and also located in the appendix. Activity 5: Implementation Schedule Tasks Timeline Beginning/Ending 9/1 –9/5 Informal assessment surveys Analyze informal assessments 9/8 Time, planning period Consult with literacy coach for developing instructional focus 9/10 Analyzed informal assessments Time, planning period Locate materials for reading instruction 9/12 – 9/15 Curriculum resource teacher, literacy coach, manipulatives, and books Implement instructional focus 9/02 – 2/03 Reading materials, manipulatives, and resources Investigate area of concern by administering informal assessments Monitor students’ learning Resources 9/02 – 2/03 Informal assessments and schooldaily, bi-monthly, and every required assessments nine weeks Time for analysis, planning period Figure 3.2. Example of Implementation Schedule 36 Activity 5: Implementation Schedule Tasks Timeline Beginning/Ending Resources 37 Implementing an Action Research Plan When implementing an action research plan in the classroom, remember three guiding principles for conducting action research. 1. Implement the instructional practices consistently. To maintain the integrity of your action research, it is critical that you remain focused and implement the practices and collect data as described. Follow the plan as written. 2. Implement the instructional practices as they were designed to be implemented. Most teaching strategies have been developed using information gathered from research on their effectiveness. Deviations from guidelines for use of such strategies may affect the results within your classroom. Another way to ensure high-quality implementation in the classroom is to obtain feedback and guidance from a coach or another teacher who is knowledgeable in the specific instructional practice. 3. Monitor student results. Throughout the action research process, monitor student learning to determine if your teaching is making an impact. Data collection is important to determine whether the teaching techniques were effective. In other words, data collection and analysis provide the answer to the research question. Summary Creating a framework for action research by using an action research plan and implementation schedule is helpful for teachers because it provides a focus for effective implementation. To measure the effectiveness of implementation, teachers engage in the third phase of the action research process, data collection and analysis. Chapter 4 focuses on how to choose specific data collection strategies aligned to the teacher’s instructional focus. Descriptions and examples of a variety of data collection tools are provided. 38 Chapter 3: Developing and Implementing an Action Research Plan Take several minutes to reflect upon and answer the following questions. Summary Questions Name and describe four characteristics of a good research question. What topics are included in an action research plan? What are the three guiding principles for implementing action research? Reflection Questions When you begin implementing your action research plan, what strategies or resources can help you remain focused and follow-through with your plan of action? 39 40 Chapter 4 Collecting and Analyzing Data “Gathering evidence of student learning is a primary function of teaching.” ~National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) “Data provide the power to…make good decisions, work intelligently, work effectively and efficiently, change things in better ways, know the impact of our hard work, help us prepare for the future, and know how to make our work benefit all children.” ~Victoria L. Bernhardt Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Curriculum, instruction, and assessment are integral Chapter Outcomes and interrelated components of the teaching and action research processes. Action researchers must Define the term and be knowledgeable of and be able to articulate importance of classroom expectations in relation to the curriculum triangulation. standards and the individual needs of the students in List questions to consider the classroom. The curriculum standards include when determining data the content to be learned by the students in the collection strategies for class. The instructional focus is the instructional individual action research. practices and materials used by the teacher to teach Name and describe curricular expectations. Assessment provides the various data collection data needed to answer the critical question: “Are my sources for monitoring students learning and meeting the curricular student learning related to goals?” The action researcher uses the evidence action research. collected from assessments to make instructional decisions. Based on my evidence, do I continue implementing the instructional focus? Do I modify my instructional focus to better meet the needs of my students? Does the evidence suggest that the practice is not making an impact and will I study and implement another approach? The information received from data collection will guide the action research process and instruction in the classroom. 41 How to Gather Evidence on Student Learning “Using a variety of assessment tools and approaches gives us more confidence that decisions are based on accurate evidence.” ~NCTM In order to build a complete picture of students’ learning and abilities, data should be gathered from many sources of information. This more complete picture allows us to understand students’ learning process and measure the impact of instruction. Using only one form of assessment can be misleading because it is a snapshot of the student’s ability on a particular day and time. Evidence gathered from many different sources over a period of time provides a broader and deeper understanding of students’ knowledge and learning. In research terminology, the process of collecting multiple sources of data for every problem (phenomenon) or issue being studied is called triangulation (Sagor, 1992). Triangulating data may seem time consuming and overwhelming at first, but it provides a depth of information about student performance. When choosing assessment tools for data collection, refer to the following guidelines about assessment. NCTM (2001) stated that to be useful, assessments should match what students have been studying focus on important content rather than trivia yield useful information, not just “scores” use clear and helpful criteria provide a complete picture of students’ learning and abilities. Identifying Useful Sources of Classroom Data “Schools are naturally data-rich environments, and simply opening our eyes to some of the most frequently used and easily obtainable sources of data can make planning the data collection process much easier.” ~Sagor, 1994 Meaningful action research should not depart from the daily work of classroom teachers, but become a part of their daily work. Hence, selecting the data collection strategies to use for study simply means thinking about life in the classroom/school and the ways life in the classroom/school can be naturally captured as data (Dana & Yendol-Silva, 2003). When conducting action research, teachers are continuously gathering and using data from their classrooms throughout each phase of the process. When considering data collection strategies, think about what assessments are already in place in the classroom and school. Before deciding on the specific tools, reflect on the following questions: What are three different sources of data that I can collect? What information do I need to collect to measure student learning aligned to my instructional focus? What data collection sources will provide me with the needed information? Are the data collection sources easy to administer, gather, and analyze? 42 Classroom Data Collection Tools 1. Observations Observations are a form of assessment used when teachers observe students and record the behaviors or actions seen in a qualitative (written) or quantitative (numerical) form. Taking notes on observations is a very common data collection approach. To document observations, it is helpful to record the observation in an organized manner. Formats include checklists, anecdotal records, and grids/charts. When planning an observation, NCTM (2003) suggests the following tips to ensure that observations are manageable and useful: Determine what to assess. Decide which students to observe. Decide how to record the information. Plan activities for students to perform during the observation process. Checklists Checklists are an efficient way to record observations of student learning related to specific objectives. When creating checklists, specify the event and tasks to check-off during an observation. When observing student performance, mark the checklist with notations that reflect whether the student was able to perform the specific objective(s). Add brief notes, if applicable. Checklists can be used with an individual student, small group, or whole class. Example Date: November 15, 2003 Rhyme Identification Rhyme Production Carlos + + Susan + -inconsistent + -inconsistent, 2/5 Danny Anecdotal Records Anecdotal records are written narratives of teacher observations of their students. Teachers record their important observations to note student progress or for informing instruction. Anecdotal notes become very useful tools for reflecting on children’s progress within a given time span (Harp, 2000). Anecdotal records can be documented in several ways, such as on note cards, notebook paper, computer, and charts. 43 Example: November 15, 2003 During a read aloud with the focus on rhyming, Susan and Danny were demonstrating difficulty with producing rhymes. Both were able to identify rhyming pairs at an independent level without any support. Chart/Grids Charts and grids can be used with individual students, small groups, or the whole-class. They are efficient tools for noting observations on student performance. Brief notations are recorded on student performance related to a specific objective. Example: Chart Name: Susan Date 11/15/03 Anecdote Susan was able to identify rhyming pairs, but demonstrated difficulty with producing rhymes. Action Model and scaffold in the areas of rhyme production. Example: Grid Date: 11/15/03 Objective: Rhyme production Name: Susan 0/2 “cat” “dog” “sit” “down” Name: Danny 2/2 Name: Carlos 3/3 Name: Isabel 2/2 Name: Jason 0/2 no response Name: Jordan 2/2 Name: Marquis 2/2 Name: Kelly 2/2 2. Interviews and Conversations Questioning and listening to students can provide helpful information regarding students’ perceptions of their own learning and knowledge. An informal interview is a question and answer session conducted by the teacher with an individual student. Harp (2000) stated that interviews conducted during conferences can give teachers a great deal of insight into students’ thinking. He further suggested that questioning and engaging in 44 conversation with students as they are working on a specific task will provide rich data on the student’s immediate work. When interviewing or conversing with students, ask questions in an open-ended format to elicit responses other than “yes” or “no.” For example, “What do you do when you have difficulty understanding what you read?” Asking students questions regarding rationale and procedures enlists more active engagement of the students. The purpose of collecting data is to monitor students’ learning related to the identified goal(s) for improvement. Write students’ answers on an interview question sheet or on a chart/grid for documentation. Example Reading at Home Interview Name: Date: 1. How many minutes a day do you spend reading books at home? 2. When is your favorite time to read? 3. What is your favorite book to read? What is your favorite topic to read about? 4. What was the last book that you read? 5. When do your parents read to you at home? 6. How does reading make you feel? 3. Student Work Examples of student work can be a powerful source of data for action researchers. Student work may include writing samples, journals, homework assignments, reports, math performance tasks, and artwork. Two specific assessment techniques that evaluate student work are portfolios and rubrics. A portfolio is a data collection approach that involves collecting and analyzing individual student work over a period of time. The samples of work may be organized in a binder, notebook, or other container. Samples of work may include the following (Harp 2000): 45 Reading o Copies of reading assessments o Reading log o Reading journal o Anecdotal records o Audiotape of student’s reading Writing o Essays, reports, stories, letters, projects, poetry o Finished pieces that illustrate ability to write in various genres o Several drafts of a piece and a final version o Pieces that illustrate a particular skill, such as staying on topic or providing supportive details. Wiggins (1998) defines rubrics as a set of scoring guidelines for evaluating students’ work. The guidelines consist of scales that define levels of performance for specific tasks. Educators use rubrics to assess students’ performance based on a set of standards that communicate high, average, and low quality work. Rubrics may include general or specific information, depending on the purpose. General rubrics describe the criteria of successful work in general terms and can be applied to a variety of tasks or problems. Specific rubrics reflect the same criteria as general rubrics do, but they include much more detail about specific tasks rather than sets of tasks (NCTM, 2003). It is recommended to share rubrics with students before they are assessed, so they are aware of the expectations and current performance of the critical skills assessed and recorded on the rubric. Performance data can be collected over time to continuously monitor student performance. For example, rubrics developed to assess writing are aligned to the writing process. By collecting student writing samples and evaluating the samples using the same standards-based rubric, important data can be analyzed. This provides excellent information about student learning related to writing. 46 Add Writing Rubric, Saved On Publisher. 47 4. Grades, Report Cards, Cumulative Records Emily Calhoun (1994) refers to grades, report cards, and cumulative records as existing archival sources of data. These existing archives provide a history of students’ learning and schooling and measure their progress as new documents become available. Within these school and teacher files are student grades, discipline referrals, standardized test reports, past work samples, etc. 5. Tests Criterion-referenced tests are a common source of data used in classrooms and schools on a continuous basis. The criterion-referenced test is a format used frequently to measure student learning related to a particular objective or criterion. Test items frequently sample sequential skills, enabling a teacher to not only know the specific point at which to begin instruction but also to plan those instructional aspects that follow directly in the curricular sequence (Salvia & Ysseldyke, 1998). Pre- and post-curriculum based tests (e.g., spelling tests, oral reading fluency tests) are often used by teachers to assess student learning. Some examples of criterion-referenced tests include teacher-made tests, published tests, and curriculum-based assessments. Refer to the templates in the appendix found on page 74. These templates are from a Project CENTRAL resource called Cool Tools, a series of informal elementary reading assessments that can be downloaded free from http://reach.ucf.edu/~CENTRAL. Assessment Quality Control In order to assure credible classroom action research results, it is very important that the data collected be of high quality. Here are questions to address about data assessment: Do the assessment instruments and methods selected measure what you want to measure (validity)? Are the assessment instruments and methods selected easy to administer and score consistently (reliability)? Are the data collected from several sources, convincing, and thorough (triangulation)? Analyzing Classroom Data After collecting several sources of data, it is important to take time to analyze the information. Geoffrey E. Mills (2003) defined data analysis as an attempt by the teacher researcher to summarize the data that have been collected in a dependable, accurate, reliable, and correct manner. Data analysis provides the teacher with critical information needed to make further instructional decisions. When analyzing the data, refer to the action research question. Do the collected data answer the research question? When analyzing each source, look for central themes across the data and create a list of findings. A visual display can be a useful organizational tool when sorting and displaying the findings. For example, Richard Sagor (1992) created a data matrix for data sorting that consists of a table or matrix divided into themes and data sources. As the action researcher reviews the data, he or she summarizes important details and inputs the findings under specific themes. Refer to figure 4.1 for an example. 48 Data Matrix Research Question: How will incorporating visible prompts and hands-on manipulatives into small group reading instruction affect my students’ ability to hear and record sounds in words? Data Sources Central Themes Phonemic awareness Letter-sound correspondence Word building Independence -Danny identified all letters of the English alphabet. Letter-sound identification surveys -Janice identified 50 out of 52 (lower and uppercase) letters of the English alphabet. She substituted /b/ for /d/ and /d/ for /b/. -When shown a letter, Danny and Janice produced all consonant sounds accurately. -When shown a letter, Danny and Janice produced all vowel sounds inaccurately except /a/. Phonemic awareness surveys -Danny improved his ability to blend and segment phonemes orally. Blending: 10/10 Segmenting: 8/10 -Janice improved her ability to blend and segment phonemes orally. Blending: 10/10 Segmenting: 10/10 49 Data Sources Observations Central Themes Phonemic Awareness Letter-sound correspondence Word building Independence -Through the use of Elkonin boxes and tokens, Danny and Janice demonstrated their ability to hear sounds (phonemes) in words sequentially. -Danny and Janice made significant improvements. Both were able to identify letter names and produce the appropriate sounds (consonants) by using alphabet charts and magnetic letters. Both students are inconsistent with their vowel sounds. -Through the use of Elkonin boxes, magnetic letters, and whiteboards, Danny and Janice demonstrated the ability to hear and record sounds in words with 3-4 sounds (CVC and CVCC). - Both recorded sounds in a sequential manner. - Both students are showing inconsistencies with vowel sounds. -During writing, Danny and Janice transferred the new knowledge into their writing as they are saying words slowly and recording what they hear. Danny and Janice demonstrated the ability to build words with 3 to 4 sounds. -Danny and Janice’s teachers reported that both students are writing independently in class with minimal support. Writing Samples Danny and Janice demonstrated the ability to hear sounds in words in a sequential manner. Writing samples demonstrated a significant improvement in letter/sound correspondence. Danny and Janice can write messages and simple stories independently. They do need support with gradelevel assignments. Figure 4.1. Example of Data Matrix Adapted from Sagor, 1992 After sorting the multiple sources of data and displaying the findings visually, teachers use this information to make instructional decisions. Teachers look for evidence of improved student learning related to the action research question. Areas of need may also be evident, which can help the teacher decide on the next step. Refer to the example on page 46. 50 Example of evidence of improved student learning: Student PA Letter Sound Word building Writing Danny Through the use of Elkonin boxes and tokens, Danny demonstrated his ability to hear sounds (phonemes) in words sequentially. Danny identified letter names and produced the appropriate sounds (consonants) by using alphabet charts and magnetic letters. Danny demonstrated the ability to hear and record sounds in words with 3-4 sounds (CVC). During writing, Danny transferred the new knowledge into his writing as he said words slowly and recorded what he heard. Janice Through the use of Elkonin boxes and tokens, Janice demonstrated her ability to hear sounds (phonemes) in words sequentially. Janice identified letter names and produced the appropriate sounds (consonants) by using alphabet charts and magnetic letters. Janice demonstrated the ability to hear and record sounds in words with 3-4 sounds (CVC). Janice transferred the new knowledge into her writing as she said words slowly and recorded what she heard. Letter Sound Word building Writing Danny Danny is inconsistent with his vowel sounds. Vowels, word building beyond 3 to 4 phonemes into multi-syllabic words. Janice Janice substituted /b/ for /d/ and /d/ for /b/. Janice is also inconsistent with her vowel sounds. Example of areas in need for improvement: Student PA Summary Once the results have been determined, the next step is to use the analyzed data to make instructional decisions. The last phase of the action research process is using and sharing results. Chapter 5 will describe how to use the analyzed data to make instructional decisions and guide the teacher’s next step of the action research process. 51 Chapter 4: Collecting and Analyzing Data Take several minutes to reflect upon and answer the following questions. Summary Questions Why is triangulating data important in the process of action research? What should teachers consider when selecting data collection strategies to measure student learning related to their action research? Name and describe various data collection sources for monitoring student learning related to action research. Reflection Questions How will you measure student learning related to your instructional focus? How will you triangulate your data? 52 Chapter 5 Making Instructional Decisions and Sharing the Results “People without information cannot act. People with information cannot help but act.” ~Ken Blanchard Determining Next Steps After planning, teaching, and collecting data, it is very important to follow through by analyzing the results of the action research and making instructional decisions based on the findings. Analyzed data will guide this critical question in the action research process, “Where do I go next?” In the process of action research, analyzed data will determine whether to continue with current practices, revise the action research plan, or report the results of successes. Chapter Outcomes Name and describe the three options for making instructional decisions about action research using analyzed data. Describe ways to share action research results List components of an action research report. In order to determine the next step, think about and answer the following questions: Are students benefiting from the instructional focus I have planned and implemented? Was the classroom problem solved? Did the instructional focus align to my students’ needs? Were all of the phases of the action research process followed? Was the plan completed as written (with the materials and time dedicated as outlined in the implementation schedule)? Were all the necessary materials (personnel and resources) available? Did I receive the support I need? Did the information (data) collected from the students provide the necessary evidence about the results of the efforts to solve the problem? If teachers can answer “yes” to the questions above and have strong evidence of student learning resulting in meeting the stated goal(s) for improvement, the teachers are ready to share results and identify the next classroom problem for study. If the teachers cannot answer “yes”, the findings may lead to two choices: continue to implement the plan or revise the action research plan. 53 Continue with the action research plan When considering this choice, think about the instructional practices that are being implemented to solve the identified classroom problem. Are students making progress with the current instructional focus? If so, have the students met the instructional expectations? Students may be progressing, but the goal(s) for improvement have not yet been met. At this time, the teacher may choose to continue with the instructional focus without altering the action research plan. School schedules and unexpected circumstances may also cause an interruption in the implementation of the action research study. When an interruption has occurred, teachers should revisit their implementation schedule to refocus and continue with their initial plans of action. Revise the action research plan Many factors may lead to this choice. If student learning is questionable, the teacher should consider if the classroom problem was identified correctly. Collaborating with a knowledgeable colleague or resource at this time may help re-identify the classroom problem, if needed. Another action that may need to take place is to revise the instructional focus. Are students benefiting from instruction? It’s important to reflect on the instructional practices and analyze the collected data to determine if students are learning. The instructional focus may be impacting students to some degree. Perhaps intensifying the instruction will result in increased improvements. Trying another instructional approach could also be an option. Again, collaborating with a coach, mentor, teacher, or support personnel may prove to be helpful at this time to determine the next instructional steps. Sharing and Reporting Results Once students meet the instructional goals identified on the action research plan or there is a need to communicate student performance, it is time to share and report results. Results can be reported in a variety of formats, depending on the audience and purpose of the reporting. Here are some options: Individual reporting in student folders, files, portfolios, and other student records. This is probably the most common way results are reported within schools. Teachers complete an accurate report of the individual student’s level of achievement of specific curricular goals. Data collected through the classroom action research process are easily reported through school, district, and state accountability reporting systems. This is why it is so important to align action research to curricular goals. Graphic representations of results. Presentation of data must be clear and meaningful. Whether the audience is the individual student or the district school board, charts, graphs, tables, and target lines describe the findings in a clear fashion. Confidentiality must be protected, so that no individual student is identified. Computer-assisted software for analyzing, graphing, and charting data is readily available. 54 Written reports and professional articles. Credibly completed action research continues to advance knowledge within the teaching profession. Reporting research disseminates important findings and advances the practice of education (Sagor, 1992). As classroom teachers who have designed research plans, implemented them, and collected student products (data) to determine their effectiveness, who better than teachers to tell the story through a report or professional article? Teachers learn from others who have actually implemented particular strategies and have the student results to show for it. The action research plan and its implementation plan can be outlined in the elements shown on the template Sharing the Results: A Format for Reporting Action Research (activity 6). Refer to page 52. Discussions and presentations with teachers. A very effective strategy for disseminating action research results is the use of table discussions with other educators from your grade level, team, or school. This is an excellent way to discuss real issues at the school site, as well as to provide personal professional development directly related to educational issues identified at the school. When presenting this information, set aside insights and encourage group members to give their perspectives. Report only on the expectations for the research study and present some of the data collected. Again, tables, charts, and graphs may be effective tools. Specific questions to facilitate dialogue include the following: o Do you think that what I believe occurred is what really happened? o As you look at the data, do you think any unplanned results occurred? o In what ways do you think the quality of education for my students improved during this study? o What might be the next steps? Summary Of course, the most important evaluation, reflection, and decision-making is done by the teacher researcher. The results of the carefully planned and conducted classroom research will provide the teacher with the new knowledge needed to make informed decisions about what to teach and how to teach it. Once the data are compiled, analyzed, shared, and discussed, it is critical for the teacher researcher to reconsider the action research by asking those core questions: How was the quality of education improved for my students? How was my understanding of my teaching changed and improved? The answers to these two questions will lead into the next phase of the cycle of continuous improvement – creating new goals for improvement and plans for action research based on evidence of student learning. As each teacher uses his or her problemsolving abilities to address classroom needs through action research, each student will make learning gains. 55 Chapter 5: Making Instructional Decisions and Sharing the Results Take several minutes to reflect upon and answer the following questions. Summary Questions When making instructional decisions after data analysis, what choices should the teacher consider regarding the action research process? How can teachers share their action research results with students, parents, colleagues, and the educational community? Reflection Questions After reading about the complete cycle of action research, how can engaging in all phases of the action research process impact students’ learning and improve a teacher’s instructional practice? 56 Activity 6: Sharing the Results A Format for Reporting Action Research Title of Action Research Project: Name of Teacher Researcher: Name of School and County: Abstract: Provide a brief summary of your action research report. Topics may include student sample, instructional focus, and data collection and analysis. Classroom Problem: Provide a description of your identified classroom problem. How did you identify the classroom problem? Describe the students who were affected and possible causes of the problem. What were the goals for improvement? Research Process: Provide a detailed description of your research process. What was your research question? What instructional strategies or practices were implemented that were aligned to the classroom problem? Describe your implementation. Data Collection and Analysis: Provide a narrative summary of your collected and analyzed data. If appropriate, include graphs and tables to accompany the narrative summary. Include templates of your data collection sources as well as student work samples. Taking Action: Provide a summary of your decisions based on your analyzed data. What are your next steps? Do you need to continue your action research using the same procedures? Do you need to revise your action research procedures? How? Were you satisfied with your results and ready to investigate new concerns? Professional Reflection: What did you learn through this process? How did conducting action research impact your teaching? 57 Activity 6: Sharing the Results A Format for Reporting Action Research Example Developing Beginning Reading and Writing of Struggling Readers Mrs. Levine and Ms. Rollins ABC Elementary School Stone County Public Schools Abstract Two third grade students with specific learning disabilities and language impairments participated in a nine-month action research study focusing on improving their abilities to hear and record sounds in words (phonemic awareness and phonics). In addition to their regular reading instruction, Students A and B received explicit small group instruction following a systematic instructional plan that included daily word work that incorporated the following teaching techniques: providing explicit instruction in developing letter/sound correspondence, building the ability to hear and record sounds in words through the use of Elkonin boxes and other visible prompts, using manipulatives (letter magnets) during daily practice, and connecting reading to writing. Collected and analyzed data indicated significant growth in the areas of phonemic awareness, letter/sound correspondence, word building and decoding, and a sense of independence. Classroom Problem Two third grade students with specific learning disabilities and language impairments were having difficulties learning to read and write. They entered third grade reading at the pre-primer level and consistently scored a Level 1 on their writing rubrics. After further investigation, we found that Student A and Student B had poor letter/sound correspondence and weak phonemic awareness. In addition, they were unable to work independently and avoided reading and writing activities. Our goal for these two students was to improve their ability to hear and record sounds in words (phonemic awareness and phonics). In addition to their regular reading and writing instruction, Student A and Student B received small group instruction geared to meeting their goal for improvement. Research Process “How will incorporating visible prompts and hands-on manipulatives into small group reading instruction affect my students’ ability to hear and record sounds (phonemic awareness and phonics) in words?” was the research question studied. Students A and B received daily small group reading instruction with the addition of explicit word work incorporating Elkonin boxes and various manipulatives (tokens, magnetic letters, white boards, etc.) to scaffold and develop their phonemic awareness and letter/sound correspondence. 58 Content followed a systematic instructional plan, always with the goal of connecting reading and writing. Students began their sessions with phonemic awareness exercises focusing on segmenting and blending using Elkonin boxes and tokens. Physical manipulation of tokens provided concreteness to the exercise, which was needed due to their language impairments and processing difficulties. Following phonemic awareness instruction, physical representations of sounds were introduced through the same process. Students then practiced decoding and writing words used during word work. Students received small group instruction daily for 45 minutes in addition to their regular reading instruction. Data Collection and Analysis Qualitative and quantitative data sources were collected during this study. I, the ESE teacher, collected the majority of the data in small group instruction. The data collection sources that were collected through our action research process were as follows: letter/sound identification surveys phonemic awareness surveys writing samples observations school-required reading and writing assessments. The letter/sound identification and phonemic awareness surveys were collected weekly and bi-weekly. To measure our students’ ability to hear and record sounds in words, we collected data through observations and writing samples on a daily basis. Schoolrequired reading and writing assessments were administered every nine weeks. The letter/sound identification surveys indicated significant growth in students’ understanding of letter/sound correspondence, showing 100% accuracy by the end of the study. Letter/Sound Correspondence (Upper and lowercase letters) Student A Student B 9/3/01 10/1/01 3/52 28/52 8/52 35/52 (Examples from weekly assessment scores.) 11/5/01 52/52 52/52 Phonemic awareness surveys showed that the students improved their phonemic awareness (blending and segmenting) and were able to hear sounds (phonemes) in words sequentially. 59 Phonemic Awareness Surveys (Blending) Student A Student B 9/10/01 10/8/01 0/10 8/10 3/10 10/10 (Examples from bi-weekly assessment scores.) 11/12/01 10/10 10/10 Phonemic Awareness Surveys (Segmenting) 11/15/01 0/10 Student A 3/10 Student B (Examples from bi-weekly assessment scores.) 12/3/01 8/10 10/10 The findings from our observations and work samples showed that Students A and B heard and recorded sounds in words with minimal support from their teachers. In addition, they used the same strategies when decoding words in reading. September 2001 Writing Samples (Data gathered before instructional focus was implemented.) Student A: Writing Sample 1 The writing prompt focused on telling a story about the student’s family. He drew a picture of his family, but was unable to write a story. Student A: Writing Sample 2 The student wrote about his pet turtle. The teacher transcribed his story after the student read it aloud. “I have a pet turtle.” 60 February 2002 Writing Sample Writing Sample 3 Student A wrote a story about catching a shark. At this time, he was able to say words slowly and record the sounds that he heard. In addition, he started finding words he didn’t know how to spell by locating them in his reading books or on the word wall. 61 Student B (Observations of Writing) (Data gathered before instructional focus was implemented.) 9/3/01, Language Arts Activity: Writing in Journal Student B wrote, “I love my pig. My pig is fun. I like to play. My pig like to play. I love my pig.” After writing her message, she began to draw a picture of a pig playing in a park. 9/5/01, Language Arts Activity: Writing Prompt (Topic: Family) Student B wrote, “My pig is fun. I love to play and I love my pig. I love my pig. My pig is fun.” When Student B was asked to write about her family, she said, “No, I want to write about a pig.” Student B (Summary of Observations) 3/2002 Student B is now writing more independently than at the beginning of the year. She developed a larger repertoire of sight words, which made writing an easier task. Her ability to hear and record sounds in words has improved, as she is now using strategies independently in her writing and decoding. The students’ teachers reported they are working more independently in the classroom (using appropriate ability-level materials) and willingly participating in reading and writing. Taking Action Both students made significant improvements in their ability to hear and record sounds in words, which resulted in improvements in their reading and writing. However, we will continue with our same instructional focus, targeting more complex word patterns and alphabetic principles. In addition, another instructional goal is to increase their repertoire of sight words in context. Professional Reflection Conducting action research was a very empowering process for both of us. Triangulating our data in the beginning of this cycle pinpointed specific learning needs in these two third graders. We believe that triangulating student data is extremely important because the information gathered provided a clearer picture of our students’ abilities. Our 62 instruction was aligned to their learning needs and we now see the impact of our instruction, which is powerful. Throughout this process, we learned the importance of scaffolding students’ learning. Working with two third graders who were unable to read and write was very challenging. Our literacy coach modeled how to scaffold their learning and we began using teaching techniques that provided our students with the needed support. We found that the students began taking risks in their learning when they felt supported in their learning. 63 64 Appendix Anticipation Guide Activity 1: Action Research Rationale Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process: Investigating Classroom Concerns Activity 3: Identifying a Classroom Problem Activity 4: Action Research Plan Activity 5: Implementation Schedule Activity 6: Sharing the Results Observational Checklist Anecdotal Records Individual Student Observational Chart Classroom Grid: Whole Class Reading at Home Interview Reading and Writing Interview Writing Rubric Templates from Cool Tools, Informal Reading Assessments Activity 6: Sharing the Results 65 66 Anticipation Guide An anticipation guide is a series of statements connected to a certain text. The use of an anticipation guide can activate prior knowledge and allow the reader to make predictions about the text. Directions: Each of the following statements is connected to the content in this guide. After reading, specify whether you agree or disagree with each statement by circling your answer. In addition, provide an explanation of your opinion if you have a made a shift in your thinking. Statements 1. Educators should follow the steps of action research in a linear fashion. Explanation: Agree or Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree 3. In order to get the maximum benefits from action research, educators should have a working knowledge of statistics. Explanation: Agree Disagree 4. An educator has completed the action research process once all steps have been implemented. Explanation: Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree 2. One piece of data can provide teachers with enough information needed to identify the specific needs of a particular student or group of students. Explanation: 5. Most educators participate in action research to some degree. Explanation: 6. Because action research involves the collection of data, it alleviates the need for educators to make educated guesses regarding student learning. Explanation: 7. Engaging in action research allows educators to assess and reflect on the effectiveness for their teaching practices. Explanation: Adapted from FLaRE Action Research Module (Kelly & Rawlinson, 2003) 67 68 Activity 1: Action Research Rationale Why Conduct Action Research? Take a moment and reflect on why you should conduct action research. What are the benefits of action research to teachers and students? How could participating in this model of professional development impact your professional practice? Do you have concerns about conducting action research in your classroom? Use this space to record your personal reflections. 69 70 Activity 2: Beginning the Action Research Process Investigating Classroom Concerns Reflect on and complete the following open-ended probes to assist you in investigating your initial concerns and identifying a classroom problem or area of change. Name: Currently in my classroom, I am concerned about In order to investigate my concern, I need to collect information on I will gather this information by collecting the following data After analyzing my data, I found that my students are having difficulties with To meet my students’ needs, I need to focus my instruction on 71 72 Activity 3: Identifying a Classroom Problem Name(s): School: Grade Level: Problem Statement: Compose a problem statement specifically describing who is affected, supported causes of the problem, the goal for improvement, and what might be done about the problem. (Provide as much specific information as possible.) 73 74 Activity 4: Action Research Plan Name(s): School: Grade Level: Research Question: Pose a question that will focus your study. Be sure to include what student learning will occur and what instructional practices will be implemented. Learning Outcomes: What specific student learning will occur? Instructional Focus: Describe the specific instructional practice(s) that will be implemented and studied. Specify when and how the practice(s) will be implemented. Data Collection: Specify the data you will collect that are aligned to the classroom problem. Describe how often you will collect the data? Data Source 1: (What & How?) Data Source 2: (What & How?) Data Source 3: (What & How?) Support: What support will you need from your colleagues? 75 Activity 5: Implementation Schedule Tasks Timeline Beginning/Ending Resources 76 77 Activity 6: Sharing the Results A Format for Reporting Action Research Title of Action Research Project: Name of Teacher Researcher: Name of School and County: Abstract: Provide a brief summary of your action research report. Topics may include student sample, instructional focus, and data collection and analysis. Classroom Problem: Provide a description of your identified classroom problem. How did you identify the classroom problem? Describe the students who were affected and possible causes of the problem. What were the goals for improvement? Research Process: Provide a detailed description of your research process. What was your research question? What instructional strategies or practices were implemented that were aligned to the classroom problem? Describe your implementation. Data Collection and Analysis: Provide a narrative summary of your collected and analyzed data. If appropriate, include graphs and tables to accompany the narrative summary. Include templates of your data collection sources as well as student work samples. Taking Action: Provide a summary of your decisions based on your analyzed data. What are your next steps? Do you need to continue your action research using the same procedures? Do you need to revise your action research procedures? How? Were you satisfied with your results and ready to investigate new concerns? Professional Reflection: What did you learn through this process? How did conducting action research impact your teaching? 78 79 Observation Checklist Objective Date Student Names 80 81 Observations: Anecdotal Records Date: Date: Date: Date: 82 83 Observations: Chart Individual Name: Date Anecdote Action 84 85 Observations: Grid Small Group or Class Date: Objective: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: 86 87 Reading at Home Interview Name: Date: 1. How many minutes a day do you spend reading books at home? 2. When is your favorite time to read? 3. What is your favorite book to read? What is your favorite topic to read about? 4. What was the last book that you read? 5. When do your parents read to you at home? 6. How does reading make you feel? 88 89 Reading and Writing Interview Name: Date: 1. How would you explain what reading is to someone else? 2. What do you like the most about reading? 3. What is your least favorite thing about reading? 4. How would explain what writing is to someone else? 5. What do you like the most about writing? 6. What is your least favorite thing about writing? Taken from The Handbook of Literacy Assessment and Evaluation Bill Harp 90 91 Insert Writing Rubric 92 93 COOL TOOLS Informal Reading Assessments PREFACE Given the national and state goal to have every child reading on grade level by grade 3 (No Child Left Behind Act, Reading First, and Just Read, Florida!) and the significant number of children struggling with learning to read, educators are in need of readily available, scientifically based reading instruction resources to help meet this need. Project CENTRAL is pleased to offer COOL TOOLS - Informal Reading Assessments for classroom educators. This product was developed as a companion to Knowing What Works – Action Research, also created by Project CENTRAL and designed to serve classroom teachers’ needs for informal, sequential measures of student’s reading abilities across the five areas of reading instruction identified by the 2000 report of the National Reading Panel: phonological awareness phonics fluency vocabulary text comprehension. The National Reading Panel’s research findings and conclusions have been summarized in the document Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read - Kindergarten through Third Grade. This document was a collaborative effort between the National Institute for Literacy, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the U.S. Department of Education to create a guide for teachers written by teachers that explores the specific strategies and skills needed to successfully teach children to read. Put Reading First should be considered a companion to this manual. You can download Put Reading First from the National Institute for Literacy website at www.nifl.gov or find the direct pdf file at: http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/Cierra.pdf . As a part of the No Child Left Behind Act, Reading First defines reading as a complex system of deriving meaning from print that requires skills and knowledge to understand how phonemes, or speech sounds, are connected to print, the ability to decode unfamiliar words, the ability to read fluently, sufficient background information and vocabulary to foster reading comprehension, the development of appropriate active strategies to construct meaning from print, and development and maintenance of a motivation to read. (Part B, Subpart 1, Reading First, of Title 1, of Public Law 107-110 (2001), pp. 204-205.) Just Read, Florida! has proposed the following formula to express the larger meaning of the above stated research: 5 + 3 + ii + iii = No Child Left Behind. This refers to the 5 94 components of reading instruction, 3 types of assessment, strategies for initial instruction, and immediate intensive intervention. Just Read, Florida! Formula 5 + 3 + ii + iii 5 Components of Reading Instruction Phonological awareness Phonics Fluency Vocabulary Comprehension 3 Types of Assessment Screening Diagnostic assessments Progress monitoring Strategies for Initial Instruction Grounded in scientifically based reading research (SBRR) and aligned with the Sunshine State Standards Strategies for Immediate Intensive Intervention Identification of students, diagnosis of the nature, Prescription of instruction, Provision of intensive instruction, grounded in SBRR and prescribed in the AIP, and Ongoing progress monitoring and continued support Project CENTRAL offers the following Cool Tools for teachers to use as potential measures of all three types of assessment on an informal level. The data can in turn assist teachers in the planning and delivery of data-based instruction during the action research process. These informal assessments can also be viewed as samples for creating individualized informal assessments based on the specific skill needs of individual students. In schools where students are learning to read as well as reading to learn, administrators and teachers must know how every student is progressing in reading at any given time – not just the students who are having difficulties in reading. Assessments that give a global picture of students’ reading achievement are not sufficient to plan instruction, enrichment, or remediation. (McEwan, 2002). 95 ****Only those templates from Cool Tools are included here that specifically relate to the case study described in this guide. To view the full document, visit Project CENTRAL’s website at http://reach.ucf.edu/~CENTRAL. COOL TOOLS Phonological Awareness – Phoneme Blending Student’s Name: Date: Student’s Score:______________________ MASTERED REMEDIATE Directions: This test should be administered individually to students. The teacher could introduce the test by saying, “I am going to separate the sounds of a word and I want you to tell me what word it is.” Practice Items: Help the student identify how to blend phonemes with the following practice items. Create additional practice items as needed. “/s/ /i/ /t/ is what word? SIT” “/s/ /t/ /o/ /p/ is what word? STOP” Test Items: Read the sounds of a word and allow the student to respond. Mark those items that the student answers correctly. Create additional lists as needed. 1. /m/ /ee/ _____ (me) 2. /b/ /e/ /d/ _____ (bed) 3. /h/ /a/ /t/ _____ (hat) 4. /m/ /u/ /s/ /t/ _____ (must) 5. /sh/ /o/ /p/ _____ (shop) 6. /p/ /l/ /a/ /n/ /t/ _____ (plant) 7. /s/ /t/ /o/ /p/ _____ (stop) 8. /f/ /l/ /ow/ /er/ _____ (flower) 9. /l/ /u/ /n/ /ch/ _____ (lunch) 10. /s/ /t/ /r/ /a/ /n/ /d/ _____ (strand) 96 Number correct _________ Total possible _________ 97 COOL TOOLS Phonological Awareness – Phoneme Segmentation Student’s Name: ___________________________ Date: ________________ Student’s Score: ______________________ MASTERED REMEDIATE Directions: This test should be administered individually to students. The teacher could introduce the test by saying, “I am going to say a word; I want you to tell me all of the sounds that you hear in that word.” Practice Items: Help the student identify how to segment phonemes in a word with the following practice item. Create additional practice items as needed. “DIM, I hear the sounds /d/ /i/ /m/.” Test Items: Read each word and allow the student to respond. Mark those items that the student answers correctly. Create additional lists as needed. 1. in /i/ /n/ _____ (2) 2. at /a/ /t/ _____ (2) 3. name /n/ /ae/ /m/ _____ (3) 4. ship /sh/ /i/ /p/ _____ (3) 5. sock /s/ /o/ /k/ _____ (3) 6. chin /ch/ /i/ /n/ _____ (3) 7. sand /s/ /a/ /n/ /d/ _____ (4) Number correct _________ 98 Total possible _________ (20) 99 COOL TOOLS Fluency – Capital Letter Names Student’s Name: ___________________________ Date: ________________ Student’s Score: ______________________ MASTERED REMEDIATE Directions: This test should be administered individually to students. The teacher could introduce the test by saying, “I want you to tell me some letter names.” Test Items: Present the student with the STUDENT’S COPY of Capital Letters page. Teacher says,“When I say BEGIN, you will have 1 minute to tell me as many letter names as possible. Ready? BEGIN.” Mark those items that the student answers correctly on the TEACHER’S COPY. Create additional probes as needed. 100 101 COOL TOOLS 102 TEACHER’S COPY G J O H P Z M F I W B T C Y T U E X I X L D U Q N E E R M V D N U C H S Y D M J M S L B F K R V K A T U I U X M Q R Z A K B J P R P K O K T C W S Y L N G O E C G D H O 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 103 COOL TOOLS 104 Name:_____________________Score:___________ STUDENT’S COPY G J O H P Z M F I W B T C Y T U E X I X L D U Q N E E R M V D N U C H S Y D M J M S L B F K R V K A T U I U X M Q R Z A K B J P R P K O K T C W S Y L N G O E C G D H O 105 COOL TOOLS 106 Fluency – Lower Case Letter Names Student’s Name:_________________________Date:________________ Student’s Score:______________________ MASTERED REMEDIATE Directions: This test should be administered individually to students. The teacher could introduce the test by saying, “I want you to tell me some letter names.” Test Items: Present the student with the STUDENT’S COPY of Lower Case letters page. Teacher says,“When I say BEGIN, you will have 1 minute to tell me as many letter names as possible. Ready? BEGIN.” Mark those items that the student answers correctly on the TEACHER’S COPY. Create additional probes as needed. 107 COOL TOOLS 108 TEACHER’S COPY r o h p z m i f w t y c g y u e x i x l u d q e r e t r v d n u c h y m h n s m o e b f k r v k t i u v m k b w r z a k b j r k p d t x m i w s y l n g e g c a o h p j 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 109 COOL TOOLS 110 STUDENT’S COPY Name: _____________________ Score: ___________________ r o h p z m i f w t y c g y b f k r v k t i u v m k b w u e x i x l u d q e r e t r v d n u c h y m h n s m o e r z a k b j r k p d t x m i w s y l n g e g c a o h p j 111 COOL TOOLS 112 Fluency – Mixed Sounds Student’s Name: ___________________________ Date: ________________ Student’s Score: ______________________ MASTERED REMEDIATE Directions: This test should be administered individually to students. The teacher could introduce the test by saying, “I want you to tell me some SOUNDS – not letter names.” Test Items: Present the student with the STUDENT’S COPY of the Mixed Sounds page. Teacher says,“When I say BEGIN, you will have 1 minute to tell me as many sounds as possible. Ready? BEGIN.” Mark those items that the student answers correctly on the TEACHER’S COPY. Create additional probes as needed. 113 COOL TOOLS 114 TEACHER’S COPY – MIXED SOUNDS r o h p z m i f w t y c g y u e x i x l u d k e r e t r v d n u c h y m h n s m o e b f k r v k t i u v m k b w r z a k b j r k p d t x m i w s y l n g e g c a o h p j 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 115 116 Name:_____________________Score:___________ COOL TOOLS STUDENT’S COPY r o h p z m i f w t y c g y u e x i x l u d k e r e t r v d n u c h y m h n s m o e b f k r v k t i u v m k b w r z a k b j r k p d t x m i w s y l n g e g c a o h p j 117 Resources Grant Opportunities and Websites Action Research Grants Classroom Action Research Awards: Leading the Way to Literacy Florida Reading Association awards grants up to $500 for research projects conducted by full-time classroom teachers employed in public or private schools in Florida. http://www.flreads.org/Scholarships%20&%20Awards/classroo.htm The NEA Foundation for the Improvement of Education Learning and Leadership Grants http://www.nfie.org/grants.htm Websites Action Research as a Framework for School Improvement South Florida Center for Educators; Florida Atlantic University http://www.coe.fau.edu/sfcel/default.htm Florida Atlantic University’s website for action research as a framework for school improvement offers information about action research in general, as well as projects that are specific to FAU’s region. Action Research Module, John Hopkins University http://www.sitesupport.org/actionresearch/ Developed by John Hopkins University, Baltimore City Public School System, Morgan State University, and the University of Maryland, this site offers innovative teacher training opportunities and professional development modules in this electronic learning community. Action Research Resources http://scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arhome.html A substantial website monitored by Scott Campell University of Australia, this site offers information for beginning researchers as well as an extensive array of links, books, articles, and discussions on theories and methodologies of action research. Action Research: The Education Alliance at Brown University http://www.alliance.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf This link is to an on-line article about action research published by Brown University. It provides an overview of different definitions of action research and the various models. It offers in-depth answers to questions about data collection and the action research process. 118 It also highlights a reflection from a teacher researcher’s first attempt at pursuing action research. An Introductory Guide to Teacher Candidates at Queen’s Univerity: Action Research Who? Why? How? So what? http://educ.queensu.ca/projects/action_research/guide.htm This website offers a quick introductory look at the basics of action research. It helps answer frequently asked questions and addresses concerns about the basic structure of action research. By answering the fundamental questions of who, what, why, where, and how, it gives a good overview for beginning researchers. Links are also provided for other resources and further exploration. Collaborative Action Research Network: University of Anglia http://did.stu.mmu.ac.uk/carn/ The Collaborative Action Research Network (CARN) website is an online network for professional development. Based in the United Kingdom, their aim is to offer support and encouragement to all action research projects (personal, local, national, and international). Educational Action Research, an international journal focusing on educational research and practice. http://www.triangle.co.uk/ear/index.htm This website highlights the journal, Education Action Research, as a resource for those engaged in action research. It is a refereed international journal that publishes a wide range of action research studies and maintains a literature review. Networks: An online journal of teacher research. http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/~ctd/networks/ The website is an online journal for professionals involved in teacher research projects. The site offers archived research projects for review, book reviews, and discussion links for ongoing projects. Teacher Research: George Mason University http://www.gse.gmu.edu/research/tr/index.shtml This website by George Mason University’s Graduate School of Education is an extensive site covering the basics of action research, the steps in the process, and discussion of data analysis and conclusions. It also offers a growing online archive of finished action research projects. 119 References Aitken, N., Glanfield, F., Joyner, N., Midgett, C., Simpson, S., & Thompson, C. (2003). Classroom assessment for school mathematics: Mathematics assessment: A practical handbook for grades k-2. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Allen, C., Ferguson, S. K., Gadd, J., Koch, L. C., Kravin, D., Lambdin, D., & Rasmussen, M. (2001). Classroom assessment for school mathematics: Mathematics assessment: A practical handbook for grades 3-5. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Bernhardt, V. L. (1998). Data analysis for comprehensive school-wide improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Calhoun, E. F. (1994). How to use action research in the self-renewing school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Silva, D. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Florida Literacy and Reading Excellence. (2003). Organizing for school-wide change (6-12) action research. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education Glanz, J. (2003). Action research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers. Harp, B. (2000). The handbook of literacy assessment and evaluation. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers. Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacherresearchers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse. Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B.M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher-researchers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Little, M. (2001). Classroom action research: Improving student outcomes. Florida Educational Leadership, 1, Sept., 2001, 41-44. 120 Little, M. E., & Houston, D. (2003). Research into practice through professional development. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 75-87. Little, M., & Rawlinson, D. (2002). Becoming an action researcher to improve learning in your classroom. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Ruscoe, K. (2003). Cool tools: Informal reading assessments. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1998). Assessment. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Schmuck, R. A. (1997). Practical action research for change. Arlington Heights: IL: IRI SkyLight Training and Publishing. Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-involved classroom assessments. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 121 311612 122 123
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz