Unit Approval Template Instructions
March 2014
Please complete the Unit Approval Template electronically. Send it to approvers by email.
Proposers and approvers should ‘sign’ by typing their name at the appropriate place in the
document, or by inserting their electronic signature.
When all approvals have been signed off, please email the document to your Coursework
Coordinator.
The Coursework Coordinator is responsible for collecting the unit proposals and emailing them to
the Director of Academic Services for consideration by a unit panel of the Learning and Teaching
Committee.
The process for approval of units is detailed in the Unit Approval Procedures. This is available on
the University website at
http://www.divinity.edu.au/documents/unit-approval-procedures/
1.
Unit code and title
Replace Unit code and title with actual unit code and title. Check TAMS to make sure the
code is not already in use for an existing unit as the code for each unit must be unique across
the University. Your Registrar or Coursework Coordinator will be able to help you with this.
Replace College with College Code [ALC, CBC, CTC, SACOTC, Sentir, STC, UFT, WHT, YTU]
Refer to the Unit Coding Policy for details on how to assemble codes for new units. This is
available on the University website at
http://www.divinity.edu.au/documents/unit-coding-policy/
2.
New / Revised unit
Delete the one which is inapplicable, so this line says either New Unit or Revised Unit. If the
unit is revised, provide a brief description of the change for the benefit of the panel.
3.
Proposed by
The name of the faculty member who is proposing the unit (described below as ‘the
proposer’).
4.
Unit value
A standard unit is 15 points; other values should be used only in exceptional circumstances.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 1 of 9
5.
Level
Specify the levels at which the unit is available. Levels are:
Diploma
Undergraduate
Postgraduate Foundational
Postgraduate Elective
Postgraduate Capstone
6.
DipTheol, AdvDipTheol
BTheol, BMin (specify levels 1, 2 or 3)
GradCerts, GradDips, MDiv, MTS, MA(Theol)
All postgraduate awards in which coursework units are permitted
Masters courses only
Discipline
Every unit must have a single ‘home discipline’ chosen from this table.
Field A
Humanities
Field B
Biblical Studies
AL - Biblical Languages
AH - History
AL - Languages ancient
and modern
AP - Philosophy
AR - Religious Studies
BA - Old Testament
BN - New Testament
BS - Biblical Studies
Field C
Christian Thought and
History
CH - Church History
CT - Systematic Theology
Field D
Theology: Mission and Ministry
DA - Mission and Ministry
DC - Canon Law
DU - Ecumenical Studies
DE - Education Studies
DL - Liturgy
DM - Missiology
DT - Moral Theology
DP - Pastoral Theology and Ministry
Studies
DR - Religious Education
DS - Spirituality
DS - Spiritual Direction (PG only)
7.
Crosslisted to other disciplines
Some units are ‘crosslisted’ to other disciplines. If this is the case, please provide a separate
unit code for the crosslisted version of the unit.
8.
Courses in which this unit is taught
List all courses for which this will be an eligible unit. Please provide separate Unit Approval
Templates for undergraduate and postgraduate versions of a unit.
9.
Content
Write one to two paragraphs describing the unit. This section should be aimed at the
student.
10.
Learning outcomes
List the knowledge and skills the students will be expected to have gained by the end of the
unit. Learning outcomes must be measurable goals which should be tested by the
assessment for the unit. Use action words such as:
analyse, articulate, assess, characterise, compare, complete a project..., contrast,
demonstrate, evaluate, exhibit, identify, interpret, manifest, show, write a paper...
Please also refer to the 'Bloom’s Taxonomy' at the end of this document for a discussion of
outcomes at different levels.
Where a class is taught at more than one level, the higher level should comprise additional
and more intense learning outcomes.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 2 of 9
11.
Graduate Attributes
In the rightmost column, insert the numbers of the learning outcomes which align with the
University’s graduate attributes. The learning outcomes for the unit should address at least
one of the University’s graduate attributes. They do not have to address them all. If you
believe that a particular learning outcome contributes to more than one graduate attribute,
feel free to insert it two or three times.
Example: Biblical Studies 101
Graduate Attributes
Specify Learning Outcomes
which contribute towards
attainment of this
Graduate Attribute
1
1, 2, 3
LEARN
Graduates are equipped for critical study, especially of Christian texts and traditions
2
ARTICULATE
Graduates articulate theological insight and reflection
3
COMMUNICATE
3, 4
Graduates communicate informed views through structured argument
4
ENGAGE
3, 5
Graduates engage with diverse views, contexts and traditions
5
SERVE
Graduates are prepared for the service of others
12.
Assessment
Briefly describe all assessment tasks for the unit, including word counts for each item (e.g. 1
x 3000 word research essay). Provide a weighting for each item (e.g. 50%) ensuring that the
total adds up to 100%.
Since assessment tasks must test the learning outcomes for the unit, please provide the
numbers of the learning outcomes assessed by each task. If there is only one assessment
task, it should assess all learning outcomes.
The normal total word count for a standard 15 point unit at each level is as follows:
Diploma
3,000 to 4,000 words
Undergraduate
first year
4,000 words
second year
4,000-5,000 words
third year
5,000-6,000 words
Postgraduate
6,000 words
Each hour of examination time counts as 1,000 words.
Each 15 minutes of oral examination counts as 1,000 words.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 3 of 9
If this unit is to be assessed by means other than written work, please provide a justification
explaining how the assessment may be marked by two examiners and providing an
equivalent word length for any non-written item.
13.
Delivery mode
Please write one of: Face-to-face, Online, Mixed, Distance, Other.
If the choice is Mixed or Other, please describe how the unit will be delivered.
A Face-to-face unit includes units where some resources are provided online or assessments
are to be submitted online.
A unit which is taught in both face-to-face and wholly online mode should have separate
unit approvals, because the assessment tasks, delivery mode, timing, teaching methods,
lecturer and bibliography may be different.
14.
Timing
If the unit is semester-based, taught weekly in the standard semester and examined in the
examination period, then the total duration of unit is normally 16 weeks, comprising 12
weeks of teaching plus two weeks of mid-semester break plus one study week plus one
examination week, or however long students have to complete their last assignments.
If the unit is not semester-based (for example, an Intensive), then the total duration of the
unit (including any pre-reading periods, and time elapsed between the final class and the
submission of the final assessment task), total duration of teaching, and the pattern of hours
are required.
15.
Workload
For 15-point face-to-face units, it is expected that:
a)
Undergraduate students undertake 36 hours of engagement with teacher and / or
class and 72 hours of personal study;
b)
Postgraduate students undertake 36 hours of engagement with teacher and / or class
and 108 hours of personal study;
Online units should achieve total hours and ratios of teacher and class engagement and
personal study similar to face-to-face units.
16.
Teaching methods
For standard delivery, write Lectures, seminars, tutorials, or other activities you will provide.
For online delivery, describe the interactions and student experiences.
Describe in more detail any non-standard teaching methods.
17.
Prerequisites, Corequisites, Prohibited Combinations
Prerequisites: Please specify units or areas of study which must be completed before this
unit is undertaken.
Corequisites: Please specify any other units which students must complete in order to
receive credit for this unit.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 4 of 9
Prohibited Combinations: Please specify any units within your College with substantially
similar content which cannot be credited in the same course as this unit.
18.
Lecturer
Name the lecturer who will be taking and examining the class. If the lecturer has not been
accredited by the University's Academic Board in the discipline and level of the unit, please
also complete and submit a Lecturer Accreditation form.
If the unit is offered online, describe the lecturer’s previous experience teaching online
units. If the lecturer is teaching online for the first time, describe the support the College
will provide to that lecturer.
19.
Recommended reading
Provide a bibliography of 8 - 14 works. Mark with asterisks those texts which students
should purchase.
Please format the list as for a bibliography according to Turabian
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/turabian/turabian_citationguide.html
20.
Library Impact Statement
Check available texts and other resources against the unit’s Recommended Reading, and
identify resources which may need to be made available by the appropriate library.
The library impact statement may be signed off by the librarian, the unit’s lecturer or other
appropriate College member.
21.
Approvals
All approvals must be complete before the unit can be presented to the Learning and
Teaching Committee.
For new units, two reviewers in addition to the proposer are required. At least one of these
reviewers must be external to the offering College.
For revised units, one reviewer in addition to the proposer is required. This reviewer may
be internal to your College.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 5 of 9
UNIVERSITY OF DIVINITY
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
1.
LEARN
Graduates are equipped for critical study, especially of Christian texts and traditions
2.
ARTICULATE
Graduates articulate theological insight and reflection
3.
COMMUNICATE
Graduates communicate informed views through structured argument
4.
ENGAGE
Graduates engage with diverse views, contexts and traditions
5.
SERVE
Graduates are prepared for the service of others
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
For course learning outcomes please consult the 'Our Courses' section of the University website
and select the appropriate course:
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 6 of 9
Summary of Bloom's taxonomy
In the 1950s, educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom developed a hierarchical classification of
behaviour important in learning—from the simple cognitive behaviour of recall and fact
recognition to more complex behaviour, involving increasing mental abstraction.
Bloom also classified the types of questions used by educators in assessing students by verb form.
The type of action required by the verbs used in an assessment question indicate the cognitive
demands being placed on students.
Knowledge:
arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize,
relate, recall, repeat, reproduce, state
Comprehension:
classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate,
recognize, report, restate, review, select, translate
Application:
apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret,
operate, practice, schedule, sketch, solve, use, write
Analysis:
analyse, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize,
differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test
Synthesis:
arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop,
formulate, manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write
Evaluation:
appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend, estimate, judge,
predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 7 of 9
SOLO taxonomy
In the 1980s educational psychologists Kevin Collis and John Biggs designed SOLO, which stands
for the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome. SOLO taxonomy is a means of classifying
learning outcomes in terms of their complexity, enabling us to assess students’ work in terms of its
quality not of how many bits of this and of that they got right.
At first, learners may pick up only one or few aspects of the task (unistructural), then from several
but unrelated aspects (multistructural), they progress in learning how to integrate them into a
whole (relational), and finally, develop ability to generalise that whole to as yet untaught
applications (extended abstract). The diagram lists verbs typical of each such level.
SOLO can be used not only in assessment, but in designing the curriculum in terms of the learning
outcomes intended, which is helpful in implementing constructive alignment.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 8 of 9
Learning outcomes and assessment
A useful way of conceptualising the relationship between learning outcomes and the selection of
appropriate assessment tasks is represented in the diagram of the “task-oriented question
construction wheel” (St Edward’s University, 2004), based on Bloom’s original taxonomy. Use this
wheel to identify assessment tasks which align with learning outcomes at different levels of
cognition.
Unit Approval Template Completion Guide 2014
Page 9 of 9