March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
Selection Procedure for TGai
Date: 2011-03-14
Authors:
Name
Affiliations
Address
Phone
email
Yukimasa Nagai
Mitsubishi
Electric Corp.
+81-457-412115
[email protected]
ubishiElectric.co.jp
Akira Yamada
NTT
Docomo, Inc
+81-46-8406527
yamadaakira@nttdocomo.
com
Fujio
WATANABE
DOCOMO
USA Labs Inc.
+1-650-4964726
[email protected]
Ping Fang
Huawei
Technologies
Co., Ltd.
5-1-1, Ofuna,
Kamakura-shi,
Kanagawa, Japan
3-6, Hikarino-oka,
Yokosuka-shi,
Kanagawa, Japan
3240 Hillview
Avenue, Palo Alto,
CA 94304-1201,
USA
Vision Software
Park, Nanshan
District, Shenzhen,
Guangdong, China,
518057
+86 755
36835101
[email protected]
Submission
Slide 1
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
Abstract
This presentation shows selection procedures of TGn,
TGr, TGac TGad and TGah as references for TGai
selection procedure
Submission
Slide 2
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
Selection procedure discussed in TGai
• Defined documents for TGai in January meeting.
• We’ve not defined
– Procedure / evaluation methodology for CFP, down selection, etc
– Necessary and sufficient condition for documents
(11-11/0201r00)
Submission
Slide 3
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
Selection Procedures Documents in others
• PHY/MAC: TGn, TGac, TGad
• MAC Only: TGr, etc
• PHY Only(?): TGah, etc
Submission
Slide 4
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. TGn Selection Procedure Flow Chart
Mergers may
take place.
The TG may
Step 11 decide time
required for
consideration of
new mergers
A
Initial 60 Minutes
presentation for all
proposals.
Panel discussion.
Step 7
Step 8
Step 16
Procedure Start
Step 9
Any new
mergers?
Y
Step 2:
Adopt Channel
Models
Step 3:
Adopt Functional
Requirements
Step 4:
Adopt Comparison
Criteria
Step 10
Step 12
Elimination vote.
Eliminate proposal
with least support.
Recess to allow
merger granted at
option of TG.
Presentation of
merged proposals.
Y
N
Step 1:
Adopt Usage
Models
Step 11
Mergers may
Step 13 The remaining
take place.
proposals may
The TG may
undergo technical
decide time
changes without
required for
requiring a
consideration of
merge.
new mergers
Any Mergers
take place?
Discard unmerged partial
proposals.
Step 13
N
Final 5 minute
statement.
25% low-bar
Elimination vote
The remaining
proposals may
undergo technical
changes without
requiring a
merge.
More than 1
proposal left?
Y
Presentation of all
remaining
proposals
Y
Panel Discussion
at option of the
chair
N
Step 5:
Issue Call for
Proposals
Step 14
60 minute
presentation of
remaining
proposals
including Q & A
Step
17
Step 15
More than 1
proposal left?
N
Statements from
no voters of why
they voted no.
Roll-call
confirmation vote
N
Step 20
Editor prepares
Draft 1.0. Vote that
it is technically
consistent with
technical spec.
Step 6:
Classify
Proposals
Step 19
Adopt proposal as
initial technical
specification
Y
75% for ?
Response by
proposers.
75% for ?
Roll-call
confirmation vote
N
Y
75% for ?
Y
Step 11
Step 21
Forward Draft 1.0
to WG for Letter
Ballot
A
Procedure End
Submission
Slide 5
Mergers may
take place.
The TG may
decide time
required for
consideration of
new mergers
Step 18
N
Step 13
The remaining
proposals may
undergo technical
changes without
requiring a
merge.
Bring back last
three proposals
Drawing by Adrian Stephens
September 16, 2003
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. TGac Selection Procedure Flow Chart
Usage
Models
Channel
Models
Functional
Requirements*
Draft Spec
Complete and
Coherent Enough
for Letter Ballot?
75%?)
Specification
Framework
Sufficient
Support for
Framework?
(50%? or 75%?)
Y
N
Contributions
and Decision
Making on Spec
Element(s)
75%
Y
Letter
Ballot
N
* Functional requirement document to include System Level Performance Targets and Simulation Instructions
Note: This proposal does not foresee any changes to the subsequent steps in the IEEE procedure (Letter Ballots, Sponsor Ballots)
Submission
Slide 6
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. TGah Selection Procedure Flow Chart
Submission
Slide 7
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. TGad Selection Procedure Flow Chart
A
Procedure Start
Y
Step 3
Step 1:
Issue Call for New
Techniques and
Complete
Proposals
Presentations of
Complete
Proposals
Mergers
N
Step 4
Step
1
Step 6
Step
1
Strawpoll may be
held on Complete
Proposals
Step 8
Any Mergers
take place?
Step 7
N
Confirmation vote?
Step 5
Step 2
Presentations of
New Techniques
Proposals
Y
Confirmation vote
achieves 75%?
Y
Confirmed
proposal becomes
initial technical
specification
Procedure End
A
Submission
Slide 8
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
N
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. TGr Selection Procedure Document
•
Definitions for documents
– Functional Requirements – A list of mandatory features, performances and
behaviors of the amendment. These requirements shall be consistent with the
PAR, the 5 Criteria and the Usage Models. The Functional Requirements
document shall contain a template that defines the format that presenters shall use
to declare compliance with the requirements.
– Comparison Criteria – A list of metrics and their definitions by which proposals
shall be compared. The Comparison Criteria document shall contain a template
that defines the format that presenters shall use to state their responses.
– Other definitions in TGr: Complete Proposal, Partial Proposal.
•
Steps of the Procedure
1. TGr shall adopt Usage Models for the IEEE 802.11r amendment.
2. Deleted
3. TGr shall adopt Functional Requirements that must be met by all complete
proposals. (ToDo: necessary?)
4. TGr shall adopt Comparison Criteria that must be addressed by all proposals.
(ToDo: delete?)
5. TGr shall issue a call for proposals.
6. Prior to the first vote, the presenters shall classify their proposals as partial or
complete.
(continued Step 21)
Submission
Slide 9
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
e.g. Proposed TGai Selection Procedure
Procedure Start
Step 3:
Adopt Evaluation
Criteria
Step 2:
Adopt Functional
Requirement
Step 1:
Adopt Use Case
Step 4:
Issue Call for
Proposals
Step 5:
Classify Proposals
Need to Update
Step 6:
Baseline documents
N
Sufficient Support for
Functional Requirement
and Evaluation Criteria ?
(50%? Or 75%?)
Submission
Step 7:
Y
Step 8:
Contributions and
Decision Making on
Spec Element(s)
Draft Spec Complete
and Coherent Enough
for Letter Ballot ?
(75%?)
Step 9:
75%
Y
Step 10:
Letter Ballot
N
Slide 10
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
Suggestions
• Define following unclear subjects before CFP !
– Procedure / evaluation methodology for CFP, down selection, etc
– Necessary and sufficient condition for documents
• Use Case
• Functional Requirement
• Evaluation Criteria
– accept partial proposals or not
– etc
Submission
Slide 11
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric
March 2011
doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0356r0
References
• 11-03-0665-09-0000-tgn-selection-procedure.doc
• 11-09-0059-06-00ac-802-11ac-proposed-selectionprocedure.doc
• 11-09-0935-05-00ad-selection-procedure.doc
• 11-11-0239-02-00ah-proposed-selection procedure.docx
• 11-04-0782-00-000r-tgr-selection-procedure.doc
• 11-11-0201-00-00ai-tgai-closing-report-losangelsjanuary-2011-ppt.ppt
Submission
Slide 12
Yukimasa Nagai, Mitsubishi Electric