Bell tests with Photons Henry Clausen Photon Bell Tests Outline: Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook EPR-Paradoxon |Ψ = 1 (|HH 2 Alice Bob Collapse + |VV ) + Entanglement contradicts GR: + Emmission Measurement I is influenced by an event (measurement II) outside its backwards lightcone Einstein also did not like the random character of QM • “Every complete theory must assign a value to every element at every physical reality” Image source: http://rqgravity.net/images/paradox/Paradox-7N.gif (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Local hidden variable theory Considerations: • Quantum mechanics might be incomplete • Unknown variables determine outcome of measurements prior to measurement No randomness Locality For entangled photons: • Whether + or - is measured is determined before the measurement Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell‘s theorem “Quantum mechanics cannot arise from a theory of local pre-existing hidden variables” Necessary conditions on theory for Bell’s theorem: Locality Counterfactual definiteness Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Locality No influence of events outside the backwards light cone Counterfactual definiteness A property is assigned to a system at all times independently of whether the measurement is carried out Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Correlation Hidden parameter 𝜆 Observed variables 𝑋 𝜆 , 𝑌 𝜆 ∈ −1,1 • Like polarization of photons Expectation value: 𝐸 𝑋 : = ∫ 𝑋 𝜆 𝜎 𝜆 𝑑𝜆 𝜎 𝜆 is probability measure Correlation: 𝜌 𝑋, 𝑌 : = ∫ 𝑋 𝜆 𝑌 𝜆 𝜎(𝜆)𝑑𝜆 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Correlation 𝑅 +𝑅 −𝑅 −𝑅 Correlation: 𝜌 𝑋, 𝑌 = ++ −− +− −+ 𝑅++ +𝑅−− +𝑅+− −𝑅−+ 𝑅∎∎ =measurement rate … Antiparallel Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3 Pair 4 + Alice + - + + + + Bob - + - - +1 +1 Correlation -1 -1 -1 -1 Parallel Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3 Pair 4 Alice + - + Bob + - Correlation +1 +1 +1 Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell%27s_theorem.svg (18.05.2013) … -1 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Correlation 𝐴, 𝐵 measured with different detector settings A 𝑎, 𝜆 , 𝐵(𝑏, 𝜆) Orthogonal Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3 Pair 4 Pair 5 Alice + - - + + Bob + + - + - Correlation +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell%27s_theorem.svg (18.05.2013) … 0 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook CHSH inequality 𝐴, 𝐵 measured with different detector settings 𝑎, 𝑎′ , 𝑏, 𝑏′ 𝑆: = 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 + 𝜌 𝑎′ , 𝑏 + 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 ′ − 𝜌 𝑎′ , 𝑏 ′ Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell%27s_theorem.svg (18.05.2013) ≤2 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook CHSH inequality 𝐴, 𝐵 measured with different detector settings 𝑎, 𝑎′ , 𝑏, 𝑏′ 𝑆: = 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 + 𝜌 𝑎′ , 𝑏 + 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 ′ − 𝜌 𝑎′ , 𝑏 ′ ≤2 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook But… For entangled photons: 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 = ±cos[2 𝑎 − 𝑏 ] 𝜌 0°, 22,5° + 𝜌 45°, 67,5° + 𝜌 45°, 22,5° − 𝜌 0,67,5° 𝛼, 𝛼 ′ : 0°, 45° 𝛽, 𝛽′ : 22,5°, 67,5° = 4 2 >2 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell Test by Alain Aspect, 1981 Paper: Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 2 (1982) Image source: http://phototheque.institutoptique.fr/picture.php?/7212 (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell Test by Alain Aspect, 1981 Done in Paris First experiment to measure the Bell inequality directly Prior only single-channelanalyzer experiments Image source: http://phototheque.institutoptique.fr/picture.php?/7212 (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Setup WL-filter WL-filter Single rate monitor Single rate monitor Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell-test-photon-analyer.png (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Photon Source Calcium-40 cascade is exited by two photon absorption Pairs of photons are emitted Wavelengths 𝜆1 = 551.3 nm, 𝜆2 = 422.7 nm |Ψ = 1 (|H 1 |H 2 2 + |V 1 |V 2 ) Emission rate: 5 × 107 s −1 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Polarizers Two prisms separated by thin film • Parallel polarized light transmitted • Orthogonal polarized light reflected Rotatable Image source: http://www.meadowlark.com/images/products_large/laserline_beamsplitting_polarizer_fig1_17_2_13895.gif (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Polarizers 𝑇1∥ = 𝑅1⊥ = 0.950 for 𝜆1 𝑇1⊥ = 𝑅1∥ = 0.007 𝑇2∥ = 𝑅2⊥ = 0.930 for 𝜆2 𝑇2⊥ = 𝑅2∥ = 0.007 Image source: http://www.meadowlark.com/images/products_large/laserline_beamsplitting_polarizer_fig1_17_2_13895.gif (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Advantage of two-channel polarizers A one-channel polarizer always blocks one polarization (-) Coincidence rates 𝑅± (𝑎, 𝑏) and 𝑅−− (𝑎, 𝑏) cannot be measured directly 𝑅++ +𝑅−− −𝑅+− −𝑅−+ 𝑅++ +𝑅−− +𝑅+− −𝑅−+ Measurement of 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 = not direct No sufficient violation Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Single-channel_Bell_test.svg (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Detection One Photomultiplier for each channel (4 in total) Photon-coincidence and single-photondetection are both measured and stored Single-photon detection rate ~104 s −1 Dark rate ~102 s −1 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Setup WL-filter WL-filter Single monitor Single monitor Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell-test-photon-analyer.png (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Detection Coincidence window = 20 ns Lifetime of exited state ~5 ns All photon pairs included ρ(45°,22,5°) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 R++ Coincidence From single-photon rate the accidental coincidences are estimated to be ~10 s −1 Substracted from total coincidences True coincidence rate 𝑅±,± 𝑎, 𝑏 ≈ 0 − 40 𝑠 −1 R-+ R+- R-- Accidential Coincidence Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Result Five runs at 100 s 𝑆𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠 = 2.697 ± 0.015 Correction: 𝜌 𝑎, 𝑏 = =0.984 𝐹 𝑇1∥ − 𝑇1⊥ 𝑇2∥ − 𝑇2⊥ 𝑇1∥ + 𝑇1⊥ 𝑆𝑒𝑥𝑝 = 2.70 ± 0.05 Image source: [2] 𝑇2∥ + 𝑇2⊥ cos 2 𝑎𝑏 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Result 𝑆𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠 = 2.697 ± 0.015 𝑆𝑒𝑥𝑝 = 2.70 ± 0.05 Overall corrections and errors: • Accidental coincidences • Poisson deviation • Visibility (Not perfect transmission & reflection) • Asymetry of detectors Image source: [2] Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Detection Loophole Not every photon pair was measured • • Emission rate: ~5 × 107 𝑠 −1 Coincidence rate: ~80 𝑠 −1 4 𝜂 Corrected Bell ineq: 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 ≤ − 2 Possible violation in a test: • 𝑆𝑞𝑚 > 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 ⇒ 𝜂min = 0.82 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Locality Loophole No communication between measurements assumed Even if separation spacelike: Communication after changing the angle possible Measurement basis (angle) has to be changed after photon emission Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell Test by Gregor Weihs, 1998 Paper: Violation of Bell’s Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 23 (1998) Image source: [3] Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Bell Test by Gregor Weihs, 1998 Spacelike separation of measurements Random number generator to determine measurement basis Done during photon flight First time Locality Loophole was closed Image source: [3] Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Setup Aspect WL-filter WL-filter Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell-test-photon-analyer.png (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Setup Weihs Laser Modulator Modulator 400 m Random-number-generators Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bell-test-photon-analyer.png (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Fibers Single mode optical fibers Depolarization ~1% Each cable 500 m long (600 m coiled up) Difference less than 1 m (~5 ns) Image source: S. Johnson, Quantum Electronics FS2013 Summary of lecture notes, (30.07.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Rotation Rotation of the polarized light, not the polarizers Done by electro-optic modulator Voltage controlled optic axis If voltage applied, polarization rotates by 45° Voltage controlled by RNG Image source: S. Johnson, Quantum Electronics FS2013 Summary of lecture notes, (30.07.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Rotation Toggle frequency 𝜔 ≈ 10 𝑀𝐻𝑧 (𝑇 = 100 ns) Each setting is stored with time-tag Atomic clock at each polarizer for synchronization • Accuracy: ~20 ns Image source: S. Johnson, Quantum Electronics FS2013 Summary of lecture notes, (30.07.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Locality of measurement Measurement delays: • • • • • RNG + Amplifier Electro-optic modulator Photomultiplier Sample storing fiber length difference Total 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐧𝐬 Separation of measurement stations: 400 m 400 m ⇔ 𝑡 = = 𝟏. 𝟑 𝛍𝐬 𝑐 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Locality of measurement Measurement delays: • • • • • RNG + Amplifier Electro-optic modulator Photomultiplier Sample storing fiber length difference Total 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐧𝐬 Time between entanglement and measurement: 500 m = 𝟏. 𝟔𝟔𝟖 𝛍𝐬 𝑐 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Result Visibility = 0.97 ⇒ 𝑆exp = 2.74 Measured value: 𝑆meas = 2.73 ± 0.02 Measurement 10 s long, 14700 coincidences collected Efficiency ~5% Still detection loophole Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Outlook Detection loophole for photons closed 2013 by Zeilinger group Used Eberhard inequality, not CHSH • Only 𝜂 = 0.66 required Not maximally entangled photons • 𝛹 = 1 1+𝑟 2 ( 𝐻𝑉 + 𝑟 𝑉𝐻 ) Superconducting TES-calorimeter • Arm efficiency: 𝜂 ≈ 0.75 Image source: http://phonon.gsfc.nasa.gov/qcal/qcal_f4.html (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Outlook Weihs‘ Bell test Freedman & Clauser Locality loophole closed First Bell test 1970 010 1975 1980 Aspect’s Bell Test 1985 1990 1995 2000 Wineland et al. First time detection loophole closed with ions Zeilinger’s test Matsukevich & Moehring Detection loophole closed for photons Bell test with two remote atomic qubits 2005 2010 Ansmann et. al. Detection loophole closed with Josephson Qubits Sources [1] L. Maccone, A simple proof of Bell’s inequality, arXiv:1212.5214v2 (2013) [quant-ph] [2] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger, Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 2 (1982) [3] G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Violation of Bell’s Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 23 (1998) [4] D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, D. L. Moehring, S. Olmschenk, C. Monroe, Bell Inequality Violation with Two Remote Atomic Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 150404 [5] M. Giustina, A. Mech, S. Ramelow, B. Wittmann, J. Kofler, J. Beyer, A. Lita, B. Calkins, T. Gerrits, S.W. Nam, R. Ursin. A. Zeilinger, Bell violation with entangled photons, free of fair-sampling assumption, arXiv:1212.0533 [quant-ph] (2013) [6] Wikipedia Foundation, Bell’s theorem, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_inequalities (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Source Argon ion laser 351 nm Parametric down conversion with BBO-crystal Entangled 702 nm photon pairs |Ψ = 1 (|H 1 |V 2 2 − |V 1 |H 2 ) Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Scheme_of_spontaneous_parametric_down-conversion.pdf (18.05.2013) Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook RNG Diode Diode emits light onto beam splitter One photomultiplier corresponds to “0”, one to “1” 1 BS PM Toggle frequency 𝜔 ≈ 10 𝑀𝐻𝑧 (𝑇 = 100 ns) “0” and “1” not necessarily equally often Stored in coincidence monitor PM 0 Bell‘s theorem Photon Bell Test by Aspect Loopholes Photon Bell Test by Weihs Outlook Detection Rotation switched many time between two coincidences Very high resolved time tags (75 ps) and synchronization required Atomic clock at each station Synchronized before measurement ~20 ns Coincidences + polarization setting can be identified without confusion
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz