CO2 Reactivity Testing Without Blood Pressure Monitoring? A. Hetzel, MD; S. Braune, MD; B. Guschlbauer; K. Dohms, MD Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 31, 2017 Background and Purpose—Responsiveness to CO2 is an established test of cerebrovascular reserve capacity. Arterial partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) and arterial blood pressure (BP) are key parameters for cerebral blood flow. To investigate the interaction between PCO2 and BP, we performed a study with simultaneous measurement of CO2 and BP during CO2 reactivity testing with transcranial Doppler sonography. Methods—Eighty-one healthy volunteers, aged 19 to 74 years, underwent examination defined by a protocol with multimodality monitoring of BP, heart rate (HR), PCO2, and Doppler frequencies (DFs) of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA). Reproducibility was tested in a subgroup of 14 volunteers $65 years of age by CO2 reactivity testing on different days. Results—Increase of PCO2 was accompanied by a parallel increase of mean6SD time values of DF (3.661.6%/mm Hg CO2). BP levels were significantly elevated after 60-second hypercapnia (mean values, 0.560.55 mm Hg/mm Hg CO2). A significant decrease over time was seen only for pulsatility in DF but not in BP. Analysis of variance and covariance with repeated measures revealed a highly significant effect of CO2 on MCA Doppler shift. A less-pronounced effect on DF was seen for BP. Correlation analysis showed no significance for CO2 reactivity, but a significant correlation between test and retest was seen in BP-related CO2 reactivity. Conclusions—The CO2 response curve showed the known linear increase of DF. The parallel significant increase in BP most likely results from activation of the central sympathetic nervous system. The poor reproducibility for Doppler CO2 reactivity is to some extent explainable by variability of BP. CO2-induced increases in BP can have relevant influence on MCA Doppler shift and lead to misinterpretation of Doppler CO2 test results. (Stroke. 1999;30:398-401.) Key Words: blood pressure n carbon dioxide n Doppler effect n ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial C This study included simultaneous measurement of CO2 and BP to assess the role of BP variability during CO2 reactivity testing with transcranial Doppler sonography. erebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation and the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) have predominant influence on the regulation of global cerebral perfusion.1 Cerebral vessels constrict and dilate during increase and decrease of perfusion pressure.2 Myogenic (intrinsic response of vascular muscle to changes in stretch) and metabolic (release of mediators during tissue hypoxia) mechanisms have been proposed as important regulatory control systems.3,4 The potent effect of CO2 is a local action on cerebral arterioles and appears to be mediated by extracellular H1 ions.5,6 Therefore, cerebrovascular reserve capacity is tested by inducing changes in extracellular H1 ions (CO2 reactivity or Diamox test).7–10 In occlusive cerebrovascular disease, not only may responsiveness to changes in extracellular pH be deranged,9,10 but CBF autoregulation may also be impaired.11 After cerebral ischemia, tissue becomes pressure dependent owing to loss of CBF autoregulation.12 CO2 reactivity testing presupposes stable blood pressure (BP). Persistent slow and rapid changes in BP interfere with measurements of flow velocity in the MCA11,13 because of delay in autoregulative response. Subjects and Methods Transcranial Doppler frequencies (DFs) under normocapnia and hypercapnia correspond closely to other cerebral blood flow measurements,1,14 –17 accurately reflecting the relative changes in CBF during dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Noninvasive continuous measurement of arterial BP by the Finapres method allows accurate measurement with a maximal variation of 65 mm Hg, which is also representative for the brachial BP.18,19 End-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2) and intra-arterial CO2 were shown to correlate closely.20 PETCO2 was measured in millimeters of mercury during expiration by an infrared capnometer with a probe attached to 1 nostril. Eighty-one healthy volunteers, aged 19 to 74 years, underwent examination defined by a protocol with continuous measurement of digital BP and heart rate (HR) (Finapres), unilateral DF of the middle cerebral artery (MCA; EME TC2– 64), and PETCO2 (infrared capnometer, Normocap, DATEX). For analysis of reproducibility, an additional group of 14 volunteers, aged $65 years (range, 65 to 82 years) and without ipsilateral relevant atherosclerosis, was examined twice with the same protocol. After a resting period of sufficient length to obtain stable baseline values, with the patients in supine position, a CO2 reactivity test was Received March 9, 1998; final revision received August 6, 1998; accepted October 30, 1998. From the Department of Neurology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Correspondence to Dr Andreas Hetzel, Department of Neurology, University Clinics, Breisacherstr 64, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail [email protected] © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. Stroke is available at http://www.strokeaha.org 398 Hetzel et al February 1999 399 performed with rebreathing in a 50-L bag filled with 7% CO2enriched air. Five phases were defined during CO2 reactivity testing: baseline (phase 0) and the increase of PETCO2 divided into steps of approximately 4 mm Hg CO2 during rebreathing (phase I, beginning; phase II, 4 to 5 mm Hg CO2; phase III, 8 to 9 mm Hg CO2; and phase IV, 12 to 13 mm Hg). The changes in DF were calculated as percentage of baseline values and the remaining parameters as differences from baseline. Data were reported as mean6SD. Data evaluation was carried out by standard statistical techniques (nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and nonparametric Wilcoxon’s test for paired samples). Analysis of variance and covariance with repeated measures were performed to investigate the interaction between the parameters measured. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for estimation of retest variability. Results Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 31, 2017 Increasing PaCO2 during CO2 reactivity testing provoked a significant increase in DF. The time-mean of DF increased by 3.661.6%/mm Hg CO2 (P,0.001), and pulsatility measured by Gosling’s pulsatility index decreased significantly after reaching 8 mm Hg PaCO2. During hypercapnia mean BP values increased significantly (see upper panel of Figure 1); mean values of BP were positively correlated to PETCO2 (0.5560.50 mm Hg/mm Hg CO2, P,0.001). HR (not shown in Figure 1) was significantly elevated by 4.667.8 bpm only during phase 4 (P,0.01). ANOVA with repeated measures showed that CO2 as independent variable was the most relevant parameter for the variable MCA-DF but interacted closely with the covariables BP and HR. A significant correlation was found between the covariables CO2 (P,0.001), BP (P,0.05), and HR (P,0.01). Multifactor variance analysis revealed that CO2 was not the only relevant covariable. The retest variability of 14 volunteers was quantified with Spearman correlation coefficients. The time-mean values of all measured parameters did show significant correlation (DF, 0.67, P,0. 01; BP, 0.66, P,0. 05; and CO2, 0.70, P,0. 01), but CO2 reactivity itself showed only a poor correlation (0.36, P50.20). The correlation analysis for the BP-related CO2 reactivity (CO2 reactivity per mm Hg change in BP) revealed a significant Spearman correlation coefficient (0.73, P,0. 01). Not only could the reproducibility be increased by additional BP measurements, but the interpretation of individual results of CO2 reactivity testing could also be improved as shown in following cases. In the first case, that of a 53-year-old migraineur, breathdependent oscillations of BP induced amplified amplitudes of oscillation of DF under normocapnia. During hypercapnia, a significant increase of BP occurred, and changes in BP predominantly determined changes in DF. Steady-state hypercapnia was reached after 20 seconds and induced continuous increase of MCA blood flow velocity and BP over a period of 40 seconds. The relevance of changes in BP are plainly recognizable at the end of hypercapnia. Rapid changes due to arrhythmia led to parallel changes in DF (see Figure 2). This demonstrates that BP oscillations may interfere with CO2 reactivity testing and result in limited reproducibility, even under physiological conditions in healthy people. Figure 1. Multimodality monitoring during CO2 reactivity testing with simultaneously recorded BP (in mm Hg), MCA-DF (kHz), heart rate (bpm) and PETCO2 (mm Hg). Relative changes compared with baseline values were calculated for all parameters. Data are reported as mean6SD. The symbols indicate significant differences between phases in Wilcoxon’s test for paired samples (1P,0.01, *P,0.001). In the second case, a 69-year-old man presented with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis on the left side. The preoperative CO2 reactivity testing is shown in Figure 3. No side-to-side differences were seen under normocapnia. A relevant increase of DF during hypercapnia on the left side was not observed. Vasomotor reactivity was exhausted on the left side. The MCA-DF, however, increased with the rise of BP at the end. CO2 reactivity at the beginning of steady-state hypercapnia was 0%/mm Hg CO2 and increased as a result of BP increase by 0.8%/mm Hg CO2. Therefore, despite maximal vasodilatation, a falsely indicated partially maintained CO2 reactivity was evoked by a CO2-induced increase of BP. Discussion The CO2 response curve confirmed the known linear correlation between PaCO2 and MCA flow velocity.7–10,21 Recently, Kastrup et al22 observed an increase of BP during hypercapnia that reached values similar to ours but did not reach significance in the t test. The parallel increase of BP more than HR is induced by activation of the central sympathetic nervous system.23 In some individuals the effect of BP 400 CO2 Reactivity Testing Without BP Monitoring? Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 31, 2017 Figure 2. Individual multimodality monitoring during CO2 reactivity testing in a 53-year-old migraineur with simultaneously recorded BP (in mm Hg), bilateral MCA flow velocity (mean time of MCA velocity in cm/s), and PetCO2 (in mm Hg). See text for further details. Figure 3. Patient with 90% stenosis of the left internal carotid artery with multimodality monitoring during CO2 reactivity test: hypercapnia demonstrates exhausted vasomotor reactivity. Significant increase of MCA-DF on the left side is not visible despite hypercapnia (compare first and second bars that indicate periods of measurements). MCA-DF did not increase, however, until BP rose (third bar). Calculation of CO2 reactivity revealed 0%/mm Hg CO2 at the beginning of hypercapnic steady state. CO2 reactivity increased at the end of hypercapnia because of BP increase from 0% to 0.8%/mm Hg CO2 (see text for further details). Hetzel et al Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 31, 2017 reaches the level of CO2-induced changes. The differentiation of normal from pathological findings can be difficult because of large SDs of changes in BP and CO2 during CO2 reactivity testing (Figure 1). Therefore, the common Doppler CO2 test should be interpreted very carefully, as recommended by Widder et al.9 In their opinion, only exhausted CO2 reactivity is a significant finding. The problem of variable CO2 effects on DF and BP can lead to misinterpretation of CO2 test results if not all relevant parameters are monitored (see Figures 2 and 3). The effect of BP on MCA Doppler shift is not linear. This might be explained by the high-pass filter properties of cerebral autoregulation. Depending on the frequency of BP oscillation, a phase displacement and potentially a rise of amplitudes of DF oscillation was observed by Diehl et al.24 Therefore, simple mathematical methods are not able to extract the irregular variations in DF due to BP variations. In the present study, only individual phase-related data exist, with no opportunity of performing time-series analysis to exclude the individual effect of BP on CO2 reactivity. An ongoing study of BP increase during CO2 reactivity measurements in patients with carotid stenoses will provide such data. Parallel measurement of BP increases the individual reliability of CO2 reactivity testing. Correlation of test and retest of CO2 reactivity related to BP changes showed a moderately significant correlation, whereas the correlation of the Doppler CO2 test alone was poor. We conclude that the consideration of changes in BP improves the prognostic value and minimizes false-negative results of CO2 reactivity testing. References 1. Kety SS, Schmidt CF. The nitrous oxide method for the quantitative determination of cerebral blood flow in man: theory, procedure and normal values. J Clin Invest. 1948;27:476 – 483. 2. Kontos HA, Wei EP, Navari RM, Levasseur JE, Rosenblum WI, Patterson JL Jr. Responses of cerebral arteries and arterioles to hypotension and hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1978;234:H371–H383. 3. Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1990;2:161–192. 4. Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebral blood flow and its pathophysiology in hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:486 – 492. 5. Kontos HA, Wei EP, Raper AJ, Patterson JL Jr. Local mechanism of CO2 reaction of cat pial arterioles. Stroke. 1977;8:227–229. 6. Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 1984;15: 413– 416. 7. Bishop CCR, Powell S, Insall M, Rutt D, Browse NL. Effect of internal carotid artery occlusion on middle cerebral artery blood flow at rest and in response to hypercapnia. Lancet. 1986;1:710 –712. February 1999 401 8. Ringelstein EB, Sievers C, Ecker S, Schneider PA, Otis SM. Noninvasive assessment of CO2-induced cerebral vasomotor response in normal individuals and patients with internal carotid occlusions. Stroke. 1988;19: 963–969. 9. Widder B. The Doppler CO2 test to exclude patients not in need of extracranial/intracranial bypass surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:38 – 42. 10. Kleiser B, Widder B. Course of carotid artery occlusions with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. Stroke. 1992;23:171–174. 11. Tiecks FP, Douville C, Byrd S, Lam AM, Newell DW. Evaluation of impaired cerebral autoregulation by the Valsalva maneuver. Stroke. 1996; 27:1177–1182. 12. Waltz AG. Effect of blood pressure on blood flow in ischemic and in nonischemic cerebral cortex: the phenomena of autoregulation and luxury perfusion. Neurology. 1968;18:613– 631. 13. Diehl RR, Linden D, Lücke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure: a clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke. 1995;26:1801–1804. 14. Harper AM, Glass HI. Effect of alterations in the arterial carbon dioxide tension on the blood flow through the cerebral cortex at normal and low arterial blood pressures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1965;28: 449 – 452. 15. Kontos HA. Validity of cerebral arterial blood flow calculations from velocity measurements. Stroke. 1989;15:76 –79. 16. Newell DW, Aaslid R, Lam A, Mayberg TS, Winn HR. Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans. Stroke. 1994;25:793–797. 17. Larsen FS, Olsen KS, Hansen BA, Paulson OB, Knudsen GM. Transcranial Doppler is valid for determination of the lower limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Stroke. 1989;25:1985–1988. 18. Silke B, Spiers JP, Boyd E, Graham E, McParland G, Scott ME. Evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure measurement by the Finapres method at rest and during exercise in subjects with cardiovascular insufficiency. Clin Auton Res. 1994;4:49 –56. 19. Parati G, Casadei R, Gropelli A, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring in rest and during laboratory testing. Hypertension. 1989;13:647– 655. 20. Young WL, Prohovnik I, Ornstein E, Ostapkovich N, Matteo RS. Cerebral blood flow reactivity to changes in carbon dioxide calculated using end-tidal versus arterial tensions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:1031–1035. 21. Markwalder T-M. Dependency of blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery on end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure: a transcranial ultrasound Doppler study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1984;4:368 –372. 22. Kastrup A, Dichgans J, Niemeier M, Schabet M. Changes of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity during normal aging. Stroke. 1998;29:1311–1314. 23. Braune S, Hetzel A, Prasse A, Dohms K, Guschlbauer B, Lücking CH. Stimulation of sympathetic activity by carbon dioxide in patients with autonomic failure compared to normal subjects. Clin Auton Res. 1997;7: 327–332. 24. Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure: a clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke. 1995;26:1801–1804. CO2 Reactivity Testing Without Blood Pressure Monitoring? A. Hetzel, S. Braune, B. Guschlbauer and K. Dohms Downloaded from http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ by guest on July 31, 2017 Stroke. 1999;30:398-401 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.2.398 Stroke is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0039-2499. Online ISSN: 1524-4628 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/30/2/398 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Stroke can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Stroke is online at: http://stroke.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz