September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 CA Document Update Date: 2006-9-19 Authors: Name Company Address Eldad Perahia Intel Phone email eldad.perahia @intel.com Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <[email protected]> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <[email protected]>. Submission Slide 1 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Abstract • Review update to the CA document in 06/338r4 Submission Slide 2 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Comment Summary • 7846, 7855: Analysis treats BT like wideband interferer. Run simulation with a PSD representative of BT • 7846, 7855: 11n can operate in both 20 and 40MHz, run sims in both 20 and 40 MHz • 7853, 7855: Analysis of collision with BT packet causes complete 11n packet failure. Consider model in which collision only corrupts a portion of the aggregate • 7854: Add probability of collision plots, not just throughput • 7870: No information provided for 802.15.4, please provide Submission Slide 3 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 BT interferer waveform simulated in PHY sim Submission Slide 4 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 PER vs. SIR for 20MHz, channel model B with P802.15.1 interference SNR = 40dB 1 MCS BW (MH z) Data Rate Mb/s Required SNR (dB) @ PER=1% 0 20 6.5 12 7 20 65 31 15 20 130 35.5 PER 0.1 MCS 0; 1x2 MCS 7; 1x2 MCS 15; 2x3 0.01 0.001 0 5 10 15 20 SIR (dB) 25 30 35 40 More degradation to interference than to noise •Interference power concentrated in just a few tones •Channel estimate and Decoder metrics are adversely effected by interference with basic MMSE receiver Submission Slide 5 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 11n Link • Link budget modified to separate received SNR and minimum allowable C/I • Process to calculate separation between STA and interferer – Set desired AP – STA separation, which determines the Received SNR – Run PER vs SIR curve at Received SNR – Calculate Interferer – STA separation based on minimum allowable C/I Submission Slide 6 Tx Power Tx antenna gain pathloss frequency distance breakpoint shadow fading before breakpoint shadow fading after breakpoint free space total loss dBm dBi 17 2 GHz m m 2.4 20 5 dB dB 4 54.0 79.1 Rx antenna gain RSSI Noise Power NF BW total Received SNR dBi dBm 2 -58.1 dB MHz dBm dB 6 20 -95.0 36.9 3 minimum allowable C/I Allowable Receive Interference power dBm -79.2 Interferer Tx Power Tx antenna gain Pathloss separation from STA dBm dBi dB m 0 2 83.2 26.2 21.1 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 40 MHz Submission Slide 7 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 PER curves for 40MHz, channel model B 1 0.1 PER MCS 32; 1x2 MCS 0; 1x2 MCS 7; 1x2 MCS 15; 2x3 0.01 0.001 -5 Submission 0 5 10 15 20 SNR (dB) Slide 8 25 30 35 40 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 PER vs. SIR for 40MHz, channel model B with P802.15.1 interference SNR = 40dB 1 0.1 PER MCS 32; 1x2 MCS 0; 1x2 MCS 7; 1x2 MCS 15; 2x3 0.01 0.001 0 5 10 15 20 SIR (dB) 25 30 35 40 20 MHz and 40 MHz p802.11n receivers experience similar degradation from a P802.15.1 interferer Submission Slide 9 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 40MHz spectral plot 40 MHz HT ( HT-LTF and HT-Data) 25 20 15 10 Power (dB) 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -20 Submission -15 -10 -5 0 Frequency (MHz) Slide 10 5 10 15 20 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Partial Packet Failure Submission Slide 11 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Partial Packet Failure • With A-MSDU aggregation, the entire aggregate is protected by a single FCS – Therefore bit errors anywhere in the aggregate will cause all subframes to be lost and require retransmission. – As such, A-MSDU aggregation follows the previously provided derivation • With A-MPDU aggregation, each MPDU contains its own FCS. In addition, each MPDU is preceded by a delimiter. Therefore portions of the transmission can be corrupted without loosing all MPDUs – However, if the PHY preamble and header are corrupted by a collision with a P802.15.1 packet, the entire aggregate will still be lost – New analysis provided such that only MPDUs which collided with P802.15.1 packets were considered lost. If a P802.15.1 packet collided with the PHY preamble, the entire aggregate was considered lost Submission Slide 12 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on p802.11n throughput for 130Mb/s, 20MHz mode with A-MPDU model PHY Data Rate = 130.0 Mb/s; BW = 20 MHz; sub-packet length = 1500B 120 • Performance with A-MPDU model substantially improved over A-MSDU model with high BT occupancy 11n Throughput (Mb/s) 100 80 BT Occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 60 40 20 0 Submission 0 5 Slide 13 10 15 20 25 30 Aggregate Packet Length(kBytes) 35 40 Eldad Perahia (Intel) 45 September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on p802.11n throughput for 270Mb/s, 40MHz mode with A-MPDU model PHY Data Rate = 270 Mb/s; BW = 40 MHz; sub-packet length = 1500B 250 11n Throughput (Mb/s) 200 150 100 BT Occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 50 0 Submission 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Aggregate Packet Length(kBytes) Slide 14 70 80 90 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 p802.11n throughput with A-MPDU aggregation C/N = 40dB 110 100 90 11n Throughput (Mbps) • In terms of throughput vs STA-Interferer separation, AMPDU is a little better than A-MSDU at smaller separation, but results converge at larger separations 80 MCS 0, 1x2 MCS 7, 1x2 MCS 15, 2x3 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 STA - Interferer Separation (m) Submission Slide 15 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Probability of Collision Plots Submission Slide 16 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on probability of collision for 130Mb/s, 20MHz mode PHY Data Rate = 130.0 Mb/s; BW = 20 MHz 0.8 0.7 Probability of Collision 0.6 BT occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Submission 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Aggregate Packet Length (kBytes) Slide 17 35 40 45 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on probability of collision for 6.5Mb/s, 20MHz mode PHY Data Rate = 6.5 Mb/s; BW = 20 MHz 0.8 0.7 Probability of Collision 0.6 BT occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Submission 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Aggregate Packet Length (kBytes) Slide 18 1.8 1.9 2 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on probability of collision for 270Mb/s, 40MHz mode PHY Data Rate = 270.0 Mb/s; BW = 40 MHz 1 0.9 Probability of Collision 0.8 BT occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Submission 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Aggregate Packet Length (kBytes) Slide 19 70 80 90 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Impact of aggregate packet length and P802.15.1 utilization on probability of collision for 13.5Mb/s, 40MHz mode PHY Data Rate = 13.5 Mb/s; BW = 40 MHz 1 0.9 Probability of Collision 0.8 BT occup = 0% 10% 50% 100% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Submission 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Aggregate Packet Length (kBytes) Slide 20 3.5 4 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 P802.15.4 Interferer Submission Slide 21 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Pertinent Parameters • • • The scope and purpose of P802.15.4 is to provide specification for low data rate connectivity and ultra-low power consumption for use in the personal operating space of 10 m. The applications range from interactive toys to sensor and automation Low Data Rate: 250 kbps Tx Power [P802.15.4, Annex E.2.5] – – • Low Duty Cycle [ P802.15.4, Annex E.2.4] – • 1% Dynamic Channel Selection [ P802.15.4, Annex E.2.6] – – • ranging from -3 dBm to 10 dBm 0 dBm typical Channel center frequency Fc = 2405+(k - 11)*5 in MHz, for k = 11, 12,…, 26 Channels 15, 20, 25, and 26 do not overlap with 802.11, 2.4 GHz, channels 1, 6, and 11 with 20 MHz channel Average Packet Length [P802.15.4, Annex E.3.1.9] – – Submission 22 bytes with overhead, typical P802.15.4 packet length is ~900 μsec, on the order of a p802.11n TXOP Slide 22 Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 Channel Selection 40 MHz 20 MHz 2462 2437 2412 2400 MHz 2483.5 MHz a) Example p802.11n channel selection 2 MHz b) P802.15.4 channel selection (2400 MHz PHY) Slide 23 2480 2475 2470 2465 2460 2455 2450 2445 2440 2435 2430 2425 2420 2415 Submission 2410 2405 2400 MHz 2483.5 MHz Eldad Perahia (Intel) September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 PER vs. SIR for 20 MHz, channel model B with P802.15.4 interference • P802.15.4 waveform incorporated into the simulation as interference source • Curves run for various channel offsets MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-2 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=3 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-7 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=8 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-2 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=3 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-7 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=8 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-2 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=3 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-7 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=8 MHz SNR = 40dB 1 PER 0.1 0.01 0.001 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SIR (dB) Submission Slide 24 Eldad Perahia (Intel) 50 September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1482r0 PER vs. SIR for 40 MHz, channel model B with P802.15.4 interference SNR = 40dB 1 MCS 15 PER 0.1 0.01 MCS 0 MCS 32 MCS 7 0.001 -5 Submission 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 SIR (dB) Slide 25 MCS 32; 1x2; offset=-2 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=3 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=-7 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=8 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=-12 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=13 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=-17 MHz MCS 32; 1x2; offset=18 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-2 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=3 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-7 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=8 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-12 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=13 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=-17 MHz MCS 0; 1x2; offset=18 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-2 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=3 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-7 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=8 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-12 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=13 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=-17 MHz MCS 7; 1x2; offset=18 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-2 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=3 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-7 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=8 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-12 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=13 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=-17 MHz MCS 15; 2x3; offset=18 MHz Eldad Perahia (Intel)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz