UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS
Review and Proposed Way
Ahead
Lt Col Jamie M. Wade
JS/J4 Capabilities and Analysis
Division
Current as of July 16
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Overview
• History of CMRS and CMRP
• CMRS Review Guidance
• CMRS Review Criteria
• Global Materiel Synchronization
• CMRS Review Initiatives
• Areas Requiring Additional Attention
• Strategic Review Recap
• Proposed COAs
• Recommended COA
UNCLASSIFIED
2
UNCLASSIFIED
History of CMRS and CMRP
Comprehensive Materiel Response Strategy (CMRS)
- In 2011, SecDef directed DLA and TRANSCOM to
develop a strategy to position materiel and distribution
capabilities globally to project and sustain the elements of
natural power.
Comprehensive Materiel Response Plan (CMRP)
- CMRS directs the development of a plan to operationalize
the CMRS
- CMRP is signed by the CJCS on 10 May 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
3
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS Review Guidance
Stakeholder participants are asked to consider future
operations through the lens of the Materiel Response
from the perspective of their organization missions and
requirements in addressing the analysis questions and
assessing the viability of the Strategy.
Stakeholder participants:
•
•
•
•
•
Joint Staff
OSD L&MR
DLA
TRANSCOM
Services
The CMRS provides the foundational construct for Materiel Response in support of the
national military strategic priorities, long-term posture efforts, and integration of regional
materiel requirements.
UNCLASSIFIED
4
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS Review Criteria
Determine level of CMRS applicability to the
current and future complex environment.
Viable
Feasible
Ideas in the
CMRS are
executable
given leader
support and
adequate
funding.
UNCLASSIFIED
Acceptable
Risk associated
with the CMRS is
perceived as
tolerable;
required policies
and aid to fix an
existing Materiel
Response issue.
Adequate
Principles and
required
capabilities are
sufficient to
guide Joint
Force
development
and integration
of Materiel
Response.
Advantageous
Following the principles
and realizing the
required capabilities, the
CMRS will provide a
reasonable expectation
of providing the Joint
Force with an
operational advantage
and optimize JLEnt
Materiel Response
Capability
5
Global Materiel Synchronization
Existing
working groups
Materiel studies, analysis,
plans, and lessons learned
Strategic Guidance
CMRS LOE
Asset Visibility
AVWG,IUID,
IGC/ITV and
GCSS-J
Theater Planning
CP-GD, JOPES,
and Theater
Campaign Plan
Supply Chain / Distribution
DWG, JDDE and
Global Prepositioned Materiel
Infrastructure
ERIMP and SIMP
Interagency / Multinational Partners
MNWG and
LogCAG
Compliance
DLMS and FIAR
6
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS Review Initiatives
Initiatives
Initiatives
OPR
OPR
J4 POC
J4 POC
Asset Visibility
Asset Visibility
GCSS-J
GCSS-J
IGC/ITV
IGC/ITV
IUID
IUID
Theater Campaign Plan
Theater Campaign Plan
Global Pre-positioned Materiel management
Global Pre-positioned Materiel management
CP-GD
CP-GD
JOPES/APEX
JOPES/APEX
Inventory Management
Inventory Management
Materiel distribution performance/DWG
Materiel distribution performance/DWG
JDDE
JDDE
ERIMP/SIMP
ERIMP/SIMP
DLMS compliancy
DLMS compliancy
Comprehensive Material Response Plan
OSD
OSD
OSD
OSD
TRANSCOM/OSD
TRANSCOM/OSD
OSD
OSD
OSD
OSD
OSD
OSD
TRANSCOM
TRANSCOM
OSD
OSD
OSD/DLA
OSD/DLA
OSD
OSD
TRANSCOM
TRANSCOM
TRANSCOM
TRANSCOM
DLA
DLA
OSD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 KBLD
JS J4 MMSD
JS J4 SD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 MMSD
JS J4 SD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 SRD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 DD
JS J4 ED
JS J4 ED
JS J4 MMSD
JS J4 SD
JS J4 CAD
Improvements in materiel positioning and joint distribution capabilities have moved the
DoD closer to achieving the strategic goals of agile and flexible solutions; shared
capabilities and common materiel; effective and efficient sourcing; and optimized
positioning of materiel in support of global military operations.
UNCLASSIFIED
7
UNCLASSIFIED
Areas That Merit Further Exploration
• Industry practices that are acceptable and
potentially applicable to the DoD
• Collaboration and integration / synchronization with
Interagency and Multinational Partners
UNCLASSIFIED
8
UNCLASSIFIED
Strategic Review Recap
• CMRS review conducted Nov 2015-Feb 2016
• Working group established and applied review criteria
• Closely examined CMRS LOEs, existing efforts to
address, and associated applicability to CMRS goals
• Identified two areas that merit further exploration
CMRS Strategic Review led to the development of two COAs to address next steps for
CMRS and CMRP.
UNCLASSIFIED
9
UNCLASSIFIED
Proposed COAs
UNCLASSIFIED
10
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS COA 1
• Maintain CMRS. Consider updating CMRS following
change of Administration
• J4 and OSD L&MR will continue to synchronize all
materiel response efforts, inclusive of JLEnt and Industry
• Integrate CMRS LOEs into the on-going JCL campaign
design
• Discontinue the CMRP Capabilities Working Group
• Archive CMRP
Facilitate the preservation and enhancement of the global supply network by
synchronizing global materiel response planning.
UNCLASSIFIED
11
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS COA 2
• Archive CMRP and CMRS
• Maintain J4 membership in the existing working
groups
• Discontinue the CMRP Capabilities Working Group
• Initiatives identified in the CMRS are being
addressed by other organizations and agencies
Efforts during the past 3 years to achieve CMRS goals have resulted in an improved
materiel response capability across the full range of military activities in the context of
leveraging worldwide supply and distribution networks.
UNCLASSIFIED
12
UNCLASSIFIED
Recommend COA 1
• Co-Chairs (J4 CAD and OSD L&MR) and CMRP Working
Group agree on recommendation
• 5 of the CMRS LOEs are listed in the JCL Concept
Required Capabilities and will be included in the JCL
campaign design. 1 CMRS LOE (Compliance) is not
specifically addressed, however, it is mandated by law
• Efforts over the past three years have resulted in an
improved materiel response capability
• Synchronization across the full range of military activities
and working group resulted in the leveraging of worldwide
supply and distribution networks
UNCLASSIFIED
13
UNCLASSIFIED
QUESTIONS?
UNCLASSIFIED
14
UNCLASSIFIED
BACK UP
UNCLASSIFIED
15
Asset Visibility Initiative
Asset Visibility (AV) Working Group
• Section 326 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY 2014
established a formal requirement for the DoD to
develop a comprehensive strategy for improving
asset tracking (AT) and in-transit visibility (ITV).
TRANSCOM Integrated Data
Environment/Global Transportation
Network Convergence (IGC)
• DoD system of record for In-transit Visibility (ITV)
and Asset Visibility (AV).
• Strategy for Improving DoD Asset Visibility, Aug
2015.
• Provides over 8,500 customers end-to-end visibility
in the DoD logistics pipeline.
• Vision: DoD Components work collaboratively to
providing accurate, reliable, and timely data to
enhance visibility of assets throughout their
lifecycle.
• COCOMS, Joint Staff and Services rely upon IGC
to provide timely and accurate information on the
location, movement, status, and identity of units,
personnel, equipment, and supplies.
Current Focus:
Current Focus:
• TRANSCOM working to increase the perform of the
system
• aRFID
• OPR is TRANSCOM
• OPR is OSD AT&L
• JS/J4 lead is Col Trautmann, DDSL/KBLD
• JS/J4 lead is Col Trautmann, DDSL/KBLD
Asset Visibility Initiative
Global Combat Support System - Joint
(GCSS-J)
• Single source of visibility & decision support for
the Joint loggie.
• Jan 16, GCSS-J Planners Board voted on 8
development priorities:
- Operational Contract Support
- Deployment and Distribution
- Supply Enhancements
- Sustainment Estimation
- Equipment Availability
- Enterprise-Wide Visibility
- Medical Readiness
- Logistics Services Management
Current Focus:
• Re-validate & prioritize remaining requirements
• Determine best “new development” vs
“sustainment” acquisition strategy
• OPR is OSD
• JS/J4 lead is Col Trautmann, DDOL/KBLD
Item Unique Identification (IUID)
• DoDI 8320.04, IUID Standards for Tangible
Personal Property, Sept 15; states all new contract
must have the IUID clause included.
• GAO IUID Audit 2012; still nine open items.
However, all recommendations for closure have
been submitted.
• IUID Clause Compliance Reporting Metric. Most
Services and agencies (except DLA and USMC)
are using Defense Procurement Acquisition
Policy’s (DPAP) metrics.
Current Focus:
• DFARS 252.211-7003 update
• IUID Implementation Plan
• Capital Equipment Tracking
• OPR is OSD
• JS/J4 lead is Lt Col Clarke, DDOL/SD
Theater Initiative
Global Pre-positioned Materiel
Management
Campaign Plan for Global Distribution 9033 (CPGD 9033)
• The GAO audit of the FY14 Congressional Report
is nearing completion. The exit conference took
place on 19 January and reported that all twelve
elements required by NDAA 2008 section 352 were
identified as addressed.
• Facilitate the Global Distribution Network by
synchronizing planning with Theater Campaign
Plans, Theater Posture Plans, Theater Distribution
Plans, and Service/Agency Campaign Support
Plans.
• DoDD will be the “strategic policy” for the
department
• Provides agile, scalable, and resilient distribution
from point of origin to point of employment.
• DoDI 3110.06 War Reserve Materiel Policy” and
the implementation plan will provide the procedures
or “how” regarding PWRM
• Lines of Effort:
- Optimize Global Materiel Positioning
Current Focus:
- Coordinate Global Distribution Planning and Related
Activities
• Developing a DODD
- Attain accessible, secure, resilient, and flexible
distribution infrastructure
• Develop the implementation plan
Current Focus:
• Mar 16, Synchronization Conference
• OPR and JS/J4 lead is LtCol Clarke, DDOL/SD
with OSD
• OPR TRANSCOM
• JS/J4 lead is DDOL/DD
Supply Chain / Distribution Initiative
Distribution Working Group (DWG)
• DoD has experienced areas of weakness in its
supply chain management of materiel distribution
as evidenced by the its appearance on the GAO
High-Risk Series list since 2005.
• DWG was established to develop a corrective
action plan based off the GAO report
Current Focus:
• Corrective Action Plan 4 LOE:
– Policy, Governance, Data Availability, Metrics and
Performance
Joint Deployment and Distribution
Enterprise (JDDE)
• An integrated system providing prospective joint
force commanders with the ability to rapidly and
effectively move and sustain joint forces in support
of major combat operations or other joint
operations.
• JDDE is enabled by linking the Materiel Distribution
function and processes to elements of both
Inventory Management (IM) and Asset Visibility
(AV).
– Two areas that were also on GAO’s High-Risk Series
for DoD.
• OPR Co-Chair’s are TRANSCOM and OSD
• In January 2014, the USD for Policy signed the
DoD Campaign Plan for Global Distribution (CPGD) 9033. CP-GD 9033 will allow USTRANSCOM
to synchronize world-wide distribution planning to
establish a more effective and efficient Global
Distribution Network (GDN).
• JS/J4 lead is Mr. Higgins, DDOL/DD
• OPR is TRANSCOM
• Monitor distribution performance thru the JDDE
• Alignment of policy with performance metrics
• JS/J4 lead is Mr. Higgins, DDOL/DD
Infrastructure Initiative
En-route Infrastructure Master Plan (ERIMP)
• TRANSCOM Global Posture Plan
• Develop and maintain an ERIMP, prioritized across the future years defense program which aligns GCC
mobility requirements.
• Objectives:
- Considers All 3 Elements of Global Posture: Forces, Footprint & Agreements
- Forward looking 5 to 15 years (Not specific to current operations)
- Requirement-Driven / Analysis-Supported
- Focused on Intermediate OCONUS Nodes
Current Focus:
• Updated ERIMP currently in final JS coordination
• OPR is TRANSCOM and J5
• JS/J4 lead is CDR Crigler, DDOL/ED
Compliance Initiative
Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS)
• DoD Directive, 8190.01E, Defense Logistics Management Standards (DLMS), January 9, 2015: DoD
standard for electronic data interchange among the Automated Information Systems (AIS) that comprise
assigned business processes of the global supply chain management system.
• USD AT&L Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Functional Business Strategy Document: Requires
DoD to achieve full DLMS compliance by 2019.
• Jan 2016, 79% of all transactions were completed in DLMS.
• 16.4 million DLMS processed in April 2006 and approximately 59 million DLMS processed in January
2016.
Current Focus:
• Greater fidelity to the data capturing system information for those still sending legacy (smaller volume of
transactions).
• OPR is DLA
• JS/J4 lead is Lt Col Clarke, DDSL/SD
UNCLASSIFIED
CMRS Review Methodology
Components
Object
Analytic Framework
Context
NMS
JCL
GCSS-J
DWG
CCJO JF 2020
PWRM
JP 4-0
Issues
Assumptions
Assertions
Analysis Questions
Stakeholder SMEs
Strategic Vision Review
• Joint Staff *
• OSD *
• DLA *
• TRANSCOM *
• Services *
• GCC
• USAID
• FEMA
* Initial review team
Process
Strategic
Context
Oct 15
UNCLASSIFIED
Analysis
Nov 15 – Jan 16
Facilitated
Discussion /
Speakers
Nov 15 – Jan 16
Stakeholders
Feedback
Jan 16
Assessment of
Viability
Jan 16
22
CMRS Review Criteria
Viable: Determine level of CMRS applicability to the current and future
complex environment
Feasible: Ideas in the CMRS are executable given leader support and
adequate funding.
Acceptable: Risk associated with the CMRS is perceived as tolerable;
required policies and aid to fix an existing materiel response issue.
Adequate: Principles and required capabilities are sufficient to guide JF
development and integration of materiel response.
Advantageous: Following the principles and realizing the required
capabilities, the CMRS will provide a reasonable expectation of
providing the JF with an operational advantage and optimize JLEnt
materiel response capability.
Existing WGs
CMRS LOEs
Asset Visibility
AVWG, IUID, IGC/ITV, GCSS-J
Theater Planning
CP-GD, JOPES, Theater
Campaign Plan
Supply Chain /
Distribution
DWG, JDDE, Global Prep-po
materiel
Infrastructure
ERIMP, SIMP
Interagency /
MNP
MNWG, LogCAG
Compliance
DLMS, FIAR
COAs
Area Requiring Additional Attention
1.
Adaption and implementation of industry best practices
2.
Collaboration and integration / synchronization with Interagency
and Multinational Partner
COA 1: Archive CMRP; Discontinue the CMRP WG; J4 and OSD
continue to synchronize all materiel response efforts, inclusive of
Multinational/Interagency Partners and Industries best practices;
integrate CMRS LOEs into the JCL Campaign Plan; Maintain CMRS;
Reconsider CMRS update following change of Administration
COA 2: Archive CMRP and CMRS; Discontinue the CMRP WG;
Maintain J4 membership in existing working groups; initiatives in
CMRS are being worked by other agencies
Efforts the past 3 years have resulted in an improved
materiel response capability via leveraging
worldwide supply and distribution network
Archiving Process
• Accomplish an O-6 and GO/FO JSAP
• JSAP will be sent to all Stakeholders for the appropriate document fro concurrence or non-concurrence.
- CMRS: CCMDs, JS, Services, OSD, DLA, TRANSCOM, USAID and FEMA
- CMRP: JS, Services, OSD, DLA and TRANSCOM
• Adjudicate any non-concurrence comments
• Accomplish a SecDef and/or CJCS level JSAP for approval to archive
• Once approved the document will be archived on the J4 Sharepoint