TECHNICAL REVIEW: AIR PERMIT BY RULE
Permit No.:
Project No.:
119373
211056
Company Name: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Unit Name:
Beaumont Refinery Sru 1
GENERAL INFORMATION
Regulated Entity No.:
Customer Reference No.:
Account No.:
City/County:
RN102450756
CN600920748
JE-0067-I
Beaumont, Jefferson County
CONTACT INFORMATION
Responsible Official/ Primary
Contact Name and Title:
Technical Contact/ Consultant
Name and Title:
APD Reviewer: Mr. Robert Chavez
PBR No(s).:
106.262
Project Type:
Date Received by TCEQ:
Date Received by Reviewer:
Physical Location:
Ms. Britney E Head
Environmental Section Supervisorpermitting & Programs
Mr. Jahi White
Environmental Advisor
GENERAL RULES CHECK
Is confidential information included in the application?
Is this registration certified?
Is this an APWL site?
Are there any upstream or downstream affects associated with
this registration?
Is planned MSS included in the registration?
Are there affected NSR or Title V authorizations for the
project?
Is each PBR > 25/250 tpy?
Are PBR sitewide emissions > 25/250 tpy?
Are there permit limits on using PBRs at the site?
Is PSD or Nonattainment netting required?
YES
Do NSPS, NESHAP, or MACT standards apply to this
registration?
Does NOx Cap and Trade apply to this registration?
Is the facility in compliance with all other applicable rules and
regulations?
X
Permit by Rule Application
May 19, 2014
June 25, 2014
1795 Burt St
Phone No.:
Fax No.:
(409) 757-6269
(409) 757-6899
Email:
BRITNEY.E.HEAD@EXX
ONMOBIL.COM
Phone No.:
Fax No.:
(409) 757-6342
(409) 757-6905
Email:
JAHI.Y.WHITE@EXXON
MOBIL.COM
NO
X
COMMENTS
X
X
X
X
X
If yes, what is the number(s): NSR#49138; several PBRs; Title V: O02000 (all not directly associated)
Site has been to public notice
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
This site is not one of the 28 named sources and emissions are below
the federal significance as major sources levels. Therefore, PSD and
NA review and netting are not required.
NSPS VV, MACT CC
Site is not in the HGA
In compliance with all rules and regulations. Company is in
compliance with Ch. 115 requirements
DESCRIBE OVERALL PROCESS AT THE SITE
ExxonMobil owns and operates the Beaumont Refinery SRU#1 located near Beaumont, Jefferson County.
The refinery operates three Claus sulfur recovery units that covert a hydrogen sulfide feed to elemental sulfur and water. The recovered sulfur is sold as
product. The three sulfur recovery units feed to two amine tail gas treating units for the removal of hydrogen sulfide. The exhaust gases from the tail gas units
are sent to a thermal oxidizer. MSS emissions are included.
TECHNICAL SUMMARY - DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS THE RULES
PBR 106.262 Compliance Demonstration

The emission point(s) associated with the facilities or changes to facilities are located at least 100 ft from the nearest off-site receptor.

The total new or increase emissions will comply with the applicable hourly and annual emission limits as represented in the table below.

There are no changes to or addition of any pollution abatement equipment.

Visible emissions to the atmosphere, from any point or fugitive source, do not exceed 5.0% opacity in any six-minute period.

This registration is not for authorization for construction or to change a facility authorized under another section of this chapter or under
standard permit.
Fugitives: Emissions are calculated using AP-42 emission factors.
ESTIMATED EMISSIONS
EPN / Emission Source
VOC
NOx
CO
PM10
PM 2.5
lbs/hr tpy lbs/hr tpy lbs/hr tpy lbs/hr tpy lbs/hr tpy
Fugitives
<0.01 0.03
TOTAL EMISSIONS (TPY):
0.03
MAXIMUM OPERATING SCHEDULE:
Hours/Day
Days/Week
Weeks/Year
1
SO2
Other
lbs/hr tpy lbs/hr tpy
Hours/Year 8,760
TECHNICAL REVIEW: AIR PERMIT BY RULE
Permit No.:
Project No.:
119373
211056
Company Name: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Unit Name:
Beaumont Refinery Sru 1
TECHNICAL REVIEWER
APD Reviewer: Mr. Robert Chavez
PBR No(s).:
106.262
PEER REVIEWER
FINAL REVIEWER
SIGNATURE:
See Hard Copy.
PRINTED NAME:
Mr. Robert Chavez
Mr. Mark McDonald
Ms. Anne M. Inman, P.E., Manager
DATE:
July 3, 2014
July 3, 2014
July 7, 2014
BASIS OF PROJECT POINTS
POINTS
Base Points:
1.5
Project Complexity Description and Points:
Complete in <14 days
1.0
Technical Reviewer Project Points
2.5
Assessment:
Final Reviewer Project Points Confirmation:
2