How combined changes in air humidity and temperature of leaves affect xylem flux and growth of fast-growing deciduous trees? Anu Sõber*, Jaak Sõber, Priit Kupper, Arne Sellin, Arvo Tullus University of Tartu, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences Backround: Regional differences in water regime can occur simultaneously with global climate warming. More rain and higher air humidity is predicted for Nothern Europe, including Baltic region. Temperature is increasing mainly in late autumn and winter, but not in cloudy and rainy summer, when tree leaves can stay wet for a long time. How these conditions affect tree growth? Free air experiment: Relative air humidity of three experimental plots (with about 100 Hybrid aspen and 100 Silver birch trees) was rised by misting teqnique. Three plots served as controls. Wind direction Silver birch Hybrid aspen Relative humidity and temperature of air (monthly average values during misting) RH was ca 10 % higher during misting, but no difference found in air temperature. Sap flow measurements to estimate water flux Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals Control Misting 2,0 -2 -1 Sap flux density (mmol m s ) 2,5 Heat balanse method: 4 Kuchera (or Dynamax) sensors per species in one plot 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 Estimation of leaf area 3 4 5 10 11 13 16 17 24 27 28 29 30 31 Day of August Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals -1 Control Misting 2,0 -2 Sap flow density was ca 30% less during misting Sap flux density (mmol m s ) 2,5 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 1 2 6 7 8 9 12 14 Day of August 15 19 21 22 23 Daily average values of stem sap flux density (mmol m-2 s-1) of sample trees in control and misting plots during mist fumigation and on misting-free days in the summers of 2008 and 2009 Year Tree species During mist fumigation • C plots H plots P value 2008 silver birch 1.41 1.06 < 0.05 2009 silver birch 1.03 0.75 < 0.01 2009 hybrid aspen 1.26 0.49 < 0.001 Without mist fumigation C plots H plots P value 1.04 0.98 ns 0.96 1.01 ns 1.03 0.63 < 0.001 Humidity was only 10 % higher, but water flux was 30% lower in misted plots – why? *Measurement of leaf temperature: Average leaf temperature, 0 C (with thermocamera and with sensors, attached to leaves) * Temperature of leaves was lower in misted plots up to 5 degrees. (depends on % of wet leaves and on meteorological conditions). C Temperature of leaves and air (Silver birch, 18.07.2009) 30,00 25,00 20,00 9:36 H 14:24 19:12 Effect of misting on tree growth Growth rate decreased in misted trees. This effect was more pronounced in Silver birch. Tree hight, autumn 2009 Increment in stem volume ( groving-season 2009) 300 200 100 0 C H Hybrid aspen C H Silver birch Relative stem volum e increm ent, % Tree hight, cm 400 400 300 200 100 0 C H Hybrid aspen C H Silver birch What affects growth? * 1. Lower temperature of leaves (lower rate of photosynthesis etc) * 2. Decrease in water flux (less nutrients) * 3. Damage of young, developing leaves (less leaf area) As nitrogen and chlorophyll contents of leaves were less in misted plots, and the negative impact of misting decreased with increasing plot fertility, we belive, that reduced water flux was most important factor of stress for fast-growing trees in this experiment. Photosynthetic parameters (Silver birch), 2009 The effect of misting on tree growth is a sum previous and current year effects. Bud size (buds formed in summer 2008) Bud length 10 Bud width 4 mm 8 6 2 4 2 0 C • • aspen birch H ring C H Difference in bud length 20% and 30% (accordingly aspen and birch, p=0.01). Difference in width 7% and 30% (p=0.01) Leaf area 2009 3 leaf area dm 2 aspen birch 2 1 0 C H ring • For birch, there was nearly 4 times more leaf area per annual shoot in control. • Aspen had ~50% more leaf area in control. Conclusion: More rain and higher air humidity can reduces water flux through the canopy and growth rate of deciduous trees in Northern Europe. This effect will be probably more pronounced at nitrogen-deficient sites. Temperature of leaves Hybrid aspen, Aug, 20, 2009 C1 H1 air Time Canopy conductance, mmol m -2 s-1 Canopy conductance (created by stomata and boundary layer) 300 200 100 0 7:12 H C 12:00 16:48 Time 21:36
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz