Rashba and other spin-orbit interactions Yuli Lyanda-Geller Department of Physics and Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University Work in progress in collaboration with M.I. Dykman Workshop on Quantum Engineering with Electrons on Helium, May 21 2010, Princeton NJ. Central Themes • Spin Qubit – spin-dependent interactions •Spin-Orbit – free electrons •Spin-Orbit – Confined Electrons (Rashba Interaction) • Condensed Matter Systems • Electrons on He – Rashba Interaction •Spin-Orbit Coupling – ripplons •Electron-Electron Interactions Electron spin qubits on the He-4/vacuum interface He m=2 H m=1 Decoherence ? 1D hydrogenic spectrum Spin-orbit effects ? Spin-orbit interactions mc2 I+U(r) cp Free relativistic electron -mc2 I+U(r) cp Expansion in p/mc p e [ p U ] H U (r ) H 2m 2mc 4m mc2 2 2mc2 Spin-orbit interactions Confined electrons mc2 I+U(z) cp Dirac Hamiltonian cp -mc2 I+U(z) The same U acts on electrons and positrons p e [ p U ] H U (r ) H * ( z ) ( z )dz 2 2m 2mc 4m mc 2 Spin-orbit interactions Confined electrons [ p ] * ( z ) U ( z ) dz 2 4m mc U iH , pz i U ,i iHpz pz H z * ( z ) U ( z ) dz i ( z)(Hpz pz H )( z)dz * H E ; H E * Ehrenfest theorem * [ p ] * ( z)U( z )dz 0 2 4m mc !! Spin-orbit interactions Condensed Matter systems ms2 I+U1(r)+ eEr sp sp Eg -ms2 I+U2(r) + eEr Different offsets, different barriers For conduction and valence electrons or ground s and excited p states Spin-orbit interactions Condensed Matter systems Uc Uv H so U c U v [ p eE ] Uc 4m ms 2 Different offsets in conduction and valence bands Lassnig (1985) Rashba type spin-orbit interaction He He m=2 • Penetration into He • Excited p-state • Different parameters of quantized state in s and p-state • Eg =50 eV , s= 2.7x108 cm/s • m – free electron mass m=1 H so [ p eE ] 4m ms 2 Order of magnitude stronger than relativistic spin-orbit term. T1= 1s (=100ns) Lateral confinement All discrete levels; no k Capillary waves - ripplons Thermally excited height variations of the helium surface (r , t ) r 2D in-plane coordinate U (r ) eE (r , t ) Spectrum 2 ( / )k 3 Spin relaxation in a He surface quantum dot H so ( x p y y p x ) eE z 4m ms 2 Up and down spins are described by the same (blue) orbital wavefunction Admixture by Rashba term to red state (different lateral orbital wavefunction Ripplon T1= 106s For inelastic [processes, acoustic phonons are more important Other spin-orbit interactions Capillary waves - ripplons Thermally excited height variations of the helium surface (r , t ) r 2D in-plane coordinate U (r ) eE (r , t ) Spectrum [ p U ] 4m ms 2 H so E – total electric field in z=direction 2 ( / )k 3 Spin-orbit interactions with ripplons [ p k ] eE 4m ms 2 ms2 I+U(r,t) sp sp H so -ms2 I+U(r,t) Magnitude: is the average mean displacement k is the transferred wavevector Ripplon coupling limits mobility (= 108 cm2 /V s ) H so z [ p k ]z eE 2 4m ms Only in-plane wavevectors z Spin-orbit interactions with ripplons H so z [ p k ]z eE 4m ms 2 Sz is not affected , no spin relaxation Sx , Sy are affected , hence spin dephasing (decoherence) Spin dephasing times 0.1-2 s Corresponds to momentum relaxation =100ns Lateral confinement [ p U ] 4m ms 2 H so Direct spin-ripplon coupling to Each of the excited level T2= 102s Virtual escape of electron from the dot Other spin-orbit interactions Solids : interaction of spin of one electron with an orbital motion of another electron Eg Breit –Landau term in two-electron Dirac Model Electron-electron Interactions contribute to relaxation and dephasing Conclusions • In 2D, Rashba interaction is present • Coupling with ripplons is more important • Spin dephasing times shorter than spin relaxation times •Spin-orbit terms in electron-electron interactions
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz