The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-Induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September 17 2014 Bruce Schumm Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics T-506 Motivation I: The ILC BeamCal ILC Detector BeamCal: accepts electrons (positrons) scattered between 5 and 50 MRad 2 T-506 Motivation II BeamCal maximum dose ~100 MRad/yr Beam Calorimeter is a sizable: ~2 m2 of sensors. A number of ongoing studies with novel sensoers: GaAs, CVD diamond Are these sensors radiation-hard? Might mainstream Si sensors be of use? (some reasons for optimism…) 3 Departure from NIEL (non-ionizing energy-loss) scaling observed for electron irradiation NIEL e- Energy 2x10-2 0.5 MeV 5x10-2 2 MeV 1x10-1 10 MeV 2x10-1 200 MeV G.P. Summers et al., IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 40, 1372 (1993) Also: for ~50 MRad illumination of 900 MeV electrons, little loss of charge collection seen for wide variety of sensors (S. Dittongo et al., NIM A 530, 110 (2004) But what about the hadronic component of EM shower? 4 Hadronic Processes in EM Showers There seem to be three main processes for generating hadrons in EM showers (all induced by photons): • Nuclear (“giant dipole”) resonances Resonance at 10-20 MeV (~Ecritical) • Photoproduction Threshold seems to be about 200 MeV • Nuclear Compton scattering Threshold at about 10 MeV; resonance at 340 MeV These are largely isotropic; must have most of hadronic component develop near sample 5 2 X0 pre-radiator; introduces a little divergence in shower Sensor sample Not shown: 4 X0 and 8 X0 radiators just before and after sensor Fluence (particles per cm2) Detector Fluence Distribution (per incident e-) For later charge collection measurement, must have ~1cm2 uniformly illuminated area Raster sensor across beam 1.0 2.0 3.0 7 Radius (cm) Dose Rates (Including 1 cm2 Rastering) Mean fluence per incident e- Confirmed with RADFET to within 10% Approximate dose rate: 1.7 Mrad per GeV-nA-Hour Maximum dose rate (10.6 GeV; 10 Hz; 150 pC per pulse; end of 2013): 28 Mrad per hour 8 LCLS and ESA Use pulsed magnets in the beam switchyard to send beam in ESA. Mauro Pivi SLAC, ESTB 2011 Workshop, Page 9 ESTB parameters Parameters ESA Energy 3..5-10.5 (for now) Repetition Rate Up to 10 Hz! Charge per pulse ≤ 0.15 nC 0.25 nC 15 GeV 5 Hz 0.35 nC Energy spread, sE /E 0.02% Bunch length rms 100 mm Emittance rms (gex,gey) (4, 1) 10-6 m-rad Spot size at waist (sx,y) < 10 mm Drift Space available for experimental apparatus Transverse space available for experimental apparatus 60 m 5x5m T506 Doses for Si Diode Sensors “P” = p-type “F” = float zone “N” = n-type “C” = Czochralski 11 Charge Collection Apparatus at SCIPP (UCSC Campus) Sensor + FE ASIC DAQ FPGA with Ethernet 12 Results: NC sensors 13 Results: NF sensors high dose 14 Other T506 Exposures • Two bulk GaAs sensors – – – 5 Mrad 20 Mrad Charge-collection evaluation underway • LCLS Upgrade attachment samples • T506 apparatus/infrastructure can be made available upon request 15 T506 Plans for 2015 • Exposures must be at least 100 Mrad to be of use • Low-energy/low-current running probably not of use • Second kicker-magnet probably solves everything (T506 could make use of frequent high-energy running which is best for it anyway!) 16 T506 Wish List for 2015 • “NC” sensor to 500 Mrad • “NF” sensor to 250+ Mrad • “PF”, “PC” sensors to 100 Mrad • GaAs sensor to 100 Mrad 5 GeV, 0.75 nA ~200 Hrs (20-25 shifts) 13 GeV, 1 nA ~50 Hrs (5-7 shifts) 17 Summary and Conclusions • The 2014 re-configuration of the T506 target has made it trustworthy and easy to use • Running to date has shown promise for performance of “everyday” Si Diode sensors at ILC BeamCal dose rates • With second kicker magnet, ESTB is up to the task of exploring full BeamCal dose rates • T506 target also used for other exposures, including GaAs and LCLS upgrade samples • T506 apparatus can be made available for controlled irradiation studies for any interested 18 user BACKUP 19 Results: NF sensors low dose 20 Results: PC sensors 21 Results: PF sensors 22 Charge Collection Measurement 2.3 MeV e- through sensor into scintillator Median Collected Charge Channel-overthreshold profile Efficiency vs. threshold 23
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz