Construct Measured Reading Comprehension of Key Ideas and Details Score Point = 4 EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS The student response…. Demonstrates full comprehension of ideas stated explicitly and inferentially by providing an accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with effective and convincing textual evidence. Score Point = 3 MEETS EXPECTATIONS The student response…. Demonstrates comprehension of ideas by providing a mostly accurate analysis with adequate supporting textual evidence. The student response…. Writing Written Expression Writing Knowledge Of Language and Conventions The student response…. Has a strong purpose and develops ideas effectively Clearly states a claim or objective Answers the prompt with thorough reasoning Stays consistently on topic Uses supporting evidence, all of which is convincing and based on the text Demonstrates clarity and fluidity Enables readers to understand the writing with ease Uses specific language that effectively clarifies ideas Correctly uses the conventions of the discipline (Same as three because student has already demonstrated a complete command of the task.) Has a purpose and develops ideas appropriately States a claim or objective Answers the prompt with adequate reasoning Generally stays on topic Uses supporting evidence which is convincing and based on the text Demonstrates clarity Enables readers to understand most of the writing with ease Uses language that helps to clarify ideas Appropriately uses the conventions of the discipline The Student Response…. Demonstrates a complete command of conventions at grade level complexity Includes very few errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage and its meaning is clear *Mechanics are capitalization, punctuation, quotation marks, etc. *Usage is word choice such as vocabulary, metaphors, similes, etc. Score Point = 2 BELOW EXPECTATIONS The student response…. Demonstrates basic comprehension of ideas by providing a generally accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with basic textual evidence. The student response…. Score Point = 1 MEETS MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS Score Point = OFF TOPIC OFF TASK 0 The student response…. Demonstrates limited comprehension of ideas by providing a minimally accurate analysis and supporting the analysis with limited textual evidence. The student response…. Demonstrates no comprehension of ideas by providing inaccurate or no analysis and little to no textual evidence. The student response…. The student response…. Develops ideas that are somewhat appropriate Attempts to state a claim or objective Answers the prompt with some reasoning Stays somewhat on topic Uses some supporting evidence which is based on the text Demonstrates some clarity Enables readers to discern the writer’s purpose, but the content is not always easy to understand Uses some language that helps to clarify ideas Generally uses conventions of the discipline appropriately Minimally develops ideas Ineffectively states a claim or objective Answers the prompt with minimal reasoning Inconsistently stays on topic Uses limited supporting evidence based on the text Demonstrates little clarity Elicits little understanding on the part of the reader Uses language that creates confusion Incorrectly uses the conventions of the discipline. The Student Response…. The Student Response…. Demonstrates some Demonstrates a limited/minimal command of conventions at command of conventions grade level complexity at grade level complexity Includes some errors in Includes errors in mechanics, mechanics, grammar, and grammar, and usage that often usage that interfere with interfere with understanding understanding at times Has a meaning which is Has a meaning which is generally unclear generally clear Is not developed and/or is inappropriate to the task Contains no claim or objective Answers the prompt with no appropriate reasoning Is not on topic Uses little or no supporting evidence from text Is incoherent Loses the reader’s attention Shows little or no knowledge of the conventions of the discipline The Student Response…. Demonstrate little to no understanding of conventions Includes frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage that consistently interfere with understanding Has a meaning which is unclear Construct Measured Writing Written Expression Score Point = 4 EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS Score Point = 3 MEETS EXPECTATIONS Score Point = 2 BELOW EXPECTATIONS The student response…. The student response…. The student response…. Is effectively developed all the time through the use of narrative elements and is consistently appropriate to the prompt/task Is effectively developed most of the time through the use of narrative elements and is generally appropriate to the prompt/task Merges ideas that create a clear purpose, making the composition fairly easy to follow Establishes and maintains a mostly effective style, while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. Merges ideas that create a clear unity of purpose, making the composition easy to follow Establishes and maintains an effective style, attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. Writing Knowledge of Language and Conventions (Same as three because student has already demonstrated a complete command of the task.) The Student Response…. Demonstrates a complete command of conventions at grade level complexity Includes very few errors in mechanics, grammar, and usage, but meaning is clear Is developed with some narrative elements and is somewhat appropriate to the prompt/task Demonstrates some connectivity, clarity or order, making the writer’s progression of ideas usually discernible but not obvious Establishes a style that is somewhat effective, generally attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. The Student Response…. Score Point = 1 MEETS MINIMAL EXPECTATIONS The student response…. Score Point = 0 OFF TOPIC OFF TASK The student response…. Is minimally developed with few Is undeveloped and/or narrative elements and is limited inappropriate to the prompt/ task in its appropriateness to the Is incoherent, unclear and/or prompt/task unorganized Demonstrates limited Establishes an inappropriate connectivity, clarity, and/or style, with little to no awareness order, making the writer’s of the norms of the discipline. progression of ideas somewhat unfocused Establishes a style that has limited effectiveness, with some awareness of the norms of the discipline. The Student Response…. The Student Response…. Demonstrates some Demonstrates a limited/minimal Demonstrates little to no command of conventions at understanding of conventions at understanding of conventions at grade level complexity grade level complexity grade level complexity Includes errors in mechanics, Includes errors in mechanics, Includes frequent errors in grammar, and usage that grammar, and usage that often mechanics, grammar, and usage interfere with understanding interfere with understanding that consistently interfere with at times Has a meaning which is generally understanding Has a meaning which is unclear Has a meaning which is unclear generally clear *Narrative Elements are setting, character, conflict, resolution, theme, point of view, etc. *Narrative style is language chosen to tell the story, including sensory detail and figurative language. *Conventions are spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and grammar. NOTE: The reading dimension is not scored for elicited narrative stories. The elements of coherence, clarity, and cohesion to be assessed are expressed in the grade-level standards 1-4 for writing. Tone is not assessed in grade 6. Per the CCSS, narrative elements in grades 3-5 may include: establishing a situation, organizing a logical event sequence, describing scenes, objects or people, developing characters personalities, and using dialogue as appropriate. In grades 6-8, narrative elements may include, in addition to the grades 3-5 elements, establishing a context, situating events in a time and place, developing a point of view, developing characters’ motives. In grades 9-11, narrative elements may include, in addition to the grades 3-8 elements, outlining step-by-step procedures, creating one or more points of view, and constructing event models of what happened. The elements to be assessed are expressed in grade-level standards 3 for writing. A response is considered unscoreable if it cannot be assigned a score based on the rubric criteria. For unscoreable student responses, one of the following condition codes will be applied. Coded Responses: A=No response B=Response is unintelligible or undecipherable C=Response is not written in English D=Off-topic E=Refusal to respond F=Don’t understand/know * This rubric is subject to further refinement based on research and study.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz