Introduction to Modeling Fluid Dynamics 1 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Different Kind of Problem • Can be particles, but lots of them • Solve instead on a uniform grid 2 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL No Particles => New State Particle • Mass • Velocity • Position 3 Fluid • Density • Velocity Field • Pressure • Viscosity The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL No Particles => New Equations Navier-Stokes equations for viscous, incompressible liquids. u 0 ut u u u 2 4 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL What goes in must come out Gradient of the velocity field= 0 Conservation of Mass u 0 ut u u u 2 5 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Time derivative Time derivative of velocity field Think acceleration u a t u 0 ut u u u 2 6 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Advection term Field is advected through itself Velocity goes with the flow u 0 ut u u u 2 7 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Diffusion term Kinematic Viscosity times Laplacian of u Differences in Velocity damp out u 0 ut u u u 2 8 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Pressure term Fluid moves from high pressure to low pressure Inversely proportional to fluid density, ρ u 0 ut u u u 2 9 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL External Force Term Can be or represent anythying Used for gravity or to let animator “stir” u 0 ut u u u 2 10 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Navier-Stokes How do we solve these equations? u 0 ut u u u 2 11 1 p f The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Discretizing in space and time • We have differential equations • We need to put them in a form we can compute • Discetization – Finite Difference Method 12 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Discretize in Space Staggered Grid vs Regular X Velocity Y Velocity Pressure 13 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Discretize the operators • Just look them up or derive them with multidimensional Taylor Expansion • Be careful if you used a staggered grid 14 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Example 2D Discetizations Divergence Operator Laplacian Operator 1 -1 0 -1 15 1 1 1 -4 1 1 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Make a linear system It all boils down to Ax=b. x1 b1 ? ? ? x b ? ? 2 2 ? ? d d xn d xn d n xn 16 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Simple Linear System • Exact solution takes O(n3) time where n is number of cells • In 3D k3 cells where k is discretization on each axis • Way too slow O(n9) 17 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Need faster solver • Our matrix is symmetric and positive definite….This means we can use ♦ Conjugate Gradient • Multigrid also an option – better asymptotic, but slower in practice. 18 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Time Integration • Solver gives us time derivative • Use it to update the system state U(t+Δt) U(t) Ut 19 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Discetize in Time • Use some system such as forward Euler. • RK methods are bad because derivatives are expensive • Be careful of timestep 20 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Time/Space relation? • Courant-FriedrichsLewy (CFL) condition • Comes from the advection term 21 x t u The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Now we have a CFD simulator • We can simulate fluid using only the aforementioned parts so far • This would be like Foster & Metaxas first full 3D simulator • What if we want it real-time? 22 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Time for Graphics Hacks • Unconditionally stable advection ♦ Kills the CFL condition • Split the operators ♦ Lets us run simpler solvers • Impose divergence free field ♦ Do as post process 23 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Semi-lagrangian Advection CFL Condition limits speed of information travel forward in time Like backward Euler, what if instead we trace back in time? p(x,t) back-trace 24 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Divergence Free Field • Helmholtz-Hodge Decomposition ♦ Every field can be written as w u q • w is any vector field • u is a divergence free field • q is a scalar field 25 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Helmholtz-Hodge STAM 2003 26 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Divergence Free Field • We have w and we want u w u q w u 2q w 2q • Projection step solves this equation u w q 27 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Ensures Mass Conservation • Applied to field before advection • Applied at the end of a step • Takes the place of first equation in Navier-Stokes 28 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Operator Splitting • We can’t use semi-lagrangian advection with a Poisson solver • We have to solve the problem in phases • Introduces another source of error, first order approximation 29 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Operator Splitting u 0 1 u t u u u p f 2 30 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Operator Splitting 1. Add External Forces 2. Semi-lagrangian advection u u 3. Diffusion solve u u 0 4. Project field 31 f 2 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Operator Splitting u(x,t) u 0 u u W0 W1 f 32 W2 W3 W4 u 2 u(x,t+Δt) The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Various Extensions • Free surface tracking • Inviscid Navier-Stokes • Solid Fluid interaction 33 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Free Surfaces • Level sets ♦ Loses volume ♦ Poor surface detail • Particle-level sets ♦ Still loses volume ♦ Osher, Stanley, & Fedkiw, 2002 • MAC grid ♦ Harlow, F.H. and Welch, J.E., "Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with a Free Surface", The Physics of Fluids 8, 2182-2189 (1965). 34 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Free Surfaces MAC Grid 35 Level Set - + + + + + + + + - 0 + + + + + + + - - 0 + + + + + + - - - + + + + + + - - - - - + + + + - - - - - - + + + - - - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Inviscid Navier-Stokes • Can be run faster • Only 1 Poisson Solve needed • Useful to model smoke and fire ♦ Fedkiw, Stam, Jensen 2001 36 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Solid Fluid Interaction • Long history in CFD • Graphics has many papers on 1 way coupling ♦ Way back to Foster & Metaxas, 1996 • Two way coupling is a new area in past 3-4 years ♦ Carlson 2004 37 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Where to get more info • Simplest way to working fluid simulator (Even has code) ♦ STAM 2003 • Best way to learn enough to be dangerous ♦ CARLSON 2004 38 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL References CARLSON, M., “Rigid, Melting, and Flowing Fluid,” PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Jul. 2004. FEDKIW, R., STAM, J., and JENSEN, H. W., “Visual simulation of smoke,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pp. 15–22, Aug. 2001. FOSTER, N. and METAXAS, D., “Realistic animation of liquids,” Graphical Models and Image Processing, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 471–483, 1996. HARLOW, F.H. and WELCH, J.E., "Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with a Free Surface", The Physics of Fluids 8, 2182-2189 (1965). LOSASSO, F., GIBOU, F., and FEDKIW, R., “Simulating water and smoke with an octree data structure,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 23, pp. 457–462, Aug. 2004. OSHER, STANLEY J. & FEDKIW, R. (2002). Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. SpringerVerlag. STAM, J., “Real-time fluid dynamics for games,” in Proceedings of the Game Developer Conference, Mar. 2003. 39 The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz