Outline of Presentation Urea for CO2 Fertilization Importance of CO2 and Fertilizers Job Fugice, Upendra Singh and Deborah Hellums Nutrient Dynamics Program International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) Muscle Shoals, Alabama Carbon Footprint of Fertilizers Improved Efficiency CO2-Enrichment Effect on Crops and Soils Quantifying CO2 Emission from Urea Concluding Remarks Agricultural Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Importance of Carbon Carbon is an essential element and the main building block for all life forms on earth. Carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere at 398 ppm (~0.04%) is source for photosynthesis. Enrichment of CO2 concentration increases photosynthesis in most plants. Aquatic plants enjoy higher CO2 concentration (0.15%) for photosynthesis. CO2 is also responsible for 82% of GHGs. Overall agricultural GHG emissions will continue to rise for the foreseeable future as agricultural production expands to keep pace with growing food, feed, fiber and bioenergy demand. Increasing agricultural efficiency is critical to keep emissions as low as possible and to reduce the level of emissions per unit of agricultural output. Efficient and responsible production, distribution and use of fertilizers are central to achieving these goals. Manufacturer Carbon Footprint of Fertilizers Greatest Impact on Nutrient and Emission Efficiency Warehouse Fertilizers account for 1/3 of N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Expect to increase further with increasing fertilizer use. Combined fertilizer use, manufacture, distribution ~ 2.5% of global GHG emissions or 10% of agricultural GHG emissions. Fertilizer Use = 1.5% of global GHG emissions. Urea hydrolysis alone = 0.2% of Global GHG Emission. Low Soil Fertility: reduces yield and increases GHG emission. 48% people are currently fed as a result of manufactured N fertilizer use (Erisman et al., 2008). Ocean Transport A Healthy Crop Port Discharge Trucks to Warehouse Farmer Application Inland Transportation Training of Farmers Agro-Dealer Shop 1 Total Emission: Urea and Ammonium Nitrate Production and Consumption Carbon Footprint for Urea and Ammonium Nitrate Production Total CO2-Equivalent Emission-BAT1 and BMP2 Total CO2-Equivalent Emission (Average Today) UREA CO2 Emission Urea Production Total CO2-eq Emission NH3 Production Total Urea Production Emission kg CO2-eq /kg Urea 0.32 AMMONIUM NITRATE (AN) kg CO2-eq /kg AN kg CO2-eq /kg N 0.69 1.38 2.95 1.70 CO2 (N2O) Emission Nitric Acid Total CO2-eq Emission NH3 Production Solidification Total AN Production Emission CO2-eq Emission Production N2O Emission Nitric Acid Production Total Production Emission CO2 Emission Application N2O Emission Application Total Application Emission2 Total Emission 3.64 kg CO2-eq /kg N 1.84 5.27 0.85 2.44 0.03 2.73 0.10 7.81 AMMONIUM NITRATE UREA kg CO2-eq /kg N 1.30 0.00 kg CO2-eq /kg N 2.40 1.40 1.30 (3.64) 2.30 6.70 9.00 10.30 3.80 (7.81) 0.80 4.80 5.60 8.80 1. BAT is best available technology (cleansing, etc). 2. BMP for all management with surface broadcast N application under upland conditions. Adapted from IFA (2009), Bellarby et al (2008), and Yara (2012). Improve N Efficiency and Reduce Emission Improve Efficiency – Practice NH3 N2O NO Ammonia UREASE INHIBITOR WORKS HERE Urea NH3 Ammonium NITRIFICATION INHIBITOR WORKS HERE CONTROLRELEASE WORKS HERE N2 NO3- NH4+ DEEP PLACEMENT WORKS HERE Nitrate Leaching Knifed into the soil Dribbled (banded) on the soil surface Banded at planting Side-dressed or top-dressed during the growing season Fertigation Foliar spray Deep placement (urea, NPK briquettes) Runoff Urea Hydrolysis and CO2 Emission 2NH3 + CO2 + H2O Globally about 140 million tons of urea is consumed in agriculture annually resulting in >100 million tons (Tg) of CO2 emission as a byproduct of urea hydrolysis Reducing CO2 Emission and Increasing CO2 Trapping Application: incorporation, sub-surface (band), deeppoint placement Reduce urea hydrolysis rate with urease inhibitors Reduce rate of urea release (control-release) Hypothesis: Slowed/controlled release of CO2 from urea and/or trapped in soil will have greater impact on crop growth and GHG mitigation 9000 Evidence CO2-Enrichment: Growth Chamber 8000 -1 (NH4)2CO3 Rice Grain Yield (kg ha ) urease, 2H2O CO2 Enrichment Effect on Yield 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Growth chambers Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments with > 18 sites worldwide. Exp 1 Exp 2 2000 200 400 600 CO2 Concentration (ppm) 800 1000 Baker et al. 2 Split Application Deep Placement: Long-Term Effect of Urea Deep Placement on Soil Health Increased N Uptake, Reduced N Loss, Higher Productivity. In Grain 23% Unaccounted 35% In Straw 9% CO2 fertilization? Y = 640+1.04 x; R2 = 0.92; N = 3124 -1 In Soil 33% Rice Grain Yield with UDP (kg ha ) 12000 Unaccounted 4% Deep Placed Urea Briquette In Soil 31% In Grain 42% 10000 6000 4000 Boro Aman 1:1 Line 2000 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Rice Grain Yield with Prilled Urea (kg ha-1) IRRI-IFDC, 1993 IFDC, 2012 In Straw 23% Urea Deep Placement Urea Broadcast Incorporation 8000 Long-Term Effect – C Sequestration CO2 Emission: Urea Hydrolysis Rate Organic Matter Content (%) Changes in Urea-N Content on Greenville Soil 12 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 UDP Soil Depth (cm) -20 1% increase in OM for 10 cm soil depth = 10 t ha-1 OM -30 -40 Urea-N Content (mg N/cup) 10 Urea -10 8 Slope = -0.75 6 Slope = -1.56 4 2 Urea Agrotain Modified by urease inhibitor Soil Types Duration also influenced by urearelease Importance of duration 0 -50 0 2 4 6 8 Time (Days) -60 -70 Comparison of Organic Matter Content with UDP and Urea Soil Product Greenville Urea Agrotain Urea Agrotain Brownfield Quantifying CO2 Emission from Urea Hydrolysis Sample Agrotain SuperU Phosphoric Acid Scrubber NaOH Traps 0.056 0.027 0.084 0.050 14.3 7.8 24.9 14.3 Days of Hydrolysis 7.00 12.87 4.01 6.98 CO2 Emission from Urea Application Product Urea NaOH Scrubbers Urea Hydrolysis Rate (mmol/day) (% applied/day) Amount Applied (g) 77.83 77.66 77.17 77.5 78.33 78.17 CO2 Incubation Release (Hrs) (mmol) 37 19.461 61 25.595 39 12.226 67 19.103 41 13.762 69 23.382 CO2 Release CO2 (% Rate Applied) (mmol/hr) 25.0 33.0 0.445 15.8 24.7 0.287 17.6 29.9 0.339 Modified by: urease inhibitor (above) - soil types and urea-release rate (not presented) BaCl2 is added to 10 mL aliquot from NaOH trap and titrated with HCl 3 Concluding Remarks 1. Fertilizer use will continue to increase to meet the increasing demand for food, feed, fiber, and fuel. 2. Urea is most widely used N fertilizer and most economical N source 3. It’s carbon footprint during manufacturing is much lower than Ammonium Nitrate. 4. Improved urea management – enhanced efficiency fertilizers and 4R – would not only increase productivity and N use efficiency but improve CO2 capture including enrichment effect on crops. 5. On-going studies: quantify CO2 fertilization effect on crop growth using C-labelled urea under different management. Acknowledgement Julie Howe, Auburn University 4
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz