Student’s Name Professor’s Name Class Introduction Morality development is usually enhanced through face to face interaction with the public and more specifically with our professional colleagues as presented by sociologist Goffman. Presentation of self is achieved when an individual come in direct contact with the other people, and he or she attempt by all means to control his natural behavior, appearance, and manner so that it can be in line with what the public expected of him or her. In such a situation, an individual is made to suppress his or her consciousness of what he or she may find to be contrary to his or her opinion and believe. A person on stage is also expected not to embarrass others by following his or her conscience which in most cases different from the public opinion. Goffman asserts that if a professional colleague, for instance, does something that is morally wrong, and individual in that setting is supposed not to speak out of that person for the sake of that person's reputation. Morality Erving Goffman has well presented the issue of morality when one is with his or her social group especially when he or she is on the stage. His insight on the professional sense of self is indeed very relevant today in various professions in different social classes and groups. He has presented the self of an individual when on stage for others. Goffman presents the sense of loyalty as being overridden by that urge and needs to show a good picture so that cases of immorality is covered up for the sake of other people one is representing. Morality He says that situation becomes like a drama in that one act morally upright for the sake of others. An individual on stage would, therefore, maintain a high degree of behavior that he does not believe since he alienates from his usual self because of that need to wary others. An individual, in this case, is therefore imprisoned by the role others want him to play. In his analysis, Goffman asserts that the sense of loyalty only emerges as a reflection of the role an individual plays in others whereby that individual has to silence his conscience so that he plays that is required of him (1). Morality The way one expose the people closely related to him or she entirely depend on how much that individual has internalized the role the public expects him or her to play especially on the personal level. In such a situation, a person is expected to refuse to speak aloud against the ethical transgression and morals for one to be better actors before others. One should therefore not speak out of his or her professional colleague at places of work, and as a result, a person is fully lost in the professional role. Morality Goffman might as well say that in the process of one trying to maintain morality and loyalty of his or her profession, he or she becomes a slave of his or her profession to make his role better. Goffman asserts that if an individual speaks according to his conscience in the workplace, he or she enhance her or his backstage condition (4). Another human identity according to Goffman is displayed when a person acts offstage by contradicting the public acting. According to Goffman, one develops his or her character of loyalty and morality especially at the places of work by trying to honor his or her colleagues and suppressing his consciousness (3). Morality . The exercise of one trying to honor all the concerned and close colleagues becomes one of the main events of developing a character that will, in the long run, be maintained even when one is alone. Goffman asserts that the role one plays in public is crucial in the development of identity. He suggests that it is from that process of developing the character through playing our roles in the community that one learn not to accept blindly weird moral transgression which may eventually change ones’ behavior and way of conduct. Morality Goffman further suggests that developing such immorality involves knowing that it cannot be replicated by the same individual. He concluded that it is critical that an individual should not keep down that inner voice that condemns the development of immoral character. Goffman then argued that it is possible to sustain both realities which will, in the end, help to make an advanced and actualized consciousness within oneself (2). References References 1.Bauman, Zygmunt. "Morality without ethics." Theory, Culture & Society 11.4 (1994): 1-34. 2.Weiss, Paul. "Morality and ethics." The Journal of Philosophy 39.14 (1942): 381-385. 3.Miller, W. Watts. "Morality and ethics." Durkheim Today (2002): 55-68. 4.Kagan, Shelly. "Normative ethics." (1998).
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz