BRISTOL AGEING BETTER
COMMUNITY WEBS PROJECT
APPENDIX 2: BID EVALUATION MODEL
SECTION 1:
Question
Score :
Question 2: Financial Capability
Pass/Fail
Question 3 : Policies and Compliance
Constitution / Articles of Association / Governance
Document
Vulnerable Adults Safeguarding Policy
Pass/Fail
Health and Safety
Pass/Fail
Equalities
Pass/Fail
Volunteers Policy
Pass/Fail
Older People Involvement/Service User Participation
Policy.
Pass/Fail
Data Protection
Pass/Fail
Insurance
Pass/Fail
DBS Certificates
Pass/Fail
Complaints
Pass/Fail
Pass/Fail
SECTION B: TENDER PROPOSAL
Question
Evaluation Criteria
Weighting
Word limit
%
QUALITY 80%
1.
Please provide a description of you and your partner organisations’
experience of working with Older People in the geographical areas
identified in the Invitation to Tender.
Minimum 2 years experience of:
-
Working with older people
-
Providing services with a focus
on reducing and/or preventing
isolation and loneliness in later
life
10
300
40
1,000
Organisations’ experience covers both
Bedminster Medical Group and
Northern Arc GP cluster areas.
Organisational values reflect BAB
values.
2.
2: Please describe your proposed project making reference to the
functions and specifications set out in the Invitation to Tender:
All points are covered and evidenced
in the narrative.
Functions:
Proposed allocation of staff resource
is likely to deliver the required
functions.
Community Webs Co-ordinator
• Works closely with all participating GP surgeries across both
clusters to develop the necessary systems, processes and
pathways needed
• Oversees and liaises with the Signposters
Question
Evaluation Criteria
Weighting
Word limit
%
•
Reports to the Test & Learn Project group
Signposter ( 1 for Northern Arc and 1 for Bedminster)
• patient facing
• up to date knowledge of local assets
• offer a signposting facility to patients
Specifications:
1. Developing the necessary systems, processes, pathways
needed to operate the Community Webs model within both
areas.
2. Managing the project and the staff in line with expectations
from Better Care and BAB.
3. Ensuring the Community Webs model is reflective of the
needs of both communities involved in the pilot
4. Pilot model to last no more than 12 months including an
evaluation period
5. Trialling a model that has the potential to be scaled-up.
6. Using the Bristol Ageing Better Common Measurement
Framework short form as the minimum form of evaluation
3.
Please identify how many beneficiaries you estimate working with
Beneficiary numbers are realistic and
achievable within the proposed project
5
100
4.
Please provide a summary action plan for the 12 months of the pilot
project setting out proposed actions and timescales.
Realistic action plan covering all 12
months of the project. To include but
not limited to:
10
N/A
Question
Evaluation Criteria
Weighting
Word limit
%
-
-
-
Staff recruitment and training
Working with participating GP
surgeries to develop
identification and referral
pathways
Developing an understanding
of relevant existing services in
both geographical areas
Ongoing monitoring and
evaluation
5.
Please describe how your proposed project will work with Primary
Care to identify individuals who would benefit from accessing the
Community Webs service.
Engagement with participating GP
practices to identify those who would
benefit from the service.
10
300
6.
Please provide an assessment of key risks to delivery and how you
propose to mitigate these.
Evidenced understanding of risk.
5
300
Please give a breakdown of the costs of your service in the budget
pro forma.
Appropriate profiling, and reasonable
allocation of budget to deliver service
plan and achieve best value from
funding
7.
Comprehensive mitigation of risk
detailed in answer.
Added value.
20
SCORE GUIDE
SCORE
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Unacceptable
The Bidder has failed to provide relevant detail for all parts
of question requirements
0
Weak
1-4
Adequate
5-6
Good
The Bidder has failed to provide relevant detail for a
significant part of question requirements
The Bidder has provided a satisfactory level of relevant
detail for all parts of the question requirements
The bidder has provided detailed and comprehensive
responses to all question requirements and has provided
supporting evidence where appropriate.
7-8
Excellent
9-10
The Bidder has exceeded the question requirements with
detailed and, comprehensive responses with supporting
evidence (where appropriate).
The responses are creative and innovative, add value to bid
requirements and clearly demonstrate how delivery
methods will result in improved outcomes for older people
0117 928 1539
www.bristolageingbetter.org.uk