Axion-like particles in the high energy universe Denis Wouters Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 1 Which ALPs ? A. Ringwald, 2012, arXiv: 1210.5081 Low mass ALPs « Transparency hint » Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 2 Gould & Schréder, 1967, Phys. Rev. Stecker, de Jager, Salamon, 1992, ApJ Lett. Transparency hint? • Universe opaque at very high energies (VHE, E ~ 1 TeV) Background photons 2 2 .5 3 2.5 3 Extragalactic background light (EBL) 3 2 5 1.5 2. 1 .5 2 5 1 1. 5 0. 0 1 .5 0. .5 -0 1 0 5 0 .5 -0 -1 1 0 0 .5 0.5 0 1 0 .5 -1 -1 0 .5 -0 0 .5 0 1 -1 0 0 -0.5 1 1 .5 0.5 1 e+ e- 2 1 0.5 2 .5 0 -0 .5 -1 0 3 0.5 1 TeV γ-rays 1.5 2 2.5 3 HESS 2, 2012 φ φ at the source at the source at the Earth 1 TeV Denis Wouters 1 TeV E ALPs in the HE universe E 3 The Extragalactic Background Light: • Various models, uncertainties Dole et al. 2006, A&A • Optical background (COB) • hard to measure (foreground emission from Milky Way) TeV γ-ray absorption Kneiske & Dole, 2010, A&A Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 4 Universe too transparent? too much γ detected at VHE EBL corrected φ at the source at the Earth 1 TeV E HESS Collaboration, 2006, Nature • 2006: H.E.S.S. observations of 2 sources at z = 0.165, 0.186 • 2008: MAGIC observation of 3C279 at z = 0.536 MAGIC Collaboration, 2008, Science The universe is more transparent than expected! Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 5 ALPs can explain this effect: • γ-ALP oscillations in intergalactic magnetic field (IGMF) • ALPs not absorbed by EBL Background photons 2 2 .5 3 2.5 3 Extragalactic background light (EBL) 3 2 5 1.5 2. .5 2 1 5 1 1. 5 0. 0 1 .5 0. .5 -0 1 0 5 0 .5 -0 -1 1 0 0 .5 0.5 0 1 0 .5 -1 -1 0 .5 -0 0 .5 0 1 -1 0 0 -0.5 1 1 .5 0.5 1 ALPs 2 1 0.5 2 .5 0 -0 .5 -1 0 3 0.5 TeV γ-rays 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 EBL without ALPs corrected φ at the source De Angelis et al. 2007, PRD Simet et al. 2008, PRD Sanchez Conde et al. 2009, PRD EBL with ALPs corrected at the Earth 1 TeV Denis Wouters E ALPs in the HE universe 6 γ-ALP mixing: • Two photon polarization states, one ALP state • Optical depth of photons on the EBL • No plasma correction, Faraday rotation, Birefringence Projection on polarization axis Mixing matrix: EBL absorption γ-ALP coupling with transverse component of B Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe ALP mass Csaki et al. 2005, JCAP 7 Coherent magnetic field: • Magnetic field: Uniform orientation and strength • Turn-off EBL absorption (for the moment) • Conversion in domain of size s: δ • Effect is energy dependent. Critical energy – E << Ec : No conversion – E ~Ec : spatial oscillations, energy dependent – E >> Ec : spatial oscillations, energy independent Hochmuth & Sigl, 2007, PRD • δ : strength of the coupling ó Hillas criterion (max. ) Hooper & Serpico, 2007, PRL Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 8 Coherent magnetic field: • Example for different values of δ: 1 domain, g = 8 × 10-11 GeV-1, ma = 2 neV, Ethr = 1 TeV Wouters & Brun, 2012, PRD Pγ → γ = 1 - Pγ → a 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 δ=5 δ = 10 δ = 15 0.6 0.5 10-1 1 10 102 Energy (TeV) • Unpredictable attenuation at high energies Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 9 Astrophysical magnetic fields: • Various magnetic fields: – Milky-way – Intergalactic Magnetic Field (IGMF) – Cluster of galaxies • Not coherent: turbulence • Naive representation of the turbulence: γ γ, a Coherence length Magnetic field coherent within one domain Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 10 Averaged behavior: • Behavior for average over all possible realizations of B • Two effects in the spectrum: – Drop of 1/3 at Ec – Boost at high energies due to non-EBL absorption of ALPs Sanchez Conde et al. 2009, PRD Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 11 For one realization: • Average behavior Average over many sources • Not available at TeV energies: ~ 10 sources. • ALP mixing random process: variance of the prediction? universe can be more transparent or more opaque! Variance for prediction EBL model only Average prediction Mirizzi et Montanino, 2009, JCAP • Large population studies required for average Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 12 Population studies: • Look for anomaly in spectra of extragalactic sources • 2012: 24 extragalactic sources discovered Horns & Meyer, 2012, JCAP • Claim for unexpected boost at VHE (4.2σ effect) • Not enough sources… prospect for CTA Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 13 Signature for single source: • Boost at VHE not valid for observations of one source • Behavior around critical energy? - Source at redshift 0.1 - g = 8 10-11 GeV-1 , ma = 2 neV, B = 1 nG , L = 1 Mpc 0.8 Without EBL absorption P 0.6 0.4 0.2 1 « Opacity effect » P 10-1 -2 10 With EBL absorption Wouters & Brun, 2012, PRD 1 EBL without ALPs 10-1 1 10 102 Energy (TeV) Smooth Denis Wouters - Noisy ALPs in the HE universe - Smooth behavior 14 Signature for single source: • Turbulence of magnetic field irregularities in spectrum • Irregularities around critical energy • Can be detected by Cherenkov telescopes Wouters & Brun, 2012, PRD 0.6 10-4 0.4 -6 10 Relative fit residuals Flux (photons m-2 s-1 TeV-1 ) -5 10 10-7 -8 10 -9 10 -10 10 10-11 10-12 Unbinned spectrum (EBL × log-parabola) fit 0.2 0 -0.2 With ALPs -0.4 Binned spectrum Without ALPs -13 10 -0.6 10-1 1 10 Energy (TeV) 10-1 1 Energy (TeV) • Proposed for quasars observations in optical Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 15 Application to HESS: • Look for irregularities in spectrum of one bright source Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe H.E.S.S. Collaboration, 2007, ApJ Lett. • Brightest extragalactic source: PKS 2155-304 • Redshift z = 0.116 (d = 478 Mpc) • Big flare in July 2006, ~50*base flux 16 Conclusion: • ALPs relevant for γ-ray astronomy at very low mass ( < µeV) • Unexpected transparency of the universe: – – – – Anomaly weakens with recent EBL models can be explained by ALPs can be explained by other exotic models cannot be used to put constraints on ALP models • Irregularities at critical energy: – independent from « transparency hint » – signature for potential detection – can be used to put constraints with HESS Denis Wouters ALPs in the HE universe 17
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz